Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Representative Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Here, we describe a preclinical orthotopic mouse model for GBM, established by intracranial injection of cells derived from genetically engineered mouse model tumors. This model displays the disease hallmarks of human GBM. For translational studies, the mouse brain tumor is tracked by in vivo MRI and histopathology.

Abstract

Genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models for human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are critical to understanding the development and progression of brain tumors. Unlike xenograft tumors, in GEMs, tumors arise in the native microenvironment in an immunocompetent mouse. However, the use of GBM GEMs in preclinical treatment studies is challenging due to long tumor latencies, heterogeneity in neoplasm frequency, and the timing of advanced grade tumor development. Mice induced via intracranial orthotopic injection are more tractable for preclinical studies, and retain features of the GEM tumors. We generated an orthotopic brain tumor model derived from a GEM model with Rb, Kras, and p53 aberrations (TRP), which develops GBM tumors displaying linear foci of necrosis by neoplastic cells, and dense vascularization analogous to human GBM. Cells derived from GEM GBM tumors are injected intracranially into wild-type, strain-matched recipient mice and reproduce grade IV tumors, therefore bypassing the long tumor latency period in GEM mice and allowing for the creation of large and reproducible cohorts for preclinical studies. The highly proliferative, invasive, and vascular features of the TRP GEM model for GBM are recapitulated in the orthotopic tumors, and histopathology markers reflect human GBM subgroups. Tumor growth is monitored by serial MRI scans. Due to the invasive nature of the intracranial tumors in immunocompetent models, carefully following the injection procedure outlined here is essential to prevent extracranial tumor growth.

Introduction

Glioblastoma (GBM; grade IV glioma) is the most common and malignant brain tumor, and current therapies are ineffective, resulting in a median survival of 15 months1. Reliable and accurate preclinical models that represent the complex signaling pathways involved in brain tumor growth and pathogenesis are essential to expedite the progress in evaluating new therapeutic regimens for GBM. Mouse models in which human brain tumor cell lines are implanted subcutaneously in immunocompromised mice do not reflect the native immune environment of brain tumors, nor can they be used to evaluate the ability of therapeutics to cross the blood-brain barr....

Protocol

The study protocol described here was approved by the NCI at Frederick Animal Care and Use Committee. NCI-Frederick is accredited by AAALAC International and follows the Public Health Service Policy for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Animal care was provided in accordance with the procedures outlined in the “Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, 2011; The National Academies Press, Washington D.C.).

1. Preparation of cells for injection

Representative Results

Mice injected with brain tumor cells should be monitored daily for signs of tumor growth such as seizures, ataxia, or weight loss. Brain tumor growth may also be monitored by MRI scanning at regular intervals. Weekly MRI scans allow the visualization of increasing tumor burden within the brain and tumor volume measurements (Figure 1C). In particular, TRP tumors exhibit aggressive growth, and 3D tumor volumes are measurable by MRI within 2 to 3 weeks post-intracranial injection (with an avera.......

Discussion

Preclinical models are essential for the evaluation of new therapeutic targets and novel treatment strategies in GBM. Genetically engineered mouse models for GBM have the advantage of tumor occurrence in the autochthonous site, but often with a long latency and unpredictable tumor growth13. The GEM model tumors exhibit a latency of 4-5 months, and the ideal time window for imaging, recruitment, and treatment is variable among individual mice. The orthotopic model has a well-established and tractab.......

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mr. Alan E. Kulaga for excellent technical assistance and to Ms. Michelle L. Gumprecht for refining the surgical techniques. We thank Dr. Philip L. Martin for pathology analysis and Ms. Lilia Ileva and Dr. Joseph Kalen of the Frederick National Laboratory Small Animal Imaging Program for MRI scans.

This project has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN261201500003I. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does the mention of t....

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
5% methylcellulose in 1X PBS, autoclavedMillipore SigmaM7027
1mL Tuberculin Syringe, slip tipBD309659
6" Cotton Tipped ApplicatorsPuritanS-18991
Adjustable stage platformDavid Kopf InstrumentsModel 901
Aerosol Barrier TipsFisher Scientific02-707-33
Alcohol Prep Pads Sterile, Large - 2.5 x 3 InchPDIC69900
B6D2  mouse strain (C57Bl/6J x DBA/2J)Jackson LaboratoryJax #10006
Bone WaxSurgical Specialties901
Bupivacaine 0.25%Henry Schein6023287
BuprenorphineSRZooPharmn/a
Clear Vinyl Tubing 1/8ID X 3/16ODUDPT10004001
CVS Lubricant Eye OintmentCVS Pharmacy247881
Disposable Scalpels, #10 bladeScalpel Miltex16-63810
Gas anesthesia machine with oxygen hook-up and anesthesia boxSomni Scientificn/aInvestigator may use facility
standard equipment
Gas anesthesia platform for miceDavid Kopf InstrumentsModel 923-B
GraphPad PrismGraphpadPrism      9      version 9.4.1
Hamilton 30 g needle, ½ “, small hub, point pst 3HamiltonSpecial Order
Hamilton precision microliter syringe, 1701 RN, no needle 10 µLHamilton7653-01
Hot bead sterilizer with beadsFine Science Tools18000-45
Invitrogen Countess 3 Automated Cell CounterFisher ScientificAMQAX2000
IsoFluranePiramal Critical Care29404
Isopropyl Alcohol Prep PadsPDIC69900
ITK_SNAP (Version 36.X, 2011-present)Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory (PICSL) at the University of Pennsylvania, and the Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute (SCI) at the University of Utah
KOPF Small Animal Stereotaxic Instrument with digital readout consoleDavid Kopf InstrumentsModel 940
Masterflex Fitting, PVDF, Straight, Hose Barb Reducer, 1/4" ID x 1/8" IDMasterflexHV-30616-16
Mouse Heating PlateDavid Kopf InstrumentsPH HP-4M
Mouse Rectal ProbeDavid Kopf InstrumentsPH RET-3-ISO
Nalgene Super Versi-Dry Surface ProtectorsThermoFisher Scientific74000-00
P20 pipetteGilsonF123600
Povidone Iodine Surgical ScrubDynarex1415
Reflex 9 mm Wound Clip ApplicatorFine Science Tools12031-09
Reflex 9 mm Wound Clip RemoverFine Science Tools12033-00
Reflex 9 mm Wound ClipsFine Science Tools12032-09
Semken forceps, curvedFine Science Tools11009-13
Temperature ControllerDavid Kopf InstrumentsPH TCAT-2LV
Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%)ThermoFisher Scientific25200056
Tuberculin Syringe with 25g needle, slip tipBD309626
UltraMicroPump 3 with Micro2T ControllerWorld Precision InstrumentsModel UMP3T

References

  1. Tamimi, A. F., Juweid, M. Epidemiology and Outcome of Glioblastoma. Glioblastoma. , (2017).
  2. Robertson, F. L., Marques-Torrejon, M. A., Morrison, G. M., Pollard, S. M. Experimental models and tools to tackle glioblastoma. Disease Mo....

Explore More Articles

Artificial IntelligenceAI Writing AssistantAuto Content GenerationCopywritingContent CreationText Generator

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved