A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol provides a simple and easy-to-use approach for determining the colonization rate of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the roots of invasive plants.

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are widely distributed soil fungi in ecosystems and can form symbiotic associations (mycorrhizae) with the roots of most terrestrial plants. Plants provide carbon sources to AMF through mycorrhizal associations, while AMF hyphae can expand the range of nutrient absorption by roots and promote plant nutrient uptake. There are many different species of AMF, and the symbiotic relationships between different species of AMF and different plants vary. Invasive plants can enrich AMF species with better symbiotic capabilities through root exudates, promoting their growth and thereby increasing their colonization in invasive plant roots. At the same time, invasive plants can also disrupt the symbiotic relationship between AMF and native plants, affecting the local plant community, which is one of the mechanisms for successful plant invasion. The colonization rate of AMF in the roots of invasive and native plants indirectly reflects the role of AMF in the process of invasive plant invasion. In this method, collected plant roots can be processed directly or saved in a fixative for later batch processing. Through decolorization, acidification, staining, and destaining treatment of roots, the hyphae, spores, and arbuscular structures of AMF in the root system can be clearly observed. This method can be completed in a basic laboratory to observe and calculate the colonization rate of AMF in the root systems of invasive plants.

Introduction

Mycorrhizal fungi are prevalent in natural ecosystems and establish symbiotic relationships with the roots of most plants, forming mycorrhizae1. These associations are mutually beneficial, as plants provide photosynthetically fixed carbon compounds such as fatty acids and sugars to support the growth of mycorrhizal fungi, while the fungi reciprocate by supplying mineral nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen to the host plants, thereby promoting plant growth2. Based on their mycorrhizal types formed with plant roots, mycorrhizal fungi can be divided into four main types: ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi, ericoid mycorrhizal (ERM) fungi, orchid mycorrhizal (ORM) fungi, and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi1. Among them, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) have the widest distribution and can form mycorrhizal associations with over 80% of plant species3,4.

AMF play a crucial role in enhancing soil nutrient cycling5, improving plant nutrient uptake6, and regulating plant competition and succession. They play an important role in the process of invasive plant species invasion7,8. AMF, classified under the phylum Mucoromycota9, encompasses more than 250 species10. The specific symbiotic relationships between different species of AMF and different plants may vary. Invasive plant species have the potential to alter AMF diversity and promote the enrichment of AMF species with better symbiotic capabilities that contribute to their competitive advantage during growth and colonization8,11,12,13. Understanding the dynamics of AMF and their interactions with invasive plant species is essential for comprehending the mechanisms underlying plant invasions and their ecological impacts.

Qualitative studies of AMF species typically involve two main methods. One is morphological identification, such as collecting AMF spores from soil using methods like wet sieving-sucrose centrifugation, followed by classifying and quantifying the spores based on their morphology14. The other method involves molecular techniques, amplifying conserved regions of AMF genes and sequencing them for identification15. However, these methods often require extensive morphological identification experience or higher financial resources. On the other hand, quantitative studies of AMF colonization rates, while unable to determine changes in AMF species and composition, still provide a comprehensive assessment of the symbiotic relationship between AMF and plants. Such studies are indispensable in both basic research and subsequent validation work for inoculation experiments.

The colonization of AMF plays a crucial role in determining the distribution of resources among coexisting plant species7. It reflects the establishment and strength of the symbiotic relationship between AMF and host plant roots. In the same habitat, invasive plant species often exhibit higher colonization rates compared to native plants16,17. This enhanced colonization of AMF contributes to the successful invasion of invasive species such as Ambrosia artemisiifolia18, Solidago canadensis19, Sapium sebiferum20, Ageratina adenophora21, Sphagneticola trilobata22, and Flaveria bidentis7. Understanding the colonization rate of AMF in the roots of invasive plants provides a foundation for unraveling the soil microbial mechanisms underlying the successful invasion of these species. Investigating the colonization rate of AMF in invasive plant roots sheds light on the ecological implications of plant-microbe interactions and contributes to our understanding of the mechanisms driving plant invasions.

The determination of AMF colonization rate involves a staining microscopy technique, which includes several steps: root preservation, clarification, acidification, staining, destaining, and microscopic examination (Supplementary Figure 1). Over the past decades, researchers have explored various observation methods for AMF and have developed various staining techniques. In the early stages, Trypan blue staining was widely used23,24. However, this method has limitations due to the toxicity of Trypan blue. Acid fuchsin staining, on the other hand, is a commonly used method that provides bright colors, and shows reliable, and stable staining results25. Additionally, the staining solution can be reused, making it more cost-effective. The colonization rate is determined using the gridline intersect method, which provides more objective statistical results compared to other approaches26. This method is characterized by its simplicity, low cost, and minimal equipment requirements, making it feasible to be performed in basic laboratory settings. It offers a practical and accessible approach to assess the colonization rate of AMF and contributes to our understanding of the symbiotic associations between AMF and plant roots.

Protocol

We conducted experiments using one invasive plant F. bidentis and one native plant Setaria viridis. Both plants were grown in experimental plots at the Langfang Scientific Research Pilot Base of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Hebei, China. Each plant species was individually planted in separate plots, with each plot measuring 2 m x 3 m and a 1-meter gap between plots. The plants were left to grow naturally, and after approximately two months, root samples were collected.

1. Root preparation and preservation

  1. For each plot, randomly select three plants with similar growth conditions. Loosen the soil around the plants with a shovel, and gently pull the plants out. After shaking off the soil from the roots, cut the entire root system and bring this to the laboratory. Rince the collected root samples thoroughly under running water and mix the roots from three plants within the same plot to form one replicate.
    NOTE: To facilitate the description of the operational process, this protocol provides instructions for one biological replicate. To ensure the reliability of experimental results, it is recommended to collect samples from at least three biological replicates according to the experimental design during actual operations.
  2. Use a filter paper to remove excess moisture from the cleaned roots and let them air dry.
  3. Use scissors to trim damaged roots, cut intact fine roots, and preserve them for storage or proceed to the next step. If proceeding with the next step within 2 days, store them in a refrigerator at 4 °C. For preserving the root samples for later use, store them in a fixative solution, such as Formalin-Aceto-Alcohol solution (FAA, 5 mL of 38% formalin + 5 mL of acetic acid + 90 mL of 70% alcohol).
    ​NOTE: The FAA fixative is NOT mandatory. If there are only a small number of samples and can stain and count the roots within a short period after collection, skip the FAA fixative step and proceed directly after washing off the soil from the roots. When using FAA fixative, ensure that the operation is conducted in a well-ventilated area due to the presence of formaldehyde.

2. Staining of the roots

  1. Remove the preserved roots from the storage solution and rinse the roots clean. Place the roots in a 100 mL beaker and add about 50 mL of 10% KOH (10 g KOH + 100 mL water) solution, making sure all roots are completely immersed in the solution. Heat the beaker at 90 °C for 30 min.
    NOTE: Adjust the heating time based on the maturity of the roots. This step removes pigments from the roots, making them transparent for microscopic observation.
  2. Pour off the KOH solution from the beaker and rinse root sample gently with tap water 3x-6x to remove any remaining KOH. Pour off the excess water.
    NOTE: Ensure that the beaker and all tools used are thoroughly cleaned of KOH residue, as any remnants may result in incomplete acidification in the next step, thereby affecting the staining effectiveness of the acid fuchsin.
  3. Add a 2% HCl solution to the beaker, ensuring that the liquid completely covers the roots. Let the roots soak in the acidic solution at room temperature for 10 min.
  4. Discard the HCl solution from the beaker and add about 50 mL of 0.01% acid fuchsin solution (874 mL of lactic acid, 63 mL of glycerol, 63 mL of distilled water, 0.1 g acid fuchsin). Stain the roots at 90 °C for 20-60 min. After staining, the acid fuchsin solution can be recovered and reused for future staining.
    ​NOTE: The staining time may vary depending on the age and condition of the roots, with younger and tender roots potentially requiring overnight staining at room temperature.

3. Destaining and microscopy

  1. Place the stained roots in about 50 mL of lactic acid (85%) solution to remove the acid fuchsin from the root cells. The separation treatment will result in AMF tissues being stained red, while root cells remain uncolored or colored light red. The central cylinder may appear red.
  2. Observe the root tissues and fungal tissues under a 200x microscope to ensure clear distinguishability before stopping the destaining. When the AMF structure and root cells could be clearly distinguished, the destaining process could be completed.
    NOTE: Adjust the destaining time based on root maturity. During the process, select some roots for squash preparation to observe under a microscope.
  3. Remove the roots from the lactic acid solution and transfer them to about 50 mL of glycerol (99%) solution. The acid fuchsin in the AMF structure and root cells will no longer separate out and can be used for subsequent microscopic examination.
  4. Place a drop of glycerol on a glass slide. For each replicate, randomly select 30-50 roots, cut 1 cm long root segments from each root. Arrange them on glass slides with glycerol, parallel to the short side of the slide, and place them parallel to each other (Supplementary Figure 1). Place 10 root sections on each slide, resulting in 3 to 5 replicates for each replicate.
    NOTE: This step describes the number of root segments used for observation, referring to the number of technical replicates for each replicate. The number of root segments observed for each sample should be reasonably arranged based on the plant species and root morphology. For fine roots, observing 30-50 root segments, each 1 cm long, per sample is sufficient. However, for bigger roots, such as those of corn, it is necessary to increase the number of observations appropriately. To ensure the reliability of the statistical results, each treatment should have at least 3 biological replicates, and each biological replicate should be operated following the aforementioned method.
  5. Cover with a coverslip. After placing the coverslip, avoid horizontally shifting the samples to prevent any rubbing or deformation of the roots. This ensures that the normal state of hyphal morphology can be observed without interference, thus maintaining the accuracy of colonization rate calculations.
  6. Using a 200x microscope, employ the cross-counting method to determine the colonization rate with reference to the schematic diagram (Supplementary Figure 2).
    1. Install a micrometer with crosshairs in the eyepiece of the microscope. Move the field of view to one end of the root and align one of the crosshairs parallel to the root. Observe whether the other line crosses with the hyphae, arbuscules, or vesicles.
    2. Move the field of view along the root direction to the other end, moving the same distance each time based on the coordinates of the microscope stage. Record the intersections in each field of view using a binary approach (0 or 1). If the other crosshair intersects with AMF hyphae, arbuscules, or vesicles, it is recorded as 1 in the corresponding cell of the table. Otherwise, it is recorded as 0. If there are no intersections with any of the AMF structures, it is recorded as 1 in the negative area. Observe 10 fields of view for each root segment, for a total of 100 observations are obtained per slide, resulting in 300 to 500 observations per plant sample.

4. Colonization rate calculation

  1. Based on the recorded numbers of intersections with hyphae (H), arbuscules (A), and vesicles (V), and non-mycorrhizal (N) in the 10 roots of each slide (as shown in Table 1), calculate the colonization rates as follows:

    Hyphal colonization rate = (AH / AT) × 100%
    Arbuscular colonization rate = (AA / AT) × 100%
    Vesicular colonization rate = (AV / AT) × 100%
    Total colonization rate = [(AT - AN) / AT] × 100%

    Where:
    AH: Number of intersections with hyphae
    AA: Number of intersections with arbuscules
    AV: Number of intersections with vesicles
    AT: Total number of intersections
    AN: Number of intersections with non-mycorrhizal roots

    These calculations provide the colonization rates for each structure (hyphae, arbuscules, and vesicles) and the overall colonization rate, which is the sum of the colonization rates for all structures.
TreatmentSlideNumber of intersections
NegativeHyphaeArbusculesVesiclesTotal
Sample 1Slide 1AN1AH1AA1AV1AT1
Slide 2AN2AH2AA2AV2AT2
Slide 3AN3AH3AA3AV3AT3
TotalANAHAAAVAT

Table 1: Statistical table of colonization rates of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Abbreviations: AH = Number of intersections with hyphae; AA = Number of intersections with arbuscules; AV = Number of intersections with vesicles; AT = Total number of intersections; AN = Number of intersections with non-mycorrhizal roots.

Results

The staining results of the invasive plant roots using this method are shown in Figure 1. The structures (hyphae, arbuscules, spores, and vesicles) of AMF are stained red, the root cortex cells are stained light red after destaining, and the central cylinder is stained red. This staining result is sufficient to distinguish the fungal structures as AMF mainly exists in the plant's cortex. From the staining result, clear structures such as arbuscules (A), intraradical hyphae (IH), extrarad...

Discussion

The interactions between invasive plants and AMF are complex and diverse. Studying these interactions is crucial for understanding the success of invasive plants and their ecological effects. They can influence the invasive ability of plants, the structure and function of soil ecosystems, and the competitiveness of native plants. The colonization rate serves as an important indicator for studying the relationship between invasive plants and AMF. It provides a quantitative measure for establishing symbiotic relationships,...

Disclosures

Authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD1400100, 2021YFC2600400 and 2022YFC2601100), and by the National Science Foundation of China (42207162).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
70% AlcoholShanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., LtdR433197
Acetic acid solutionShanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., LtdA116166
Acid fuchsinShanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., LtdA104917
Formaldehyde solution, FormalinShanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., LtdF111941
GlycerolShanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., LtdG116203
Hydrochloric acid, HClShanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., LtdH399657
Lactic acidShanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., LtdL432769
Manual System Microscope BX43Olympus (China) co., Ltd
Potassium hydroxide, KOHShanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., LtdP112284

References

  1. Genre, A., Lanfranco, L., Perotto, S. Unique and common traits in mycorrhizal symbioses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 18 (11), 649-660 (2020).
  2. Shi, J., Wang, X., Wang, E. Mycorrhizal symbiosis in plant growth and stress adaptation: from genes to ecosystems. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 74, 569-607 (2023).
  3. Evelin, H., Devi, T. S., Gupta, S., Kapoor, R. Mitigation of salinity stress in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: current understanding and new challenges. Front Plant Sci. 10, 470 (2019).
  4. Smith, S. E., Read, D. J. . Mycorrhizal symbiosis. , (2010).
  5. Bender, S. F., Conen, F., Heijden, M. v. d. Mycorrhizal effects on nutrient cycling, nutrient leaching and N2O production in experimental grassland. Soil Biol Biochem. 80, 283-292 (2015).
  6. Shen, K., et al. AM fungi alleviate phosphorus limitation and enhance nutrient competitiveness of invasive plants via mycorrhizal networks in Karst Areas. Front Ecol Evol. 8, 125 (2020).
  7. Zhang, F. J., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi facilitate growth and competitive ability of an exotic species Flaveria bidentis. Soil Biol Biochem. 115, 275-284 (2017).
  8. Zhang, F., et al. AM fungi facilitate the competitive growth of two invasive plant species, Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Bidens pilosa. Mycorrhiza. 28 (8), 703-715 (2018).
  9. Spatafora, J. W., et al. A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data. Mycologia. 108 (5), 1028-1046 (2016).
  10. Tedersoo, L., et al. High-level classification of the fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses. Fungal Diversity. 90 (1), 135-159 (2018).
  11. Meinhardt, K. A., Gehring, C. A. Disrupting mycorrhizal mutualisms: a potential mechanism by which exotic tamarisk outcompetes native cottonwoods. Ecol Appl. 22 (2), 532-549 (2012).
  12. Dong, L. J., Ma, L. N., He, W. M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi help explain invasion success of Solidago canadensis. Appl Soil Ecol. 157, 103763 (2021).
  13. Ramana, J. V., Tylianakis, J. M., Ridgway, H. J., Dickie, I. A. Root diameter, host specificity and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community composition among native and exotic plant species. New Phytol. 239 (1), 301-310 (2023).
  14. Mertz, S. M., Heithaus, J. J., Bush, R. L. Mass production of axenic spores of the endomycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora margarita. Trans British Mycol Soc. 72 (1), 167-169 (1979).
  15. Renker, C., Heinrichs, J., Kaldorf, M., Buscot, F. Combining nested PCR and restriction digest of the internal transcribed spacer region to characterize arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on roots from the field. Mycorrhiza. 13 (4), 191-198 (2003).
  16. Bunn, R. A., Ramsey, P. W., Lekberg, Y. Do native and invasive plants differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? A meta-analysis. J Ecol. 103 (6), 1547-1556 (2015).
  17. Majewska, M. L., Rola, K., Zubek, S. The growth and phosphorus acquisition of invasive plants Rudbeckia laciniata and Solidago gigantea are enhanced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza. 27 (2), 83-94 (2017).
  18. Huang, D., Sang, W. G., Zhu, L., Song, Y. Y., Wang, J. P. Effects of nitrogen and carbon addition and arbuscular mycorrhiza on alien invasive plant Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Chinese J Appl Ecol. 21 (12), 3056-3062 (2010).
  19. Zhang, Q., et al. Positive feedback between mycorrhizal fungi and plants influences plant invasion success and resistance to invasion. PLoS ONE. 5 (8), e12380 (2010).
  20. Yang, Q., Li, B., Siemann, E. Positive and negative biotic interactions and invasive Triadica sebifera tolerance to salinity: a cross-continent comparative study. Oikos. 124 (2), 216-224 (2015).
  21. Li, L. Q., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance invasive plant, Ageratina adenophora growth and competition with native plants. Chinese J Ecol. 35 (1), 79-86 (2016).
  22. QI, S. S., et al. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and the competition of an invasive plant Wedelia trilobata. Microbiol China. 47 (11), 3801-3810 (2020).
  23. Phillips, J. M., Hayman, D. S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans British Mycol Soc. 55 (1), 158-161 (1970).
  24. Koske, R. E., Gemma, J. N. A modified procedure for staining roots to detect VA mycorrhizas. Mycol Res. 92 (4), 486-488 (1989).
  25. Kormanik, P. P., Bryan, W. C., Schultz, R. C. Procedures and equipment for staining large numbers of plant root samples for endomycorrhizal assay. Can J Microbiol. 26 (4), 536-538 (1980).
  26. McGonigle, T. P., Miller, M. H., Evans, D. G., Fairchild, G. L., Swan, J. A. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 115 (3), 495-501 (1990).
  27. Souza, T. . Handbook of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. , (2015).
  28. Chandwani, S., Maiti, S., Amaresan, N. . Microbial Symbionts. , (2023).
  29. Piercey, M. M., Graham, S. W., Currah, R. S. Patterns of genetic variation in Phialocephala fortinii across a broad latitudinal transect in Canada. Mycol Res. 108 (Pt 8), 955-964 (2004).
  30. Jumpponen, A. R. I., Trappe, J. M. Dark septate endophytes: a review of facultative biotrophic root-colonizing fungi. New Phytol. 140 (2), 295-310 (1998).
  31. Du, E., et al. Rhizoglomus intraradices and associated Brevibacterium frigoritolerans enhance the competitive growth of Flaveria bidentis. Plant Soil. 453, 281-295 (2020).
  32. Wang, S. Y., et al. Practical methods for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spore density, hyphal density and colonization rate of AMF. Bio-protocol. 101, e2104253 (2022).
  33. Sheng, P., Liu, R., Li, M. Methodological comparison of observation and colonization measurement of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. MYCOSYSTEMA. 30 (4), 519-525 (2011).
  34. Grace, C., Stribley, D. P. A safer procedure for routine staining of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycol Res. 95 (10), 1160-1162 (1991).
  35. Vierheilig, H., Coughlan, A. P., Wyss, U., Piche, Y. Ink and vinegar, a simple staining technique for arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol. 64 (12), 5004-5007 (1998).
  36. Vierheilig, H., Schweiger, P., Brundrett, M. An overview of methods for the detection and observation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in roots. Physiol Plant. 125 (4), 393-404 (2005).
  37. Dalpé, Y., Séguin, S. M. Microwave-assisted technology for the clearing and staining of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in roots. Mycorrhiza. 23, 333-340 (2013).
  38. Biermann, B., Linderman, R. G. Quantifying vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae: a proposed method towards standardization. New Phytol. 87 (1), 63-67 (1981).
  39. Bethlenfalvay, G. J., Pacovsky, R. S., Brown, M. S. Measurement of mycorrhizal infection in soybeans. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 45 (5), 871-875 (1981).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal FungiAMFColonization RateInvasive Alien PlantsMycorrhizal AssociationsNutrient AbsorptionSymbiotic RelationshipsRoot ExudatesPlant InvasionHyphaeSporesArbuscular StructuresLaboratory MethodNative Plants

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved