March 3rd, 2014
•Different electrode coatings affect neural recording performance through changes to electrochemical, chemical and mechanical properties. Comparison of electrodes in vitro is relatively simple, however comparison of in vivo response is typically complicated by variations in electrode/neuron distance and between animals. This article provides a robust method to compare neural recording electrodes.
Related Videos
Surgical Implantation of Chronic Neural Electrodes for Recording Single Unit Activity and Electrocorticographic Signals
Reproducible Mouse Sciatic Nerve Crush and Subsequent Assessment of Regeneration by Whole Mount Muscle Analysis
Preparation of an Awake Mouse for Recording Neural Responses and Injecting Tracers
Optical Recording of Suprathreshold Neural Activity with Single-cell and Single-spike Resolution
Manufacturing and Using Piggy-back Multibarrel Electrodes for In vivo Pharmacological Manipulations of Neural Responses
Forebrain Electrophysiological Recording in Larval Zebrafish
Simultaneous Electrophysiological Recording and Calcium Imaging of Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Neurons
Electrophysiological Recording in the Brain of Intact Adult Zebrafish
Electrophysiological Recording From Drosophila Labellar Taste Sensilla
Extracellular Recording of Neuronal Activity Combined with Microiontophoretic Application of Neuroactive Substances in Awake Mice
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved