Automatisierte Quantifizierung der Fluoreszenz-in Synaptic<em&gt; C elegans</em

Zusammenfassung

Die Fülle von Neurotransmitter-Rezeptoren an den Synapsen stark beeinflusst geclusterten synaptischen Stärke. Diese Methode quantifiziert fluoreszenzmarkierten Neurotransmitter-Rezeptoren in drei Dimensionen mit Single-Auflösung in Synapsen C elegans, So dass Hunderte von Synapsen zu schnell innerhalb einer einzigen Probe, ohne Verzerrungen, die durch z-Ebene Projektion eingeführt wird.

Zusammenfassung

Synapse Stärke bezieht sich auf die Amplitude des postsynaptischen Antworten auf präsynaptische Freisetzung von Neurotransmittern Ereignisse, und hat einen großen Einfluss auf die Gesamt-neuronalen Schaltkreis-Funktion. Synapse Stärke hängt entscheidend von der Fülle von Neurotransmitter-Rezeptoren an Synapsen auf der postsynaptischen Membran gruppierten. Rezeptor-Ebenen sind entwicklungsgeschichtlich, etabliert und kann durch Rezeptortransport zwischen Oberflächen-lokalisierten, subsynaptischen und intrazellulären Pools, die für wichtige Mechanismen der synaptischen Plastizität und Neuromodulation verändert werden. Rigorosen Methoden zur synaptisch-lokalisierte Neurotransmitter-Rezeptor Fülle quantifizieren sind unerlässlich, um synaptischen Entwicklung und Plastizität zu studieren. Die Fluoreszenzmikroskopie ist optimal, weil es räumliche Information erhält, unterscheiden synaptischen aus nicht-synaptischen Pools und Unterscheiden zwischen Rezeptorpopulationen lokalisiert, um verschiedene Arten von Synapsen. Die genetischen Modellorganismus Caenorhabditis elegans ist besonders gut für diese Studien aufgrund der geringen Größe und der relativen Einfachheit seines Nervensystems, seine Transparenz, und die Verfügbarkeit von leistungsfähigen genetischen Techniken geeignet und ermöglicht Untersuchung der nativen Synapsen in intakten Tieren.

Hier präsentieren wir eine Methode zur Quantifizierung von fluoreszenzmarkierten synaptischen Neurotransmitter-Rezeptoren in C. elegans. Sein wesentliches Merkmal ist die automatisierte Identifikation und Analyse einzelner Synapsen in drei Dimensionen in mehreren Ebenen konfokalen Mikroskop Ausgabedateien, Tabellieren Position, Volumen, Intensität der Fluoreszenz, Fluoreszenz und insgesamt für jede Synapse. Dieser Ansatz hat zwei wesentliche Vorteile gegenüber der manuellen Analyse der z-Ebene konfokale Projektionen von Daten. Erstens, weil jede Ebene des konfokalen Datensatz enthalten ist, werden keine Daten über z-Ebene Projektion verloren, in der Regel auf Pixelintensität Durchschnitte oder Maxima basiert. Zweitens Identifizierung von Synapsen automatisiert ist, aber durch die ex überprüft werdenperimenter wie die Datenanalyse geht, so dass eine schnelle und genaue Extrahierung von Daten aus einer großen Anzahl von Synapsen. Hunderte bis Tausende von Synapsen pro Probe leicht erhalten werden, produzieren große Datensätze statistische Energie zu maximieren. Überlegungen zur Vorbereitung C. elegans zur Analyse und Durchführung konfokale Bildgebung an Variabilität zwischen den Tieren innerhalb Behandlungsgruppen zu minimieren werden ebenfalls diskutiert. Zwar entwickelt, um C zu analysieren elegans postsynaptischen Rezeptoren, ist dieses Verfahren im Allgemeinen für jede Art von synaptisch-lokalisierten Protein oder Tat, einem Fluoreszenz-Signal, das diskrete Cluster, Punkte oder Organellen lokalisiert ist nützlich.

Das Verfahren wird in drei Schritten durchgeführt: 1) Herstellung von Proben, 2) konfokale Abbildung, und 3) Bildanalyse. Schritt 1 und 2 sind spezifisch für C elegans, und Stufe 3 ist allgemein anwendbar auf jede punktförmige Fluoreszenz-Signal in der konfokalen Aufnahmen.

Protokoll

1. Preparation of Worms for Imaging

This segment of the protocol is based on published C. elegans culture techniques^1,2, and is outlined in Figure 1.

1. Grow worms on high peptone NGM agar plates (10 cm) seeded with NA22 E. coli bacteria until nearly starved. If immunostaining, one plate will reliably produce enough worms for 1 individual stain, taking into account losses along the way, and the strict criteria used to select worms for imaging (see Part 2).
2. Harvest worms by pouring a few ml of ddH₂0 onto plate, swirling briefly, and pouring liquid into a 15 ml conical tube (repeat if necessary to transfer most of the worms to the tube). Pellet in clinical centrifuge for 3 min, 1000x g. Wash pellet 1-3x with ddH₂O until supernatant is clear to remove residual bacteria. Use polypropylene transfer pipettes to remove supernatants, as worms stick to glass (from this step onward it is critical to minimize time between steps to avoid losses in egg viability).
3. After the last wash, resuspend worm pellet in 5 ml alkaline hypochlorite solution to lyse worms and release eggs. Rock gently, and examine tubes under a dissecting microscope about once per minute. When about 50% of worms are lysed (they will appear bent and broken open), terminate lysis by filling the tube to the top with Egg Buffer, inverting several times, and pelleting for 3 min, 1000x g. Lysis time must not exceed 5 min.
4. Remove supernatant with transfer pipette, and wash pellet 3x with Egg Buffer.
5. To separate eggs from debris, float them on a cushion of 30% sucrose in ddH₂O: after the final wash from step 1.4, carefully remove supernatant and resuspend pellet in 5 ml ddH₂0. Add 5 ml sterile 60% sucrose in ddH₂O, and mix well. Spin in clinical centrifuge 6 min, 1000x g. Eggs will collect at the meniscus (they will have a cloudy appearance), while debris will pellet.
6. Using a plastic transfer pipette, suck up eggs in a minimal volume and transfer to unseeded NGM agar plates. Any eggs adhering to side of tube can be rinsed down gently and transferred as well. One 10 cm unseeded plate per strain analyzed is sufficient.
7. Incubate the unseeded plates with the eggs overnight (~16 hr) at 20 °C. Vent the plate for the first few hours to dry it by leaving the lid slightly off for a few hours, but be sure to cover overnight.
8. After hatching, transfer the L1 larvae to a 15 ml conical tube in S Basal (add a few ml S Basal to plate, swirl, pour into tube). Pellet in clinical centrifuge (3 min, 1000x g), resuspend in a minimal volume of S Basal, and transfer to 10 cm NGM agar plates seeded with NA22 bacteria. Use 2 plates here for each original plate from step 1.1. Incubate until worms reach desired age.
9. Monitor the cultures once or twice per day. If they are in danger of starving, transfer to fresh NA22 plates. For wild-type N2 worms, starvation is preceded by the formation of a line or wave of worms that moves across the plate as animals migrate en masse away from food-depleted zones. Once this forms, the food will be completely depleted within a few hours.
10. Worms are now ready for immunostaining or live imaging. Fixing and staining worms in suspension is optimal because large numbers of intact worms can be imaged easily. Staining procedures based on the Finney and Ruvkun protocol^3-6 are preferable to freeze-crack procedures because large numbers of worms are needed for imaging.

2. Confocal Imaging

1. Mount worms on slides for confocal imaging. Adjust density of worms to a few hundred per microliter. Make a pad of 2% agarose in S-basal surrounded by a thin ring of Vaseline to prevent evaporation during imaging (applied via a 3 ml syringe fitted with a cut-off 25 gauge needle). Pipette a few microliters of the worm suspension onto a cover slip (use anaesthetic if imaging live worms), and lower the agarose pad onto the cover slip, spreading the worms evenly over the pad.
2. Select worms for imaging. Choose worms where the synapses of interest are oriented toward the objective lens, with radial displacement of no more than ±45° (where 0° means oriented directly toward the objective). Perform this assessment quickly (a few seconds) to avoid photobleaching. The scale of the initial cultures is optimized to ensure sufficient worms will satisfy these geometric criteria.
3. Complete the confocal imaging of the specimen. Relatively flat samples that can be encompassed within about 14 0.4 μm thick sections produce the best results. High speed, low resolution images (512 x 512 pixels) are sufficient for rapid accurate data collection. Avoid saturating the detector with excessive signal strengths, as this will cause underestimation of fluorescence signals.

3. Automated Identification and Analysis of Individual Synaptic Clusters

1. Open multi-TIF output files from the confocal microscope using Volocity 4.0 (or higher) software (PerkinElmer).
2. Crop away areas of the image that do not contain the structure of interest (Image -> Extended Focus -> Select area of interest using 'Freehand ROI' tool -> Actions -> Crop to Selection; Figure 2A). Note, Extended Focus produces a z-plane projection on the computer screen to aid your analysis, but does not affect the underlying data; the same is true for brightness and contrast adjustments, if necessary).
3. Measure the length of the area analyzed using the Line Tool. The length of the line will be calculated and added to the data table (Figure 2B).
4. Identify objects using the 'Objects by Intensity' filter (Measurements mode). Specify a threshold such that synaptic clusters are highlighted and non-synaptic background is not (Figure 2C). Inclusion of an independent synaptic marker labeled with another color may help unambiguously identify synapses. Typical synapses range from a few to a few hundred voxels. Set the threshold once using a control sample, and use it for all subsequent samples. Thresholding each sample separately is unacceptable because it introduces the potential for experimenter bias. Objects are selected and tabulated automatically (Figure 2D).
5. Arrange and Export the data. Eliminate objects of 2 or fewer voxels, since these are usually background specks. These can be eliminated by further filtering, or during subsequent analysis. To facilitate their removal downstream, re-sort the data file by 'object size' so they will all group together. Export the data in CSV format, which can be opened by Microsoft Excel or other spreadsheet programs. Each image produces one output file.
6. If Volocity software is unavailable, alternative methods to analyze Z-plane projections of confocal data may be utilized (e.g. ref. ⁷, or manual analysis using ImageJ), although 3-dimensional information is lost (see Discussion).

4. Representative Results

The quantification method presented should be able to distinguish between cluster populations of different brightness and different volumes. Representative images and corresponding quantitative data presented in Figure 3 demonstrate examples of differentiation on the basis of these parameters. As a general rule the results should conform to what is evident to the eye. In the case of UNC-49 GABA receptor immunostaining the ventral nerve cord of C. elegans, all animals typically appeared very similar in size and maturity, and total synaptic fluorescence values for a group of five worms (normalized to the length of nerve cord analyzed) showed Standard Error values of about 10% of the mean ⁴. Genetic mutation and other experimental treatments (e.g. drug exposure) may alter not only the volume and intensity values and frequency distributions of synaptic clusters, but possibly the developmental time-course and synchrony of the worms, leading to higher variability. However the quantitative results should always reflect what can be appreciated visually and if not, inspection of the images and the objects identified by Volocity should reveal where the error occurred and suggest corrective action such as re-thresholding or removal of artefactual objects.

Figure 1. Preparation of synchronous C. elegans cultures. Synchronous cultures are obtained from this procedure because C. elegans development arrests and the L1 larval stage in the absence of food, and resumes when food is introduced.

Figure 2. Quantitation of synaptic puncta.

1. Extraneous regions of the image are cropped to reduce file sizes and increase specificity. Left hand panel shows starting image, middle panel shows selected region, right panel shows image after cropping. Red signal is UNC-49 GABA receptor immunofluorescence, green signal is synaptobrevin-GFP (a presynaptic marker) expressed in presynaptic GABA neurons ⁴. Click here to view larger figure.
2. A line is drawn the length of the nerve cord segment to be analyzed, and its length is automatically recorded in the results table. This information is necessary to normalize synaptic data due to the length of analyzable nerve cord, which can vary several fold if worms become fragmented during staining. Click here to view larger figure.
3. A threshold is applied to identify individual synaptic clusters. Left panel shows image before thresholding; examples of different thresholding levels are shown in separate panels (green signal omitted). Each identified object is depicted on the image as a colored region. Note the correspondence between the visually evident synaptic clusters in the left-most panel and the colored regions on the right-most panel. Click here to view larger figure.
4. Each identified object is listed separately in the results table. Individual objects may be selected, and are highlighted on the image for inspection if desired. Note that table contains information for the red ('rhodamine') and green ('EGFP') channels; the green channel information is potentially misleading since objects were identified based strictly on red fluorescence. This analysis may also be performed on single color images. Click here to view larger figure.

Figure 3. Representative results. Representative micrographs from wild-type C. elegans stained for UNC-49 GABA receptors before (A) and after (B) treatment with muscimol, a GABA receptor agonist that causes receptors to become downregulated after long exposure. Panels show cropped images before (left) and after (right) thresholding and removal of small background specks. (C) Plots of quantitative synaptic parameters for the specimens shown in (A) and (B): total fluorescence normalized to nerve cord length (left), and cumulative probability histograms of individual synapse fluorescence content (middle) and synapse volume (right), demonstrating statistically significant reduction in synaptic content and volume induced by agonist exposure (n = 60 synapses for untreated, n = 115 synapses for muscimol-treated; p < 0.001, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/KS-test.html).

Diskussion

Die hier vorgestellte Methode wurde entwickelt, um quantitative Multi-Parameter-Daten für große Populationen von Synapsen in C extrahieren elegans, bei gleichzeitiger Maximierung der Konsistenz innerhalb Behandlungsgruppen. Drei Merkmale tragen zu diesen Zielen. Zunächst wird Immunfärbung auf synchrone Wurm Populationen durchgeführt, um sicherzustellen, dass alle Tiere gleich alt sind. Dieser Schritt ist wichtig, weil Entwicklungs-Regulierung der Expression Effekte der experimentellen Behandlung z...

Materialien

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
Name der Software	Firma		Kommentare (optional)
Endgeschwindigkeit, v4.0 oder höher	PerkinElmer / Improvision		Überprüfen Sie Ihre lokalen Imaging Core Facility für den Zugang zu dieser Software. Demo-Software ist auf der Website von PerkinElmer zur Verfügung. Diese Methode erfordert nur die Quantifizierung des Moduls Endgeschwindigkeit.
			Tabelle 2. Spezifischen Reagenzien und Geräte.
			Egg-Puffer NaCl KCl CaCl 2 MgCl 2 HEPES (Den pH-Wert 7,3) 118 mM 48 mM 2 mM 2 mM 24 mM Alkalischem Hypochlorit (für 5 ml) Frische Haushaltsbleiche (verwerfen Flasche 30 Tage nach dem Öffnen) 10 N NaOH ddH 2 O 1,0 ml 0,25 ml 3,75 ml
			Tabelle 1. Solutions.