Zaloguj się

Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Protokół
  • Wyniki
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

Here a simple and well-validated protocol for measuring bulk autophagic sequestration activity in mammalian cells is described. The method is based on quantifying the proportion of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in sedimentable cell fractions compared to total cellular LDH levels.

Streszczenie

Bulk autophagy is characterized by the sequestration of large portions of cytoplasm into double/multi-membrane structures termed autophagosomes. Here a simple protocol to monitor this process is described. Moreover, typical results and experimental validation of the method under autophagy-inducing conditions in various types of cultured mammalian cells are provided. During bulk autophagy, autophagosomes sequester cytosol, and thereby also soluble cytosolic proteins, alongside other autophagic cargo. LDH is a stable and highly abundant, soluble cytosolic enzyme that is non-selectively sequestered into autophagosomes. The amount of LDH sequestration therefore reflects the amount of bulk autophagic sequestration. To efficiently and accurately determine LDH sequestration in cells, we employ an electrodisruption-based fractionation protocol that effectively separates sedimentable from cytosolic LDH, followed by measurement of enzymatic activity in sedimentable fractions versus whole-cell samples. Autophagic sequestration is determined by subtracting the proportion of sedimentable LDH in untreated cells from that in treated cells. The advantage of the LDH sequestration assay is that it gives a quantitative measure of the autophagic sequestration of endogenous cargo, as opposed to other methods that either involve ectopic expression of sequestration probes or semi-quantitative protease protection analyses of autophagy markers or receptors.

Wprowadzenie

Autophagy (Greek for "self-eating") is an evolutionary conserved process for vacuolar/lysosomal degradation of intracellular material. Upon discovery of the autophagy-related ("ATG") genes, which are important for autophagy in yeast and humans, and the realization that autophagy plays a significant role in human health and disease (acknowledged by the 2016 Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology to Yoshinori Ohsumi), autophagy has quickly become one of the most intensely studied processes in cell biology1,2.

Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as "autophagy") is characterized by the expansion and folding of intracellular membrane cisternae ("phagophores") into sealed, double- or multi-membrane structures ("autophagosomes") that effectively sequester the enwrapped material from the rest of the cytoplasm. Upon fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes, the inner autophagosomal membrane and the sequestered cargo is degraded and recycled. Autophagosomes can sequester cytoplasmic material in both random (non-selective autophagy) and selective (selective autophagy) manners. Bulk autophagy most likely represents a mix of non-selective and selective autophagy.

In the 1960's and 70's ("the morphological era" of autophagy research), autophagic sequestration was mainly assessed through ultrastructural analyses. In the 1980's and beginning of the 1990's ("the biochemical era") Per Seglen and co-workers — who studied autophagy in primary rat hepatocytes — developed the first methods to quantitatively measure autophagic sequestration activity3. Using these assays, Seglen defined and characterized different steps of the autophagic-lysosomal pathway4,5, discovered and coined the amphisome6 (the product of endosome-autophagosome fusion), and was the first to describe the role of protein phosphorylation in autophagy regulation7. However, after the discovery of the ATGs in the 1990's ("the molecular era") and the first characterization of a mammalian ATG8 protein, microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3) in 20008, the use of ATG proteins as markers for the autophagic process quickly gained popularity, and the older and more laborious biochemical methods were left behind. In fact, over the last 18 years, western blot and fluorescence microscopy analyses of LC3 have become the by far most popular (and in many cases the only) means of studying autophagy in mammalian cells. The advantage is the relative ease by which these methods can be carried out. The disadvantage is that one is studying a cart component (LC3) rather than actual autophagic cargo. This is a rather serious disadvantage, because the relationship between the states and/or flux of LC3 through the pathway versus the sequestration and flux of cargo is highly unclear. In fact, we have shown that bulk cargo flux can be maintained at high levels under conditions where there is no LC3 flux, despite the presence of conjugated LC3 in the cells9. Moreover, we demonstrated that bulk autophagy is unaffected by efficient LC3 depletion, and thus likely is LC3-independent9. This finding has later been confirmed by LC3 knock-out studies10,11, which also indicate that Parkin-dependent mitophagy (the selective autophagy of mitochondria) is independent of LC310,11.

In summary, there is a clear need for cargo-based assays to monitor autophagic activity. Optimally such assays should be broadly applicable, well-defined, and easy to perform. Over the last few years we have taken a particular interest in the LDH sequestration assay, which was developed by Per Seglen in the 1980's12, and is based on measuring the transfer of cytosolic LDH to sedimentable, autophagic vacuole-containing cell fractions. LDH is a stable, soluble cytosolic protein that is readily co-sequestered when phagophores enwrap cytoplasmic cargo. Sequestration of LDH is therefore a general measure of autophagic sequestration. LDH is exclusively degraded by the autophagic-lysosomal pathway12. Thus, in the presence of lysosomal degradation inhibitors, e.g., bafilomycin A1 (Baf)13, experimental treatment effects directly reflect alterations in autophagic sequestration activity. In the absence of degradation inhibitors, the net effect of alterations in LDH sequestration and degradation can be measured.

The LDH sequestration assay is broadly applicable, since LDH is highly and ubiquitously expressed in all cell types, and LDH levels can be accurately quantified by an enzymatic assay14,15. However, the original protocol12 — established in primary rat hepatocytes — was rather time-consuming and required a high amount of starting material as well as a custom-made electric discharge capacitor. In a step-wise manner, we have gradually transformed the assay into an easy and versatile method. First, the original protocol was adapted for use in mammalian cell lines16. Second, the method was substantially downscaled3,9. Third, several steps in the protocol were eliminated, including a laborious density cushion step17. This simultaneously enabled an even further downscaling of the method, from the original starting point of using a 10 cm plate per sample16 to using a single well from a 12-well plate per sample (i.e., approximately 15-fold less starting material)17. Fourth, we identified a commercial electroporation apparatus that could replace the custom-made electric discharge capacitor17.

Here our most up-to-date protocol of the LDH sequestration assay, which includes some further simplifications of the method as compared to the previously published17 is presented. Furthermore, a set of typical results obtained in a number of different cell types is shown, and importantly, multiple lines of experimental validations of the method using pharmacological as well as genetic knockdown and knockout approaches are provided. For an overall flow scheme of the whole protocol, see Figure 1.

Protokół

1. Cell Seeding and Treatment

  1. Culture adherent cells in 75 cm2 tissue culture flasks in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C, using the preferred culture medium for the cell type in question. Allow the cells to grow until they reach a near-confluent cell layer.
    NOTE: Use RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for LNCaP, HEK293, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), BJ, MCF-7, and RPE-1 cells.
    1. Wash the cells with 3 mL 37 °C phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4. Replace the PBS with 3 mL 0.25% (w/v) Trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), and incubate the flask in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C until the cells detach (2–5 min).
    2. Resuspend the detached cells with 7 mL culture medium containing 10% FBS. Mix a 10 µL cell suspension aliquot with 10 µL 0.4% Trypan Blue in a microcentrifuge tube, using a 0.5–20 µL pipette tip. Use the same pipette tip to immediately fill a counting chamber slide, and count the cells in an automated cell counter.
  2. Prepare a suitable dilution (see note below) of the cell suspension from step 1.1.2 using culture medium containing 10% FBS, and seed 1 mL of the diluted cell suspension in each well of a 12-well tissue culture plate (surface area ~3.8 cm2) using aseptic technique. Allow growth in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C until the desired cell density has been reached, e.g., 60–90% confluence at harvest.
    NOTE: The appropriate dilution of the cell suspension that will give the desired cell confluency at harvest will vary from cell type to cell type, as well as according to the duration and type of experimental treatments. Thus, this must be empirically assessed in each case.
    1. For experiments that are to be both treated and harvested 2 days after seeding, seed 2.5 x 105 LNCaP, HEK293, or MCF-7 cells, 5 x 104 MEFs, 4 x 105 BJ, or 1.5 x 105 RPE-1 cells in each well of the 12-well plate.
    2. For cells that adhere loosely, coat the plates with the type of coating recommended for the cell type in question. For LNCaP (and HEK293) cells use plates coated with poly-D-lysine (PDL).
    3. To that end, add 500 µL PDL at 2.5 µg/mL in sterile H2O to each well, and incubate the plates in a sterile environment for 30 min at room temperature (20–25 °C). Remove the PDL with suction, and wash each well briefly with 1 mL sterile H2O.
      NOTE: Generally, step 1.2.1 is done without any experimental treatments. However, if performing RNAi, it may be convenient to start a reverse transfection with the seeding9.
  3. Perform experimental treatments in duplicate or triplicate wells per condition.
    1. For example, treat the cells with 50 nM of the mTOR-inhibitor Torin1, which generally is an efficient inducer of autophagic sequestration, or subject the cells to acute serum- and amino acid starvation by washing the cells with 1 mL of amino acid-free Earle's Balanced Salt Solution (EBSS) medium, and subsequently incubate the cells in 1 mL of EBSS in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
    2. Leave one set of wells untreated in order to define background levels of sedimentable LDH.
    3. Add a saturating amount of the post-sequestration inhibitor bafilomycin A1 (Baf)3,13,16,18 in the absence or presence of the experimental treatments, 3–4 h before cell harvest. Incubate the cells in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
      1. Use 100 nM Baf for LNCaP, HEK293, BJ, MCF-7 and RPE-1 cells, and 10 nM Baf for MEFs.
      2. For experimental treatments that have a duration of only 3–4 h (like those exemplified in step 1.3.1 typically have), add Baf simultaneously with the treatments. For longer experimental treatments, wait until 3-4 h before harvest, and add 2 µL of a 500x concentrated Baf stock directly into the medium.
      3. Mix by agitating the plate immediately after the addition of Baf. At this point it is also recommendable to add macroautophagic sequestration inhibitors as controls, e.g., 10 mM of the pan-phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor 3-methyl adenine (3MA)19, or 10 µM of the selective PI3K class III inhibitor SAR-40520.

2. Cell Harvest and Preparation for Electrodisruption

  1. At the end of the treatment period, aspirate the medium with suction and add 200 µL cell detachment solution (pre-heated to 37 °C) to each well. Incubate at 37 °C until the cells detach (typically around 5 min).
    NOTE: Whereas 0.25% (w/v) Trypsin-EDTA may be used instead of the cell detachment solution, the latter contains DNase, which helps reduce the viscosity of the detached cells. As long as the medium is thoroughly aspirated, it is not necessary to wash the cells before addition of Trypsin-EDTA or cell detachment solution.
  2. Add 500 µL room temperature (20-25 °C) PBS, pH 7.4, containing 2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) to each well, and resuspend with the pipette until no cell clumps are visible. Immediately transfer the cell suspension to 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes on ice.
    NOTE: Unless otherwise stated, perform all subsequent steps on ice.
  3. Sediment the cells by centrifugation at 400 x g for 5 min at 4 °C.
  4. Thoroughly aspirate the supernatant (with suction) to leave the cell pellets as dry as possible.
  5. Add 400 µL 10% (w/v) sucrose (in ultrapure H2O) to each tube.

3. Plasma Membrane Electrodisruption and Separation of Sedimentable- and Total-cell Fractions

  1. Resuspend the cell pellet with a pipette to obtain a near single-cell suspension, and transfer it to a 4 mm electroporation cuvette.
    NOTE: Pipetting up-and-down ~10–15 times, using a 100–1,000 µL pipette tip, is usually sufficient.
  2. Place the cuvette in an exponential decay wave electroporator, and discharge a single electric pulse at 800 V, 25 µF, and 400 Ω; these settings produce a pulse of ~8 ms duration.
  3. Use a new pipette tip to transfer the cell disruptate to a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube containing 400 µL ice-cold phosphate-buffered sucrose solution (100 mM sodium monophosphate, 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 2 mM EDTA, and 1.75% sucrose, pH 7.5), and mix briefly by pipetting.
    1. Optional: To verify efficient plasma membrane electrodisruption17, mix 10 µL of the diluted cell disruptate from step 3.3 with 10 µL 0.4% Trypan Blue in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube. Transfer to a counting chamber and verify that the percentage of Trypan Blue positive cells is >99%.
      1. Leave the sample in the counting chamber for 30 min at room temperature (20–25 °C), and verify that the percentage of Trypan Blue positive cells has remained >99%.
    2. Optional: To verify that the electrodisruption has not been too harsh, that is, it has not disrupted intracellular organelles, perform steps 1.1–3.3 as described above, but use a larger starting material (a well from a 6-well plate with an ~80% confluent cell layer), and use 150 µL 10% sucrose in step 2.5 and 150 µL phosphate-buffered sucrose solution without DTT in step 3.3.
      1. Use a pipette to carefully layer 200 µL of the diluted cell disruptate solution on top of a 1.2 mL density cushion of phosphate-buffered 8% (w/v) density gradient medium (e.g, 8% Nycodenz, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 2.2% sucrose, 1 mM EDTA) in a 2 mL centrifuge tube. Centrifuge at 20,000 x g for 45 min at 4 °C in a microcentrifuge with soft-mode function (for gentle acceleration and deceleration), and carefully put the tubes on ice.
      2. Carefully remove 60 µL of the ~200 µL top fraction, making sure not to pick up any density gradient medium solution, and transfer to a fresh microcentrifuge tube.
        NOTE: This should contain cytosol of exceptional purity, termed "cell sap"21.
      3. Test the purity of the fraction obtained in the above step, by performing western blot analyses of organelle-contained proteins, using standard techniques and 4–20% gradient gels16.
      4. Perform for example immunoblotting for cathepsin B21, cytochrome c, and protein disulphide isomerase, to verify that the electric shock in step 3.2 has not disrupted lysosomes, mitochondria, or endoplasmic reticulum, respectively, and immunoblot for LDH to verify presence of a cytosolic protein in the cell sap.
      5. In parallel, perform immunoblotting on protein extracts made from the total cell disruptate solution16 to confirm that the antibodies used can detect the organelle-contained proteins that are being assessed.
  4. Repeat steps 3.1–3.3 for each sample.
  5. Remove 550 µL from each diluted cell disruptate solution (obtained at step 3.3) to 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes containing 900 µL ice-cold resuspension buffer (50 mM sodium monophosphate, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, and 5.9% sucrose, pH 7.5) supplemented with 0.5% BSA and 0.01% Tween-20, and mix briefly by pipetting.
  6. Centrifuge at 18,000 x g for 45 min at 4 °C to produce pellets containing "sedimented LDH". Thoroughly aspirate the supernatant (with suction) to leave the pellets as dry as possible. Place the samples in a -80 °C freezer.
  7. Transfer 150 µL from each diluted cell disruptate solution (obtained at step 3.3) to new tubes, and place the samples in a -80 °C freezer. Use these samples to determine the "total LDH" levels in the cells.
    NOTE: At this point the experiment can be paused for as long as desired.

4. LDH Extraction and Measurement of LDH Enzymatic Activity

  1. Thaw the "sedimented LDH" (from step 3.6) and "total LDH" samples (from step 3.7) on ice.
  2. Add 300 µL of ice-cold resuspension buffer containing 1.5% Triton X-405 to the "total LDH" samples (yielding a final Triton X-405 concentration of 1%). Rotate the samples on a roller in a cold room (4–8 °C) for 30 min.
  3. Add 750 µL of ice-cold resuspension buffer with 1% Triton X-405 to the "sedimented LDH" samples, and resuspend the pellets with a pipette until a homogenous solution is reached.
  4. Centrifuge the samples from step 4.2 and 4.3 at 18,000 x g for 5 min at 4 °C to sediment undissolved cellular debris.
  5. Mix 4 parts of cold 65 mM imidazole (pH 7.5)/0.75 mM pyruvate with one part of cold 65 mM imidazole (pH 7.5)/1.8 mM NADH to obtain a working solution that is stable for at least three weeks at 4 °C.
  6. Mix 3–30 µL of the supernatants from step 4.4 with 200 µL of the step 4.5 working solution.
  7. Determine the amount of LDH by measuring LDH enzymatic activity as the decline in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (reduced form) (NADH) absorbance at 340 nm at 37 °C compared to a standard with a known LDH concentration. Perform absorbance measurements until the reaction has approached completion, i.e. until the absorbance at 340 nm no longer changes with time.
    NOTE: This is the classical biochemical method to measure LDH activity. Although the current protocol performs the reaction at 37 °C, it can also be performed at room temperature (20–25 °C), which is advisable if doing manual spectrophotometry. The current protocol uses a robotic multianalyzer instrument, which in an automated fashion mixes samples with working solution in a 96-well plate, and measures the absorbance at 340 nm at 37 °C every 20 s for 3 min. Thereafter, the instrument software calculates the concentration of LDH, expressed as Units (U)/L, by comparing the slope of the absorbance measurements over time compared to a standard curve obtained through calibration with a standard of known LDH concentration. The linear range of detection by this approach is 30–1,500 U/L. As an alternative, a wide variety of commercially available kits to measure LDH exist. Some of them are based on coupling the enzymatic reaction to the generation of colorimetric or fluorescent products, enabling detection by other means than UV spectrophotometry, and with other linear ranges of detection.

5. Calculation of LDH Sequestration

  1. Calculate the percentage of sedimented LDH to total LDH for each sample, taking the dilutions and sampling into account:
    Sedimented LDH (%) = figure-protocol-13500
    NOTE: During steps 3.1–3.3 approximately 50 µL is lost due to transfer into and out of the electroporation cuvette. Thus, calculate from having a total of 750 µL (instead of 800 µL) of diluted cell disruptate in step 3.3.
  2. Subtract the percentage of sedimented LDH obtained in the samples from untreated cells (step 1.3.2) from the percentage of sedimented LDH obtained in samples from experimentally treated cells, and divide by the treatment time with Baf to obtain the percentage of sequestered LDH per hour in the sampling period:
    Sequestered LDH (%/h) = figure-protocol-14171

Wyniki

Using the protocol described here, bulk autophagic sequestration activity in a number of different mammalian cell lines, including LAPC4, DU145, Huh7, PNT2A, HeLa, VCaP, H3122, Hec1A, MCF-7, T47D, U2OS, PC3, G361, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), RPE-1, HEK293, BJ, and LNCaP cells was measured. Sequestration was assessed under basal conditions (in complete, nutrient-rich medium), or in cells acutely starved for serum and amino acids (a bona fide autophagy-inducing condition

Dyskusje

In summary, the protocol described here represents a reliable and widely applicable method to monitor bulk autophagic sequestration activity in mammalian cells. Compared to the original method12,16, we have removed a number of unnecessary steps, simplified several of the remaining steps, and introduced a substantial downscaling. As a result, the protocol is greatly improved in relation to cost- and time-efficiency, and the same amount of samples can now be handle...

Ujawnienia

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Podziękowania

This work was financially supported by the Research Council of Norway, the University of Oslo, the Anders Jahre Foundation, the Nansen Foundation, and the Legacy in the memory of Henrik Homan. We thank Dr. Noboru Mizushima for the ATG5+/+ MEFs and ATG5-/- MEFs, Dr. Masaaki Komatsu for the ATG7+/+ MEFs and ATG7-/- MEFs, and Dr. Shizuo Akira for the ATG9A+/+ MEFs and ATG9A-/- MEFs. We thank Frank Sætre for technical assistance, and Dr. Per O. Seglen for constructive methodological discussions.

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1.5 ml and 2 ml microcentrifuge tubes Eppendorf211-2130 and 211-2120
12-well plates Falcon353043
Accumax  cell detachment solutionInnovative Cell TechnologiesA7089Keep aliquots at -20 °C for years, and in fridge for a few months
Bafilomycin A1EnzoBML-CM110-0100Dissolve in DMSO
BJ cellsATCCCRL-2522use at passage <30
Bovine serum albumin (BSA)VWR422361V
Burker counting chamberFisher Scientific139-658585
Countess Cell Counting Chamber SlidesThermoFisher ScientficC10228
Countess II Automated Cell CounterThermoFisher ScientficAMQAX1000
Cover glass for the Burker counting chamberFisher Scientific139-658586
Criterion Tris-HCl Gel, 4–20%, 26-well, 15 µl, 13.3 x 8.7 cm (W x L) Bio-Rad3450034
DTTSigma-AldrichD0632
Earle's balanced salt solution (EBSS)Gibco24010-043conatains 0.1% glucose
EDTASigma-AldrichE7889
Electroporation cuvette (4 mm)Bio-Rad1652088
Exponential decay wave electroporatorBTX Harvard Apparatus EMC 630
Fetal bovine serum (FBS)SigmaF752410% final concentration in RPMI 1640 medium
HEK293 cellsATCCCRL-1573
ImidazoleSigma-Aldrich56750Autoclave a 65 mM solution and keep in fridge for months
Incubator; Autoflow IR Direct Heat CO2 incubatorNuAireNU-5510E
Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Transfection ReagentThermoFisher13778150
LNCaP cellsATCCCRL-1740use at passage <30
3-Methyl Adenine (3MA)Sigma-AldrichM9281Stock 100 mM in RPMI in -20 °C.  Heat stock to 65 °C for 10 minutes, and use at 10 mM final concentration
Refridgerated MicrocentrifugeBeckman Coulter Life Sciences368831
Refridgerated Microcentrifuge with soft-mode functionEppendorf Eppendorf 5417R 
MRT67307 hydrochloride (ULKi)Sigma-AldrichSML0702Inhibits ULK kinase activity. Dissolve in DMSO.
MaxMat Multianalyzer instrumentErba DiagnosticsPL-II
MCF7 cellsATCCHTB-22
NADHMerck-Millipore1.24644.001
NycodenzAxis-Shield1002424
Opti-MEM Reduced Serum MediumThermoFisher31985062
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)Gibco20012-019
Pipette tips 3 (0.5-20 µl)VWR732-2223Thermo Fischer ART Barrier tips
Pipette tips (1-200 µl)VWR732-2207 Thermo Fischer ART Barrier tips
Pipette tips (100-1000µl)VWR732-2355 Thermo Fischer ART Barrier tips
PipettesThermoFisher4701070Finnpipette F2 GLP Kit
Poly-D-lysineSigma-AldrichP6407-10X5MGMake a 1 mg/ml stock solution in sterile H2O. This solution is stable at -20 °C for at least 1 year.
PyruvateMerck-Millipore1066190050
RPE-1 cells (hTERT RPE-1)ATCCCRL-4000
RPMI 1640Gibco21875-037
SAR-405ApexBio A8883Inhibits phosphoinositide 3-kinase class III (PIK3C3). Dissolve in DMSO.
Silencer Select Negative Control #1 (siCtrl)ThermoFisher/Ambion4390843
Silencer Select ATG9-targeting siRNA (siATG9A)ThermoFisher/Ambions35504
Silencer Select FIP200-targeting siRNA (siFIP200)ThermoFisher/Ambions18995
Silencer Select ULK1-targeting siRNA (siULK1)ThermoFisher/Ambions15964
Silencer Select ULK2-targeting siRNA (siULK2)ThermoFisher/Ambions18705
Silencer Select GABARAP-targeting siRNA (siGABARAP)ThermoFisher/Ambions22362
Silencer Select GABARAPL1-targeting siRNA (siGABARAPL1)ThermoFisher/Ambions24333
Silencer Select GABARAPL2-targeting siRNA (siGABARAPL2)ThermoFisher/Ambions22387
Sodium phosphate monobasic dihydrate (NaH2PO4 • 2H2O) Merck-Millipore1.06580.1000
Sodium phosphate dibasic dihydrate (Na2HPO4 • 2H2O ) Prolabo28014.291
SucroseVWR443816T10% final concentration in water; filter through 0.45 µm filter and keep in fridge for months
ThapsigarginSigma-AldrichT9033Inhibits the SERCA ER Ca2+ pump. Dissolve in DMSO.
Triton X-405 Sigma-AldrichX4051% final
Trypan Blue stain 0.4%Molecular ProbesT10282
Trypsin-EDTA (0.25% w/v Trypsin)Gibco25200-056
Tween-20Sigma-AldrichP22870.01% final

Odniesienia

  1. Rubinsztein, D. C., Frake, R. A. Yoshinori Ohsumi's Nobel Prize for mechanisms of autophagy: from basic yeast biology to therapeutic potential. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 46 (4), 228-233 (2016).
  2. Mizushima, N. The exponential growth of autophagy-related research: from the humble yeast to the Nobel Prize. FEBS Lett. 591 (5), 681-689 (2017).
  3. Seglen, P. O., et al. Macroautophagic cargo sequestration assays. Methods. 75, 25-36 (2015).
  4. Hoyvik, H., Gordon, P. B., Seglen, P. O. Use of a hydrolysable probe, [14C]lactose, to distinguish between pre-lysosomal and lysosomal steps in the autophagic pathway. Exp Cell Res. 166 (1), 1-14 (1986).
  5. Plomp, P. J., Gordon, P. B., Meijer, A. J., Hoyvik, H., Seglen, P. O. Energy dependence of different steps in the autophagic-lysosomal pathway. J Biol Chem. 264 (12), 6699-6704 (1989).
  6. Gordon, P. B., Seglen, P. O. Prelysosomal convergence of autophagic and endocytic pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 151 (1), 40-47 (1988).
  7. Holen, I., Gordon, P. B., Seglen, P. O. Protein kinase-dependent effects of okadaic acid on hepatocytic autophagy and cytoskeletal integrity. Biochem J. 284, 633-636 (1992).
  8. Kabeya, Y., et al. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. Embo j. 19 (21), 5720-5728 (2000).
  9. Szalai, P., et al. Autophagic bulk sequestration of cytosolic cargo is independent of LC3, but requires GABARAPs. Exp Cell Res. 333 (1), 21-38 (2015).
  10. Nguyen, T. N., et al. Atg8 family LC3/GABARAP proteins are crucial for autophagosome-lysosome fusion but not autophagosome formation during PINK1/Parkin mitophagy and starvation. J Cell Biol. , (2016).
  11. Pontano Vaites, L., Paulo, J. A., Huttlin, E. L., Harper, J. W. Systematic analysis of human cells lacking ATG8 proteins uncovers roles for GABARAPs and the CCZ1/MON1 regulator C18orf8/RMC1 in macro and selective autophagic flux. Mol Cell Biol. , (2017).
  12. Kopitz, J., Kisen, G. O., Gordon, P. B., Bohley, P., Seglen, P. O. Nonselective autophagy of cytosolic enzymes by isolated rat hepatocytes. J Cell Biol. 111 (3), 941-953 (1990).
  13. Bowman, E. J., Siebers, A., Altendorf, K. Bafilomycins: a class of inhibitors of membrane ATPases from microorganisms, animal cells, and plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 85 (21), 7972-7976 (1988).
  14. Hadjivassiliou, A. G., Rieder, S. V. The enzymatic assay of pyruvic and lactic acids. A definitive procedure. Clin Chim Acta. 19 (3), 357-361 (1968).
  15. Bergmeyer, H. U., Bernt, E., Bergmeyer, H. U. . Methods of enzymatic analysis (2nd English ed). 2, 574-579 (1974).
  16. Engedal, N., et al. Modulation of intracellular calcium homeostasis blocks autophagosome formation. Autophagy. 9 (10), 1475-1490 (2013).
  17. Luhr, M., et al. A Simple Cargo Sequestration Assay for Quantitative Measurement of Nonselective Autophagy in Cultured Cells. Methods Enzymol. 587, 351-364 (2017).
  18. Mousavi, S. A., et al. Effects of inhibitors of the vacuolar proton pump on hepatic heterophagy and autophagy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1510 (1-2), 243-257 (2001).
  19. Seglen, P. O., Gordon, P. B. 3-Methyladenine: specific inhibitor of autophagic/lysosomal protein degradation in isolated rat hepatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 79 (6), 1889-1892 (1982).
  20. Ronan, B., et al. A highly potent and selective Vps34 inhibitor alters vesicle trafficking and autophagy. Nat Chem Biol. 10 (12), 1013-1019 (2014).
  21. Saetre, F., Hagen, L. K., Engedal, N., Seglen, P. O. Novel steps in the autophagic-lysosomal pathway. Febs j. 282 (11), 2202-2214 (2015).
  22. Klionsky, D. J., et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy. 12 (1), 1-222 (2016).
  23. Seglen, P. O., Overbye, A., Saetre, F. Sequestration assays for mammalian autophagy. Methods Enzymol. 452, 63-83 (2009).
  24. Hurley, J. H., Young, L. N. Mechanisms of Autophagy Initiation. Annu Rev Biochem. 86, 225-244 (2017).
  25. Thastrup, O., Cullen, P. J., Drobak, B. K., Hanley, M. R., Dawson, A. P. Thapsigargin, a tumor promoter, discharges intracellular Ca2+ stores by specific inhibition of the endoplasmic reticulum Ca2(+)-ATPase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 87 (7), 2466-2470 (1990).
  26. Kuma, A., et al. The role of autophagy during the early neonatal starvation period. Nature. 432 (7020), 1032-1036 (2004).
  27. Komatsu, M., et al. Impairment of starvation-induced and constitutive autophagy in Atg7-deficient mice. J Cell Biol. 169 (3), 425-434 (2005).
  28. Saitoh, T., et al. Atg9a controls dsDNA-driven dynamic translocation of STING and the innate immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106 (49), 20842-20846 (2009).
  29. Gordon, P. B., Seglen, P. O. Autophagic sequestration of [14C]sucrose, introduced into rat hepatocytes by reversible electro-permeabilization. Exp Cell Res. 142 (1), 1-14 (1982).
  30. An, H., Harper, J. W. Systematic analysis of ribophagy in human cells reveals bystander flux during selective autophagy. Nat Cell Biol. 20 (2), 135-143 (2018).
  31. Fass, E., Shvets, E., Degani, I., Hirschberg, K., Elazar, Z. Microtubules support production of starvation-induced autophagosomes but not their targeting and fusion with lysosomes. J Biol Chem. 281 (47), 36303-36316 (2006).
  32. Velikkakath, A. K., Nishimura, T., Oita, E., Ishihara, N., Mizushima, N. Mammalian Atg2 proteins are essential for autophagosome formation and important for regulation of size and distribution of lipid droplets. Mol Biol Cell. 23 (5), 896-909 (2012).
  33. Øverbye, A., Sætre, F., Hagen, L. K., Johansen, H. T., Seglen, P. O. Autophagic activity measured in whole rat hepatocytes as the accumulation of a novel BHMT fragment (p10), generated in amphisomes by the asparaginyl proteinase, legumain. Autophagy. 7 (9), 1011-1027 (2011).
  34. Kominami, E., Hashida, S., Khairallah, E. A., Katunuma, N. Sequestration of cytoplasmic enzymes in an autophagic vacuole-lysosomal system induced by injection of leupeptin. J Biol Chem. 258 (10), 6093-6100 (1983).
  35. Rosado, C. J., Mijaljica, D., Hatzinisiriou, I., Prescott, M., Devenish, R. J. Rosella: a fluorescent pH-biosensor for reporting vacuolar turnover of cytosol and organelles in yeast. Autophagy. 4 (2), 205-213 (2008).
  36. Katayama, H., Kogure, T., Mizushima, N., Yoshimori, T., Miyawaki, A. A sensitive and quantitative technique for detecting autophagic events based on lysosomal delivery. Chem Biol. 18 (8), 1042-1052 (2011).
  37. Ogier-Denis, E., et al. A heterotrimeric Gi3-protein controls autophagic sequestration in the human colon cancer cell line HT-29. J Biol Chem. 270 (1), 13-16 (1995).
  38. Seglen, P. O., Gordon, P. B., Tolleshaug, H., Hoyvik, H. Use of [3H]raffinose as a specific probe of autophagic sequestration. Exp Cell Res. 162 (1), 273-277 (1986).
  39. Luhr, M., Sætre, F., Engedal, N. The Long-lived Protein Degradation Assay: an Efficient Method for Quantitative Determination of the Autophagic Flux of Endogenous Proteins in Adherent Cell Lines. Bio-protocol. 8 (9), e2836 (2018).
  40. Ronning, O. W., Pettersen, E. O., Seglen, P. O. Protein synthesis and protein degradation through the cell cycle of human NHIK 3025 cells in vitro. Exp Cell Res. 123 (1), 63-72 (1979).
  41. Seglen, P. O., Grinde, B., Solheim, A. E. Inhibition of the lysosomal pathway of protein degradation in isolated rat hepatocytes by ammonia, methylamine, chloroquine and leupeptin. Eur J Biochem. 95 (2), 215-225 (1979).
  42. Seglen, P. O., Solheim, A. E. Valine uptake and incorporation into protein in isolated rat hepatocytes. Nature of the precursor pool for protein synthesis. Eur J Biochem. 85 (1), 15-25 (1978).
  43. Bauvy, C., Meijer, A. J., Codogno, P. Assaying of autophagic protein degradation. Methods Enzymol. 452, 47-61 (2009).
  44. Engedal, N., Seglen, P. O. Autophagy of cytoplasmic bulk cargo does not require LC3. Autophagy. 12 (2), 1-3 (2016).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

Lactate Dehydrogenase Sequestration AssayAutophagyAutophagic SequestrationCell CultureTrypsinCell CountingCell SeedingBafilomycin A1Cell Detachment

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone