Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Obtaining sterilization is essential for tracheal tissue transplant. Herein, we present a sterilization protocol using low-dose gamma irradiation that is fully tolerated by organs.
One of the main key aspects in ensuring that a transplant evolves correctly is the sterility of the medium. Decellularized tracheal transplantation involves implanting an organ that was originally in contact with the environment, thus not being sterile from the outset. While the decellularization protocol (through detergent exposition [2% sodium dodecyl sulfate], continuous stirring, and osmotic shocks) is conducted in line with aseptic measures, it does not provide sterilization. Therefore, one of the main challenges is ensuring sterility prior to in vivo implantation. Although there are established gamma radiation sterilization protocols for inorganic materials, there are no such measures for organic materials. Additionally, the protocols in place for inorganic materials cannot be applied to organic materials, as the established radiation dose (25 kGy) would completely destroy the implant. This paper studies the effect of an escalated radiation dose in a decellularized rabbit trachea. We maintained the dose range (kGy) and tested escalated doses until finding the minimal dose at which sterilization is achieved. After determining the dose, we studied effects of it on the organ, both histologically and biomechanically. We determined that while 0.5 kGy did not achieve sterility, doses of both 1 kGy and 2 kGy did, with 1 kGy, therefore, being the minimal dose necessary to achieve sterilization. Microscopic studies showed no relevant changes compared to non-sterilized organs. Axial biomechanical characteristics were not altered at all, and only a slight reduction in the force per unit of length that the organ can radially tolerate was observed. We can therefore conclude that 1 kGy achieves complete sterilization of decellularized rabbit trachea with a minimal, if any, effects on the organ.
Sterilization of an implant is a basic requisite for its viability; in fact, prostheses that have proven to be successful are those implanted in sterile areas (blood vessels, heart, bone, etc.)1. The trachea has two surfaces: a surface in contact with the external environment, which is therefore not sterile, and a surface toward the mediastinum, which is sterile. Therefore, from the moment the trachea is extracted, it is not a sterile organ. Despite the subsequent decellularization process being carried out in maximum sterile conditions, it is not a sterilization step2. The implantation of foreign material in itself entails a risk of infection due to the probacterial microenvironment it produces3and an up to 0.014% risk of disease transmission from the donor to the recipient, even if the material has been sterilized4. To ensure correct vascularization of the trachea, in almost all experimental transplant protocols, it first undergoes heterotopic implant5,6,7 to a sterile area (muscle, fascia, omentum, subcutaneous, etc.); this is because implanting a non-sterile element in this medium would lead to infection of the area3.
There are a range of possible strategies to obtain a sterile implant. Using supercritical CO2has achieved terminal sterilization8,9. Other methods, such as ultraviolet radiation or treatment with substances such as peracetic acid, ethanol, oxygen peroxide, and electrolyzed water, have obtained different success rates in sterilization, almost always depending on their dosages, but they have been shown to affect the biomechanical characteristics of implants. Indeed, some substances, such as ethylene oxide, can substantially change the structure of the implanted matrix and can even cause undesirable immunogenic effects. For this reason, many of these strategies cannot be applied to biological models2,10,11,12,13.
The most widely studied and accepted sterilization strategy is that established by the ISO 11737-1:2006 standard for the sterilization of medical devices implanted in humans, with a gamma radiation dose of 25 kGy. However, this regulation focuses only on the sterilization of inert, non-biological elements14,15. Additionally, radiotherapy doses in the radical treatment of carcinoma are three orders of magnitude lower than those used to sterilize medical devices1. With this in mind, we can conclude that said dose would not only kill the microbiota but would also destroy and radically alter the biological structure of the implant. There is also the possibility that it would generate residual lipids upon degradation, which can potentially be cytotoxic and accelerate the enzymatic degradation of the scaffold13,14,15,16,17, even when using doses as low as 1.9 kGy and with damage directly proportional to the radiation dose received17.
Thus, the objective of this paper is to try to identify the radiation dose that allows for a sterile implant to be obtained with minimal harmful effects caused by irradiation2,18,19. The strategy we followed involved the irradiation of decellularized and irradiated tracheas at different escalated doses within a range of kilograys (0.5, 1, 2, 3 kGy, etc.), until achieving a negative culture. Additional tests were carried out for those doses that achieved negative cultures, in order to confirm sterilization. After determining the minimum dose to obtain sterilization, the structural and biomechanical impact of the irradiation on the trachea were checked. All the metrics were compared with the control native rabbit tracheas. The sterilization of the construct was then tested in vivo by implanting the tracheas into New Zealand white rabbits.
The European directive 20170/63/EU for the care and use of laboratory animals was adhered to and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Valencia (Law 86/609/EEC and 214/1997 and Code 2018/VSC/PEA/0122 Type 2 of the Government of Valencia, Spain).
1. Tracheal decellularization
NOTE: The decellularization method has been reported elsewhere20.
2. Sterilization
3. Histological analysis
NOTE: Stain the pieces using hematoxylin and eosin21, Masson's trichrome, and orcein22.
4. Biomechanical study
NOTE: Tracheal resistance to longitudinal and transverse forces is measured through axial tensile and radial compression tests23.
5. Surgical technique
NOTE: The surgical technique has been widely reported elsewhere20.
6. Statistical analysis
Decellularization
DAPI staining shows the absence of DNA, and no DNA values higher than 50 ng were detected in any of the tracheae any by electrophoresis, with all fragments being smaller than 200 bp20.
Microbial culture
Two of the eight pieces subjected to 0.5 kGy showed color change in less than 1 week. None of the pieces irradiated at 1 kGy and 2 kGy showed any color change (Figure 1).
There are several sterilization strategies that exist. Supercritical CO2fully penetrates tissues, acidifying the medium and deconstructing the cellular phospholipid bilayer with simple elimination by means of depressurization of the implant8,14,25. Ultraviolet radiation has also been used, and its effectiveness in rodent trachea has been published, although there are only a few reports in the literature
None of the authors have any conflict of interests.
This paper was supported by the 2018 Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery Grant to National Multicentric Study [Number 180101 awarded to Néstor J.Martínez-Hernández] and PI16-01315 [awarded to Manuel Mata-Roig] by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. CIBERER is funded by the VI National R&D&I Plan 2018-2011, Iniciativa Ingenio 2010, Consolider Program, CIBER Actions, and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, with assistance from the European Regional Development Fund.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
6-0 nylon monofilament suture | Monosoft. Covidien; Mansfield, MA, USA | SN-5698G | |
Amphotericin B 5% | Gibco Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA USA | 15290018 | |
Bioanalyzer | Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA | G2939BA | |
Buprenorphine | Buprex. Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare; Hull, Reino Unido | N02AE01 | |
Compression desktop UTM | Microtest, Madrid, Spain | EM1/10/FR | |
Cryostate | Leyca CM3059, Leyca Biosystems, Wetzlar, Alemania | CM3059 | |
DAPI (4',6-diamino-2-phenylindole) | DAPI. Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA | D9542 | |
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) | Sigma-Aldrich; MO, USA | D2650 | |
DMEM | Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA | 11965084 | |
DNA extraction kit | DNeasy extraction kit Quiagen, Hilden, Germany | 4368814 | |
Enrofloxacin, 2.5% | Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany | 0035-0002 | |
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) | GE Healthcare Hyclone; Madrid, Spain | SH20898.03IR | |
Fluorescence microscope | Leyca DM2500 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) | DM2500?? | |
Freezing Container | Mr Frosty. Thermo Fisher; Madrid, Spain | 5100-0001 | |
Isofluorane | Isoflo; Proyma Ganadera; Ciudad Real, Spain | 8.43603E+12 | |
Ketamin | Imalgene. Merial; Toulouse, Francia | BOE127823 | |
Linear accelerator | "True Beam". Varian, Palo Alto, California, USA | H191001 | |
Magnetic stirrer | Orbital Shaker PSU-10i. Biosan; Riga, Letonia | BS-010144-AAN | |
Meloxicam 5 mg/ml | Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany | 6283-MV | |
OCT (Optimal Cutting Temperature Compound) | Fischer Scientific, Madrid, Spain | 12678646 | |
Penicillin-streptomycin 5% | Gibco Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA USA | 15140122 | |
Pentobarbital sodium | Dolethal. Vetoquinol; Madrid, España | 3.60587E+12 | |
Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) | Sigma-Aldrich; MO, USA | P2272 | |
Propofol | Propofol Lipuro. B. Braun Melsungen AG; Melsungen, Alemania | G 151030 | |
Proteinase K | Gibco Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, Massachussetts, USA | S3020 | |
PVC hollow tubes | Cristallo Extra; FITT, Sandrigo, Italy | hhdddyyZ | |
PVC stent | ArgyleTM Medtronic; Istanbul, Turkey | 019 5305 1 | |
R software, Version 3.5.3 R Core | R Foundation for Statistical Computing | R 3.5.3 | |
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) | Sigma-Aldrich; MO, USA | 8,17,034 | |
Spectrophotometer | Nanodrop, Life Technologies; Isogen Life Science. Utrech, Netherlands | ND-ONEC-W | |
Spreadsheet | Microsoft Excel for Mac, Version 16.23, Redmond, WA, USA | 2864993241 | |
Traction Universal Testing Machine | Testing Machines, Veenendaal, Netherlands | 84-01 | |
UTM Software | TestWorks 4, MTS Systems Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA | 100-093-627 F | |
VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium | Vector Labs, Burlingame; CA; USA | H-1000-10 | |
Xylacine | Xilagesic. Calier; Barcelona, España | 20102-003 |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone