JoVE Logo

Zaloguj się

Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Protokół
  • Wyniki
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

Here we describe a time-specific method to effectively manipulate critical developmental pathways in the mouse placenta in vivo. This is performed through the injection and electroporation of CRISPR plasmids into the placentas of pregnant dams on embryonic day 12.5.

Streszczenie

The placenta is an essential organ that regulates and maintains mammalian development in utero. The placenta is responsible for the transfer of nutrients and waste between the mother and fetus and the production and delivery of growth factors and hormones. Placental genetic manipulations in mice are critical for understanding the placenta's specific role in prenatal development. Placental-specific Cre-expressing transgenic mice have varying effectiveness, and other methods for placental gene manipulation can be useful alternatives. This paper describes a technique to directly alter placental gene expression using CRISPR gene manipulation, which can be used to modify the expression of targeted genes. Using a relatively advanced surgical approach, pregnant dams undergo a laparotomy on embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5), and a CRISPR plasmid is delivered by a glass micropipette into the individual placentas. The plasmid is immediately electroporated after each injection. After dam recovery, the placentas and embryos can continue development until assessment at a later time point. The evaluation of the placenta and offspring after the use of this technique can determine the role of time-specific placental function in development. This type of manipulation will allow for a better understanding of how placental genetics and function impact fetal growth and development in multiple disease contexts.

Wprowadzenie

The placenta is an essential organ involved in the development of the fetus. The main role of the placenta is to provide essential factors and regulate the transfer of nutrients and waste to and from the fetus. Mammalian placentas are composed of both fetal and maternal tissue, which make up the fetal-maternal interface, and, thus, the genetics of both the mother and fetus impact function1. Genetic anomalies or impaired function of the placenta can drastically alter fetal development. Previous work has shown that placental genetics and development are associated with the altered development of specific organ systems in the fetus. Particularly, abnormalities in the placenta are linked with changes in the fetal brain, heart, and vascular system2,3,4,5.

The transport of hormones, growth factors, and other molecules from the placenta to the fetus plays a major role in fetal development6. It has been shown that altering the placental production of specific molecules can alter neurodevelopment. Maternal inflammation can increase the production of serotonin by altering tryptophan (TRP) metabolic gene expression in the placenta, which subsequently creates an accumulation of serotonin in the fetal brain7. Other studies have found placental abnormalities alongside heart defects. Abnormalities in the placenta are thought to contribute to congenital heart defects, the most common birth defect in humans8. A recent study has identified several genes that have similar cellular pathways in both the placenta and heart. If disrupted, these pathways could cause defects in both organs9. The defects in the placenta may exacerbate congenital heart defects. The role of placental genetics and function on specific fetal organ system development is an emerging field of study.

Mice have hemochorial placentas and other features of human placentas, which makes them highly useful models for studying human disease1. Despite the importance of the placenta, there is currently a lack of targeted in vivo genetic manipulations. Furthermore, there are currently more options available for knockouts or knockdowns than overexpression or gain-of-function manipulations in the placenta10. There are several transgenic Cre-expressing lines for placental-specific manipulation, each in different trophoblast lineages at different time points. These include Cyp19-Cre, Ada/Tpbpa-Cre, PDGFRα-CreER, and Gcm1-Cre11,12,13,14. While these Cre transgenes are efficient, they may not be capable of manipulating some genes at specific time points. Another commonly used method to either knockout or overexpress placental gene expression is the insertion of lentiviral vectors into blastocyst culture, which causes a trophoblast-specific genetic manipulation15,16. This technique allows for a robust change in the placental gene expression early in development. The use of RNA interference in vivo has been sparsely utilized in the placenta. The insertion of shRNA plasmids can be performed similarly to the CRIPSR technique described in this paper. This has been done at E13.5 to successfully decrease PlGF expression in the placenta, with impacts on offspring brain vasculature17.

In addition to techniques that are primarily used for knockout or knockdown, inducing overexpression is commonly performed with adenoviruses or the insertion of an exogenous protein. The techniques used for overexpression have varying rates of success and have mostly been performed later in gestation. To investigate the role of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in placental function, an adenoviral-mediated placental gene transfer was performed to induce the overexpression of the IGF-1 gene18,19. This was performed late in mouse gestation on E18.5 via direct placental injection. To provide additional options and circumvent possible failures of established placental genetic manipulations, such as Cre-Lox combination failures, the possible toxicity of adenoviruses, and the off-target effects of shRNA, in vivo direct CRISPR manipulation of the placenta can be used20,21,22. This model was developed to address the lack of overexpression models and to create a model with flexibility.

This technique is based upon the work of Lecuyer et al., in which shRNA and CRISPR plasmids were targeted directly in vivo to mouse placentas to alter PlGF expression17. This technique can be used to directly alter placental gene expression using CRISPR manipulation at multiple time points; for this work, E12.5 was selected. The placenta has matured by this point and is large enough to manipulate, allowing for the insertion of a specific CRISPR plasmid on E12.5, which can have a significant impact on fetal development from mid to late pregnancy23,24. Unlike transgenic approaches, but similar to viral inductions or RNA interference, this technique allows for overexpression or knockout at particular time points using a relatively advanced surgical approach, thus avoiding possible impaired placentation or embryonic lethality from earlier changes. As only a few placentas receive the experimental or control plasmid within a litter, the approach allows for two types of internal controls. These controls are those injected and electroporated with the appropriate control plasmid and those that receive no direct manipulation. This technique was optimized to create an overexpression of the IGF-1 gene in the mouse placenta via a synergistic activation mediator (SAM) CRISPR plasmid. The IGF-1 gene was chosen, as IGF-1 is an essential growth hormone delivered to the fetus that is primarily produced in the placenta prior to birth25,26. This new placental-targeted CRISPR technique will allow for direct manipulation to help define the connection between placental function and fetal development.

Protokół

All procedures were performed in accordance and compliance with federal regulations and University of Iowa policy and were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

1. Animals and husbandry

  1. Keep the animals in a 12 h daylight cycle with food and water ad libitum.
  2. Use CD-1 female mice aged 8-15 weeks. Use the presence of a copulatory plug to identify E0.5.
  3. On E0.5, singly house the pregnant dams.

2. Calibration of the micropipette

NOTE: The calibration of the micropipette should be performed prior to surgery when possible.

  1. Prior to making and calibrating the micropipette, dilute all the plasmids to the recommended concentration (0.1 µg/µL) in DNase-free water. Mix the plasmid with appropriately diluted Fast Green dye (1 µg/µL in PBS) (final plasmid concentration: 0.06 µg/µL).
  2. Pull micropipettes using 10 cm glass capillaries with an outer diameter of 1.5 mm and an inner diameter of 0.86 mm with a micropipette puller.
  3. Carefully break off the tip of a micropipette (2-3 mm) with sterile forceps.
  4. Load the micropipette into a microcapillary tip attached to a microinjector. Ensure the microinjector is attached to the microinjection machine and that there are sufficient levels of nitrogen to calibrate the micropipette.
  5. Once the micropipette is attached to the microinjector, load it with the Fast Green dye solution to perform the calibration (1 µg/µL in PBS). Calibrate the micropipette to inject a volume of approximately 3.5 µL. Empty ("clear") the micropipette in preparation for loading the plasmid solutions as below.
    ​NOTE: Each micropipette will be slightly different. To avoid damaging the placenta during the injection, the injection time should be set between 0.5-1.5 s. The pressure should be set between 1-8.5 psi. Calibrate each micropipette separately; if the micropipette cannot be calibrated within these parameters, then it should not be used.

3. Surgery (Figure 1A)

NOTE: To prepare, clean the surfaces of both the preparation and surgical areas with 70% ethanol. Place an absorbent underpad in the preparation area. In the surgery area, place a heating pad down, and then place an absorbent underpad on top of this. Sterilize all the tools prior to surgery. The time the dam is under anesthesia should be under 1 h.

  1. Anesthetization
    1. Administer 5 mg/kg of NSAID (meloxicam) or another approved analgesic to the pregnant dam 30 min to 1 h before surgery.
    2. Place the pregnant dam in an induction chamber attached to an isoflurane vaporizer.
    3. Set the vaporizer to 4% isoflurane and 3.5 L/min oxygen.
    4. Once anesthetization has been confirmed by the lack of response to a toe pinch and a reduced breathing rate, remove the dam from the induction chamber to the preparation area.
  2. Surgery preparation
    1. In the preparation area, place the dam supine with a nose cone.
    2. Reduce the vaporizer to 2% isoflurane and 3.5 L/min oxygen while the dam is in the nose cone.
    3. Shave the abdomen of the dam thoroughly and remove excess fur. Alternate coating the shaved abdomen with povidone solution and 70% ethanol three times using sterile cotton-tipped applicators. Apply final coat of povidone solution. To prevent corneal drying, place artificial tear gel over both eyes of the dam (Figure 2A, B).
    4. After preparation, move the dam with the nose cone to the designated surgery area.
  3. Uterine laparotomy
    NOTE: Use sterile gloves throughout the surgical procedure. Change the gloves if any non-sterile surface is contacted. 
    1. In the surgery area, place the dam supine, and secure the nose cone in place with tape. Set the heating pad underneath the absorbent pad to 45 °C.
    2. Using forceps and scissors, make an approximate 2 cm midline incision through the skin. Use forceps to tent the skin, and make a vertical incision into the skin. After this, make another similarly sized incision through the peritoneum to expose the uterine horns. Using forceps, tent the peritoneum while making the vertical incision (Figure 2C, D).
      NOTE: Failure to properly tent while incising the peritoneum may lead to a fatal incision of the intestines.
    3. Gently massage the uterine horns through the incision by pressing on the sides of the abdomen. Do this by carefully guiding the uterus without tools, using only fingers to avoid accidental injury. Place the exposed uterus on top of a sterile surgical drape covering the abdomen of the dam and keep it moist throughout surgery with drops of sterile saline, which can be warmed to 30 °C prior to use as needed (Figure 2E, F).
      NOTE: The uterine horns can be identified as described in Wang et al.27.
    4. Once the uterus is exposed, select three pairs of placentas for manipulation.
      NOTE: The placentas can be identified as described by Elmore et al.24. To maximize the survival of the embryos, no more than 6 placentas should be treated. If there are fewer than 12 embryos present, no more than 4 placentas should be injected. Select two adjacent placentas so that one receives a control injection and the other receives the experimental plasmid. The use of two adjacent placentas allows for a better comparison of placentas in similar locations in the uterus and also enables an increased rate of survival. The selected placental pairs are chosen randomly and spaced throughout both uterine horns (Figure 1B).
    5. Record the location of placental manipulations and organization of the embryos within the uterine horns so that the embryos and placentas can be identified during collection, as one dam will carry both control and experimentally treated placentas/embryos.
  4. Placental injection and electroporation of the control plasmid
    NOTE: To maintain an aseptic technique, sterilize the electroporation paddles and microinjector with a cold sterilant before use. Change gloves if any non-sterile surface is contacted. 
    1. Using the calibrated micropipette, load a sufficient quantity of the appropriate control plasmid for three injections. Perform all the injections at a depth of ~0.5 mm laterally into the placenta between the decidua (white) and junctional zone (dark red) (Figure 3A-F).
    2. Perform injections in the three control placentas.
      NOTE: Perform all the control plasmid injections prior to the experimental injections to avoid cross-contamination of the plasmids with the micropipette. This will allow for the same micropipette to be used, as changing micropipettes and calibration time drastically increases the surgery time and decreases dam survival.
    3. Perform electroporation of the control plasmid-injected placentas within 2 min of the injection.
    4. For electroporation, use a pair of 3 mm paddles attached to an electroporation machine. To ensure CRISPR incorporation efficiency and the viability of embryos, use the following electroporation settings: 2 pulses, 30 V, 30 ms pulse, 970 ms pulse off, unipolar.
    5. After injection but immediately prior to electroporation, coat the places of contact with sterile saline, applying the saline precisely to the three sites on the uterine wall and the paddles with a dropper or syringe.
    6. Gently press the electroporation paddles on the lateral sides of the placenta. Place the anode paddle over the injection site and the cathode directly opposite (Figure 4A-C).
    7. Press the pulse on the electroporation machine, and wait for the two pulses to complete prior to removing the electroporation paddles.
      NOTE: A small amount of white foam is often seen between the paddles and placenta during pulses. If this does not occur, check the voltage from the paddles with a voltmeter before further use. If the reading on the voltmeter does not match the electroporation voltage setting, the paddles are nonfunctional.
  5. Placental injection and electroporation of the experimental plasmid
    1. Follow the same instructions from step 3.4.1. to step 3.4.2. using the experimental plasmid instead of the control plasmid.
    2. Perform electroporation of all three experimental injected placentas within 2 min of the injection. This should be performed in the same manner as for those injected with the control plasmids. Follow step 3.4.4. to step 3.4.7.
  6. Completion of the surgery
    1. Once the placental manipulation is complete, gently massage the uterine horns back inside the abdominal cavity using only fingers (Figure 5A).
    2. First, perform double-knotted single sutures on the peritoneum layer using coated and braided dissolvable sutures that are 45 cm long with a 13 mm 3/8c needle alloy. Space the sutures 2-3 mm apart (Figure 5B).
    3. After suturing the peritoneum layer, suture the skin with dissolvable sutures. Triple knot the single sutures 2-3 mm apart to ensure that the dam cannot undo the suturing (Figure 5C).
    4. Once the suturing is complete, set the isoflurane to 1% and the oxygen to 3.5 L/min, and apply tissue adhesive to the sutures on the skin (Figure 5D).
      NOTE: Tissue adhesive is optional but recommended to prevent re-opening of the incision due to dam chewing.
    5. When the tissue adhesive has dried, turn off the vaporizer, and remove the dam from the surgery area. Place the dam in a supportive cage on its back.

4. Post-surgery care and monitoring

  1. Allow the pregnant dam to recuperate in a clean cage under supervision for a minimum of 30 min to ensure no immediate complications of the surgery. Observe until it is fully ambulatory and can flip onto its feet without assistance. Singly house the dam post-surgery.
  2. Follow the institutional post-operative care and monitoring until embryo collection. Record the dam weight, and monitor the sutures and the incision site daily.

5. E14.5 placental collection

  1. On E14.5, deeply anesthetize the dam with a ketamine/xylazine cocktail (1 mg/mL ketamine and 0.1 mg/mL xylazine), and then cervically dislocate the dam.
  2. Make a V-shaped incision into the abdomen of the dam with scissors, and remove the uterus. Place immediately onto a 5 cm Petri dish on ice. Using forceps, carefully remove the embryo and the corresponding placenta from the uterus.
    NOTE: Keep a record of the embryo location and corresponding placenta in the uterine horns to determine which received the direct manipulation during surgery.
  3. Record the placental weights. Using RNAse-free forceps and razors, cut the placenta in half down the midline. Put one half into 4% PFA at 4 °C. Cut the remaining half in half again, and store the remaining two quarters at −80 °C in two tubes, one with RNA storage reagent.
    ​NOTE: Embryos and other maternal tissues can be stored from the collection at −80 °C for future use.

6. Placental gene expression analysis

  1. Use the quarter of the placenta stored at −80 °C in RNA storage reagent.
  2. Process the placentas for qPCR as described in Elser et al. using the Trizol method for RNA isolation, a spectrophotometer for RNA concentration, a cDNA synthesis kit, and qPCR with SYBR Green Master Mix28. In place of the Turbo DNAfree kit DNAse referenced in Elser et al., use an RNAcleanup kit after the Trizol RNA isolation to ensure the samples do not contain contaminants28.
    NOTE: Read the material safety data sheet (MSDS) for Trizol, and use it in a chemical fume hood.
  3. Assess the plasmid insertion of the control plasmid with GFP primers and of the experimental plasmid with BLAST primers (primers listed in Supplementary Table 1). Use the CT value to determine the presence of the plasmid.
    NOTE: CT values above 35 are false positives, and only those below 35 should be considered a positive indicator that the plasmid was successfully inserted.
  4. Assess IGF-1 placental expression normalized to the housekeeping gene 18s (primers listed in Supplementary Table 1). Use the ddCT method to calculate the fold change, and then calculate the normalized fold change of the experimental samples to the mean fold change of the control samples.

7. Placental protein level analysis

  1. Use the quarter of the placenta that has been stored at −80 °C. Homogenize the tissue in a buffer solution made of 11.5 mM Tris HCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM protease inhibitor in diH2O with a final pH of 7.4. Use a handheld homogenizer and pestle to break up the tissue.
    NOTE: The sample should not exceed 10% of the volume of the buffer.
  2. Dilute the homogenized samples in the buffer at 1:12, so that they are within the detectable range of a bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) kit. Perform the BCA assay according to the manufacturer's instructions, and quantify the total protein using a plate reader.
  3. After performing the BCA assay, normalize all the samples to the same total protein concentration of 2 mg/mL for the IGF-1 ELISA, as done in Gumusoglu et al.29.
  4. Perform the IGF-1 ELISA according to the manufacturer's instructions, and quantify the IGF-1 protein levels with a plate reader using a standard concentration curve.

8. Spatial CRIPSR verification using fluorescent in situ hybridization labeling

  1. After the placental halves have been appropriately fixed in 4% PFA at 4 °C for 1-3 days, move them into 20% sucrose at 4 °C before freezing them in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound.
  2. Serially section the OCT-embedded placenta halves in a −20 °C cryostat into 10 µm sections, and place them onto slides to be labeled. Section the placenta halves so that all three subregions are visible. Store the slides at −80 °C until use for in situ hybridization.
  3. Perform fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) labeling following the manufacturer's protocols. Hybridize one slide with a dCas9-3xNLS-VP64 probe and a second "sister" slide of the same placenta with a Prl8a8 probe.
    NOTE: The dCas9-3xNLS-VP64 probe detects the presence of the overexpression plasmid. The Prl8a8 probe highlights spongiotrophoblasts of the junctional zone, which allows for the subregions of the placenta to be identifiable. These two probes are labeled on separate "sister" slides to avoid interference of multi-channel fluorescence with the green autofluorescence in the placentas.
  4. Label both probes with the detection dye (Opal 620). After completing the manufacturer's protocol for FISH, apply DAPI mounting medium, and place a coverslip on the slide. Seal the coverslip with clear nail polish.
  5. Image the slides on an upright compound fluorescence microscope, and process them using an appropriate image processing software. Here, the CellSens software was used.

Wyniki

General procedure outcomes (Figure 6)
In the study, there were three manipulated groups. These included placentas injected with a general CRISPR Cas9 control plasmid (Cas9 Control), an activation control CRISPR plasmid (Act Control), or an IGF-1 SAM activation plasmid (Igf1-OE). The Cas9 Control is better suited for knockout plasmids, and the activation control is better suited for overexpression/activation plasmids. To assess the viability ch...

Dyskusje

The placenta is a primary regulator of fetal growth, and as previously noted, changes in placental gene expression or function may significantly impact fetal development6. The protocol outlined here can be used to perform a targeted in vivo CRISPR manipulation of the mouse placenta using a relatively advanced surgical approach. This technique allows for a significant yield of viable embryos and their corresponding placentas that can be used for further study (Figure 6...

Ujawnienia

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Podziękowania

The authors acknowledge the following funding sources: R01 MH122435, NIH T32GM008629, and NIH T32GM145441. The authors thank Dr. Val Sheffield and Dr. Calvin Carter's labs at the University of Iowa for the use of their surgery room and equipment, as well Dr. Eric Van Otterloo, Dr. Nandakumar Narayanan, and Dr. Matthew Weber for their assistance with microscopy. The authors also thank Dr. Sara Maurer, Maya Evans, and Sreelekha Kundu for their assistance with the pilot surgeries.

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1.5 ml TubesUSA Scientific Inc1615-5500
4% Paraformeldhyde (PFA) in PBSThermo Fisher ScientificJ61899.AP
96 Well plateCornings3598For BCA kit
Absorbent UnderpadsFisher Scientific14-206-62
Activation Control PlasmidSanta Cruz Biotechnologysc-437275Dnase-free water provided for dilution
AMV Reverse TranscriptaseNew England BiolabsM0277LUse for cDNA synthesis
Anesthetic Gas VaporizorVetamacVAD-601TTVAD-compact vaporizer
Artifical Tear GelAkornNDC 59399-162-35
BCA Protein Assay KitThermo Fisher Scientific23227Protein quantification
BiovortexerBellco Glass, Inc.198050000Hand-held tissue homogenizer
CellSens SoftwareOlympusV4.1.1Image processing to FISH images.
Centrifuge 5810EppendorfEP022628168Plate centrifuge
ChloroformThermo Fisher ScientificJ67241-APRNA isolation
Cotton Tipped ApplicatorsProAdvantage77100Sterilize before use
CRISPR/Cas9 Control PlasmidSanta Cruz Biotechnologysc-418922Dnase-free water provided for dilution
CryoStatLeicaCM1950
Dissection MicroscopeLeicaM125 CUsed for post-necroscopy imaging
Dissolvable SuturesMed Vet InternationalJ385H
Distilled WaterGibco15230162
Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS)Thermo fisher Scientific14190144(-) Calcium; (-) Magnesium
ECM 830 Electro Electroporator (Electroporation Machine)BTX Harvard Apparatus45-0662Generator only
Electric RazorWahlCL9990Kent Scientific
Electroporation paddles/TweezertrodesBTX Harvard Apparatus45-04873 mm diameter paddles; wires included
Embedding Cassette: 250 PKGrainger21RK94Placenta embedding cassettes
EthanolThermo Fisher Scientific268280010
F-Air CanistersPenn Veterinary Supply IncBIC80120Excess isoflurane filter
Fast Green Dye FCFSigmaF7252-5GDissolve to 1 μg/ml and filter; protect from light
Filter-based microplate photometer (plate reader)Fisher Scientific14377576Can be used for BCA and ELISA
ForcepsVWR82027-386Fine tips, straight, serrated
Formalin solution, neutral buffered, 10%Sigma AldrichHT501128
Glass Capillaries - Borosilicate Glass (Micropipette)Sutter InstrumentB150-86-10O.D.: 1.5 mm, I.D.: 0.86 mm, 10 cm length
Halt Protease and Phosphotase inhibitor cocktail (100x)Thermo Scientific1861281Protein homogenization buffer
Heating PadThermotechS766DDigitial Moist Heating Pad
HemostatsVWR10806-188Fully surrated jaw; curved
Hot Water BathFisher Scientific20253Isotemp 205
Igf-1 SAM Plasmid (m1)Santa Cruz Biotechnologysc-421056-ACTDnase-free water provided for dilution
Induction ChamberVetamac941443No specific liter size required
IsofluranePiramal Pharma LimitedNDC 66794-013-25
Isoproponal/2-ProponalFisher ScientificA451-4RNA isolation
Ketamine HCl 100mg/mlAkornNDC 59399-114-10
MgCl2/Magneisum ChlorideSigma Aldrich63069-100ML1M. Protein homogenization buffer
MicroAmp™ Optical 384-Well Reaction Plate with BarcodeFisher Scientific4309849Barcoded plates not required
Microcapillary TipEppendorf5196082001Attached to BTX Microinjector
MicroinjectorBTX Harvard Apparatus45-0766Stainless Steel Pipette Holder, 130 mm Length, for 1 to 1.5 mm Pipettes
Microject 1000A (Injection Machine)BTX Harvard Apparatus45-0751MicroJect 1000A Plus System
Micropipette Puller Model P-97Sutter InstrumentP-97Flaming/Brown type micropipette puller
Microplate Mixer (Plate Shaker)scilogex822000049999
Mouse/Rat IGF-I/IGF-1 Quantikine ELISA KitR & D SystemsMG100
NeedlesBD - Becton, Dickson, and Company30510630 Gx 1/2 (0.3 mm x 13 mm)
Nitrogen TankLinde7727-37-9Any innert gas
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID)Norbrook Laboratories LimitedNDC 55529-040-10Analesgic such as Meloxicam
Nose ConeVetamac9216099-14 mm
Opal 620 detection dyeAkoya BiosciencesSKU FP1495001KTUsed for FISH
Optimal Cutting Temperature (O.C.T) CompoundSakura4583
Oxygen TankLinde7782 - 44 - 7Medical grade oxygen
PestlesUSA Scientific Inc14155390
Povidone-Iodine Solution, 5%Avrio Health L.P.NDC 67618-155-16
Power SYBR™ Green PCR Master MixThermo Fisher Scientific4367659Use for qPCR
Random Hexamers (Random Primers)New England BiolabsS1330SUse for cDNA synthesis
Razor BladeGrainger26X080
RNA Cleanup Kit & ConcentratorZymo ResearchR1013
RNALaterThermo Fisher ScientificAM7021
RNAscope kit v.2.5Advanced Cells Diagnostics323100Contains all reagents required for fluorescent in situ hybridization. Probes sold separately.
RNAscope™ Probe- Mm-Prl8a8-C2Advanced Cells Diagnostics 528641-C2
RNAscope™ Probe- Vector-dCas9-3xNLS-VP64Advanced Cells Diagnostics527421
Roto-Therm MiniBenchmarkR2020Dry oven for in situ hybridization
ScissorsVWR82027-578Dissecting Scissors, Sharp Tip, 4¹/?
Sodium Chloride (Saline)HospraNDC 0409-4888-03Sterile,  0.9%
Sodium Citrate, Trisodium Salt, Dihydrate, [Citric Acid, Trisodium Dihydrate]Research Product International03-04-6132
Sodium Hydroxide 1N Concentrate, Fisher ChemicalFisher ScientificSS277Protein homogenization buffer
SteamerBellaB00DPX8UBA
Sterile Surgical DrapeBusse696Sterilize before use
Superfrost Plus Microscope SlidesFisher Scientific12-550-15
Surgipath Cover Glass 24x60Leica3800160
SyringesBD - Becton, Dickson, and Company309659BD Luer Slip Tip Syringe sterile, single use, 1 mL
Thermo Scientific™ Invitrogen™ Nanodrop™ One Spectrophotometer with WiFi and Qubit™ 4 FluorometerFisher Scientific13-400-525This configuration comes with Qubit 4 fluorometer.  Qubit quantification not required.
Tissue Adhesive3M1469SBVetBond
Tris HClThermo Fisher Scientific155680251M. Protein homogenization buffer
TRIzol™ ReagentThermo Fisher Scientific15596018RNA isolation
TSA Buffer PackAdvanced Cells Diagnostics322810Used to dilute Opal 620 detection dye
Universal F-CircuitVetamac40200Attached to vaporizer and vaporizer accessories
Upright Compound Fluorescence MicroscopeOlympusBX61VSUsed for FISH imaging
Vectorshield with DAPIVector LaboratoriesH-1200Coverslip mounting media
ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System with 384-Well BlockThermo Fisher Scientific4453536This is for SYBR 384-well block detection.  TaqMan and/or smaller blocks available
Wet n Wild Nail Polish Wild Shine, Clear Nail Protector, Nail ColorAmazonC450B
Xylazine 20mg/mlAnased343730_RX

Odniesienia

  1. Cross, J. C., et al. Genes, development and evolution of the placenta. Placenta. 24 (2-3), 123-130 (2003).
  2. Perez-Garcia, V., et al. Placentation defects are highly prevalent in embryonic lethal mouse mutants. Nature. 555 (7697), 463-468 (2018).
  3. Rosenfeld, C. S. The placenta-brain-axis. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 99 (1), 271-283 (2021).
  4. Maslen, C. L. Recent advances in placenta-heart interactions. Frontiers in Physiology. 9, 735 (2018).
  5. Kundu, S., Maurer, S. V., Stevens, H. E. Future horizons for neurodevelopmental disorders: Placental mechanisms. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 9, 653230 (2021).
  6. Woods, L., Perez-Garcia, V., Hemberger, M. Regulation of placental development and its impact on fetal growth-new insights from mouse models. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 9, 570 (2018).
  7. Goeden, N., et al. Maternal Inflammation disrupts fetal neurodevelopment via increased placental output of serotonin to the fetal brain. Journal of Neuroscience. 36 (22), 6041-6049 (2016).
  8. vander Bom, T., et al. The changing epidemiology of congenital heart disease. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 8 (1), 50-60 (2011).
  9. Wilson, R. L., et al. Analysis of commonly expressed genes between first trimester fetal heart and placenta cell types in the context of congenital heart disease. Scientific Reports. 12 (1), 10756 (2022).
  10. Renaud, S. J., Karim Rumi, M. A., Soares, M. J. Review: Genetic manipulation of the rodent placenta. Placenta. 32, S130-S135 (2011).
  11. Wenzel, P. L., Leone, G. Expression of Cre recombinase in early diploid trophoblast cells of the mouse placenta. Genesis. 45 (3), 129-134 (2007).
  12. Zhou, C. C., et al. Targeted expression of Cre recombinase provokes placental-specific DNA recombination in transgenic mice. PLoS One. 7 (2), e29236 (2012).
  13. Wattez, J. S., Qiao, L., Lee, S., Natale, D. R. C., Shao, J. The platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha promoter-directed expression of cre recombinase in mouse placenta. Developmental Dynamics. 248 (5), 363-374 (2019).
  14. Nadeau, V., et al. Map2k1 and Map2k2 genes contribute to the normal development of syncytiotrophoblasts during placentation. Development. 136 (8), 1363-1374 (2009).
  15. Chakraborty, D., Muto, M., Soares, M. J. Ex vivo trophoblast-specific genetic manipulation using lentiviral delivery. BioProtocol. 7 (24), e2652 (2017).
  16. Okada, Y., et al. Complementation of placental defects and embryonic lethality by trophoblast-specific lentiviral gene transfer. Nature Biotechnology. 25 (2), 233-237 (2007).
  17. Lecuyer, M., et al. a placental marker of fetal brain defects after in utero alcohol exposure. Acta Neuropathologica Communications. 5 (1), 44 (2017).
  18. Jones, H. N., Crombleholme, T., Habli, M. Adenoviral-mediated placental gene transfer of IGF-1 corrects placental insufficiency via enhanced placental glucose transport mechanisms. PLoS One. 8 (9), e74632 (2013).
  19. Jones, H., Crombleholme, T., Habli, M. Regulation of amino acid transporters by adenoviral-mediated human insulin-like growth factor-1 in a mouse model of placental insufficiency in vivo and the human trophoblast line BeWo in vitro. Placenta. 35 (2), 132-138 (2014).
  20. Song, A. J., Palmiter, R. D. Detecting and avoiding problems when using the Cre-lox system. Trends in Genetics. 34 (5), 333-340 (2018).
  21. Chuah, M. K., Collen, D., VandenDriessche, T. Biosafety of adenoviral vectors. Current Gene Therapy. 3 (6), 527-543 (2003).
  22. Evers, B., et al. CRISPR knockout screening outperforms shRNA and CRISPRi in identifying essential genes. Nature Biotechnology. 34 (6), 631-633 (2016).
  23. Rossant, J., Cross, J. C. Placental development: Lessons from mouse mutants. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2 (7), 538-548 (2001).
  24. Elmore, S. A., et al. Histology atlas of the developing mouse placenta. Toxicologic Pathology. 50 (1), 60-117 (2022).
  25. Sferruzzi-Perri, A. N., Sandovici, I., Constancia, M., Fowden, A. L. Placental phenotype and the insulin-like growth factors: Resource allocation to fetal growth. The Journal of Physiology. 595 (15), 5057-5093 (2017).
  26. Agrogiannis, G. D., Sifakis, S., Patsouris, E. S., Konstantinidou, A. E. Insulin-like growth factors in embryonic and fetal growth and skeletal development (Review). Molecular Medicine Reports. 10 (2), 579-584 (2014).
  27. Wang, L., Jiang, H., Brigande, J. V. Gene transfer to the developing mouse inner ear by in vivo electroporation. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (64), e3653 (2012).
  28. Elser, B. A., et al. Combined maternal exposure to cypermethrin and stress affect embryonic brain and placental outcomes in mice. Toxicological Sciences. 175 (2), 182-196 (2020).
  29. Gumusoglu, S. B., et al. Chronic maternal interleukin-17 and autism-related cortical gene expression, neurobiology, and behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology. 45 (6), 1008-1017 (2020).
  30. Liu, F., Huang, L. Electric gene transfer to the liver following systemic administration of plasmid DNA. Gene Therapy. 9 (16), 1116-1119 (2002).
  31. Kalli, C., Teoh, W. C., Leen, E. Introduction of genes via sonoporation and electroporation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 818, 231-254 (2014).
  32. Wu, W., et al. Efficient in vivo gene editing using ribonucleoproteins in skin stem cells of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa mouse model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114 (7), 1660-1665 (2017).
  33. Nakamura, H. . Electroporation and Sonoporation in Developmental Biology. , (2009).
  34. Bond, A. M., et al. Differential timing and coordination of neurogenesis and astrogenesis in developing mouse hippocampal subregions. Brain Sciences. 10 (12), 909 (2020).
  35. Kojima, Y., Tam, O. H., Tam, P. P. Timing of developmental events in the early mouse embryo. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 34, 65-75 (2014).
  36. Pennington, K. A., Schlitt, J. M., Schulz, L. C. Isolation of primary mouse trophoblast cells and trophoblast invasion assay. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (59), e3202 (2012).
  37. Mandegar, M. A., et al. CRISPR Interference efficiently induces specific and reversible gene silencing in human iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell. 18 (4), 541-553 (2016).
  38. Dai, Z., et al. Inducible CRISPRa screen identifies putative enhancers. Journal of Genetics and Genomics. 48 (10), 917-927 (2021).
  39. Ursini, G., et al. Placental genomic risk scores and early neurodevelopmental outcomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. (7), e2019789118 (2021).
  40. Smajdor, A. Ethical challenges in fetal surgery. Journal of Medical Ethics. 37 (2), 88-91 (2011).
  41. Antiel, R. M. Ethical challenges in the new world of maternal-fetal surgery. Seminars in Perinatology. 40 (4), 227-233 (2016).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

Mouse PlacentaTargeted CRISPR ManipulationGene ExpressionGenetic ManipulationCRISPR TechniqueAnesthesia PreparationUterine LaparotomyPlacental InjectionEmbryonic OrganizationSurgical ProcedureMicropipette InjectionElectroporation

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone