A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
In this video, we demonstrate the experimental techniques used to fabricate compliant, extracellular matrix (ECM) coated substrates suitable for cell culture, and which are amenable to traction force microscopy and observing effects of ECM stiffness on cell behavior.
The regulation of cellular adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM) is essential for cell migration and ECM remodeling. Focal adhesions are macromolecular assemblies that couple the contractile F-actin cytoskeleton to the ECM. This connection allows for the transmission of intracellular mechanical forces across the cell membrane to the underlying substrate. Recent work has shown the mechanical properties of the ECM regulate focal adhesion and F-actin morphology as well as numerous physiological processes, including cell differentiation, division, proliferation and migration. Thus, the use of cell culture substrates has become an increasingly prevalent method to precisely control and modulate ECM mechanical properties.
To quantify traction forces at focal adhesions in an adherent cell, compliant substrates are used in conjunction with high-resolution imaging and computational techniques in a method termed traction force microscopy (TFM). This technique relies on measurements of the local magnitude and direction of substrate deformations induced by cellular contraction. In combination with high-resolution fluorescence microscopy of fluorescently tagged proteins, it is possible to correlate cytoskeletal organization and remodeling with traction forces.
Here we present a detailed experimental protocol for the preparation of two-dimensional, compliant matrices for the purpose of creating a cell culture substrate with a well-characterized, tunable mechanical stiffness, which is suitable for measuring cellular contraction. These protocols include the fabrication of polyacrylamide hydrogels, coating of ECM proteins on such gels, plating cells on gels, and high-resolution confocal microscopy using a perfusion chamber. Additionally, we provide a representative sample of data demonstrating location and magnitude of cellular forces using cited TFM protocols.
1. Activating the coverslip surface
2. Preparation of polyacrylamide (PAA) gel
3. Coupling extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins to the PAA gel
Three distinct methods can be used to attach ECM protein either to the top surface of the PAA gel (3.1 and 3.2) or incorporating ECM protein within the gel volume (3.3). Here, we discuss the coupling of fibronectin to PAA gels to result in a surface ligand density that is equivalent to the amount adsorbed on glass after incubation with 10 μg/mL fibronectin solution for 1 hour. Considerations for choosing a method are detailed in the discussion.
4. Loading coverslip into confocal imaging chamber
These steps are conducted after cells have been allowed to spread on ECM-coated gel substrate (~6-12 hrs). To assemble the confocal imaging chamber (RC-30WA), it is useful to consult the Warner Instruments website for guidance.
Representative Results:
The above protocol describes the experimental procedure for preparing compliant PAA gels for studying cell contractility and is illustrated in Figure 1. The gel surface obtained with this protocol is relatively flat and smooth, with fluorescent beads embedded evenly throughout (Figure 2A).
If measuring gel contraction at the location of focal adhesions, imaging of the cell (Figure 3A) and gel surface (Figure 3B) should be done at the confocal optical plane of focal adhesions. The contraction of a gel can be visualized by displacement of embedded fluorescent beads (Figure 3B) at the gel surface when cells are adherent (strained) versus detached (unstrained). The use of computational algorithms can yield traction stresses associated with bead displacement and corresponding elastic modulus of the gel (Figure 3C and 3D) (Sabass et al., 2008). If imaging takes place deeper within the gel, then bead displacements will be smaller and not representative of traction forces exerted at focal adhesions.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of experimental setup. The overall goal of this procedure is to create compliant matrices for the purpose of studying cellular contraction. The first step of the experimental procedure is to activate coverslips by amino-silane/glutaraldehyde treatment for the purpose of anchoring polymerized gels. The second step is to polymerize a polyacrylamide gel, containing fluorescent beads, onto the activated coverslip. The third step involves the chemical cross-linking of extracellular ligand to the surface of the polyacrylamide gel, using one of the three coupling techniques listed in step 3. Cells are then plated onto the gel and allowed to adhere and spread. Under active cellular contraction, beads embedded in the gel displace.
Figure 2. Optical confocal slice of top surface of PAA gel, as visualized by (A.) fluorescent 40nm beads embedded within gel and (B.) fibronectin immunofluorescence.
Figure 3. Representative result for a traction force experiment. (A.) Focal adhesions in a human osteosarcoma U2OS cell are marked by GFP-paxillin and (B.) positions of fluorescent beads embedded in the PAA gel underlying focal adhesions in the strained (green) and unstrained (red) states. Arrows indicate examples of bead displacement. (C.) Traction stress vectors and (D.) corresponding heat-scale map of traction stresses derived from the contraction of the gel, using computational algorithms (Sabass et al., 2008). Scale bar = 5 μm.
Table 1:
Example Stock and Working PAA Solutions (Data in table 1 was first obtained from Yeung et. al. and independently confirmed in our laboratory.)
Stock PAA Solution | ||||
Shear Modulus of PAA Gel (Pa) | 230 | 2833 | 8640 | 16344 |
40% Acrylamide (mL) | 1.25 | 3.12 | 2.34 | 2.50 |
2% Bis-Acrylamide (mL) | 0.50 | 0.83 | 1.88 | 0.60 |
Water (mL) | 3.25 | 1.04 | 0.78 | 1. 90 |
Total Volume (mL): | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Working PAA Solution | ||||
Stock Solution Used (Pa) | 230 | 2833 | 8640 | 16344 |
Stock Solution Volume (μL) | 150 | 150 | 200 | 300 |
Water (μL) | 341.75 | 341.75 | 291.75 | 191.75 |
Beads (μL) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
TEMED (μL) | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
10% APS (μL) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Total Volume (μL): | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Final Acrylamide % | 3 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 12 |
Final Bis-Acrylamide % | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.15 |
Table 2:
Shear Modulus of PAA substrates of various final acrylamide and bis-acrylamide percentages
12% Acrylamide | 7.5% Acrylamide | |||
% Bis-Acrylamide | Shear Modulus (Pa) | % Bis-Acrylamide | Shear Modulus (Pa) | |
0.145 | 16344 | 0.01 | 689 | |
0.28 | 30067 | 0.03 | 1535 | |
0.45 | 34263 | 0.05 | 2286 | |
0.55 | 42375 | 0.075 | 2833 | |
0.575 | 50873 | 0.1 | 4069 | |
0.6 | 55293 | 0.2 | 5356 | |
0.3 | 8640 | |||
5% Acrylamide | 3% Acrylamide | |||
% Bis-Acrylamide | Shear Modulus (Pa) | % Bis-Acrylamide | Shear Modulus (Pa) | |
0.05 | 430 | 0.02 | 1.3 | |
0.075 | 600 | 0.04 | 54 | |
0.1 | 1431 |
The procedure described here for the setup of a traction force microscopy (TFM) experiment, along with the implementation of computational tracking routines (Sabass et al., 2008), allows for the quantification of cellular forces with micron-scale spatial resolution. To optimize the experimental protocol, it is critical to form a pure and uniform gel substrate with uniform coating of ECM ligand. We discuss potential pitfalls below:
Non-uniform Gel Surface or Tears:
No conflicts of interest declared.
We thank the lab of Ulrich Schwarz for computational tracking software used in quantification of cellular traction forces (Sabass et al., 2008). This work was supported by a Burroughs Wellcome Career Award and NIH Director's Pioneer Award (DP10D00354) to M.L. Gardel and Medical Scientist National Research Service Award (5 T32 GM07281) to S.P. Winter.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
3-aminopropyltrimethyoxysilane | Aldrich | 28, 177-8 | |
40% Acrylamide | Bio-Rad | 161-0140 | |
2% Bis-acrylamide | Fisher Scientific | BP1404 | |
TEMED | Fisher Scientific | BP 150-20 | |
Ammonium persulfate | Fisher Scientific | BP179 | |
40nm fluorescent micro-spheres | Invitrogen | F8789 | |
Sulfo-SANPAH | Pierce, Thermo Scientific | 22589 | |
Confocal imaging chamber (RC-30) | Warner Instruments | 64-0320 | |
Coverslip spinner | Home made | NA | |
Ultraviolet lamp CL1000 | UVP Inc. | 95-0228-01 | |
Stainless steel rack | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 72239-04 | |
acryloyl-X, SE (6-((acryloyl)amino)hexanoic acid) | Invitrogen | A-20770 | |
Hydrazine hydrate | Sigma-Aldrich | 225819 | |
Sodium meta-periodate | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 20504 | |
Isopropanol | Fisher Scientific | A416-4 | |
Fibronectin | Sigma-Aldrich | F2006 | |
Collagen | BD Biosciences | 354236 | |
Coverslips (#1.5) | Corning | 2940‐224 | |
Glutaraldehyde | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 16120 | |
Rain-X | SOPUS Products | www.rainx.com | |
Acetic Acid | Acros Organics | 64-19-7 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved