A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
We describe a sorting strategy for mouse spermatids using flow cytometry. Spermatids are sorted into four highly pure populations, including round (spermiogenesis steps 1-9), early elongating (spermiogenesis steps 10-12), late elongating (spermiogenesis steps 13-14) and elongated spermatids (spermiogenesis steps 15-16). DNA staining, size and granulosity are used as selection parameters.
The differentiation of mouse spermatids is one critical process for the production of a functional male gamete with an intact genome to be transmitted to the next generation. So far, molecular studies of this morphological transition have been hampered by the lack of a method allowing adequate separation of these important steps of spermatid differentiation for subsequent analyses. Earlier attempts at proper gating of these cells using flow cytometry may have been difficult because of a peculiar increase in DNA fluorescence in spermatids undergoing chromatin remodeling. Based on this observation, we provide details of a simple flow cytometry scheme, allowing reproducible purification of four populations of mouse spermatids fixed with ethanol, each representing a different state in the nuclear remodeling process. Population enrichment is confirmed using step-specific markers and morphological criterions. The purified spermatids can be used for genomic and proteomic analyses.
Haploid round spermatids differentiate into spermatozoa by a process called spermiogenesis. This involves many different steps including the acquisition of a flagellum, chromatin and cytoskeleton remodeling, condensation of the nucleus as well as the loss of most of the cytoplasm. These unique cellular events must be finely regulated in order to produce a mature functional gamete with an intact genome suitable for fertilization. Spermiogenesis can hardly be studied in vitro since no reliable cell culture system has so far been able to support progression through the different steps of the process. Moreover, actual in vitro techniques lead to a poor yield1,2. In vivo, proper transitions through the different steps of spermiogenesis are crucial for the natural functional integrity of the male gamete. Successful purification of spermatids according to their differentiation steps has never been accomplished with a level of enrichment sufficient to allow molecular characterization of spermiogenesis. For instance, purification of key steps of the spermatidal differentiation would be especially useful to study the developing acrosome, formation of the midpiece3, cell junction dynamics4, RNA dynamics5, chromatin remodeling process6,7 or genomic stability8. Purification of spermatids has been hampered by their progressive morphological transformation, the lack of known stage-specific external biomarkers, and their peculiar shape and size.
Although most male germ cells display a direct relationship between DNA staining and ploidy (DNA content), we noticed that such positive correlation is no longer applicable to spermatids. This stems from our early observation that seminiferous tubule sections show variable intensity of DNA staining throughout the different spermiogenesis steps. Although DNA staining is consistent with their haploid set of chromosomes from spermiogenesis steps 1 to 7 (round spermatids), we observed a sharp increase in fluorescence intensity with DAPI or SYTO 16 around the onset of nuclear reorganization and chromatin remodeling (spermiogenesis step 8) reaching a peak at the onset of nuclear condensation (spermiogenesis steps 11-12). Following condensation of the nucleus, DNA staining intensity decreases until spermiation (spermiogenesis step 16). We surmised that this was likely associated with the formation of their peculiar chromatin structure transition where histones are replaced by protamines. We therefore developed a reliable flow cytometry method that allows the separation of spermatids using the variation of DNA intensity of spermatids as a main selection parameter.
A simple flow cytometry approach is described to separate mouse spermatids with high purity (95-100%) based on their apparent DNA content (SYTO16 staining), size and granulosity. Spermatids are separated into four populations; spermiogenesis steps 1-9, 10-12, 13-14 and 15-16. Purified spermatids are suitable for genetic/genomic analysis, as well as proteomic applications as described in a recent publication from our group9.
Animal care was in accordance with the Université de Sherbrooke animal care and use committee.
1. Tube Preparation
2. Cell Preparation
3. Cell Sorter Set Up
Note: Here, a 4-Laser (405 nm - violet, 488 nm - blue, 561 nm - yellow-green, 633 nm - red) 20-parameter BDFACSAria III cell sorter is used. The BD FACSDiva 6.1.3 software is used to visualize and analyze the data. The settings may vary depending on the type of sorter used.
4. Cell Sorting
Gating strategy used with flow cytometry
Figure 1 represents the gating strategy used in flow cytometry to sort four highly pure spermatid populations. Briefly, cells with positive DNA staining (Alexa Fluor 488-A) are first selected with Gate 1. Spermatids from spermiogenesis steps 1-12 are selected (Gate 2) on a dot plot showing the granulosity (SSC-A) vs size (FSC-A) from Gate 1. Then, spermatids from spermiog...
Spermatogenic cells have always been challenging to study given the complexity of the seminiferous epithelium, as well as the limited success of in vitro culture. Over the years, many approaches to purify germ cells from various species were developed. Sedimentation techniques using gravity purification with Percoll or bovine serum albumin gradients usually provide a good yield of intact germinal cells, but lack proper definition between some cell types such as meiotic tetraploid cells and spermatids10
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
The authors wish to thank Dr. Leonid Volkov and Éric Bouchard for their technical advice regarding epifluorescence microscopy.
Financial support
Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant #MOP-93781) to G.B.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Isoflurane | ABBOT | 05260-05 | For mouse anesthesia before euthanasia |
Fetal bovine serum | Wisent | 90150 | For tube coating |
1x PBS | |||
EDTA | BioShop | EDT | For sorting buffer preparation |
HEPES | Sigma | H | For sorting buffer preparation |
100% Ethanol | Les alcools de commerce | 092-09-11N | For cell fixation |
SYTO 16 | Life Technologies | S7578 | DNA staining |
5 ml polypropylene round bottom tubes | BD Falcon | 352063 | Sorted cells collection |
15 ml polypropylene conical bottom tubes | PROgene | 1500 | |
50 ml polypropylene conical bottom tubes | PROgene | 5000 | |
TEC4 anaesthetic vaporizer | Ohmeda | 1160526 | For mouse euthanasia |
CO2 gas tank | Praxair | C799117902 | For mouse euthanasia |
O2 gas tank | Praxair | O254130501 | For mouse euthanasia |
Homemade mouse gas chamber | For mouse euthanasia | ||
40 µm Falcon cell strainer | Corning Incorporated | 352340 | |
50 μm sample line filters | BD Biosciences | 649049 | |
Vortex mixer | Labnet international, inc. | S0200 | For cell fixation |
Dynac centrifuge | Clay Adams | 101 | |
Celltrics 50 µm filters | Partec | 04-004-2327 | |
488 nm laser-euipped cell sorter | BD Biosciences | FACSAria III | |
Accudop Fluorescent Beads | BD Biosciences | 345249 | |
Sorting Buffer: 1x PBS, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 25 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 1% FBS | FBS is heat-inactivated. Make fresh solution, 0.22 μm filtered and keep at 4°C. |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved