A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
CRISPR-Cas is a powerful technology to engineer the complex genomes of plants and animals. Here, we detail a protocol to efficiently edit the human genome using different Cas endonucleases. We highlight important considerations and design parameters to optimize editing efficiency.
The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) system functions naturally in bacterial adaptive immunity, but has been successfully repurposed for genome engineering in many different living organisms. Most commonly, the wildtype CRISPR associated 9 (Cas9) or Cas12a endonuclease is used to cleave specific sites in the genome, after which the DNA double-stranded break is repaired via the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway or the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway depending on whether a donor template is absent or present respectively. To date, CRISPR systems from different bacterial species have been shown to be capable of performing genome editing in mammalian cells. However, despite the apparent simplicity of the technology, multiple design parameters need to be considered, which often leave users perplexed about how best to carry out their genome editing experiments. Here, we describe a complete workflow from experimental design to identification of cell clones that carry desired DNA modifications, with the goal of facilitating successful execution of genome editing experiments in mammalian cell lines. We highlight key considerations for users to take note of, including the choice of CRISPR system, the spacer length, and the design of a single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN) donor template. We envision that this workflow will be useful for gene knockout studies, disease modeling efforts, or the generation of reporter cell lines.
The ability to engineer the genome of any living organism has many biomedical and biotechnological applications, such as the correction of disease-causing mutations, construction of accurate cellular models for disease studies, or generation of agricultural crops with desirable traits. Since the turn of the century, various technologies have been developed for genome engineering in mammalian cells, including meganucleases1,2,3, zinc finger nucleases4,5, or transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs)6,7,8,9. However, these earlier technologies are either difficult to program or tedious to assemble, thereby hampering their widespread adoption in research and the industry.
In recent years, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)- CRISPR-associated (Cas) system has emerged as a powerful new genome engineering technology10,11. Originally an adaptive immune system in bacteria, it has been successfully deployed for genome modification in plants and animals, including humans. A primary reason why CRISPR-Cas has gained so much popularity in such a short time is that the element that brings the key Cas endonuclease, such as Cas9 or Cas12a (also known as Cpf1), to the correct location in the genome is simply a short piece of chimeric single guide RNA (sgRNA), which is straightforward to design and cheap to synthesize. After being recruited to the target site, the Cas enzyme functions as a pair of molecular scissors and cleaves the bound DNA with its RuvC, HNH, or Nuc domains12,13,14. The resulting double stranded break (DSB) is subsequently repaired by the cells via either the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway. In the absence of a repair template, the DSB is repaired by the error-prone NHEJ pathway, which can give rise to pseudo-random insertion or deletion of nucleotides (indels) at the cut site, potentially causing frameshift mutations in protein-coding genes. However, in the presence of a donor template that contains the desired DNA changes, the DSB is repaired by the high fidelity HDR pathway. Common types of donor templates include single-stranded oligonucleotides (ssODNs) and plasmids. The former is typically used if the intended DNA changes are small (for example, alteration of a single base pair), while the latter is typically used if one wishes to insert a relatively long sequence (for example, the coding sequence of a green fluorescent protein or GFP) into the target locus.
The endonuclease activity of the Cas protein requires the presence of a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) at the target site15. The PAM of Cas9 is at the 3’ end of the protospacer, while the PAM of Cas12a (also called Cpf1) is at the 5’ end instead16. The Cas-guide RNA complex is unable to introduce a DSB if the PAM is absent17. Hence, the PAM places a constraint on the genomic locations where a particular Cas nuclease is able to cleave. Fortunately, Cas nucleases from different bacterial species typically exhibit different PAM requirements. Hence, by integrating various CRISPR-Cas systems into our engineering toolbox, we can expand the range of sites that may be targeted in a genome. Moreover, a natural Cas enzyme can be engineered or evolved to recognize alternative PAM sequences, further widening the scope of genomic targets accessible to manipulation18,19,20.
Although multiple CRISPR-Cas systems are available for genome engineering purposes, most users of the technology have relied mainly on the Cas9 nuclease from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) for multiple reasons. First, it requires a relatively simply NGG PAM, unlike many other Cas proteins that can only cleave in the presence of more complex PAMs. Second, it is the first Cas endonuclease to be successfully deployed in human cells21,22,23,24. Third, SpCas9 is by far the best characterized enzyme to date. If a researcher wishes to use another Cas nuclease, he or she would often be unclear about how best to design the experiment and how well other enzymes will perform in different biological contexts compared to SpCas9.
To provide clarity to the relative performance of different CRISPR-Cas systems, we have recently performed a systematic comparison of five Cas endonucleases – SpCas9, the Cas9 enzyme from Staphylococcus aureus (SaCas9), the Cas9 enzyme from Neisseria meningitidis (NmCas9), the Cas12a enzyme from Acidaminococcus sp. BV3L6 (AsCas12a), and the Cas12a enzyme from Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006 (LbCas12a)25. For a fair comparison, we evaluated the various Cas nucleases using the same set of target sites and other experimental conditions. The study also delineated design parameters for each CRISPR-Cas system, which would serve as a useful reference for users of the technology. Here, to better enable researchers to make use of the CRISPR-Cas system, we provide a step-by-step protocol for optimal genome engineering with different Cas9 and Cas12a enzymes (see Figure 1). The protocol not only includes experimental details but also important design considerations to maximize the likelihood of a successful genome engineering outcome in mammalian cells.
Figure 1: An overview of the workflow to generate genome edited human cell lines. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
1. Design of sgRNAs
Cas Endonuclease | PAM | Optimal spacer length |
SpCas9 | NGG | 17-22 nt inclusive |
SaCas9 | NNGRRT | ≥ 21 nt |
NmCas9 | NNNNGATT | ≥ 19 nt |
AsCas12a and LbCas12a | TTTV | ≥ 19 nt |
Table 1: Some commonly used Cas enzymes with their cognate PAMs and optimal sgRNA lengths. N = Any nucleotide (A, T, G, or C); R = A or G; V = A, C, or G.
CRISPR Plasmid | Sequence |
pSpCas9 and pSaCas9 | Sense: 5' - CACC(G)NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN - 3' Antisense: 3' - (C)NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNCAAA - 5' |
pNmCas9 | Sense: 5' - CACC(G)NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN - 3' Antisense: 3' - (C)NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNCAAC - 5' |
pAsCas12a and pLbCas12a | Sense: 5' - AGATNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN - 3' Antisense: 3' - NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNAAAA - 5' |
Table 2: Oligonucleotides required for cloning sgRNA sequences into CRISPR plasmids used in a recent evaluation study25. The overhangs are italicized.
Figure 2: An example illustrating how to select target sites and design oligonucleotides for cloning into CRISPR plasmids. The target genomic locus here is exon 45 of the human CACNA1D gene. The PAMs for SpCas9 and SaCas9 are NGG and NNGRRT respectively and are highlighted in red, while the PAM for AsCas12a and LbCas12a is TTTN and is highlighted in green. The red horizontal bar indicates the protospacer for SpCas9 and SaCas9, while the green horizontal bar indicates the protospacer for the two Cas12a enzymes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
2. Cloning of oligonucleotides into a backbone vector
Figure 3: An example of a CRISPR plasmid. (a) A map indicating different important features of the plasmid. Here, the EF-1a promoter drives the expression of Cas9, while the U6 promoter drives the expression of the sgRNA. Amp(R) indicates an ampicillin-resistance gene in the plasmid. (b) The sequence of the “BbsI-BplI cloning site” in the plasmid. The recognition sequence of BbsI is GAAGAC and is indicated in red, while the recognition sequence of BplI is GAG-N5-CTC and is indicated in green. (c) Primers that can be used for colony PCR to check whether the sgRNA sequence has been successfully cloned into the plasmid. The hU6_forward primer is indicated by a purple arrow on the plasmid map, while the universal M13R(-20) primer is indicated by a pink arrow on the plasmid map. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. Design and synthesis of repair templates
NOTE: For precision genome engineering, a template specifying the desired DNA modifications needs to be provided together with the CRISPR reagents. For small DNA edits such as alteration of a single nucleotide, ssODN donor templates are most suitable (see section 3.1). For larger DNA edits such as insertion of a GFP tag 5’ or 3’ of a particular protein-coding gene, plasmid donor templates are most suitable (see section 3.2).
Figure 4: Design of ssODN donor templates. (a) Schematic illustrating various possible designs. The red horizontal rectangles indicate the non-target (NT) strand, while the blue rectangles indicate the target (T) strand. In addition, the small green rectangles indicate the desired DNA modifications (such as single nucleotide changes). When a symmetric ssODN is used, the minimum length of each homology arm should be at least 17 nt (but can be longer). For asymmetric ssODNs, the 37/77 T ssODN appears to be optimal for SpCas9-induced HDR, while the 77/37 NT ssODN appears to be optimal for Cas12a-induced HDR. L = left homology arm; R = right homology arm. (b) A specific example to demonstrate how to design ssODN templates. Here, the target genomic locus is exon 45 of the human CACNA1D gene. The PAM for Cas9 is pink and underlined, while the PAM for Cas12a is brown and underlined. The goal is to create a missense mutation (highlighted in green) by converting AGU (encoding serine) to AGG (encoding arginine). To prevent re-targeting by Cas12a, the TTTC PAM is mutated to CTTC. Note that there is no change in amino acid (UAU and UAC both code for tyrosine). To further prevent re-targeting by Cas9, an AGU codon is replaced with a UCC codon (bold), both of which code for serine. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Design and cloning of a plasmid donor template. (a) The goal in this specific example is to fuse P2A-GFP to the C-terminus of the CLTA protein. The blue horizontal rectangle indicates the left homology arm, while the red horizontal rectangle indicates the right homology arm. Capital letters indicate protein-coding sequences, while lowercase letters indicate non-coding sequences. The PAMs for SpCas9 and Cas12a are italicized and underlined. (b) A plasmid donor template that can be used to endogenously tag P2A-GFP at the C-terminus of CLTA. The provided primer sequences can be used to clone the plasmid by Gibson assembly. The PCR conditions are as follows: 98 °C for 3 min, 98 °C for 30 s (step 2), 63 °C for 30 s (step 3), 72 °C for 1 min (step 4), repeat steps 2‒4 for another 34 cycles, 72 °C for 3 min, and hold at 4 °C. Black letters correspond to vector sequences, blue letters correspond to the left homology arm, green letters correspond to P2A-GFP, and red letters correspond to the right homology arm. Note that once the sequence encoding P2A-GFP is successfully integrated into the target locus, re-targeting by SpCas9 will not be possible, since only 9 nt of its protospacer (GTGCACCAG) will be left intact. Moreover, in order to prevent re-targeting by Cas12a, three basepairs immediately downstream of the STOP codon (in bold) are deleted from the plasmid sequence. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
4. Cell transfection
NOTE: The remaining parts of the protocol are written with HEK293T cells in mind. The culture medium used consists of Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 4.5 g/L glucose, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, and 0.1% penicillin/streptomycin. Different steps of the protocol may have to be modified according to the actual cell line used. All cell culture work is done in a Class II Biosafety Cabinet to ensure a sterile work environment.
5. Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) of transfected cells
6. Expansion of individual clones
7. Evaluation of editing efficiency
Figure 6: Checking cells for successful genome editing outcomes. (a) A schematic illustrating two commonly used assays, namely the mismatch cleavage assay with the T7 endonuclease I (T7EI) enzyme and next generation sequencing (NGS) or targeted amplicon sequencing. The blue horizontal rectangles indicate DNA and the yellow circles indicate modifications induced by the CRISPR-Cas system. Primers for the T7E1 assay are denoted in green, while primers for generating amplicons for NGS are denoted in red. (b) Design of primer sequences for the T7EI cleavage assay and for NGS. Here, the target genomic locus is exon 45 of the human CACNA1D gene. The intended modification site is indicated by an asterisk. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
8. Screening of individual clones
To perform a genome editing experiment, a CRISPR plasmid expressing a sgRNA targeting the locus-of-interest needs to be cloned. First, the plasmid is digested with a restriction enzyme (typically a type IIs enzyme) to linearize it. It is recommended to resolve the digested product on a 1% agarose gel alongside an undigested plasmid to distinguish between a complete and partial digestion. As undigested plasmids are supercoiled, they tend to run faster than their linearized counterparts (see Figure 7
The CRISPR-Cas system is a powerful, revolutionary technology to engineer the genomes and transcriptomes of plants and animals. Numerous bacterial species have been found to contain CRISPR-Cas systems, which may potentially be adapted for genome and transcriptome engineering purposes44. Although the Cas9 endonuclease from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) was the first enzyme to be deployed successfully in human cells21,22,
The authors do not have competing financial interests.
M.H.T. is supported by an Agency for Science Technology and Research’s Joint Council Office grant (1431AFG103), a National Medical Research Council grant (OFIRG/0017/2016), National Research Foundation grants (NRF2013-THE001-046 and NRF2013-THE001-093), a Ministry of Education Tier 1 grant (RG50/17 (S)), a startup grant from Nanyang Technological University, and funds for the International Genetically Engineering Machine (iGEM) competition from Nanyang Technological University.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (PNK) | NEB | M0201 | |
Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (rSAP) | NEB | M0371 | |
Tris-Acetate-EDTA (TAE) Buffer, 50X | 1st Base | BUF-3000-50X4L | Dilute to 1X before use. The 1X solution contains 40 mM Tris, 20 mM acetic acid, and 1 mM EDTA. |
Tris-EDTA (TE) Buffer, 10X | 1st Base | BUF-3020-10X4L | Dilute to 1X before use. The 1X solution contains 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0) and 1 mM EDTA. |
BbsI | NEB | R0539 | |
BsmBI | NEB | R0580 | |
T4 DNA Ligase | NEB | M0202 | 400,000 units/ml |
Quick Ligation Kit | NEB | M2200 | An alternative to T4 DNA Ligase. |
Rapid DNA Ligation Kit | Thermo Scientific | K1423 | An alternative to T4 DNA Ligase. |
Zero Blunt TOPO PCR Cloning Kit | Thermo Scientific | 451245 | The salt solution comes with the TOPO vector in the kit. |
NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Master Mix | NEB | E2621L | Kit for Gibson assembly. |
One Shot Stbl3 Chemically Competent E.Coli | Thermo Scientific | C737303 | |
LB Broth (Lennox), powder | Sigma Aldrich | L3022 | Reconstitute in ddH20, and autoclave before use |
LB Broth with Agar (Lennox), powder | Sigma Aldrich | L2897 | Reconstitute in ddH20, and autoclave before use |
SOC media | - | - | 2.5 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 20 mM glucose in 1 L of LB Broth |
Ampicillin (Sodium), USP Grade | Gold Biotechnology | A-301 | |
REDiant 2X PCR Mastermix | 1st Base | BIO-5185 | |
Agarose | 1st Base | BIO-1000 | |
T7 Endonuclease I | NEB | M0302 | |
Plasmid DNA Extraction Miniprep Kit | Favorgen | FAPDE 300 | |
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), High Glucose | Hyclone | SH30081.01 | 4.5 g/L Glucose, no L-glutamine, HEPES and Sodium Pyruvate |
L-Glutamine, 200mM | Gibco | 25030 | |
Penicillin-Streptomycin, 10, 000U/mL | Gibco | 15140 | |
0.25% Trypsin-EDTA, 1X | Gibco | 25200 | |
Fetal Bovine Serum | Hyclone | SV30160 | FBS is heat inactivated before use at 56 oC for 30 min |
Phosphate Buffered Saline, 1X | Gibco | 20012 | |
jetPRIME transfection reagent | Polyplus Transfection | 114-75 | |
QuickExtract DNA Extraction Solution, 1.0 | Epicentre | LUCG-QE09050 | |
ISOLATE II Genomic DNA Kit | Bioline | BIO-52067 | An alternative to QuickExtract |
Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | NEB | M0491 | |
Deoxynucleotide (dNTP) Solution Mix | NEB | N0447 | |
6X DNA Loading Dye | Thermo Scientific | R0611 | 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) 0.03% bromophenol blue, 0.03% xylene cyanol FF, 60% glycerol, 60 mM EDTA |
Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, Set3 | Merck | 539134 | |
Nitrocellulose membrane, 0.2µm | Bio-Rad | 1620112 | |
Tris-glycine-SDS buffer, 10X | Bio-Rad | 1610772 | Dilute to 1X before use. The 1x solution contains 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 0.1% SDS. |
Tris-glycine buffer, 10X | 1st base | BUF-2020 | Dilute to 1X before use. The 1x solution contains 25 mM Tris and 192 mM glycine. |
Ponceau S solution | Sigma Aldrich | P7170 | |
TBS, 20X | 1st base | BUF-3030 | Dilute to 1X before use. The 1x solution contains 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 150 mM NaCl. |
Tween 20 | Sigma Aldrich | P9416 | |
Skim Milk for immunoassay | Nacalai Tesque | 31149-75 | |
WesternBright Sirius-femtogram HRP | Advansta | K12043 | |
Antibody for β-actin (C4) | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | sc-47778 | Lot number: C0916 |
MiSeq system | Illumina | SY-410-1003 | |
NanoDrop spectrophotometer | Thermo Scientific | ND-2000 | |
Qubit fluorometer | Thermo Scientific | Q33226 | |
EVOS FL Cell Imaging System | Thermo Scientific | AMF4300 | |
CRISPR plasmid: pSpCas9(BB)-2A-GFP (PX458) | Addgene | 48138 | Single vector system: The gRNA is expressed from the same plasmid. |
CRISPR plasmid: pX601-AAV-CMV::NLS-SaCas9-NLS-3xHA-bGHpA | Addgene | 61591 | Single vector system: The gRNA is expressed from the same plasmid. |
CRISPR plasmid: xCas9 3.7 | Addgene | 108379 | Dual vector system: The gRNA is expressed from a different plasmid. |
CRISPR plasmid: pX330-U6-Chimeric_BB-CBh-hSpCas9 | Addgene | 42230 | Single vector system: The gRNA is expressed from the same plasmid. |
CRISPR plasmid: hCas9 | Addgene | 41815 | Dual vector system: The gRNA is expressed from a different plasmid. |
CRISPR plasmid: eSpCas9(1.1) | Addgene | 71814 | Single vector system: The gRNA is expressed from the same plasmid. |
CRISPR plasmid: VP12 (SpCas9-HF1) | Addgene | 72247 | Dual vector system: The gRNA is expressed from a different plasmid. |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved