A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
Here, a simple protocol is presented for producing mRNA nanoparticles based on poly(beta aminoester) polymers, easy to be tailored by changing the encapsulated mRNA. The workflow for synthesizing the polymers, the nanoparticles, and their in vitro essential characterization are also described. A proof-of-concept regarding immunization is also added.
Vaccination has been one of the major successes of modern society and is indispensable in controlling and preventing disease. Traditional vaccines were composed of entire or fractions of the infectious agent. However, challenges remain, and new vaccine technologies are mandatory. In this context, the use of mRNA for immunizing purposes has shown an enhanced performance, as demonstrated by the speedy approval of two mRNA vaccines preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Beyond success in preventing viral infections, mRNA vaccines can also be used for therapeutic cancer applications.
Nevertheless, the instability of mRNA and its fast clearance from the body due to the presence of nucleases makes its naked delivery not possible. In this context, nanomedicines, and specifically polymeric nanoparticles, are critical mRNA delivery systems. Thus, the aim of this article is to describe the protocol for the formulation and test of an mRNA vaccine candidate based on the proprietary polymeric nanoparticles. The synthesis and chemical characterization of the poly(beta aminoesters) polymers used, their complexation with mRNA to form nanoparticles, and their lyophilization methodology will be discussed here. This is a crucial step for decreasing storage and distribution costs. Finally, the required tests to demonstrate their capacity to in vitro transfect and mature model dendritic cells will be indicated. This protocol will benefit the scientific community working on vaccination because of its high versatility that enables these vaccines to prevent or cure a wide variety of diseases.
Infectious diseases have represented a severe threat to millions of human beings around the globe and are still one of the leading causes of death in some developing countries. Prophylactic vaccination has been one of the most effective interventions of modern society to prevent and control infectious diseases1,2. These critical milestones of science in 20th-century relevance have been remarked by the recent worldwide Covid-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus3. Recognizing the importance of having efficient vaccines to curtail the dissemination of the disease, cooperative efforts from all biomedical communities have successfully resulted in many prophylactic vaccines in the market in less than a year4.
Traditionally, vaccines were composed of attenuate (live, reduced virulence) or inactivated (death particles) viruses. However, for some diseases with no margin for safety errors, viral particles are not possible, and protein subunits are used instead. Nevertheless, subunits usually do not enable the combination of more than one epitope/antigen, and adjuvants are required to enhance vaccination potency5,6. Therefore, the need for novel vaccine types stands clear.
As demonstrated during the current pandemic, novel vaccine candidates based on nucleic acids can be advantageous in terms of avoiding long development processes and providing high versatility while producing, at the same time, a vital patient immunization. This is the case of mRNA vaccines, which were initially designed as experimental cancer vaccines. Thanks to their natural capacity to produce antigen-specific T-cell responses3,5,6,7. Being mRNA the molecule that encodes the antigenic protein, only changing the same, the vaccine can be rapidly tailored to immunize other variants of the same microorganism, different strains, other infectious microorganisms, or even become a cancer immunotherapeutic treatment. In addition, they are advantageous in terms of large-scale production costs. However, mRNA has a significant hurdle that hampers their naked administration: its stability and integrity are compromised in physiological media, full of nucleases. For this reason, the use of a nanometric carrier that protects it and vectorizes mRNA to the antigen-presenting cells is required2,8.
In this context, poly(beta aminoesters) (pBAE) are a class of biocompatible and biodegradable polymers that demonstrated a remarkable ability to complex mRNA in nanometric particles, thanks to their cationic charges9,10,11. These polymers are composed of ester bonds, which makes their degradation easy by esterases in physiological conditions. Among the pBAE library candidates, those functionalized with end cationic oligopeptides showed a higher capacity to form small nanoparticles to efficiently penetrate cells through endocytosis and transfect the encapsulated gene material. Furthermore, thanks to their buffering capacity, the acidification of the endosome compartment allows endosomal escape12,13. Namely, a specific kind of pBAE, including hydrophobic moieties on their backbone (the so-named C6 pBAE) to enhance their stability and end-oligopeptide combination (60% of polymer modified with a tri-lysine and 40% of the polymer with a tri-histidine) that selectively transfects antigen-presenting cells after parenteral administration and produce the mRNA encoded antigen presentation followed by mice immunization has been recently published14. In addition, it has also been demonstrated that these formulations could circumvent one of the main bottleneck steps of nanomedicine formulations: the possibility to freeze-dry them without losing their functionality, which enables long-term stability in soft dry environments15.
In this context, the objective of the current protocol is to make the procedure for the formation of the mRNA nanoparticles available to the scientific community by giving a description of the critical steps in the protocol and enabling the production of efficient vaccines for infectious diseases prevention and tumor treatment applications.
The following protocol describes the complete workout to synthesize oligopeptide end-modified poly(beta aminoesters) - OM-pBAE polymers that will further be used for nanoparticle synthesis. In the protocol, nanoparticles formulation is also included. In addition, critical steps for the success of the procedure and representative results are also provided to ensure that the resulting formulations accomplish the required quality control characterization features to define a positive or negative result. This protocol is summarized in Figure 1.
1. Synthesis of pBAE polymer with end oligopeptides (OM-pBAE)
2. Polyplexes formation
NOTE: All the procedures should be performed inside a conditioned room to maintain a constant temperature.
3. Polyplexes lyophilization
4. Polyplex resuspension
NOTE: This protocol describes the process used to reconstruct the lyophilized C6-peptide-pBAE nanoparticles for their further use either for characterization, in vitro, or in vivo analysis.
5. Polyplex characterization
6. In vitro characterization
7. In vitro functionality tests: capacity to activate model immune cells by using ovalbumin (OVA) as antigenic model mRNA
Polymer synthesis and characterization
The OM-pBAE synthesis procedure is given in Figure 2. As Figure 2A shows, the first step to obtain the OM-pBAE is to synthesize the C6-pBAE by adding the amines (1-hexylamine and 5-amino-1-pentanol, ratio 1:1) to the diacrylate (1,4-butanediol diacrylate). This reaction is carried out at 90 °C for 20 h and with constant stirring. Afterward, a solution of oligopeptides is added to a solution ...
After the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic last year, the importance of vaccines in terms of infectious disease control has manifested as a critical component8. Efforts from scientists worldwide have enabled the release to the market of many vaccines. For the first time in history, mRNA vaccines have demonstrated their previously hypothesized success, thanks to their rapid design because of their capacity to adapt to any novel antigen within some months5,
Authors have nothing to disclose nor any conflicts of interest.
Financial support from MINECO/FEDER (grants SAF2015-64927-C2-2-R, RTI2018-094734-B-C22, and COV20/01100) is acknowledged. CGF acknowledged her IQS PhD Fellowship.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
1,4-butanediol diacrylate | Sigma Aldrich | 123048 | |
1-hexylamine | Sigma Aldrich | 219703 | |
5-amino-1-pentanol | Sigma Aldrich | 411744 | |
Acetone | Panreac | 141007 | |
CD11b antibody | BD | 550993 | |
CD86 antibody | Bioligend | 105007 | |
Chlor hydroxhyde | Panreac | 181023 | |
Chloroform-d | Sigma Aldrich | 151823 | |
Cys-His-His-His peptide | Ontores | Custom | |
Cys-Lys-Lys-Lys peptide | Ontores | Custom | |
D2O | Sigma Aldrich | 151882 | |
DEPC reagent for Rnase free water | Sigma Aldrich | D5758 | This reagent is important to treat MilliQ water to remove any RNases of the buffers |
Diethyl eter | Panreac | 212770 | |
dimethyl sulfoxide | Sigma Aldrich | 276855 | |
HEPES | Sigma Aldrich | H3375 | |
mRNA EGFP | TriLink Technologies | L-7601 | |
mRNA OVA | TriLink Technologies | L-7610 | |
RiboGreen kit | ThermoFisher | R11490 | |
sodium acetate | Sigma Aldrich | 71196 | |
sucrose | Sigma Aldrich | S0389 | |
Trifluoroacetic acid | Sigma Aldrich | 302031 | |
Trypsin-EDTA | Fisher Scientific | 11570626 | |
α-mouse AlexaFluor488 antibody | Abcam | Ab450105 | |
Equipment | |||
Nanoparticle Tracking Analyzer | Malvern Panalytical | NanoSight NS300 | |
Nuclear Magnetic Ressonance Spectrometer | Varian | 400 MHz | |
ZetaSizer | Malvern Panalytical | Nano ZS | For zeta potential and hydrodynamic size determination |
Software | |||
NanoSight NTA software | Malvern Panalytical | MAN0515-02-EN-00 | |
NovoExpress Software | Agilent | Not specified | |
ZetaSizer software | Malvern Panalytical | DTS Application | To analyze surface charge and hydrodynamic sizes |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved