A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
This protocol shows an accurate and objective approach to visualize viral titrations using crystal violet, by comparing it with optical microscopy and immunocytochemical staining.
Viral titration is a key assay for virology research. The detection of cytopathic effect (CPE) via TCID50 assays and plaque-forming units (PFU) assays are the two main methods to calculate the titer of a virus stock and are often based on microscopy detection or cell staining for visualization. In the case of TCID50 assay, objective visualization is commonly based on immunocytochemical (ICC) staining of intracellular virus to calculate titers combined with visual CPE detection via microscopy. However, ICC staining is costly and time consuming. In this study, we compared visual CPE observation via microscopy, ICC staining and crystal violet staining to determine the titers of two CPE-forming viruses, Influenza A virus (IAV) of swine origin and Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSV). We show that both crystal violet and ICC staining are more accurate than visual CPE detection, presenting nearly identical levels of precision on both IAV and PRRSV. For this reason, here we present crystal violet staining as a faster and more affordable way to determine viral titrations on a TCID50 assay for CPE-forming viruses titrated in cell lines.
Viral titration via TCID50 assay is a commonly used technique in infectious disease research1. Although variations on the math behind this method have been proposed over time1,2,3,4, the currently applied methods of infection detection rely on visual confirmation through the presence of cytopathic effect (CPE) using microscopy5. To confirm CPE visualization more objectively on TCID50 assays, immunocytochemical (ICC) intracellular staining targeting the proteins of the virus is one of t....
1. Titration protocol
NOTE: Use a cytopathic virus infecting adherent cells. For this demonstration, Influenza A Virus (IAV) of swine origin (A/California/07/2009/(H1N1)) and Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) Type 2, strain NC 1-7-4 were used.
The equations used for mathematically calculating the titer were previously described2,3.
Briefly, for PRRSV, we apply the Karber method:
Titer (TCID50) = 10 T + 1.3 where:
In this formula d = negative log of the last dilution with complete positive virus response: five posi.......
Viral titrations are routinely used in virology research, with PFU detection and TCID50 assays most commonly used1,2,3,4. Both methods rely on the detection of CPE in infected cells, and even though they can be visually assessed via microscopy, a staining is usually applied to obtain a more objective result or to even reduce incubation times. In the case of TCID50, one of the most comm.......
Authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Frank Scholle for his helpful comments in the manuscript, Chloe Mariant for her help with the microscopy images and Teresa M. Tiedge for her helpful English revision.
....Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
96-well cell culture plates | Genesee | 25-221 | Clear, flat bottom |
AEC solution | Thermo Fisher | 1122 | |
Crystal violet | Thermo Fisher | C581-25; C581-100 | |
DMEM | Corning | 10-017-CV | |
Fetal bovine serum | BioWest | S1480 | |
Paraformaldehide | Thermo Fisher | J19943 | |
Primary Influenza Antibody | Bioss | BS-0344R | |
Primary PRRSV Antibody | Bioss | BS-10043R | |
Saponin | Thermo Scientific | AAA1882014 | |
Secondaty antibody | Invitrogen | 31460 | |
Tris Hydrochloride | Thermo Scientific | AM9856 |
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved