A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol describes a CRISPR-Cas-mediated, multianalyte synthetic urine biomarker test that enables point-of-care cancer diagnostics through the ex vivo analysis of tumor-associated protease activities.

Abstract

Creating synthetic biomarkers for the development of precision diagnostics has enabled detection of disease through pathways beyond those used for traditional biofluid measurements. Synthetic biomarkers generally make use of reporters that provide readable signals in the biofluid to reflect the biochemical alterations in the local disease microenvironment during disease incidence and progression. The pharmacokinetic concentration of the reporters and biochemical amplification of the disease signal are paramount to achieving high sensitivity and specificity in a diagnostic test. Here, a cancer diagnostic platform is built using one format of synthetic biomarkers: activity-based nanosensors carrying chemically stabilized DNA reporters that can be liberated by aberrant proteolytic signatures in the tumor microenvironment. Synthetic DNA as a disease reporter affords multiplexing capability through its use as a barcode, allowing for the readout of multiple proteolytic signatures at once. DNA reporters released into the urine are detected using CRISPR nucleases via hybridization with CRISPR RNAs, which in turn produce a fluorescent or colorimetric signal upon enzyme activation. In this protocol, DNA-barcoded, activity-based nanosensors are constructed and their application is exemplified in a preclinical mouse model of metastatic colorectal cancer. This system is highly modifiable according to disease biology and generates multiple disease signals simultaneously, affording a comprehensive understanding of the disease characteristics through a minimally invasive process requiring only nanosensor administration, urine collection, and a paper test which enables point-of-care diagnostics.

Introduction

Despite the significant effort to identify tumor biomarkers such as shed proteins and DNA, the cancer diagnostic field has been strained by their low abundance or rapid degradation in circulation1. As a complementary strategy, bioengineered synthetic biomarkers that selectively respond to disease features to generate amplified signals represent new avenues towards accurate and accessible diagnostics2,3. To aid detection, these synthetic biomarkers harness tumor-dependent activation mechanisms such as enzymatic amplification to produce analytes with improved signal-to-noise ratio4. Herein, a class of cancer-associated enzymes, proteases, are leveraged to activate injectable nanoscale sensors to release disease reporters detectable from the biofluids such as blood or urine5,6. In light of tumor heterogeneity, developing a panel of protease-activated sensors allows for multianalyte tests that combine different protease cleavage events into a 'disease signature' to assess cancer incidence and progression in a more specific, multiplexed manner.

Protease-activated synthetic biomarkers have been developed that comprise peptide substrates conjugated to the surface of an inert carrier7. When injected in vivo, these peptides are carried to the tumor whereupon enzymatic cleavage by tumor proteases release reporters into blood or urine for detection. Multiplexed detection with protease-activated synthetic biomarkers requires each synthetic biomarker within a cocktail to be labeled with a unique molecular barcode. To this end, various approaches have been developed, including mass barcodes and ligand-encoded reporters8,9,10. As opposed to these methods of multiplexing which may be limited to a few different signal possibilities, DNA barcoding affords many more combinations in accordance with the high complexity and heterogeneity of human disease states. To expand the multiplexity of synthetic biomarkers, the sensors are barcoded by labeling each reporter with a unique DNA sequence for detection via CRISPR-Cas nuclease to amplify the biofluidic signal ex vivo. These single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) barcodes are designed to bind to complementary CRISPR guide RNAs (crRNAs), activating the target-triggered collateral nuclease activity of CRISPR-Cas12a11. This nuclease activity can be employed to cleave a reporter DNA strand detected through fluorescence kinetics or using paper strips.

In addition to molecular amplification via proteases (in vivo) and CRISPR-Cas (ex vivo), another key design feature of protease-activated synthetic biomarkers involves harnessing nanomaterial pharmacokinetics to increase diagnostic signal concentration in biofluids10. One approach is the use of a nanoparticle carrier to increase the circulation time of surface-conjugated peptide substrates. A polyethylene glycol (PEG) dendrimer is selected as a nanocarrier with relatively small hydrodynamic diameter and multivalency to increase delivery to tumors. While small enough to promote tumor delivery, the size of the PEG carrier is larger than the ~5 nm size cut-off of the kidney glomerular filtration barrier so that only cleaved peptide substrates can be cleared into the urine, taking advantage of size filtration by the kidneys12. In this protocol, the multiple-step workflow is outlined for the synthesis and application of DNA-barcoded activity-based nanosensors in a preclinical murine model, highlighting the setup of the CRISPR-Cas-mediated, multianalyte synthetic urine biomarker test, which has been employed by this group to classify disease status in murine models of multiple cancer types13. Owing to the versatile design principle, all three functional components of the nanosensor - the nanocarrier (PEG polymer), the stimuli-responsive module (protease-activated substrate), and the biofluidic reporter (DNA barcode) - can be precisely interchanged according to application-specific needs, allowing for modularity by tailoring the target and release specificities.

Protocol

All animal studies are approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the authors' institution. Standard animal care facilities including housing chambers, sterile hoods, anesthetization, and ethical endpoint euthanization are required to properly carry out these experiments. All experiments are conducted in compliance with institutional and national guidelines and supervised by the veterinarian staff at the institution. Female BALB/c mice, used for the experiments, are obtained from a commercial source (see Table of Materials) and ranged in age from 6 to 8 weeks at the start of the study. Sequences for custom-synthesized DNA, crRNA, FRET-based peptide substrate probes, and sensor peptides are provided in Supplementary Table 1.

1. Protease-activated peptide substrate selection

  1. Collect and prepare tissue samples from healthy lung or lung tissue with tumor nodules following a previously published report13.
    1. Homogenize tissues in pre-chilled phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) (200 mg tissue/mL PBS) with tissue dissociation tubes for the automated dissociation of tissues into single-cell suspensions.
    2. Centrifuge tissue homogenates at 6,000 x g for 5 min at 4 °C. Retain the supernatant in a new tube.
    3. Centrifuge the supernatant at 14,000 x g for 25 min at 4 °C.
    4. Measure the protein concentration using bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (see Table of Materials).
    5. Add PBS to the sample to prepare a 0.33 mg/mL solution.
  2. Assess the proteolytic activity following the steps below.
    1. In a 384-well plate, add 5 µL, 6 µM FRET-based peptide substrate probes to each well. For each probe, perform the reaction in triplicate.
      NOTE: FRET-based peptide substrate probe contains a short peptide sequence (6-8 amino acids, designed to be specific to a target protease or group of proteases) terminated with a fluorophore and quencher pair. Two FRET probes are described in Supplementary Table 1 as an example. The full library of probes can be found in Hao et al.13.
    2. Centrifuge the well plate for 10 s at room temperature at 180 x g to ensure the probes are at the bottom of the plate.
    3. Add 25 µL 0.33 mg/mL tissue sample or 40 µM recombinant protease13 to each well.
      NOTE: The final concentration of the tissue sample or recombinant protease may need to be optimized according to their intrinsic proteolytic activity. For instance, highly proteolytic tissues such as intestines may require higher dilution factors to allow for the monitoring of initial enzymatic cleavage.
    4. Centrifuge the well plate briefly at 180 x g (at room temperature) to mix the probes and tissue lysates.
    5. Immediately begin detecting probe cleavage by measuring fluorescence with the plate reader at 37 °C every 2 min for 1 h (λex: 485 nm; λem: 535 nm) to monitor the cleavage.
      NOTE: Use the appropriate excitation and emission wavelengths for specific fluorophore and quencher pairs. In the case of this study, parameters (λex: 485 nm and λem: 535 nm) are set for the FAM fluorophore.
    6. To analyze the fluorescent measurement data, utilize the Python (see Table of Materials) package for enzyme kinetics analysis available at https://github.com/nharzallah/NNanotech-Kinetic. This script calculates the initial reaction velocity (V0) using the slope of the linear fit of the first 8-10 initial time points.

2. Sensor formulation and characterization

  1. Synthesize the conjugate of DNA and protease-activated peptide (PAP).
    1. Incubate 20-mer phosphorothioated DNA reporters with 3'-DBCO group (1.1 eq., see Table of Materials) with azide-terminated PAPs with C-terminus cysteine end in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at room temperature for >4 h. If leaving overnight, incubate at 4 °C.
    2. Purify the product on a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system equipped with a column ideal for biomolecules (see Table of Materials). Set the HPLC gradient to start from 5% A buffer (0.05% TFA in H2O), keep isocratic for 20 min, and reach 80% B buffer (0.05% TFA, 99.95% acetonitrile) at 65 min with a flow rate of 0.3 mL min-1, and collect the conjugate product with retention time at ~31 min.
    3. Validate the purified conjugates by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry using α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as matrix14(see Table of Materials).
  2. Synthesize the DNA-encoded activity-based nanosensors.
    1. Dissolve 2 mg of multivalent PEG (40 kDa, 8-arm, see Table of Materials) with maleimide-reactive group in 1 mL of 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and filter (cutoff: 0.2 µm).
    2. Add the cysteine-terminated DNA-peptide conjugates (2 eq., see Table of Materials) to the PEG and react at room temperature for >4 h. If leaving overnight, incubate at 4 °C.
    3. Remove the unconjugated materials using size exclusion chromatography with a commercially available dextran-agarose composite matrix column on a fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) (see Table of Materials). Run samples in PBS and monitor absorbance at 260 nm for DNA and 280 nm for peptide.
    4. Concentrate the synthesized nanosensors with centrifugal filter tubes (MWCO = 10 kDa) according to the manufacturer's recommended speed (see Table of Materials).
    5. Quantify the concentration of DNA using ssDNA assay kit (see Table of Materials) and a plate reader at λex: 485 nm and λem: 535 nm. Store the nanosensors at 4 °C.
  3. Characterize the DNA-encoded activity-based nanosensors.
    1. Measure the hydrodynamic particle size of DNA-encoded nanosensors by dynamic light scattering (DLS).
      NOTE: The expected size range of nanosensors is 15-50 nm, with an average size of 20-30 nm. If a limited size range is desired, FPLC (in step 2.3) can be used to isolate narrower fractions with different molecular weights.
    2. Concentrate the nanosensors to 0.5 mg/mL (by DNA concentration) with centrifugal filter tubes (MWCO = 10 kDa) and load the samples onto a carbon film-coated copper grid mounted on a cryoholder. Observe the morphology using cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (200 kV, magnification of 10,000-60,000)14.

3. Sensor injection and urine collection

  1. Collect urine for baseline measurement.
    1. Place the mouse into a custom housing chamber (see Supplementary Figure 1) with a 96-well plate as the base.
    2. Restrain the mouse and apply gentle pressure on the bladder to void any remaining urine onto the plate.
    3. Pipette the collected urine (~100-200 µL) from the 96-well plate into a 1.5 mL tube after replacing the mouse to the normal housing.
  2. Establish preclinical murine tumor model.
    1. Inoculate 6 to 8-week-old BALB/c female mice by intravenous injection with luciferase-expressing MC26-Fluc cell line (100k cells/mouse) (see Table of Materials). Monitor tumor progression weekly using an in vivo fluorescence imaging system.
      NOTE: Visible tumor burden indicated by luminescent signal occurs approximately in week 2 of injection of this particular cell line. Carefully check on tumor-bearing animals during the tumor progression on a regular basis.
  3. Inject nanosensors at different time points after tumor implantation.
    1. Prepare an injection solution (200 µL maximum volume) containing nanosensors at a concentration of 1 nmol by DNA barcode in sterile PBS.
    2. Inject 200 µL sensor solution in PBS into each experimental mouse intravenously.
  4. Collect urine samples from healthy control and tumor-bearing mice at 1 h after sensor injection as described in steps 1.1-1.3.
    ​NOTE: Fresh urine samples can be processed to DNA barcode analysis directly or frozen immediately on ice.

4. CRISPR detection of DNA barcodes: fluorescence-based

  1. Use fresh urine samples or defrost frozen samples on ice. Centrifuge urine samples at 800 x g for 5 min at room temperature.
  2. Combine the reagents in Supplementary Table 2, add the Cas12a enzyme (see Table of Materials) last and gently mix the reaction by pipetting up and down. Incubate the reaction at 37 °C for 30 min.
  3. Run the reporter reaction, as shown in Supplementary Table 3, in triplicate using the product of step 2. Add the reaction from Step 2 last and quickly bring to the plate reader.
  4. Detect LbaCas12a activation by measuring fluorescence with a plate reader at 37 °C every 2 min for 3 h (λex: 485 nm and λem: 535 nm) to monitor the cleavage kinetics of the DNA reporter.
  5. To analyze the fluorescent measurement data, utilize the Python package for enzyme kinetics analysis available at https://github.com/nharzallah/NNanotech-Kinetic. This script calculates the initial reaction velocity (V0) using the slope of the linear fit of the first 8-10 initial time points.

5. CRISPR detection of DNA barcodes: paper-based

  1. Centrifuge urine samples at 800 x g for 5 min at room temperature.
    NOTE: Run the urine samples for fluorescence-based and paper-based CRISPR detection in parallel.
  2. Combine the reagents in Supplementary Table 2. Incubate at 37 °C for 30 min.
    NOTE: This incubation step is identical to that for the fluorescence-based CRISPR detection.
  3. Run the reporter reaction using FAM-biotin labeled DNA reporter for lateral flow assay on a paper strip (see Table of Materials). Combine the reagents in Supplementary Table 4 in a 96-well plate using the product of step 2. Cover with aluminum foil and incubate at 37 °C for 1 h.
    NOTE: Select the optimal incubation time according to the real-time kinetics monitoring in the fluorescence-based CRISPR detection assay described above.
  4. To a fresh well of a 96-well plate, add 80 µL of PBS. Add 20 µL of sample from step 3 to this well.
  5. Place one lateral flow paper strip to each well and wait until the liquid reaches the top of the strip (<5 min). Look for the appearance of the control and/or sample band(s) on the paper strip.
  6. Take a picture of the lateral flow strip and quantify band intensity using ImageJ.

Results

Nominating protease-activated peptide substrates
To design sensors which will reflect changes in the proteolytic activity of the tissue, protease activity in the tissue is first characterized using a library of peptide probes13 (Figure 1). Fresh and frozen tissue samples can provide substantial information about the proteolytic activity of the tumor microenvironment by combining tissue samples with FRET probes designed to detect substrate cleava...

Discussion

Presented here is a highly customizable platform for multiplexed cancer detection with a portable urine test that assesses disease-associated proteolytic activity using a minimally invasive injected sensor. When activated by tumor proteases, peptide substrate cleavage is amplified via DNA barcode release into the urine. The synthetic DNA reporters in a urine sample can be read out by a secondary CRISPR-Cas-mediated enzymatic amplification using fluorometric detection or a simple paper-based test. DNA barcoding i...

Disclosures

S.N.B., L.H., and R.T.Z. are listed as inventors on a patent application related to the content of this work. S.N.B. holds equity in Glympse Bio, Satellite Bio, Lisata Therapeutics, Port Therapeutics, Intergalactic Therapeutics, Matrisome Bio, and is a director at Vertex; consults for Moderna, and receives sponsored research funding from Johnson & Johnson, Revitope, and Owlstone.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by a Koch Institute Support Grant number P30-CA14051 from the National Cancer Institute (Swanson Biotechnology Center), a Core Center Grant P30-ES002109 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the Koch Institute's Marble Center for Cancer Nanomedicine, the Koch Institute Frontier Research Program via the Kathy and Curt Marble Cancer Research Fund, and the Virginia and D. K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research. A.E.V.H. is supported by an NIH-funded predoctoral training fellowship (T32GM130546). S.N.B. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator. L.H. is supported by a K99/R00 Pathway to Independence Award from the National Cancer Institute and the startup funding from Boston University.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
10x NEB Buffer 2.1New England BiolabsB6002SVIAL
20-mer phosphorothioated DNA reporters with 3’-DBCO groupIDTCustom DNA
Agilent 1100 High Performance Liquid Chromatography system with Vydac 214TP510 C4 column AgilentHPLC
ÄKTA fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC)GE HealthcareFPLC
Amicon ultracentrifuge tubes (MWCO = 10 kDa)EMD milliporeVarious volumes available
Azide-terminated PAPs with C-terminus cysteineCPC ScientificCustom peptide
crRNAs IDTSee Supplementary Table 1
Cryogenic transmission electron microscopyJEM-2100FJEOLcyroTEM
Cysteine terminated DNA-peptide conjugatesCPC ScientificCustom peptide
Dynamic light scattering (DLS)DLS
EnGen LbaCas12a (Cpf1), 100 µMNew England BiolabsM0653T
Experimental animalsTaconic BiosciencesBALB/cAnNTac6–8 weeks of age
gentleMACS C tubesMiltenyi Biotec130-093-237tissue homogenization
HybriDetect Universal Lateral Flow Assay KitMiltenyi BiotecMGHD 1
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time of flight (MALDI–TOF) mass spectrometry BrukerMicroflex MALDI–TOF
MC26-Fluc cell lineKenneth K. Tanabe Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital
multivalent PEG (40 kDA, 8-arm) with maleimide-reactive groupJenKemA10020-1 / 8ARM(TP)-MAL-40K,1 g
Python, Version 3.9https://www.python.org/
Quant-iT OliGreen ssDNA Assay Kit and Quant-iT OliGreen ssDNA ReagentInvitrogenO11492ssDNA assay kit
ssDNA FAM-T10-Quencher and  FAM-T10-Biotin reporter substratesIDTCustom DNA
Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL columnGE HealthcareGE28-9909-44For FPLC
Tecan Infinite Pro M200 plate readerTecan
ThermoFisher Pierce BCA Protein Assay KitThermoFisher Scientific23225

References

  1. Soleimany, A. P., Bhatia, S. N. Activity-based diagnostics: an emerging paradigm for disease detection and monitoring. Trends Mol Med. 26 (5), 450-468 (2020).
  2. Muir, R. K., Guerra, M., Bogyo, M. M. Activity-based diagnostics: recent advances in the development of probes for use with diverse detection modalities. ACS Chem Biol. 17 (2), 281-291 (2022).
  3. Heitzer, E., Haque, I. S., Roberts, C. E. S., Speicher, M. R. Current and future perspectives of liquid biopsies in genomics-driven oncology. Nat Rev Genet. 20 (2), 71-88 (2019).
  4. Dudani, J. S., Warren, A. D., Bhatia, S. N. Harnessing protease activity to improve cancer care. Annu Rev Canc Biol. 2, 353-376 (2018).
  5. Hanahan, D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discov. 12 (1), 31-46 (2022).
  6. Quail, D. F., Joyce, J. A. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 19 (11), 1423-1437 (2013).
  7. Kwong, G. A., et al. Synthetic biomarkers: a twenty-first century path to early cancer detection. Nat Rev Cancer. 21 (10), 655-668 (2021).
  8. Kirkpatrick, J. D., et al. Urinary detection of lung cancer in mice via noninvasive pulmonary protease profiling. Sci Transl Med. 12 (537), eaaw0262 (2020).
  9. Warren, A. D., et al. Disease detection by ultrasensitive quantification of microdosed synthetic urinary biomarkers. J Am Chem Soc. 136 (39), 13709-13714 (2014).
  10. Kwong, G. A., et al. Mass-encoded synthetic biomarkers for multiplexed urinary monitoring of disease. Nat Biotechnol. 31 (1), 63-70 (2013).
  11. Chen, J. S., et al. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science. 360 (6387), 436-439 (2018).
  12. Choi, H. S., et al. Renal clearance of quantum dots. Nat Biotechnol. 25 (10), 1165-1170 (2007).
  13. Hao, L., et al. CRISPR-Cas-amplified urinary biomarkers for multiplexed and portable cancer diagnostics. Nat Nanotechnol. 18 (7), 798-807 (2023).
  14. Hao, L., et al. Microenvironment-triggered multimodal precision diagnostics. Nat Mater. 20 (10), 1440-1448 (2021).
  15. Ghanta, K. S., et al. 5'-Modifications improve potency and efficacy of DNA donors for precision genome editing. Elife. 10, e72216 (2021).
  16. Bekkevold, C. M., Robertson, K. L., Reinhard, M. K., Battles, A. H., Rowland, N. E. Dehydration parameters and standards for laboratory mice. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 52 (3), 233-239 (2013).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

CRISPR CasSynthetic BiomarkersDisease DetectionDiagnosticsBiofluidsMolecular ToolsNanosensorsActivity based ReportersProteolytic SignaturesCancer DiagnosticsDNA BarcodesSensitivitySpecificityTumor Microenvironment

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved