We would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Royal British Legion Centre for Blast Injury Studies to HA and funding from the Medical Research Council (M01858X/1) to CAH.

1. Cell Culture and Sample Preparation
<ol>
	<li>Obtain an appropriate cell line (e.g., dermal papilla cells). 
	NOTE: The current protocol has been designed for adherent cells, with rat dermal papilla fibroblasts isolated from vibrissae used as a model.</li>
	<li>Culture the cells in a T-75 flask containing minimum essential medium (MEM) &#945; supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin streptomycin. Keep the cells at standard culture conditions of 37 &#176;C and 5% CO2 in a humidified environment until they reach 80% confluence.</li>
	<li>Aspirate the medium and wash the cells twice in Dulbecco&#39;s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Dissociate the cells from the flask by incubating them in 2 mL of trypsin/EDTA at standard culture conditions for 5 min. Briefly check to ensure that cells have successfully dissociated from the flask using a light/phase contrast microscope (with a 10X objective lens).</li>
	<li>Add 4 mL of culture medium to neutralize the trypsinization reaction. Transfer the cell suspension to a 15 mL centrifuge tube.</li>
	<li>Centrifuge at 200 x g for 4 min to pellet the cells.Slowly aspirate the supernatant, taking care not to dislodge the pellet.Re-suspend the pellet in 5 mL of medium.</li>
	<li>Transfer a 20 &#181;L aliquot of the cell suspension to a clean hemocytometer and count the cells using a microscope fitted with a 10X objective lens.</li>
	<li>Prepare the cells for the blast by placing three 35 mm dishes inside a 90 mm dish. Label them appropriately. Add 2 mL of medium to each 35 mm dish and seed a total of 5 x 104 cells per dish, distributing the cells evenly around the dish. Incubate the experimental samples overnight in standard culture conditions to allow for adequate cell attachment before shock wave exposure. 
	NOTE: For fluorescent imaging, cells must be seeded onto sterile glass coverslips.</li>
</ol>
2. Shock Tube Assembly
<img alt="Figure 2" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/55618/55618fig2.jpg" /> 
Figure 2: EVOC Rig and Shock Tube Assembly. (A) Image of the EVOC rig. (B) Schematic of the shock tube apparatus. Shock tube dimensions include an internal diameter of 59 mm and a total length, including the EVOC rig, of 4.13 m. The length of the driven tube and the EVOC rig totals 2.71 m. <a href="http://cloudfront.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/55618/55618fig2large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<ol>
	<li>Wear steel-toe work boots and a laboratory coat during the assembly procedures.</li>
	<li>Insert the two alignment bars through the two bolt holes found in the horizontal plane of the outlet flange. Place a nitrile-rubber gasket sheet over the end of the alignment bars so that it sits between the outlet flange and the ex vivo organ culture (EVOC) rig. 
	NOTE: The EVOC rig is a custom-designed fixture intended for use with 35 mm Petri dishes (Figure 2A).</li>
	<li>Attach the EVOC rig to the outlet flange of the shock tube by sliding the fixture over the alignment bars, ensuring that it is orientated correctly so that the section that holds the petri dish is located at its base.</li>
	<li>Insert four M24 bolts and washers into the remaining holes. Position the nuts so that they touch the flange.</li>
	<li>Tightly fasten the nuts and bolts sequentially in a diagonally symmetric fashion whilst visually checking that the EVOC rig and shock tube have successfully aligned.</li>
	<li>Attach a pressure transducer to the EVOC rig and connect it to the current source using a sensor cable. Then, using a BNC cable, connect the current source to the oscilloscope.</li>
	<li>Ensure that all release valves and flow controls on the shock tube are closed. Open the built-in external compressed air line and manually turn the pressure regulator clockwise to charge the solenoid to 2.5 bar.</li>
	<li>Open the safety valve on the compressed gas bottle by turning it anticlockwise 180&#176;.</li>
	<li>Slowly turn the pressure regulator, located on top of the gas bottle, clockwise to increase the pressure to approximately 15 bar. 
	NOTE: The setting point of this regulator should be slightly above the highest bursting pressure of the thickest diaphragm that is to be used in the experiment.</li>
	<li>Prepare the diaphragms by cutting a 0.125 mm-thick plastic sheet into 10 cm x 10 cm squares. 
	NOTE: The thickness of the diaphragm will correlate with the bursting pressure, altering the peak pressure of the shock wave (i.e., a thicker diaphragm will result in a shock wave with a larger peak pressure; Table 1).</li>
</ol>
<table fo:keep-together.within-page="1">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Mylar Diaphragm dimensions (cm)</td>
			<td>Burst pressure (bar)</td>
			<td>Sensor 3 pressure range (kPa)</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>10 x 10 x 0.023</td>
			<td>2 &#177; 0.2</td>
			<td>47 &#177; 7.5</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>10 x 10 x 0.050</td>
			<td>4 &#177; 0.2</td>
			<td>72 &#177; 7.5</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>10 x 10 x 0.125</td>
			<td>9.5 &#177; 0.5</td>
			<td>127 &#177; 12.5</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
Table 1: Burst Pressure Corresponding to Diaphragm Thickness and Peak Pressure.
<ol start="11">
	<li>Create handles out of tape, fix them to the top and bottom of the diaphragm, and use them to carefully position the diaphragm next to the front small flange by the breech chamber. Ensure that the diaphragm is straight and correctly positioned before closing the breech.</li>
	<li>Secure this using four M24 bolts and nuts. Tightly fasten the nuts and bolts sequentially in a diagonally symmetric fashion.</li>
</ol>
3. Preparation of Cells Just Prior to Shock Wave Exposure
<ol>
	<li>Prepare a tissue laminar flow hood by performing ultraviolet sterilization. Clean it with a disinfectant solution and 70% ethanol. Gather all items needed for handling cells prior to/post-shock wave exposure and place them within the sterile hood. 
	NOTE: This includes fresh medium, adhesive gas-permeable membranes, sterile scissors, pipettes, and pipette tips.</li>
	<li>Transfer one 90 mm Petri dish containing three experimental samples from the incubator to the sterile hood.</li>
	<li>Cut an adhesive gas-permeable membrane sheet (see the Table of Materials) into six squares, such that each is large enough to cover the top of one 35 mm Petri dish.</li>
	<li>Aspirate the medium from the 35 mm Petri dish, place the lid to one side, and cover with two adhesive gas-permeable membranes sections, ensuring that there is a tight seal between the membrane and the edge of the dish.</li>
	<li>Transfer the sample to the EVOC rig and secure it to the base of the fixture so that the top of the dish is aligned with the inner base of the shock tube.</li>
</ol>
4. Shock Tube Operation
<ol>
	<li>Wear ear defenders, eye goggles, safety boots, and a laboratory coat when pressurizing the shock tube system.</li>
	<li>Turn the flow control knob on the regulator clockwise, allowing gas to flow into the flexible hose connecting the compressed air cylinder to the shock tube.</li>
	<li>At the bottom of the control panel, select either the &#34;Double Breech&#34; inlet for a short-duration shock wave or the &#34;Driver Tube&#34; inlet for an increased wave duration.</li>
	<li>Switch on the DC power source and oscilloscope to acquire the waveform data. Set the oscilloscope sampling rate to 50.0 MS/s, with a record length of 1 M points. Set a range of 50 mV for firing at 2 bar and 100 mV for above 4 bar.</li>
	<li>Turn on the safety lights using the switch on the wall opposite the control panel. 
	NOTE: This tells other researchers not to enter the room when the shock tube is charging.</li>
	<li>Turn on the switch on the solenoid control box to close the solenoid. 
	NOTE: This safety feature closes a valve located on the double breech chamber, allowing for the system to be charged.</li>
	<li>On the control panel, slowly open the flow control by turning the knob counterclockwise to gradually increase the pressure within the compression chamber. Monitor the pressure using the control panel display.</li>
	<li>Once the diaphragm burst pressure is reached, the diaphragm will rupture and a &#34;bang&#34; will be heard. Quickly close the flow control by turning the knob. 
	NOTE: The shock wave will travel down the tube over the cell sample and out the end of the tube.</li>
	<li>Open the solenoid by turning off the switch on the solenoid control box and switch off the safety light (using the switch on the wall opposite the control panel).</li>
	<li>Transfer the cell sample to the sterile hood, remove the adhesive gas-permeable membranes, and fill the dish with 2 mL of fresh growth medium. The cells can be used immediately for assessment, as described in step 5, or returned to the incubator for longer-term studies.</li>
</ol>
5. Cell Viability
<ol>
	<li>Assess cell viability following shock wave exposure using the combination of a redox indicator assay and the fluorescent imaging of live and dead cells. 
	NOTE: For fluorescent imaging, cells must be seeded onto sterile glass coverslips during section 1: Cell culture and sample preparation. These can be placed within the 35-mm petri dishes.</li>
	<li>Transfer 200 &#181;L of the redox indictor reagent (see the Table of Materials) to each experimental dish directly after refilling them with 2 mL of medium post-shock wave exposure. Incubate at standard culture conditions for 4 h.</li>
	<li>For each dish, transfer (in a dark sterile hood) 2 x 100 &#181;L aliquots to either a black or clear 96-well plate, depending on whether fluorescence or absorbance will be used to assess viability.</li>
	<li>Transfer the 96-well plate to an appropriate plate reader fitted with the correct filters and read using excitation bands 530ex/590em for fluorescence or 570 nm combined with a 600-nm reference for absorbance. Export and save the data.</li>
	<li>Analyze the data to identify any difference between shock wave-exposed samples and non-exposed controls, as this can indicate a drop in cell viability. 
	NOTE: A negative control should also be included in the experimental design. Furthermore, the interpolation of a standard curve can be used to calculate cell numbers.</li>
	<li>Aspirate the medium containing the redox indicator reagent. Replace it with 2 mL of fresh medium and incubate the cells at standard culture conditions for 24 h.</li>
	<li>Repeat the above steps as necessary to obtain a second viability time point.</li>
	<li>For the fluorescent imaging of live and dead cells, aspirate the medium and wash the cells twice in 1 mL of PBS. Transfer 100 &#181;L of the complete reagent found in the imaging kit (see the Table of Materials) to each sample and incubate at room temperature protected from light for 15 min.</li>
	<li>Aspirate the reagent and wash once using 1 mL of PBS. Using fine point forceps, carefully remove the coverslip from the 35 mm dish and place it face-down onto a glass microscopy slide.</li>
	<li>Acquire images for each sample using a fluorescent microscope (10X objective lens, 0.50 numerical aperture) fitted with the correct excitation and emission filters (ex/em 488 nm/515 nm and 570 nm/602 nm). 
	NOTE: Live cells will emit intense, uniform, green fluorescence. Dead or dying cells with a compromised cellular membrane will uptake the dead kit component, resulting in the emission of red fluorescence, found predominantly in the nuclear region of the cell.</li>
	<li>Use image analysis software to either manually or automatically count the number of live and dead cells from each image.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Proud, W. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+physical+basis+of+explosion+and+blast+injury+processes%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+R+Army+Med+Corps%22%5BJournal%5D)">The physical basis of explosion and blast injury processes.</a> J R Army Med Corps. 159, Suppl 1 4-9 (2013).</li>
<li>Born, C. T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Blast+Trauma%3A+The+Fourth+Weapon+of+Mass+Destruction%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Scand+J+of+Surg%22%5BJournal%5D)">Blast Trauma: The Fourth Weapon of Mass Destruction.</a> Scand J of Surg. 94 (4), 279-285 (2005).</li>
<li>Kocsis, J. D., Tessler, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Pathology+of+blast-related+brain+injury%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Rehabil+Res+Dev%22%5BJournal%5D)">Pathology of blast-related brain injury.</a> J Rehabil Res Dev. 46 (6), 667-671 (2009).</li>
<li>Bass, C. R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22012085">Brain Injuries from Blast.</a> Ann Biomed Eng. 40 (1), 185-202 (2012).</li>
<li>Cernak, I. Brain Neurotrauma: Molecular, Neuropsychological, and Rehabilitation Aspects. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26269865">Frontiers in Neuroengineering</a>. Kobeissy, F. H. , (2015).</li>
<li>Alfieri, K. A., Forsberg, J. A., Potter, B. K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Blast+injuries+and+heterotopic+ossification%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Bone+Joint+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Blast injuries and heterotopic ossification.</a> Bone Joint Res. 1 (8), 174-179 (2012).</li>
<li>Potter, B. K., Burns, T. C., Lacap, A. P., Granville, R. R., Gajewski, D. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Heterotopic+Ossification+Following+Traumatic+and+Combat-Related+Amputations.+Prevalence%2C+Risk+Factors%2C+and+Preliminary+Results+of+Excision%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Bone+Joint+Surg+Am%22%5BJournal%5D)">Heterotopic Ossification Following Traumatic and Combat-Related Amputations. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Preliminary Results of Excision.</a> J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89 (3), 476-486 (2007).</li>
<li>Sasser, S. M., Sattin, R. W., Hunt, R. C., Krohmer, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Blast+Lung+Injury%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Prehosp+Emerg+Care%22%5BJournal%5D)">Blast Lung Injury.</a> Prehosp Emerg Care. 10 (2), 165-172 (2006).</li>
<li>Cho, S. -I., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mechanisms+of+Hearing+Loss+after+Blast+Injury+to+the+Ear%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PLoS+ONE%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mechanisms of Hearing Loss after Blast Injury to the Ear.</a> PLoS ONE. 8 (7), 67618(2013).</li>
<li>Bull, M. A., Clasper, J., Mahoney, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aBull%2C+MA+%22Blast+Injury+Science+and+Engineering%3A+A+Guide+for+Clinicians+and+Researchers%22">Blast Injury Science and Engineering: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers</a>. , Springer. (2016).</li>
<li>Arun, P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Studies+on+blast+traumatic+brain+injury+using+in-vitro+model+with+shock+tube%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuroreport%22%5BJournal%5D)">Studies on blast traumatic brain injury using in-vitro model with shock tube.</a> Neuroreport. 22 (8), 379-384 (2011).</li>
<li>Ahlers, S. T., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Assessment+of+the+effects+of+acute+and+repeated+exposure+to+blast+overpressure+in+rodents%3A+toward+a+greater+understanding+of+blast+and+the+potential+ramifications+for+injury+in+humans+exposed+to+blast%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Front+Neurol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Assessment of the effects of acute and repeated exposure to blast overpressure in rodents: toward a greater understanding of blast and the potential ramifications for injury in humans exposed to blast.</a> Front Neurol. 3, 32(2012).</li>
<li>Polfer, E. M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+development+of+a+rat+model+to+investigate+the+formation+of+blast-related+post-traumatic+heterotopic+ossification%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Bone+Joint+J%22%5BJournal%5D)">The development of a rat model to investigate the formation of blast-related post-traumatic heterotopic ossification.</a> Bone Joint J. 97 (4), 572-576 (2015).</li>
<li>Miller, A. P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effects+of+Blast+Overpressure+on+Neurons+and+Glial+Cells+in+Rat+Organotypic+Hippocampal+Slice+Cultures%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Front+Neurol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effects of Blast Overpressure on Neurons and Glial Cells in Rat Organotypic Hippocampal Slice Cultures.</a> Front Neurol. 6, 20(2015).</li>
<li>Chandra, N., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-012-0399-2">Evolution of blast wave profiles in simulated air blasts: experiment and computational modeling.</a> Shock Waves. 22 (5), 403-415 (2012).</li>
<li>Kuriakose, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Tailoring+the+Blast+Exposure+Conditions+in+the+Shock+Tube+for+Generating+Pure%2C+Primary+Shock+Waves%3A+The+End+Plate+Facilitates+Elimination+of+Secondary+Loading+of+the+Specimen%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PLoS+ONE%22%5BJournal%5D)">Tailoring the Blast Exposure Conditions in the Shock Tube for Generating Pure, Primary Shock Waves: The End Plate Facilitates Elimination of Secondary Loading of the Specimen.</a> PLoS ONE. 11 (9), 0161597(2016).</li>
<li>Reneer, D. V., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+Multi-Mode+Shock+Tube+for+Investigation+of+Blast-Induced+Traumatic+Brain+Injury%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Neurotrauma%22%5BJournal%5D)">A Multi-Mode Shock Tube for Investigation of Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury.</a> J Neurotrauma. 28 (1), 95-104 (2011).</li>
<li>VandeVord, P. J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Up-regulation+of+reactivity+and+survival+genes+in+astrocytes+after+exposure+to+short+duration+overpressure%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neurosci+Lett%22%5BJournal%5D)">Up-regulation of reactivity and survival genes in astrocytes after exposure to short duration overpressure.</a> Neurosci Lett. 434 (3), 247-252 (2008).</li>
<li>Kane, M. J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Altered+gene+expression+in+cultured+microglia+in+response+to+simulated+blast+overpressure%3A+Possible+role+of+pulse+duration%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neurosci+Lett%22%5BJournal%5D)">Altered gene expression in cultured microglia in response to simulated blast overpressure: Possible role of pulse duration.</a> Neurosci Lett. 522 (1), 47-51 (2012).</li>
<li>Nienaber, M., Lee, J. S., Feng, R., Lim, J. Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Impulsive+pressurization+of+neuronal+cells+for+traumatic+brain+injury+study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Vis+Exp%22%5BJournal%5D)">Impulsive pressurization of neuronal cells for traumatic brain injury study.</a> J Vis Exp. (56), (2011).</li>
<li>Zhang, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Transcriptional+Profiling+in+Rat+Hair+Follicles+following+Simulated+Blast+Insult%3A+A+New+Diagnostic+Tool+for+Traumatic+Brain+Injury%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PLoS+ONE%22%5BJournal%5D)">Transcriptional Profiling in Rat Hair Follicles following Simulated Blast Insult: A New Diagnostic Tool for Traumatic Brain Injury.</a> PLoS ONE. 9 (8), 104518(2014).</li>
<li>Bo, C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.3686243">Cellular characterization of compression-induceddamage in live biological samples.</a> AIP Conf Proc. 1426 (1), 153-156 (2012).</li>
<li>Tannous, O., Griffith, C., O'Toole, R. V., Pellegrini, V. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Heterotopic+ossification+after+extremity+blast+amputation+in+a+Sprague-Dawley+rat+animal+model%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Orthop+Trauma%22%5BJournal%5D)">Heterotopic ossification after extremity blast amputation in a Sprague-Dawley rat animal model.</a> J Orthop Trauma. 25 (8), 506-510 (2011).</li>
<li>Chen, Y. C., Smith, D. H., Meaney, D. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((In-Vitro+Approaches+for+Studying+Blast-Induced+Traumatic+Brain+Injury%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Neurotrauma%22%5BJournal%5D)">In-Vitro Approaches for Studying Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury.</a> J Neurotrauma. 26 (6), 861-876 (2009).</li>
<li>Nguyen, T. T. N., Wilgeroth, J. M., Proud, W. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/500/14/142025/meta">Controlling blast wave generation in a shock tube for biological applications.</a> JPCS. 500 (14), 142025(2014).</li>
</ol>

The authors have no competing financial interests.

Primary injuries obtained from exposure to blast events are not yet fully understood. Identifying and understanding the mechanisms that trigger blast-induced injuries, such as traumatic brain injury3,4 and heterotopic ossification6,7, are important first steps to developing effective methods of prophylaxis. To help achieve this goal, a number of experimental systems have been developed to replicate blast event exposure11,12,13,14,18,19. The technique described here uses shock tube equipment (Figure 2) capable of firing shock waves at a range of pressures at whole-body (i.e., rodent), tissue, or cell samples. The ability to load individual cell types rather than whole tissues gives the ability to parse out distinct cellular responses, as damage can occur concurrently via a range of mechanisms1,2. For example, to model traumatic brain injury, the assessment of individual cell types, such as neurons and astrocytes, can allow for the identification of cell-specific injury. Also, the whole-organ response can be assessed using brain tissue. Both the individual cell types and the tissue specimens have value and can give different information. It is also possible to alter the amount of air that is pressurized to generate the shock by selecting the double-breech or driver-tube inlet. This controls the duration of the shock wave. Another possibility is to change the diaphragm material and thickness to alter the peak pressure25.
Another factor to consider are interference end effects that can be present when the sample housing is located near the exit of the shock tube, such as that found on the EVOC rig described in the present system. Chandra et al. looked at blast wave profiles found on different locations on a compression-driven shock tube and found that the Friedlander waveform was best represented at a location deep within the shock tube15. Kuriakose et al. also studied secondary loading of the sample and found that the placement of an end plate at the end of the shock tube was able to eliminate unwanted reflected waves16. Considering the data found in these publications15,16, future modifications to improve the shock tube system described in this article could involve the placement of the EVOC rig at a deeper location within the driven tube or, alternatively, the inclusion of an end plate on the shock tube. Limitations of the described method could include the relatively low throughput of samples. A single user can operate the shock tube safely at an output of around 6-8 samples per hour. At present, the system is designed around the use of single 35-mm petri dishes. Therefore, larger experiments containing multiple groups and biological replicates can be difficult to achieve.
This methods article shows how the viability of adherent dermal papilla cells was affected by exposure to a single shock wave. A short-duration shock wave (&#60;10 ms) of &#8804;72 kPa did not affect viability when compared to the control (Figure 3 and Figure 4). In contrast, a shock wave at 127 kPa stimulated a significant drop in viability at 24 h post-blast, as shown by both a redox indicator assay (Figure 3) and fluorescent image analysis (Figure 4). Miller et al. reported a similar reduction in cell viability in rat organotypic hippocampal slice cultures when cells were exposed to a either a 147 kPa or 278 kPa shock wave using an open-ended, helium-driven shock tube14. In contrast, VandeVord et al. reported that there was no effect on viability in rat astrocytes exposed to a short-duration overpressure of &#62;200 kPa, although a barochamber was used rather than a shock tube18. It should be noted that the external pressure is reliant on the blast wave, although this creates complex stress waves within the body, therefore making the nature of the loading highly dependent upon the mechanical properties of the tissue or cell. Additional characterization studies of the cellular response to blast events is required. Furthermore, by assessing shock wave exposure at the cellular level, as shown in this technique, biological responses triggered from the injury, such as the perturbation of signaling pathways or epigenetic changes, can be identified and explored further.
In conclusion, this work describes the use of a stainless-steel shock tube and a modified EVOC rig to incorporate primary cell cultures. Shock waves at a range of pressures can be generated and propagated over live cells to replicate the effects that occur from exposure to a blast wave. This protocol demonstrates how to evaluate cell viability, but longer-term changes to individual cell types can also be studied. Going forward, we plan to assess the differential effects that complex shock waves can elicit in different cell types, with the aim of furthering our understanding of blast-induced primary injuries.

With the recent trend towards the use of improvised explosive devices in modern warfare and terrorist actions on civilians, understanding the effects of explosive events on the human body is of great importance. Injuries obtained through exposure to blast events can be deadly and lethal, with the physical processes of injury being divided into four categories. Primary injuries result from direct exposure to the blast wave, which interacts locally with the body in a compressive and subsequently expansive manner, causing the disruption of membranes and soft tissues1. Secondary injuries include blunt trauma or penetrative wounds caused by impact with low-mass objects propelled at high velocity by the blast wave. Tertiary injuries occur when the blast wave has sufficient energy to throw objects of high mass or individuals against objects. Lastly, quaternary blast injuries are defined by other miscellaneous injuries that do not fit the other categories, such as flash burns2. Following exposure to such blast events, primary injuries include traumatic brain injury3,4,5, heterotopic ossification6,7, blast lung injury8, loss of hearing9, and others10.
A commonly observed waveform from blast events is the Friedlander wave, representing a free-field, as opposed to an enclosed-space, explosion. The waveform consists of a blast front that can be defined as a sharp and rapid rise in positive pressure. This is immediately followed by a blast wind of air moving at high speed and a release wave that reduces the pressure to below atmospheric levels. A partial vacuum is left at the region of the initial explosion, which results in the slow backflow of air. The positive and negative phases of the wave (Figure 1A) result in the push-pull movement of the blast wave1. To help elucidate the mechanisms behind primary blast injuries, experimental models have been created to produce waveforms, such as the Friedlander wave, which cells and tissues will face when exposed to a genuine blast event. Current systems listed in the literature include shock tubes11,12,13,14,15,16,17, barochambers18,19, the Kolsky bar20, advanced blast simulators21, the Split Hopkinson pressure bar22, and the recreation of alternative blast events in a controlled environment using pentaerythritol tetranitrate23. Despite the wide range of models available, many variables influence the injury obtained from blast waves, including the pre-stress applied to, and the mechanical properties of, the individual cell types or tissues under evaluation24. While the study of tissue or organs can shed light on tissue deformation and gross morphological changes sustained as a result of blast events, analysis at the cellular level can uncover transcriptional and epigenetic changes influenced by the shock wave.
This methods article describes a technique to propagate shock waves at a range of pressures over live cells in a monolayer. This allows for the immediate characterization of cell viability, elucidating potential damage thresholds from shock waves. Furthermore, viable cells can be returned to standard culture conditions, and long-term biological effects from the blast event can be assessed. The protocol below describes two cell viability techniques that can be used on cells in culture.
<img alt="Figure 1" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/55618/55618fig1.jpg" /> 
Figure 1: Approximation of a Friedlander Wave. (A) An approximation of a Friedlander wave observed at sensor 3 on the shock tube. (B) Representative data showing the different pressure profiles observed at sensors 1, 2, and 3 on the shock tube. <a href="http://cloudflare.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/55618/55618fig1large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>

<table><tbody><tr><td>MEM &amp;alpha;, nucleosides</td><td>ThermoFisher</td><td>22571020</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fetal Bovine Serum, certified, US origin</td><td>ThermoFisher</td><td>16000044</td><td>Supplement to create complete growth media.</td></tr><tr><td>Dulbecco&amp;rsquo;s Phosphate Buffered Saline</td><td>Sigma Aldrich</td><td>D8537</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Penicillin-Streptomycin&amp;nbsp;</td><td>ThermoFisher</td><td>15070-063</td><td>Supplement to create complete growth media.</td></tr><tr><td>Trypsin-EDTA (0.5%), no phenol red</td><td>ThermoFisher</td><td>15400-054</td><td>Dilute 1 in 10 before use.</td></tr><tr><td>CytoOne T-75 Flask, TC-Treated, vented</td><td>Starlab</td><td>CC7682-4875</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>TC Dish (PS) 35 mm, 8.5 cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;</td><td>Triple Red</td><td>TCD010035</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Petri dish (PS) 90 x 14.2 mm no vent</td><td>VWR UK</td><td>391-0453&amp;nbsp;</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gas Permeable Adhesive Plate Seals</td><td>ThermoFisher</td><td>AB-0718</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>LIVE/DEAD Cell Imaging Kit (488/570)</td><td>ThermoFisher</td><td>R37601</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Alamarblue cell viability reagent</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>13494309</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Virkon tablets</td><td>VWR UK</td><td>115-0020</td><td>Use to create 2% solution as viability control reagent.</td></tr><tr><td>Dumont forceps</td><td>SurgicalTools</td><td>11295-10</td><td>Use to remove coverslips from petri dish.</td></tr><tr><td>Cover glass, square</td><td>VWR UK</td><td>631-0125</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Microscope slides</td><td>VWR UK</td><td>631-1553</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>96 Well plate, solid black</td><td>AppletonWoods</td><td>CC760</td><td>Plate to be used for fluorescence measurements.</td></tr><tr><td>96 Well plate, clear, (PS)</td><td>VWR UK</td><td>734-1799</td><td>Plate to be used for absorbance measurments.</td></tr><tr><td>Leica DMi1 Camera stand outfit</td><td>Leica Microsystems</td><td></td><td>Optical microscope used for cell culture.</td></tr><tr><td>Zeiss PALM MicroBeam Laser Capture Microdisseciton</td><td>Zeiss</td><td></td><td>Fluorescence microsope used for LIVE/DEAD imaging.</td></tr><tr><td>EnVision Multilabel Reader</td><td>PerkinElmer</td><td>2104-0010A</td><td>Plate reader to be used for fluorescence/absorbance readings.</td></tr><tr><td>Mylar Electrical &amp;amp; Chemical Insulating Film, 304 mm x 200 mm x 0.023 mm&amp;nbsp;</td><td>RS Components</td><td>785-0782</td><td>Use to create shock tube diaphragm.</td></tr><tr><td>Mylar Electrical &amp;amp; Chemical Insulating Film, 304 mm x 200 mm x 0.05 mm&amp;nbsp;</td><td>RS Components</td><td>785-0786</td><td>Use to creatw shock tube diaphragm.</td></tr><tr><td>Mylar Electrical &amp;amp; Chemical Insulating Film, 304 mm x 200 mm x 0.125 mm&amp;nbsp;</td><td>RS Components</td><td>785-0798</td><td>Use to create shock tube diaphragm.</td></tr><tr><td>Current source power unit</td><td>Dytran Intruments Inc.</td><td>4103C</td><td>Power source for 2300V1 sensor.</td></tr><tr><td>IEPE Pressure Sensor</td><td>Dytran Intruments Inc.</td><td>2300V1</td><td>Pressure sensor located on shock tube.</td></tr><tr><td>Digital Phosphor Oscilloscope</td><td>Tektronix</td><td>DPO 4104B</td><td>Use to gather and save sensor 2300V1 data.</td></tr></tbody></table>

evaluating primary blast effects in vitro

Exposure to blast events can cause severe trauma to vital organs such as the lungs, ears, and brain. Understanding the mechanisms behind such blast-induced injuries is of great importance considering the recent trend towards the use of explosives in modern warfare and terrorist-related incidents. To fully understand blast-induced injury, we must first be able to replicate such blast events in a controlled environment using a reproducible method. In this technique using shock tube equipment, shock waves at a range of pressures can be propagated over live cells grown in 2D, and markers of cell viability can be immediately analyzed using a redox indicator assay and the fluorescent imaging of live and dead cells. This method demonstrated that increasing the peak blast overpressure to 127 kPa can stimulate a significant drop in cell viability when compared to untreated controls. Test samples are not limited to adherent cells, but can include cell suspensions,&#160;whole-body and tissue samples, through minor modifications to the shock tube setup. Replicating the exact conditions that tissues and cells experience when exposed to a genuine blast event is difficult. Techniques such as the one presented in this article can help to define damage thresholds and identify the transcriptional and epigenetic changes within cells that arise from shock wave exposure.

Using the method described above, cells grown in a monolayer were exposed in triplicate to shock waves generated using a shock tube (Figure 2B). Markers of cell viability were assessed. Using a redox indicator assay, it was found that the application of a 127 kPa shock wave was able to significantly reduce the viability of dermal papilla cells compared to controls after 24 h in culture (Figure 3). The application of a shock wave &#8804;72 kPa did not reduce viability. To support these observations, a fluorescent image assay capable of fluorescently labelling live or dead cells with green or red fluorophores, respectively, was used. The quantification of live and dead cells from 13 fluorescent images per biological replicate demonstrated a reduction in cell viability in those exposed to the 127 kPa shock wave when compared to the control (Figure 4). Statistical analysis was carried out using a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey&#39;s multiple comparison test, with p &#60;0.05 deemed statistically significant. The sample size per group totaled 9 for the redox indicator assay and 39 for the quantitative fluorescence imaging analysis.
<img alt="Figure 3" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/55618/55618fig3.jpg" /> 
Figure 3: Redox Indicator Assay Data Showing Time Course of Cell Viability After Shock Wave Exposure. Significantly fewer cells were observed after 24 h in the 127-kPa shock wave-exposed group when compared to the untreated control. The negative control that consisted of a 30-s treatment with 2% disinfectant (see the Table of Materials) showed significantly fewer cells at both T0 and 24 h compared to all other groups. Each bar represents the mean &#177; 1 standard deviation (SD); biological replicates, N = 3; technical replicates, n = 3. **** = p &#60;0.0001. * = p &#60;0.05. <a href="http://cloudflare.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/55618/55618fig3large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 4" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/55618/55618fig4.jpg" /> 
Figure 4: Fluorescence Imaging. (A) Quantitative data gathered from fluorescent images of live and dead cells captured using a fluorescence microscope at 24 h post-shock wave exposure. Significantly fewer viable cells were observed in the 127 kPa (mean = 93.42) shock wave-exposed sample compared to the 47 kPa (mean = 98.18), 72 kPa (mean = 98.87), and control groups (mean = 99.10). No viable cells were observed on the negative control group after 24 h (mean = 0). (B) Representative fluorescence images. Green shows live cells, whilst red shows dead cells. Each box plot shows the upper and lower quartiles with Tukey whiskers; biological replicates, N = 3; technical replicates, n = 13. **** = p &#60;0.0001. Scale bar = 300 &#181;m. <a href="http://cloudflare.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/55618/55618fig4large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Evaluating Primary Blast Effects In Vitro at JoVE.com

Evaluating Primary Blast Effects In Vitro

Understanding how cells are modulated by exposure to shock waves can help identify the mechanisms behind injuries triggered from blast events. This protocol uses custom-built shock tube equipment to apply shock waves at a range of pressures to cell monolayers and to identify the subsequent effects on cell viability.

Evaluating Primary Blast Effects In Vitro

Exposure to blast events can cause severe trauma to vital organs such as the lungs, ears, and brain. Understanding the mechanisms behind such ...

evaluating-primary-blast-effects-in-vitro

Research

JoVE Journal

Bioengineering

8.0K Views.  Imperial College London. Understanding how cells are modulated by exposure to shock waves can help identify the mechanisms behind injuries triggered from blast events. This protocol uses custom-built shock tube equipment to apply shock waves at a range of pressures to cell monolayers and to identify the subsequent effects on cell viability.

Video: Evaluating Primary Blast Effects In Vitro

Blast Quantification Using Hopkinson Pressure Bars

Near-field blast load measurement presents an issue to many sensor types as they must endure very aggressive environments and be able to measure pressures up to many hundreds of megapascals. In this respect the simplicity of the Hopkinson pressure bar has a major advantage in that while the measurement end of the Hopkinson bar can endure and be exposed to harsh conditions, the strain gauge mounted to the bar can be affixed some distance away. This allows protective housings to be utilized which protect the strain gauge but do not interfere with the measurement acquisition. The use of an array of pressure bars allows the pressure-time histories at discrete known points to be measured. This article also describes the interpolation routine used to derive pressure-time histories at un-instrumented locations on the plane of interest. Currently the technique has been used to measure loading from high explosives in free air and buried shallowly in various soils.

This protocol details the use of Hopkinson pressure bars to measure reflected blast loading from near-field explosive events. It is capable of interpolating a pressure-time history at any point on a reflective boundary and as such can be used to fully characterize the spatial and temporal variations in loading produced.

Near-field blast load measurement presents an issue to many sensor types as they must endure very aggressive environments and be able to measure pressures ...

Engineering

A New Portable In Vitro Exposure Cassette for Aerosol Sampling

This protocol introduces a new in vitro exposure system, capable of being worn, including its characterization and performance. Air-liquid interface (ALI) in vitro exposure systems are often large and bulky, making transport to the field and operation at the source of emission or within the breathing zone difficult. Through miniaturization of these systems, the lab can be brought to the field, expediting processing time and providing a more appropriate exposure method that does not alter the aerosol prior to contacting the cells. The Portable In vitro Exposure Cassette (PIVEC) adapts a 37 mm filter cassette to allow for in vitro toxicity testing outside of a traditional laboratory setting. The PIVEC was characterized using three sizes of copper nanoparticles to determine deposition efficiency based on gravimetric and particle number concentration analysis. Initial cytotoxicity experiments were performed with exposed lung cells to determine the ability of the system to deposit particles while maintaining cell viability. The PIVEC provides a similar or increased deposition efficiency when comparing to available perpendicular flow in vitro exposure devices. Despite the lower sample throughput, the small size gives some advantages to the current in vitro ALI exposure systems. These include the ability to be worn for personal monitoring, mobility from the laboratory to the source of emission, and the option to set-up multiple systems for spatial resolution while maintaining a lower user cost. The PIVEC is a system capable of collecting aerosols in the field and within the breathing zone onto an air-interfaced, in vitro model.

A New Portable In Vitro Exposure Cassette for Aerosol Sampling

Here, we present a protocol to perform portable cellular aerosol exposures and measure cellular response. The method uses cells, grown at the air-liquid interface, mimicking in vivo physiology. Cellular response to copper nanoparticle aerosols was observed as oxidative stress through reactive oxygen species generation and cytotoxicity as lactate dehydrogenase release.

This protocol introduces a new in vitro exposure system, capable of being worn, including its characterization and performance. Air-liquid interface (ALI) ...

Environment

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Due to the high level of heterogeneity and mutations inherent in human cancers, single agent therapies, or combination regimens which target the same pathway, are likely to fail. Emphasis must be placed upon the inhibition of pathways that are responsible for intrinsic and/or adaptive resistance to therapy. An active field of investigation is the development and testing of DNA repair inhibitors that promote the action of, and prevent resistance to, commonly used chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We used a novel protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of BRCA2 inhibition as a means to sensitize tumor cells to the DNA damaging drug cisplatin. Tumor cell metabolism (acidification and respiration) was monitored in real-time for a period of 72 hr to delineate treatment effectiveness on a minute by minute basis. In combination, we performed an assessment of metastatic frequency using a chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model of extravasation and invasion. This protocol addresses some of the weaknesses of commonly used in vitro and in vivo methods to evaluate novel cancer therapy regimens. It can be used in addition to common methods such as cell proliferation assays, cell death assays, and in vivo murine xenograft studies, to more closely discriminate amongst candidate targets and agents, and select only the most promising candidates for further development.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Here, real-time monitoring of tumor cell metabolism, combined with an in vivo chicken embryo chorio-allantoic membrane (CAM) model of metastasis, are used to evaluate novel anti-cancer targets/agents for their ability to sensitize tumor cells to DNA damaging chemotherapeutics.

Due to the high level of heterogeneity and mutations inherent in human cancers, single agent therapies, or combination regimens which target the same ...

Medicine

Protocol for Human Blastoids Modeling Blastocyst Development and Implantation

A model of the human blastocyst formed from stem cells (blastoid) would support scientific and medical advances. However, its predictive power will depend on its ability to efficiently, timely, and faithfully recapitulate the sequences of blastocyst development (morphogenesis, specification, patterning), and to form cells reflecting the blastocyst stage. Here we show that na&#239;ve human pluripotent stem cells cultured in PXGL conditions and then triply inhibited for the Hippo, transforming growth factor- &#946;, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathways efficiently undergo morphogenesis to form blastoids (&gt;70%). Matching with developmental timing (~4 days), blastoids unroll the blastocyst sequence of specification by producing analogs of the trophoblast and epiblast, followed by the formation of analogs of the primitive endoderm and the polar trophoblasts. This results in the formation of cells transcriptionally similar to the blastocyst (&gt;96%) and a minority of post-implantation analogs. Blastoids efficiently pattern by forming the embryonic-abembryonic axis marked by the maturation of the polar region (NR2F2+), which acquires the specific potential to directionally attach to hormonally stimulated endometrial cells, as in utero. Such a human blastoid is a scalable, versatile, and ethical model to study human development and implantation in vitro.

A protocol outlining the formation of human blastoids that efficiently, timely, and sequentially generate blastocyst-like cells.

A model of the human blastocyst formed from stem cells (blastoid) would support scientific and medical advances. However, its predictive power will depend ...

Developmental Biology

Rapid Quantification of Mitogen-induced Blastogenesis in T Lymphocytes for Identifying Immunomodulatory Drugs

Lymphocyte proliferation in response to antigenic or mitogenic stimulation is a readily quantifiable phenomenon useful for testing immunomodulatory (i.e., immunosuppressive or immunostimulatory) chemical compounds and biologics. One of the earliest steps during mitogenesis is cell enlargement or blastogenic transformation, whereupon the cell volume increases before division. It is usually detectable in the first several hours of T-lymphocyte stimulation. Here, we describe a rapid method to quantify blastogenesis in T lymphocytes isolated from mouse spleens and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using an automated cell counter. Various commonly used proliferation assays for the most part are laborious and only reflect the overall population effect rather than individual cellular effects within a population. In contrast, the presented automated cell counter assay provides rapid, direct, and precise measurements of cell diameters that can be used for assessing the effectiveness of various mitogens and immunomodulatory drugs in vitro.

T-lymphocyte mitogenesis is accompanied by blastogenic transformation, whereupon the cell volume enlarges before cell division. Here, we describe a method to quantify blastogenesis in T lymphocytes using an automated cell counter with the capability of measuring cell diameters.

Lymphocyte proliferation in response to antigenic or mitogenic stimulation is a readily quantifiable phenomenon useful for testing immunomodulatory (i.e., ...

Immunology and Infection

A Novel In Vitro Model of Blast Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability in military and civilian populations. Blast traumatic brain injury results from the detonation of explosive devices, however, the mechanisms that underlie the brain damage resulting from blast overpressure exposure are not entirely understood and are believed to be unique to this type of brain injury. Preclinical models are crucial tools that contribute to better understand blast-induced brain injury. A novel in vitro blast TBI model was developed using an open-ended shock tube to simulate real-life open-field blast waves modelled by the Friedlander waveform. C57BL/6N mouse organotypic hippocampal slice cultures were exposed to single shock waves and the development of injury was characterized up to 72 h using propidium iodide, a well-established fluorescent marker of cell damage that only penetrates cells with compromised cellular membranes. Propidium iodide fluorescence was significantly higher in the slices exposed to a blast wave when compared with sham slices throughout the duration of the protocol. The brain tissue injury is very reproducible and proportional to the peak overpressure of the shock wave applied.

A Novel In Vitro Model of Blast Traumatic Brain Injury

This paper describes a novel model of primary blast traumatic brain injury. A compressed-air driven shock tube is used to expose in vitro mouse hippocampal slice cultures to a single shock wave. This is a simple and rapid protocol generating a reproducible brain tissue injury with a high throughput.

Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability in military and civilian populations. Blast traumatic brain injury results from the ...

Neuroscience

Effects of Blast-induced Neurotrauma on Pressurized Rodent Middle Cerebral Arteries

Though there have been studies on the histopathological and behavioral effects of blast exposure, fewer have been dedicated to blast&#39;s cerebral vascular effects. Impact (i.e., non-blast) traumatic brain injury (TBI) is known to decrease pressure autoregulation in the cerebral vasculature in both humans and experimental animals. The hypothesis that blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI), like impact TBI, results in impaired cerebral vascular reactivity was tested by measuring myogenic dilatory responses to reduced intravascular pressure in rodent middle cerebral arterial (MCA) segments from rats subjected to mild bTBI using an Advanced Blast Simulator (ABS) shock tube. Adult, male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized, intubated, ventilated and prepared for Sham bTBI (identical manipulation and anesthesia except for blast injury) or mild bTBI. Rats were randomly assigned to receive Sham bTBI or mild bTBI followed by sacrifice 30 or 60 min post-injury. Immediately after bTBI, righting reflex (RR) suppression times were assessed, euthanasia at the time points post-injury was completed, the brain was harvested and the individual MCA segments were collected, mounted and pressurized. As the intraluminal pressure perfused through the arterial segments was reduced in 20 mmHg increments from 100 to 20 mmHg, MCA diameters were measured and recorded. With decreasing intraluminal pressure, MCA diameters steadily increased significantly above baseline in the Sham bTBI groups while MCA dilator responses were significantly reduced (p &#60; 0.05) in both bTBI groups as evidenced by the impaired, smaller MCA diameters recorded for the bTBI groups. In addition, RR suppression in the bTBI groups was significantly (p &#60; 0.05) higher than in the Sham bTBI groups. MCA&#39;s collected from the Sham bTBI groups exhibited typical vasodilatory properties to decreases in intraluminal pressure while MCA&#39;s collected following bTBI exhibited significantly impaired myogenic vasodilatory responses to reduced pressure that persisted for at least 60 min after bTBI.

Here, we present a protocol to describe methods for ex vivo vascular reactivity determination following a primary blast traumatic brain injury (bTBI) using isolated, pressurized, rodent middle cerebral arterial (MCA) segments. bTBI induction is accomplished using a shock tube, also known as an Advanced Blast Simulator (ABS) device.

Though there have been studies on the histopathological and behavioral effects of blast exposure, fewer have been dedicated to blast&#39;s cerebral ...

Low-intensity Blast Wave Model for Preclinical Assessment of Closed-head Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Rodents

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a large-scale public health problem. Mild TBI is the most prevalent form of neurotrauma and accounts for a large number of medical visits in the United States. There are currently no FDA-approved treatments available for TBI. The increased incidence of military-related, blast-induced TBI further accentuates the urgent need for effective TBI treatments. Therefore, new preclinical TBI animal models that recapitulate aspects of human blast-related TBI will greatly advance the research efforts into the neurobiological and pathophysiological processes underlying mild to moderate TBI as well as the development of novel therapeutic strategies for TBI.
Here we present a reliable, reproducible model for the investigation of the molecular, cellular, and behavioral effects of mild to moderate blast-induced TBI. We describe a step-by-step protocol for closed-head, blast-induced mild TBI in rodents using a bench-top setup consisting of a gas-driven shock tube equipped with piezoelectric pressure sensors to ensure consistent test conditions. The benefits of the setup that we have established are its relative low-cost, ease of installation, ease of use and high-throughput capacity. Further advantages of this non-invasive TBI model include the scalability of the blast peak overpressure and the generation of controlled reproducible outcomes. The reproducibility and relevance of this TBI model has been evaluated in a number of downstream applications, including neurobiological, neuropathological, neurophysiological and behavioral analyses, supporting the use of this model for the characterization of processes underlying the etiology of mild to moderate TBI.

We present here a protocol of a blast wave model for rodents to investigate neurobiological and pathophysiological effects of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. We established a gas-driven, bench-top setup equipped with pressure sensors allowing for reliable and reproducible generation of blast-induced mild to moderate traumatic brain injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a large-scale public health problem. Mild TBI is the most prevalent form of neurotrauma and accounts for a large number of ...

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Here, we present a specially designed modular in vitro exposure system that enables the homogenous exposure of cultivated human lung cells at the ALI to gases, particles or complex atmospheres (e.g., cigarette smoke), thus providing realistic physiological exposure of the apical surface of the human alveolar region to air. In contrast to sequential exposure models with linear aerosol guidance, the modular design of the radial flow system meets all requirements for the continuous generation and transport of the test atmosphere to the cells, a homogenous distribution and deposition of the particles and the continuous removal of the atmosphere. This exposure method is primarily designed for the exposure of cells to airborne particles, but can be adapted to the exposure of liquid aerosols and highly toxic and aggressive gases depending on the aerosol generation method and the material of the exposure modules.
Within the framework of a recently completed validation study, this exposure system was proven as a transferable, reproducible and predictive screening method for the qualitative assessment of the acute pulmonary cytotoxicity of airborne particles, thereby potentially reducing or replacing animal experiments that would normally provide this toxicological assessment.

We present a robust, transferable and predictive in vitro exposure system for the screening and monitoring of airborne particles concerning their acute pulmonary cytotoxicity by exposing cultivated human lung cells at the air-liquid interface (ALI).

Here, we present a specially designed modular in vitro exposure system that enables the homogenous exposure of cultivated human lung cells at the ALI to ...

Shocktube Method to Model Highly Repetitive Low-Level Blast in Mice

Modeling Highly Repetitive Low-level Blast Exposure in Mice

Exposure to explosive blasts is a significant risk factor for brain trauma among exposed persons. Although the effects of large blasts on the brain are well understood, the effects of smaller blasts such as those that occur during military training are less understood. This small, low-level blast exposure also varies highly according to military occupation and training tempo, with some units experiencing few exposures over the course of several years whereas others experience hundreds within a few weeks. Animal models are an important tool in identifying both the injury mechanisms and long-term clinical health risks following low-level blast exposure. Models capable of recapitulating this wide range of exposures are necessary to inform acute and chronic injury outcomes across these disparate risk profiles.
Although outcomes following a few low-level blast exposures are easily modeled for mechanistic study, chronic exposures that occur over a career may be better modeled by blast injury paradigms with repeated exposures that occur frequently over weeks and months. Shown here are methods for modeling highly repetitive low-level blast exposure in mice. The procedures are based on established and widely used pneumatic shocktube models of open-field blast exposure that can be scaled to adjust the overpressure parameters and the number or interval of the exposures. These methods can then be used to either enable mechanistic investigations or recapitulate the routine blast exposures of clinical groups under study.

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Long-Term Effects of Low-Level Blast Exposures in Mice

Presented here are methods for producing repeated low-intensity blast exposures using mice.

Exposure to explosive blasts is a significant risk factor for brain trauma among exposed persons. Although the effects of large blasts on the brain are ...

Evaluating Primary Blast Effects In Vitro

Summary

Explore More Videos

Blast Quantification Using Hopkinson Pressure Bars

A New Portable In Vitro Exposure Cassette for Aerosol Sampling

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Protocol for Human Blastoids Modeling Blastocyst Development and Implantation

Rapid Quantification of Mitogen-induced Blastogenesis in T Lymphocytes for Identifying Immunomodulatory Drugs

A Novel In Vitro Model of Blast Traumatic Brain Injury

Effects of Blast-induced Neurotrauma on Pressurized Rodent Middle Cerebral Arteries

Low-intensity Blast Wave Model for Preclinical Assessment of Closed-head Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Rodents

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Modeling Highly Repetitive Low-level Blast Exposure in Mice