Name: megakaryocyte culture in 3d methylcellulose-based hydrogel to improve cell maturation and study the impact of stiffness and confinement
Uploaded: 2021-08-26T13:30:00.000+00:00
Duration: 7 min 53 s
Description: Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Megakaryocyte Culture in 3D Methylcellulose-Based Hydrogel to Improve Cell Maturation and Study the Impact of Stiffness and Confinement at JoVE.com

The authors would like to thank Fabien Pertuy and Alicia Aguilar who initially developed this technique in the lab, as well as Dominique Collin (Institut Charles Sadron - Strasbourg) who characterized the viscoelastic properties of the methylcellulose hydrogel. This work was supported by ARMESA (Association de Recherche et D&#233;veloppement en M&#233;decine et Sant&#233; Publique) and by an ARN grant (ANR-18-CE14-0037 PlatForMechanics). Julie Boscher is a recipient from the Fondation pour la Recherche M&#233;dicale (FRM grant number FDT202012010422).

All experiments should be performed in compliance with institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. All protocols displayed in the video were carried out in strict accordance with the European law and the recommendations of the Review Board of the Etablissement Fran&#231;ais du Sang (EFS). A first version of this protocol was originally published in 2018 in Methods in Molecular Biology 8.
NOTE: Figure 1 presents a schematic view of the whole process. This process includes 1) bone dissection, marrow retrieval, and mechanical isolation of marrow cells, 2) magnetic sorting of lineage negative (Lin-) cells, 3) seeding in liquid or methylcellulose hydrogel, and 4) resuspension of megakaryocytes grown in 3D gel for examination of proplatelet formation in liquid medium.
1. Bone collection from adult mice
NOTE: In this section, it is important to minimize microbial contamination.
<ol>
	<li>Prepare a 15 mL tube for bone collection with Dulbecco&#39;s Modified Eagle&#39;s Medium (DMEM) containing 1% of the total volume of penicillin-streptomycin-glutamin (PSG) antibiotic mix (penicillin 10000 U/mL, streptomycin 100000 &#181;g/mL and L-glutamin 29.2 mg/mL). 
	NOTE:&#160;If all the mice used have the same genotype, pool all bones in the same tube containing 1 mL of DMEM - PSG 1% per number of mice. Antibiotics are important to prevent possible bacteria proliferation during the time of bone sampling.</li>
	<li>Fill a 50 mL tube with ethanol 70% for bone disinfection and another one for rinsing instruments during the procedure. Use sterilized dissection instruments.</li>
	<li>Anesthetize the mice using isoflurane inhalation (4%) and rapidly proceed to cervical dislocation to euthanize the mice. Rapidly immerse the body in 70% ethanol to disinfect and avoid microbial contamination.</li>
	<li>Rapidly dissect out the tibias and femurs.</li>
	<li>Using a scalpel, cut away the epiphyses of the ankle side end for the tibia and of the hip side end for the femur.</li>
	<li>Immerse the bones for one second in 70% ethanol before immersing them in DMEM medium containing 1% PSG.</li>
</ol>
2. Marrow dissociation and Lin- cells isolation
NOTE: This part of the protocol is performed under a laminar flow hood. For one culture, all the wells are part of the same experiment and cannot be considered as independent biological replicates. The cells from all mice are pooled together to ensure the homogeneity of all the wells and to be able to compare them to each other while eliminating possible inter-individual variability. For independent biological replicates, the culture must be repeated.
<ol>
	<li>Place the bones in a Petri dish and rise them twice in sterile Dulbecco&#39;s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) to remove potential contaminants.</li>
	<li>Prepare DMEM - 1% PSG in a 50 mL tube. 
	NOTE: Provide 2 mL of DMEM - 1% PSG per mice used for the experiment.</li>
	<li>Fill a 5 mL syringe equipped with a 21-gauge needle with DMEM - 1% PSG.</li>
	<li>Holding the bone with forceps, introduce only the bevel of the needle at the knee side end. 
	NOTE: The knee side epiphysis should remain intact from the dissection, leaving a small cavity in its center through which to insert the needle. The remaining epiphysis will maintain the bone attached to the needle during flushing. Be careful not to introduce more than the bevel in the bone as it might squash and damage the marrow.</li>
	<li>Quickly press the syringe plunger to flush the marrow out into a 50 mL tube. 
	NOTE:&#160;To avoid splashes and facilitate&#160;the marrow flush and liberation place the free end of the bone on the tube wall, immersed in DMEM - 1% PSG. In practice, a volume between 500 &#181;L and 1 mL is generally sufficient to expel the marrow from the bone. When the marrow has been totally expelled, the bone has become white. In case the marrow has not been totally expelled from the diaphysis as judged by some remaining red color, it is possible to repeat the flush with fresh medium.</li>
	<li>Repeat steps 2.4. and 2.5. for all bones, refilling the 5 mL syringe with DMEM - 1% PSG if necessary.</li>
	<li>Use the same 5 mL syringe with the 21-gauge needle to transfer the total volume of medium containing flushed marrow into round bottomed 10 mL tubes. 
	NOTE: It is not absolutely necessary to switch to a round bottomed 10 mL tube but it makes it easier to proceed to the following dissociation steps. Do not hesitate to change syringe and/or needle if risk of contamination is suspected.</li>
	<li>Proceed to cell dissociation by aspirating and expelling the medium and marrow cells successively two times through a 21-gauge needle, three times through a 23-gauge and once through a 25-gauge needle. 
	NOTE: Avoid air bubbles as it may be detrimental for the cells.</li>
	<li>Transfer the suspension into 15 mL tubes.</li>
	<li>Measure cell number and check the viability using an automated cell counter or a cell chamber for manual counting in the presence of trypan blue to exclude dead cells.</li>
	<li>Centrifuge the 15 mL tubes for 7 min at 300 x g. Using a 1 mL transfer pipette, carefully pipette out and discard the supernatant.</li>
	<li>Isolate stem and progenitor cells by negative immunomagnetic sorting using a mouse hematopoietic cell isolation kit. 
	NOTE: The aim of this cell sorting is to retrieve the cells that are negative for all the selection antibodies (CD5, CD11b, CD19, CD45R/B220, Ly6G/C(Gr-1), TER119, 7-4) and therefore to eliminate the cells that are already engaged in a differentiation lineage other than the megakaryocytic one.</li>
	<li>Following the kit instructions, resuspend the cellular pellet in freshly prepared M medium (PBS with 2% of the final volume of fetal bovine serum (FBS), EDTA 1 mM) to a concentration of 1 &#215; 108 cells/mL and distribute the suspension in round bottomed 5 mL polystyrene tubes to a maximum volume of 2 mL.</li>
	<li>Add to the polystyrene tubes: normal rat serum at a concentration of 50 &#181;L/mL as well as the biotinylated antibody mix (CD5, CD11b, CD19, CD45R/B220, Ly6G/C(Gr-1), TER119, 7-4) at a concentration of 50 &#181;L of mix per mL and homogenize by gently flicking the tubes. 
	NOTE: These antibodies will bind to cells already engaged into a differentiation pathway except the megakaryocytic pathway.</li>
	<li>Incubate the tubes on ice for 15 min.</li>
	<li>Add streptavidin-coated magnetic beads at a concentration of 75 &#181;L/mL and homogenize by gently flicking the tubes.</li>
	<li>Incubate again on ice for 10 min.</li>
	<li>If necessary, adjust to a final volume of 2.5 mL per tube with M medium.</li>
	<li>Homogenize the suspension by gently flicking the tube just before placing them, without their caps, inside a magnet and wait for three minutes. 
	NOTE: The cells already engaged into a differentiation pathway and coated with magnetic beads will be retained on the wall of the tube inside the magnet.</li>
	<li>Invert magnet and tube to transfer the tube content into a new round-bottomed 5 mL polystyrene tube. 
	NOTE:&#160;Do not take the tube out of the magnet for the transfer; it is done by inverting the magnet with the tube still in. Use a steady movement and do not shake the tube.</li>
	<li>Discard the initial tube containing undesired magnetic-labeled cells and place the new one, without its cap, in the magnet for three more minutes.</li>
	<li>Proceeding as in step 2.20, transfer the isolated Lin&#8722; cells into a new 15 mL tube. 
	NOTE:&#160;If several 5 mL polystyrene tubes have been used for the previous steps, pool all the cells in the same 15 mL tube.&#160;The cells recovered after the cell sorting are hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors. The presence of thrombopoietin (TPO), the major physiological regulator of megakaryopoiesis 10, will direct the cell differentiation toward the megakaryocytic cell line.</li>
	<li>Measure the Lin&#8722; cell number and viability as in step 2.10.</li>
	<li>Calculate the required volume of cell suspension to centrifuge in order to have 1 x 106 viable cells x Well Number, Well Number being the number of wells to seed per condition.</li>
	<li>Prepare one tube per condition with the appropriate volume of cell suspension and centrifuge at 300 x g for 7 min.</li>
	<li>For liquid cultures, discard the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in complete culture medium (DMEM, PSG 1% of the final volume, FBS 10% of the final volume, hirudin 100 U/mL, TPO 50 ng/mL) to achieve the final concentration of 2 &#215; 106 viable cells/mL (equal to 1 &#215; 106 cells per 500 &#181;L well). Incubate the cells at 37 &#176;C under 5% CO2. (= day 0 of culture) 
	&#8203;NOTE: See the next paragraph for methylcellulose cultures As an example, to prepare complete culture medium for one well, use 435 &#181;L of DMEM, 50 &#181;L of 100% FBS for 10% final, 5 &#181;L of 100% PSG for 1% final, 5 &#181;L of 10 000 U/mL for 100 U/mL final and 5 &#181;L of 5 &#181;g/mL TPO for 50 ng/mL final. 4-well or 24-well culture plates are typically used as their well diameter is a good fit for the 500 &#181;L needed per well.</li>
</ol>
3. Cell embedding in methylcellulose hydrogel
NOTE: Please note that the following protocol describes the method to obtain a single well of hydrogel cell culture, adapt to the number of wells needed.
<ol>
	<li>Thaw 1 mL aliquots of 3% methylcellulose stock solution at room temperature.&#160;Prepare one separate extra aliquot of methylcellulose for syringe coating. 
	NOTE: At a concentration of 3%, methylcellulose remains liquid at room temperature (20-25 &#176;C).</li>
	<li>Coat a 1 mL Luer lock syringe equipped with an 18-gauge needle with methylcellulose by drawing 1 mL of methylcellulose from the extra aliquot. Totally expel the methylcellulose. 
	NOTE: This coating step ensures that the volume of methylcellulose collected in step 3.3 is exact.</li>
	<li>With the same syringe and needle but using a new methylcellulose aliquot, draw the appropriate volume of methylcellulose (Figure 2A). 
	NOTE: To achieve a final concentration of 2% methylcellulose in a final volume of 500 &#181;L per well, 333 &#181;L of 3% methylcellulose is required.</li>
	<li>Cautiously remove the needle. Using sterilized forceps, screw a Luer lock connector onto the end of the syringe (Figure 2B-C).</li>
	<li>Attach a second, non-coated, 1 mL Luer lock syringe to the Luer lock connector in order to connect the two syringes together (Figure 2D). 
	NOTE: There is no need to coat this second syringe.</li>
	<li>Equally distribute the methylcellulose volume between the two syringes (Figure 2E) and put them aside until step 3.11.</li>
	<li>Prepare the concentrated DMEM culture medium so as to obtain in the final methylcellulose volume (step 3.11) a concentration identical to the one of the liquid culture medium for each compound (PSG 1% of the final volume, FBS 10% of the final volume, hirudin 100 U/mL, TPO 50 ng/mL).
	<ol>
		<li>Prepare 167 &#181;L of concentrated culture medium per final well of 1 &#215; 106 cells. This volume of medium is calculated so as to obtain a final methylcellulose concentration of 2%. The total volume in the well will be 500 &#181;L (167 &#181;L of cell suspension in concentrated culture medium + 333 &#181;L of methylcellulose) and all the components will have a concentration identical to that in liquid wells.</li>
		<li>As an example, to prepare complete culture medium for one well, use 102 &#181;L of DMEM, 50 &#181;L of 100% FBS for 10% final, 5 &#181;L of 100% PSG for 1% final, 5 &#181;L of 10 000 U/mL for 100 U/mL final and 5 &#181;L of 5 &#181;g/mL TPO for 50 ng/mL final. It gives a volume of 167 &#181;L used to resuspend the cells and with the addition of 333 &#181;L of methylcellulose the final volume will be 500 &#181;L.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>After completing the centrifugation step 2.26, discard the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in the concentrated culture medium at a ratio of 1 &#215; 106 cells per 167 &#181;L.</li>
	<li>Take back the syringes and disconnect one of them from the connector.</li>
	<li>Pipette 167 &#181;L of the cell suspension.</li>
	<li>Add the cell suspension directly into the syringe connector (Figure 2F), making sure not to introduce air bubbles. 
	NOTE:&#160;While adding the cell suspension, slowly draw the syringe plunger simultaneously to free some space for the cell suspension.</li>
	<li>Carefully reconnect the two syringes (Figure 2G) without losing any suspension in the screw thread. 
	NOTE: Prior to the reconnection, draw the plunger in order to leave the connector half empty and let enough space for the second syringe to connect without the suspension overflowing.</li>
	<li>Slowly homogenize the methylcellulose medium with the cell suspension with ten back-and-forth plunger movements between the two syringes (Figure 2H).</li>
	<li>Draw the total volume into one syringe and disconnect the two syringes, leaving the connector on the empty one.</li>
	<li>Empty the content of the syringe into a well of a 4-well plate (Figure 2I).</li>
	<li>Incubate the cells at 37 &#176;C under 5% CO2 (= day 0 of culture). 
	NOTE:&#160;It is possible to prepare two methylcellulose wells with one pair of syringes. Increase by two the volume of methylcellulose and the volume of cell suspension to have 2 x106 cells. After completing step 3.13. distribute the volume equally between the two syringes to have 500 &#181;L in each of them. Disconnect them and empty the one without the connector in a culture well. Reconnect the syringes to transfer the volume from the one that kept the connector to the other. Disconnect the syringes, the one with the 500 &#181;L should not have the connector attached, and seed the cells in a second culture well.&#160;The 3% methylcellulose is purchased as a stock solution in Iscove&#39;s Modified Dulbecco&#39;s Medium (IMDM) while concentrated cells are suspended in DMEM. Comparative tests have been initially done to make sure that this mixed medium had no impact on the outcome of the experiment, especially compared to the liquid culture in 100% DMEM.</li>
</ol>
4. Cell Resuspension for Proplatelet Analysis
NOTE: Analysis of the capacity to form proplatelets has to be performed under comparable conditions between liquid and methylcellulose grown megakaryocytes. The physical constraints exerted by the methylcellulose hydrogel inhibit proplatelet extension. Therefore, methylcellulose-grown cells are resuspended in fresh liquid medium on day 3 of culture to allow them to extend proplatelets. Methylcellulose hydrogel is a physical hydrogel that is easily diluted upon liquid medium addition. Importantly, to avoid artifacts from resuspension and centrifugation, cells in the control liquid medium condition have to be treated simultaneously in the same way as methylcellulose-grown cells. Refer to the schematic representation of the experiment (Figure 1).
<ol>
	<li>Prepare 10 mL of DMEM - 1% PSG preheated at 37 &#176;C in a 15 mL tube for each well to resuspend.</li>
	<li>Cautiously resuspend the cells from each well in the 10 mL of DMEM - 1% PSG. 
	NOTE: Gently do several up-and-down movements to dilute the methylcellulose completely. For the liquid wells make sure to collect all the cells deposited at the bottom of the well.</li>
	<li>Centrifuge the tubes 5 min at 300 &#215; g.</li>
	<li>Meanwhile prepare complete culture medium (DMEM, PSG 1% of the final volume, FBS 10% of the final volume, hirudin 100 U/mL, TPO 50 ng/mL). 
	NOTE: At this step each well is retrieved to be diluted by half, therefore prepare 1 mL of complete culture medium per well.</li>
	<li>Discard the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in 1 mL of culture medium for each tube.</li>
	<li>Reseed 500 &#181;L of cell suspension per well in a 4 or 24-well plate and incubate at 37 &#176;C under 5% CO2. 
	NOTE: From one initial well, obtain 2 wells for proplatelet visualization in duplicate. Please note that as these duplicates originate from the same sample they cannot be considered as independent replicates.</li>
	<li>24 hours after reseeding, on day 4 of culture, randomly acquire 10 images per well using bright field microscopy and the 20&#215; objective. 
	NOTE: The cells tend to group at the center of the well, make sure not to have too many cells on the field as it may render proplatelet visualization and quantification difficult. Make sure to capture at least 5 megakaryocytes per field.</li>
	<li>Count the total number of megakaryocytes and of megakaryocytes extending proplatelets in each image and calculate the proportion of megakaryocytes extending proplatelets. 
	NOTE:&#160;The quantification is not automated; perform cell counting manually. Counting can be facilitated by the use of the cell counter plugin of ImageJ to click on the cells in order to mark them as they are counted. 10 fields acquired per well and wells in duplicate represent approximately 150-300 megakaryocytes per condition.</li>
</ol>
5. Cell fixation and retrieval for future analyses
CAUTION: This protocol uses fixatives which must be handled under a fume hood, wearing protective equipment.
NOTE: The aim is to maintain intact the gel constraints applied on the cells until they are fully fixed. Therefore, and regardless of the fixative used, it must be added in the well on top of the methylcellulose, without disturbing the gel. The same protocol is applied to liquid cultures.
<ol>
	<li>Add a volume of fixative solution equal to the seeded volume (500 &#181;L in this protocol), on top of the methylcellulose without disrupting the gel. Wait for the appropriate time according to the fixative used (at least 10 min). 
	NOTE: The fixative diffusion throughout the gel should be very rapid as revealed by a rapid change in the gel color (from pink to a yellow-orange shade). Paraformaldehyde (8% in DPBS, 500 &#181;L per well) is usually used for immunolabeling, while glutaraldhehyde (5% in cacodylate buffer, 500 &#181;L per well) is used for electron microscopy analysis.</li>
	<li>Using a P1000 pipette gently do several up-and-down pipettings with the fixative and the gel so as to homogeneously dilute the methylcellulose.</li>
	<li>Using the same pipette and tip, transfer all the volume from the well into a 15 mL tube containing 10 mL of DPBS and homogenize.</li>
	<li>Centrifuge the mixture at 300 &#215; g for 7 min. 
	NOTE: A second wash step might be needed to eliminate all the methylcellulose</li>
	<li>Discard the supernatant and resuspend the megakaryocyte pellet in the appropriate medium according to the desired analysis (immunolabeling, flow cytometry9, electron microscopy &#8230;) (for electron microscopy see also the paper method &#34;In situ exploration of the major steps of megakaryopoiesis using transmission electron microscopy&#34; in this JoVE issue).</li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Doolin, M. T., Moriarty, R. A., Stroka, K. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Mechanosensing+of+Mechanical+Confinement+by+Mesenchymal-Like+Cells.">Mechanosensing of Mechanical Confinement by Mesenchymal-Like Cells.</a> Frontiers in Physiology. 11, (2020).</li><li>Wang, C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Matrix+Stiffness+Modulates+Patient-Derived+Glioblastoma+Cell+Fates+in+Three-Dimensional+Hydrogels.">Matrix Stiffness Modulates Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Cell Fates in Three-Dimensional Hydrogels.</a> Tissue Engineering Part A. , (2020).</li><li>Doyle, A. D., Yamada, K. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Mechanosensing+via+cell-matrix+adhesions+in+3D+microenvironments.">Mechanosensing via cell-matrix adhesions in 3D microenvironments.</a> Experimental Cell Research. 343 (1), 60-66 (2016).</li><li>Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., Discher, D. E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Matrix+Elasticity+Directs+Stem+Cell+Lineage+Specification.">Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification.</a> Cell. 126 (4), 677-689 (2006).</li><li>Choi, J. S., Harley, B. A. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+combined+influence+of+substrate+elasticity+and+ligand+density+on+the+viability+and+biophysical+properties+of+hematopoietic+stem+and+progenitor+cells.">The combined influence of substrate elasticity and ligand density on the viability and biophysical properties of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.</a> Biomaterials. 33 (18), 4460-4468 (2012).</li><li>Shin, J. -. W., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Contractile+forces+sustain+and+polarize+hematopoiesis+from+stem+and+progenitor+cells.">Contractile forces sustain and polarize hematopoiesis from stem and progenitor cells.</a> Cell stem cell. 14 (1), 81-93 (2014).</li><li>Boscher, J., Guinard, I., Eckly, A., Lanza, F., L&#233;on, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Blood+platelet+formation+at+a+glance.">Blood platelet formation at a glance.</a> Journal of cell science. 133 (20), (2020).</li><li>Aguilar, A., Boscher, J., Pertuy, F., Gachet, C., L&#233;on, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Three-dimensional+culture+in+a+methylcellulose-based+hydrogel+to+study+the+impact+of+stiffness+on+megakaryocyte+differentiation.">Three-dimensional culture in a methylcellulose-based hydrogel to study the impact of stiffness on megakaryocyte differentiation.</a> Methods in Molecular Biology. 1812, 139-153 (2018).</li><li>Aguilar, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Importance+of+environmental+stiffness+for+megakaryocyte+differentiation+and+proplatelet+formation.">Importance of environmental stiffness for megakaryocyte differentiation and proplatelet formation.</a> Blood. 128, 2022-2032 (2016).</li><li>Hitchcock, I. S., Kaushansky, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Thrombopoietin+from+beginning+to+end.">Thrombopoietin from beginning to end.</a> British Journal of Haematology. 165 (2), 259-268 (2014).</li><li>Leiva, O., Leon, C., Kah Ng, S., Mangin, P., Gachet, C., Ravid, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+role+of+extracellular+matrix+stiffness+in+megakaryocyte+and+platelet+development+and+function.">The role of extracellular matrix stiffness in megakaryocyte and platelet development and function.</a> American Journal of Hematology. 93 (3), 430-441 (2018).</li><li>Jansen, L. E., Birch, N. P., Schiffman, J. D., Crosby, A. J., Peyton, S. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Mechanics+of+intact+bone+marrow.">Mechanics of intact bone marrow.</a> Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 50, 299-307 (2015).</li><li>Eckly, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Abnormal+megakaryocyte+morphology+and+proplatelet+formation+in+mice+with+megakaryocyte-restricted+MYH9+inactivation.">Abnormal megakaryocyte morphology and proplatelet formation in mice with megakaryocyte-restricted MYH9 inactivation.</a> Blood. 113 (14), 3182-3189 (2009).</li><li>Eckly, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Proplatelet+formation+deficit+and+megakaryocyte+death+contribute+to+thrombocytopenia+in+Myh9+knockout+mice.">Proplatelet formation deficit and megakaryocyte death contribute to thrombocytopenia in Myh9 knockout mice.</a> Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 8 (10), 2243-2251 (2010).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

In the previous decade, mechanobiology has raised more and more interest in many areas of biology. It is now commonly acknowledged that the mechanical environment surrounding the cells does play a role in their behavior, emphasizing the importance to study how megakaryocytes sense and respond to extracellular mechanical cues. It is challenging to accurately measure the stiffness of the bone marrow tissue in situ11, especially if we consider the hematopoietic red marrow as it is located in...

Cells in the body experience a complex 3D microenvironment and are subjected to the interplay between chemical and mechanophysical cues including stiffness from the tissue and confinement due to neighboring cells and surrounding matrix 1,2,3. The importance of stiffness and confinement for cell behavior has only been recognized in the last decades. In 2006, the seminal work from Engler et al. 4 highlighted the importance of the mechanical environment for cell differentiation. The authors demonstrated that variation in cell substrate stiffness resulted in the orientation of stem cells towards various differentiation lineages. Since then, the impact of mechanical cues on cell fate and behavior has become increasingly recognized and studied. Despite it being one of the softest tissues of the organism, the bone marrow has a 3D structural organization that is confined inside the bone. Marrow stiffness, although technically difficult to measure precisely, is estimated to lie between 15 and 300 Pa 5, 6. Within the stroma, cells are tightly confined to one another. In addition, most of them are migrating toward the sinusoid vessels to enter the blood circulation. These conditions create additional mechanical constraints on adjacent cells, which have to adapt to these forces. Mechanical cues represent an important parameter whose consequences on megakaryocyte differentiation and proplatelet formation have just recently been explored. Although megakaryocytes can differentiate in vitro in traditional liquid culture, they do not reach the degree of maturation observed in vivo, in part due to the absence of the mechanical cues from the 3D environment 7. Growing progenitors embedded in hydrogel brings 3D mechanical cues that are lacking in liquid milieu.
Hydrogels have been widely used for several decades in the hematological field, notably to grow cells in colony forming assays to quantify hematopoietic progenitors. However, such hydrogels have seldom been used to explore the biological impact of the 3D mechanical environment on maturation and differentiation of hematopoietic cells. Over the past few years our laboratory has developed a 3D culture model using a methylcellulose-based hydrogel 8. This nonreactive physical gel is a useful tool to mimic the physical constraints of the native megakaryocyte environment. It is derived from cellulose by replacement of hydroxyl residues (-OH) by methoxide groups (-OCH3). Both the degree of methyl substitution and the methylcellulose concentration determine the hydrogel stiffness once it has jellified. During the development stage of this technique, it was demonstrated that a Young&#39;s modulus in the range of 30 to 60 Pa is the optimal gel stiffness for megakaryocyte growth 9.
The following protocol describes a method to grow mouse megakaryocytic progenitors in a 3D methylcellulose hydrogel. It has been previously shown that compared with standard liquid culture, this hydrogel culture increases the degree of megakaryocyte polyploidization, improves the maturation and intracellular organization, and increases the capacity of megakaryocytes to extend proplatelets once resuspended in a liquid medium 9. This manuscript describes in detail the protocol for the isolation of mouse bone marrow Lin&#8722; cells and their embedding in a methylcellulose hydrogel for 3D culture as well as the quantification of their capacity to produce proplatelets and the recovery of the cells for further analyses.

<table><tbody><tr><td>18-gauge needles</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>1001735825</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>21-gauge needles</td><td>BD Microlance</td><td>301155</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>23-gauge needles</td><td>Terumo</td><td>AN*2332R1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>25-gauge neeldes</td><td>BD Microlance</td><td>300400</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4-well culture dishes</td><td>Thermo Scientific</td><td>144444</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>5 mL syringes</td><td>Terumo</td><td>SS+05S1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cytoclips</td><td>Microm Microtech</td><td>F/CLIPSH</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cytofunnels equiped with filter cards</td><td>Microm Microtech</td><td>F/JC304</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cytospin centrifuge</td><td>Thermo Scientific</td><td></td><td>Cytospin 4</td></tr><tr><td>Dakopen</td><td>Dako</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>DMEM 1x</td><td>Gibco, Life Technologies</td><td>41 966-029</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>DPBS</td><td>Life Technologies</td><td>14190-094</td><td>Sterile Dulbecco&amp;rsquo;s phosphate-buffered saline</td></tr><tr><td>EasySep magnets</td><td>Stem Cell Technologies</td><td>18000</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>EasySep Mouse Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell isolation Kit</td><td>Stem Cell Technologies</td><td>19856A</td><td>biotinylated antibodies (CD5,CD11b, CD19, CD45R/B220, Ly6G/C(Gr-1), TER119,7&amp;ndash;4) and streptavidin-coated magnetic beads</td></tr><tr><td>EDTA</td><td>Invitrogen</td><td>15575-020</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fetal Bovine Serum</td><td>Healthcare Life Science</td><td>SH30071.01</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Luer lock 1 mL syringes</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>Z551546-100EA</td><td>or 309628 syringes from BD MEDICAL</td></tr><tr><td>Luer lock syringes connectors</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>11891120</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>MC 3%</td><td>R&amp;amp;D systems</td><td>HSC001</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Polylysin coated slides</td><td>Thermo Scientific</td><td>J2800AMNZ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PSG 100x</td><td>Gibco, Life Technologies</td><td>1037-016</td><td>10,000 units/mL penicillin, 10,000 &amp;mu;g/mL streptomycin and 29.2 mg/mL glutamine</td></tr><tr><td>Rat serum</td><td>Stem Cell Technologies</td><td>13551</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Recombinant hirudin</td><td>Transg&amp;egrave;ne</td><td>rHV2-Lys47</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Recombinant human trombopoietin (rhTPO)</td><td>Stem Cell Technologies</td><td>2822</td><td>10,000 units/mL</td></tr><tr><td>Round bottomed 10 mL plastique tubes</td><td>Falcon</td><td>352054</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Round bottomed 5 mL polystyrene tubes</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

megakaryocyte culture in 3d methylcellulose-based hydrogel to improve cell maturation and study the impact of stiffness and confinement

The 3D environment leading to both confinement and mechanical constraints is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of cell behavior. 3D culture has thus been developed to better approach the in vivo situation. Megakaryocytes differentiate from hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in the bone marrow (BM). The BM is one of the softest tissues of the body, confined inside the bone. The bone being poorly extensible at the cell scale, megakaryocytes are concomitantly subjected to a weak stiffness and high confinement. This protocol presents a method for the recovery of mouse lineage negative (Lin-) HSPCs by immuno-magnetic sorting and their differentiation into mature megakaryocytes in a 3D medium composed of methylcellulose. Methylcellulose is non-reactive towards megakaryocytes and its stiffness may be adjusted to that of normal bone marrow or increased to mimic a pathological fibrotic marrow. The process to recover the megakaryocytes for further cell analyses is also detailed in the protocol. Although proplatelet extension is prevented within the 3D milieu, it is described below how to resuspend the megakaryocytes in liquid medium and to quantify their capacity to extend proplatelets. Megakaryocytes grown in 3D hydrogel have a higher capacity to form proplatelets compared to those grown in a liquid milieu. This 3D culture allows i) to differentiate progenitors towards megakaryocytes reaching a higher maturation state, ii) to recapitulate phenotypes that may be observed in vivo but go unnoticed in classical liquid cultures, and iii) to study transduction pathways induced by the mechanical cues provided by a 3D environment.

Data obtained using this protocol were originally published in Blood in 20169.
According to the protocol, the cells were seeded in either liquid or methylcellulose hydrogel medium. Cells in liquid medium have all sedimented at the bottom of the well, in contact with the stiff plastic surface and sometime with other cells. In contrast, cells embedded in methylcellulose hydrogel are distributed homogeneously in the gel and are isolated from neighboring cells (<strong clas...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Megakaryocyte Culture in 3D Methylcellulose-Based Hydrogel to Improve Cell Maturation and Study the Impact of Stiffness and Confinement at JoVE.com

Megakaryocyte Culture in 3D Methylcellulose-Based Hydrogel to Improve Cell Maturation and Study the Impact of Stiffness and Confinement

It is now acknowledged that the three-dimensional environment of cells can play an important role in their behavior, maturation and/or differentiation. This protocol describes a three-dimensional cell culture model designed to study the impact of physical containment and mechanical constraints on megakaryocytes.

The 3D environment leading to both confinement and mechanical constraints is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of cell behavior. 3D ...

megakaryocyte-culture-3d-methylcellulose-based-hydrogel-to-improve

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

3.0K Views.  Université de Strasbourg, INSERM, EFS Grand Est, BPPS UMR-S 1255, FMTS. It is now acknowledged that the three-dimensional environment of cells can play an important role in their behavior, maturation and/or differentiation. This protocol describes a three-dimensional cell culture model designed to study the impact of physical containment and mechanical constraints on megakaryocytes.

Video: Megakaryocyte Culture in 3D Methylcellulose-Based Hydrogel to Improve Cell Maturation and Study the Impact of Stiffness and Confinement

Microfabricated Platforms for Mechanically Dynamic Cell Culture

The ability to systematically probe in vitro cellular response to combinations of mechanobiological stimuli for tissue engineering, drug discovery or fundamental cell biology studies is limited by current bioreactor technologies, which cannot simultaneously apply a variety of mechanical stimuli to cultured cells. In order to address this issue, we have developed a series of microfabricated platforms designed to screen for the effects of mechanical stimuli in a high-throughput format. In this protocol, we demonstrate the fabrication of a microactuator array of vertically displaced posts on which the technology is based, and further demonstrate how this base technology can be modified to conduct high-throughput mechanically dynamic cell culture in both two-dimensional and three-dimensional culture paradigms.

In this protocol, we demonstrate the fabrication of a microactuator array of vertically displaced posts on which the technology is based, and how this base technology can be modified to conduct high-throughput mechanically dynamic cell culture in both two-dimensional and three-dimensional culture paradigms.

The ability to systematically probe in vitro cellular response to combinations of mechanobiological stimuli for tissue engineering, drug discovery or ...

Bioengineering

Tunable Hydrogels from Pulmonary Extracellular Matrix for 3D Cell Culture

Here we present a method for establishing multiple component cell culture hydrogels for in vitro lung cell culture. Beginning with healthy en bloc lung tissue from porcine, rat, or mouse, the tissue is perfused and submerged in subsequent chemical detergents to remove the cellular debris. Histological comparison of the tissue before and after processing confirms removal of over 95% of double stranded DNA and alpha galactosidase staining suggests the majority of cellular debris is removed. After decellularization, the tissue is lyophilized and then cryomilled into a powder. The matrix powder is digested for 48 hr in an acidic pepsin digestion solution and then neutralized to form the pregel solution. Gelation of the pregel solution can be induced by incubation at 37 &#176;C and can be used immediately following neutralization or stored at 4 &#176;C for up to two weeks. Coatings can be formed using the pregel solution on a non-treated plate for cell attachment. Cells can be suspended in the pregel prior to self-assembly to achieve a 3D culture, plated on the surface of a formed gel from which the cells can migrate through the scaffold, or plated on the coatings. Alterations to the strategy presented can impact gelation temperature, strength, or protein fragment sizes. Beyond hydrogel formation, the hydrogel stiffness may be increased using genipin.

This is a method to create a 3-dimensional cell culture scaffold from pulmonary extracellular matrix. Intact lung is processed into hydrogels that can support the growth of cells in three-dimensions.

Here we present a method for establishing multiple component cell culture hydrogels for in vitro lung cell culture. Beginning with healthy en bloc lung ...

3D Microtissues for Injectable Regenerative Therapy and High-throughput Drug Screening

To upgrade traditional 2D cell culture to 3D cell culture, we have integrated microfabrication with cryogelation technology to produce macroporous microscale cryogels (microcryogels), which can be loaded with a variety of cell types to form 3D microtissues. Herein, we present the protocol to fabricate versatile 3D microtissues and their applications in regenerative therapy and drug screening. Size and shape-controllable microcryogels can be fabricated on an array chip, which can be harvested off-chip as individual cell-loaded carriers for injectable regenerative therapy or be further assembled on-chip into 3D microtissue arrays for high-throughput drug screening. Due to the high elastic nature of these microscale cryogels, the 3D microtissues exhibit great injectability for minimally invasive cell therapy by protecting cells from mechanical shear force during injection. This ensures enhanced cell survival and therapeutic effect in the mouse limb ischemia model. Meanwhile, assembly of 3D microtissue arrays in a standard 384-multi-well format facilitates the use of common laboratory facilities and equipment, enabling high-throughput drug screening on this versatile 3D cell culture platform.

This protocol describes the fabrication of elastic 3D macroporous microcryogels by integrating microfabrication with cryogelation technology. Upon loading with cells, 3D microtissues are generated, which can be readily injected in vivo to facilitate regenerative therapy or assembled into arrays for in vitro high-throughput drug screening.

To upgrade traditional 2D cell culture to 3D cell culture, we have integrated microfabrication with cryogelation technology to produce macroporous ...

Improved 3D Hydrogel Cultures of Primary Glial Cells for In Vitro Modelling of Neuroinflammation

In the central nervous system, numerous acute injuries and neurodegenerative disorders, as well as implanted devices or biomaterials engineered to enhance function result in the same outcome: excess inflammation leads to gliosis, cytotoxicity, and/or formation of a glial scar that collectively exacerbate injury or prevent healthy recovery. With the intent of creating a system to model glial scar formation and study inflammatory processes, we have generated a 3D cell scaffold capable of housing primary cultured glial cells: microglia that regulate the foreign body response and initiate the inflammatory event, astrocytes that respond to form a fibrous scar, and oligodendrocytes that are typically vulnerable to inflammatory injury. The present work provides a detailed step-by-step method for the fabrication, culture, and microscopic characterization of a hyaluronic acid-based 3D hydrogel scaffold with encapsulated rat brain-derived glial cells. Further, protocols for characterization of cell encapsulation and the hydrogel scaffold by confocal immunofluorescence and scanning electron microscopy are demonstrated, as well as the capacity to modify the scaffold with bioactive substrates, with incorporation of a commercial basal lamina mixture to improved cell integration.

Improved 3D Hydrogel Cultures of Primary Glial Cells for In Vitro Modelling of Neuroinflammation

Herein, we present a protocol for the 3D culture of rat brain-derived glia cells, including astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes. We demonstrate primary cell culture, methacrylated hyaluronic acid (HAMA) hydrogel synthesis, HAMAphoto-polymerization and cell encapsulation, and sample processing for confocal and scanning electron microscopic imaging.

In the central nervous system, numerous acute injuries and neurodegenerative disorders, as well as implanted devices or biomaterials engineered to enhance ...

Culturing Mammalian Cells in Three-dimensional Peptide Scaffolds

A useful technique for culturing cells in a self-assembling nanofiber three-dimensional (3D) scaffold is described. This culture system recreates an environment that closely mimics the structural features of non-polarized tissue. Furthermore, the particular intrinsic nanofiber structure of the scaffold makes it transparent to visual light, which allows for easy visualization of the sample under microscopy. This advantage was largely used to study cell migration, organization, proliferation, and differentiation and thus any development of their particular cellular function by staining with specific dyes or probes. Furthermore, in this work, we describe the good performance of this system to easily study the redifferentiation of expanded human articular chondrocytes into cartilaginous tissue. Cells were encapsulated into self-assembling peptide scaffolds and cultured under specific conditions to promote chondrogenesis. Three-dimensional cultures showed good viability during the 4 weeks of the experiment. As expected, samples cultured with chondrogenic inducers (compared to non-induced controls) stained strongly positive for toluidine blue (which stains glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) that are highly present in cartilage extracellular matrix) and expressed specific molecular markers, including collagen type I, II and X, according to Western Blot analysis. This protocol is easy to perform and can be used at research laboratories, industries and for educational purposes in laboratory courses.

Here, we present a protocol to obtain 3D-culture systems in self-assembling peptide scaffolds to promote the differentiation of dedifferentiated human articular chondrocytes into cartilage-like tissue.

A useful technique for culturing cells in a self-assembling nanofiber three-dimensional (3D) scaffold is described. This culture system recreates an ...

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture on Polyvinyl Alcohol-Co-Itaconic Acid Hydrogels with Varying Stiffness Under Xeno-Free Conditions

The effect of physical cues, such as the stiffness of biomaterials on the proliferation and differentiation of stem cells, has been investigated by several researchers. However, most of these investigators have used polyacrylamide hydrogels for stem cell culture in their studies. Therefore, their results are controversial because those results might originate from the specific characteristics of the polyacrylamide and not from the physical cue (stiffness) of the biomaterials. Here, we describe a protocol for preparing hydrogels, which are not based on polyacrylamide, where various stem, cells including human embryonic stem (ES) cells and human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, can be cultured. Hydrogels with varying stiffness were prepared from bioinert polyvinyl alcohol-co-itaconic acid (P-IA), with stiffness controlled by crosslinking degree by changing crosslinking time. The P-IA hydrogels grafted with and without oligopeptides derived from extracellular matrix were investigated as a future platform for stem cell culture and differentiation. The culture and passage of amniotic fluid stem cells, adipose-derived stem cells, human ES cells, and human iPS cells is described in detail here. The oligopeptide P-IA hydrogels showed superior performances, which were induced by their stiffness properties. This protocol reports the synthesis of the biomaterial, their surface manipulation, along with controlling the stiffness properties and finally, their impact on stem cell fate using xeno-free culture conditions. Based on recent studies, such modified substrates can act as future platforms to support and direct the fate of various stem cells line to different linkages; and further, regenerate and restore the functions of the lost organ or tissue.

A protocol is presented to prepare polyvinyl alcohol-co-itaconic acid hydrogels with varying stiffness, which were grafted with and without oligopeptides, to investigate the effect of the stiffness of biomaterials on the differentiation and proliferation of stem cells. The stiffness of the hydrogels was controlled by the crosslinking time.

The effect of physical cues, such as the stiffness of biomaterials on the proliferation and differentiation of stem cells, has been investigated by ...

Production of Elastin-like Protein Hydrogels for Encapsulation and Immunostaining of Cells in 3D

Two-dimensional (2D) tissue culture techniques have been essential for our understanding of fundamental cell biology. However, traditional 2D tissue culture systems lack a three-dimensional (3D) matrix, resulting in a significant disconnect between results collected in vitro and in vivo. To address this limitation, researchers have engineered 3D hydrogel tissue culture platforms that can mimic the biochemical and biophysical properties of the in vivo cell microenvironment. This research has motivated the need to develop material platforms that support 3D cell encapsulation and downstream biochemical assays. Recombinant protein engineering offers a unique toolset for 3D hydrogel material design and development by allowing for the specific control of protein sequence and therefore, by extension, the potential mechanical and biochemical properties of the resultant matrix. Here, we present a protocol for the expression of recombinantly-derived elastin-like protein (ELP), which can be used to form hydrogels with independently tunable mechanical properties and cell-adhesive ligand concentration. We further present a methodology for cell encapsulation within ELP hydrogels and subsequent immunofluorescent staining of embedded cells for downstream analysis and quantification.

Recombinant protein-engineered hydrogels are advantageous for 3D cell culture as they allow for complete tunability of the polymer backbone and therefore, the cell microenvironment. Here, we describe the process of recombinant elastin-like protein purification and its application in 3D hydrogel cell encapsulation.

Two-dimensional (2D) tissue culture techniques have been essential for our understanding of fundamental cell biology. However, traditional 2D tissue ...

Fabrication of a Crystalline Nanocellulose Embedded Agarose Biomaterial Ink for Bone Marrow-Derived Mast Cell Culture

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting utilizes hydrogel-based composites (or biomaterial inks) that are deposited in a pattern, forming a substrate onto which cells are deposited. Because many biomaterial inks can be potentially cytotoxic to primary cells, it is necessary to determine the biocompatibility of these hydrogel composites prior to their utilization in costly 3D tissue engineering processes. Some 3D culture methods, including bioprinting, require that cells be embedded into a 3D matrix, making it difficult to extract and analyze the cells for changes in viability and biomarker expression without eliciting mechanical damage. This protocol describes as proof of concept, a method to assess the biocompatibility of a crystalline nanocellulose (CNC) embedded agarose composite, fabricated into a 24-well culture system, with mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) using flow cytometric assays for cell viability and biomarker expression.
After 18 h of exposure to the CNC/agarose/D-mannitol matrix, BMMC viability was unaltered as measured by propidium iodide (PI) permeability. However, BMMCs cultured on the CNC/agarose/D-mannitol substrate appeared to slightly increase their expression of the high-affinity IgE receptor (Fc&#949;RI) and the stem cell factor receptor (Kit; CD117), although this does not appear to be dependent on the amount of CNC in the bioink composite. The viability of BMMCs was also assessed following a time course exposure to hydrogel scaffolds that were fabricated from a commercial biomaterial ink composed of fibrillar nanocellulose (FNC) and sodium alginate using a 3D extrusion bioprinter. Over a period of 6-48 h, the FNC/alginate substrates did not adversely affect the viability of the BMMCs as determined by flow cytometry and microtiter assays (XTT and lactate dehydrogenase). This protocol describes an efficient method to rapidly screen the biochemical compatibility of candidate biomaterial inks for their utility as 3D scaffolds for post-print seeding with mast cells.

This protocol highlights a method to rapidly assess the biocompatibility of a crystalline nanocellulose (CNC)/agarose composite hydrogel biomaterial ink with mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells in terms of cell viability and phenotypic expression of the cell surface receptors, Kit (CD117) and high-affinity IgE receptor (Fc&#949;RI).

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting utilizes hydrogel-based composites (or biomaterial inks) that are deposited in a pattern, forming a substrate onto ...

Hydrogel Arrays Enable Increased Throughput for Screening Effects of Matrix Components and Therapeutics in 3D Tumor Models

Cell-matrix interactions mediate complex physiological processes through biochemical, mechanical, and geometrical cues, influencing pathological changes and therapeutic responses. Accounting for matrix effects earlier in the drug development pipeline is expected to increase the likelihood of clinical success of novel therapeutics. Biomaterial-based strategies recapitulating specific tissue microenvironments in 3D cell culture exist but integrating these with the 2D culture methods primarily used for drug screening has been challenging. Thus, the protocol presented here details the development of methods for 3D culture within miniaturized biomaterial matrices in a multi-well plate format to facilitate integration with existing drug screening pipelines and conventional assays for cell viability. Since the matrix features critical for preserving clinically relevant phenotypes in cultured cells are expected to be highly tissue- and disease-specific, combinatorial screening of matrix parameters will be necessary to identify appropriate conditions for specific applications. The methods described here use a miniaturized culture format to assess cancer cell responses to orthogonal variation of matrix mechanics and ligand presentation. Specifically, this study demonstrates the use of this platform to investigate the effects of matrix parameters on the responses of patient-derived glioblastoma (GBM) cells to chemotherapy.

The present protocol describes an experimental platform to assess the effects of mechanical and biochemical cues on chemotherapeutic responses of patient-derived glioblastoma cells in 3D matrix-mimetic cultures using a custom-made UV illumination device facilitating high-throughput photocrosslinking of hydrogels with tunable mechanical features.

Cell-matrix interactions mediate complex physiological processes through biochemical, mechanical, and geometrical cues, influencing pathological changes ...

3D Co-Culture Assay: Vascularized Osteogenic Niches for Cancer Drug Screening

Simple Establishment of a Vascularized Osteogenic Bone Marrow Niche Using Pre-Cast Poly(ethylene Glycol) (PEG) Hydrogels in an Imaging Microplate

The bone and bone marrow are highly vascularized and structurally complex organs, and are sites for cancer and metastasis formation. In vitro models recapitulating bone- and bone marrow-specific functions, including vascularization, that are compatible with drug screening are highly desirable. Such models can bridge the gap between simplistic, structurally irrelevant two-dimensional (2D) in vitro models and the more expensive, ethically challenging in vivo models. This article describes a controllable three-dimensional (3D) co-culture assay based on engineered poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) matrices for the generation of vascularized, osteogenic bone-marrow niches. The PEG matrix design allows the development of 3D cell cultures through a simple cell seeding step requiring no encapsulation, thus enabling the development of complex co-culture systems. Furthermore, the matrices are transparent and pre-cast onto glass-bottom 96-well imaging plates, rendering the system suitable for microscopy. For the assay described here, human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hBM-MSCs) are cultured first until a sufficiently developed 3D cell network is formed. Subsequently, GFP-expressing human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) are added. The culture development is followed by bright-field and fluorescence microscopy. The presence of the hBM-MSC network supports the formation of vascular-like structures that otherwise&#160;would not form and that remain stable for at least 7 days. The extent of vascular-like network formation can easily be quantified. This model can be tuned toward an osteogenic bone-marrow niche by supplementing the culture medium with bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2), which promotes the osteogenic differentiation of the hBM-MSCs, as assessed by increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity at day 4 and day 7 of co-culture. This cellular model can be used as a platform for culturing various cancer cells and studying how they interact with bone- and bone marrow-specific vascular niches. Moreover, it is suitable for automation and high-content analyses, meaning it would enable cancer drug screening under highly reproducible culture conditions.

Author Spotlight: Simple Establishment of a Vascularized Osteogenic Bone Marrow Niche Using Pre-Cast Poly(Ethylene Glycol) (PEG) Hydrogels in an Imaging Microplate  

An in vitro model of the bone marrow vascular niche is established by seeding mesenchymal and endothelial cells onto pre-cast 3D PEG hydrogels. The endothelial networks, ECM components, and ALP activity of the niches vary depending on the growth factor used. The platform can be used for advanced cancer models.

The bone and bone marrow are highly vascularized and structurally complex organs, and are sites for cancer and metastasis formation. In vitro models ...

Megakaryocyte Culture in 3D Methylcellulose-Based Hydrogel to Improve Cell Maturation and Study the Impact of Stiffness and Confinement

Summary

Explore More Videos

Chapters in this video

Microfabricated Platforms for Mechanically Dynamic Cell Culture

Tunable Hydrogels from Pulmonary Extracellular Matrix for 3D Cell Culture

3D Microtissues for Injectable Regenerative Therapy and High-throughput Drug Screening

Improved 3D Hydrogel Cultures of Primary Glial Cells for In Vitro Modelling of Neuroinflammation

Culturing Mammalian Cells in Three-dimensional Peptide Scaffolds

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture on Polyvinyl Alcohol-Co-Itaconic Acid Hydrogels with Varying Stiffness Under Xeno-Free Conditions

Production of Elastin-like Protein Hydrogels for Encapsulation and Immunostaining of Cells in 3D

Fabrication of a Crystalline Nanocellulose Embedded Agarose Biomaterial Ink for Bone Marrow-Derived Mast Cell Culture

Hydrogel Arrays Enable Increased Throughput for Screening Effects of Matrix Components and Therapeutics in 3D Tumor Models

Simple Establishment of a Vascularized Osteogenic Bone Marrow Niche Using Pre-Cast Poly(ethylene Glycol) (PEG) Hydrogels in an Imaging Microplate