Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
Tissue engineering often includes in vitro expansion in order to create autografts for tissue regeneration. In this study a method for tissue expansion, regeneration, and reconstruction in vivo was developed in order to minimize the processing of cells and biological materials outside the body.
Conventional techniques for cell expansion and transplantation of autologous cells for tissue engineering purposes can take place in specially equipped human cell culture facilities. These methods include isolation of cells in single cell suspension and several laborious and time-consuming events before transplantation back to the patient. Previous studies suggest that the body itself could be used as a bioreactor for cell expansion and regeneration of tissue in order to minimize ex vivo manipulations of tissues and cells before transplanting to the patient. The aim of this study was to demonstrate a method for tissue harvesting, isolation of continuous epithelium, mincing of the epithelium into small pieces and incorporating them into a three-layered biomaterial. The three-layered biomaterial then served as a delivery vehicle, to allow surgical handling, exchange of nutrition across the transplant, and a controlled degradation. The biomaterial consisted of two outer layers of collagen and a core of a mechanically stable and slowly degradable polymer. The minced epithelium was incorporated into one of the collagen layers before transplantation. By mincing the epithelial tissue into small pieces, the pieces could be spread and thereby the propagation of cells was stimulated. After the initial take of the transplants, cell expansion and reorganization would take place and extracellular matrix mature to allow ingrowth of capillaries and nerves and further maturation of the extracellular matrix. The technique minimizes ex vivo manipulations and allow cell harvesting, preparation of autograft, and transplantation to the patient as a simple one-stage intervention. In the future, tissue expansion could be initiated around a 3D mold inside the body itself, according to the specific needs of the patient. Additionally, the technique could be performed in an ordinary surgical setting without the need for sophisticated cell culturing facilities.
Most tissue engineering studies on transplantation to the skin and urogenital tract include autologous cell harvests from healthy tissue and cell expansion in specially equipped cell-culturing facilities1,2.
After cell expansion, cells are usually stored for later use when the patient is prepared to receive the autograft. Nitrogen freezers allow long-term storage at low temperatures of -150 °C or lower. The process of freezing must be careful and controlled in order not to lose the cells. One risk of cell death is crystallization of intracellular water during the thawing process, which can lead to rupture of the cell membranes. Cell freezing is usually performed by slow and controlled cooling (-1 °C per min), using a high concentration of cells, fetal bovine serum, and dimethyl sulfoxide. After thawing, the cells need to be processed again by removing the freezing medium and culturing on cell culture plastic or a biomaterial before transplantation back to the patient.
All the above-mentioned steps are time-consuming, laborious, and costly3. In addition, all in vitro processing of cells intended for patient transplantation are highly regulated and requires well-trained and accredited personnel and laboratories4. All in all, to procure a safe and reliable manufacturing process, the technique could only be established in a very small number of technically advanced centers and a wider use in common surgical disorders is doubtful.
In order to overcome the limitations of cell culturing in the laboratory environment, the concept of transplanting minced tissue for cell expansion in vivo is introduced by using the body itself as a bioreactor. For these purposes, the autografts would preferentially be transplanted on a 3D mold according to the shape that is needed for the final reconstruction of the organ of interest5-7.
Originally, the idea of transplanting minced epithelium was presented by Meek in 1958 when he described how epithelium grows from the edges of a wound. He demonstrated that a small piece of skin would increase its margins and thereby its potential for cell expansion by 100% by cutting the piece twice in perpendicular directions (Figure 1)8. The theory has been supported by the use of meshed partial thickness skin grafts for skin transplantation9 and in skin wound healing models10.
Figure 1: Meek theory. According to Meek’s theory, epithelium grows from the edges of a wound. By increasing the area exposed by the mincing technology, minced tissue epithelializes wounds from many spots.
The present study is based on the hypothesis that the same principle could be applied to the subcutaneous tissue by placing minced epithelium around a mold. The epithelial cells would mobilize from minced transplants (reorganize), cover the wound areas (migrate) and divide (expand) in order to form a continuous neoepithelium that covers the wound area and separates the foreign body (the mold) from the inner body (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Cartoon of a 3D mold with minced epithelium for in vivo intracorporal tissue expansion according to the theory of Meek. By using minced tissue placed on a mold and then transplanted to the subcutaneous tissue, the hypothesis is that the epithelial cells migrate from the edges of the minced tissue, reorganize, and expand so as to form a continuous neoepithelium that covers the wound area and separates the foreign body (the mold) from the inner body.
Although previous in vivo studies show promising results, further improvements could be achieved by reinforcing the autografts so that the regenerated epithelium could withstand mechanical trauma better7. For these purposes, important prerequisites for a successful biomaterial were identified, such as: easy diffusion of nutrients and waste products, possibility to mold in a 3D manner and easiness of surgical handling. Conclusions were made that these needs could be met by adding a composite biomaterial to the minced tissue.
The current study aimed at developing a scaffold composed of minced tissue in plastic-compressed collagen containing a reinforcing core of a biodegradable fabric. By these means, viable cells could migrate from the minced tissue particles and proliferate with morphological features characteristic of the original epithelium (skin or urothelium). Using plastic compression, the scaffold was reduced in size from 1 cm to about 420 µm as the minced particles were encased in the upper layer collagen. The core fabric could be any polymer but needs to be modified with a hydrophilic surface in order to interlink with the covering collagen layers11.
The method provided an enhanced scaffold integrity by incorporating a knitted mesh consisting of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) within two plastic compressed collagen gels using it as a scaffold for culturing minced bladder mucosa or minced skin from pigs. The construct was maintained in cell culture conditions for up to 6 weeks in vitro, demonstrating successful formation of a stratified, multilayered urothelium or squamous skin epithelium on the top of a well-consolidated hybrid construct. The construct was easy to handle and could be sutured in place for bladder augmentation purposes or covering of skin defects. All parts of the tissue scaffold are FDA-approved and the technique could be used for single-stage procedures by tissue harvesting, mincing, plastic compression, and transplanting back to the patient as a single-staged intervention. The procedure could be performed for tissue expansion and reconstruction under sterile conditions in any general surgery unit.
All animal protocols were pre-approved by the Stockholm County Committee on Animals and all procedures conformed to the regulations for animal use, as well as relevant federal statutes.
1. Animal Procedures
2. Minced Tissue Preparation
3. Preparation of Plastic Compressed PCL/Collagen Autografts
4. Suture of Autografts
5. Termination
6. In Vitro Culture
NOTE: To evaluate histologically the progression of the minced tissue in the PCL/collagen constructs in vitro, the collagen/PCL/minced patches are cultured in 12-well plates using keratinocyte medium.
7. Immunohistochemistry
NOTE: The immunohistochemistry protocol is generally divided into the following steps: (1) fixation and paraffin embedding, (2) micro-sectioning to 5 µm slices, placement on slides, deparaffination, and rehydration, (3) antigen unmasking, staining and mounting. Before starting the last steps in the immunohistochemistry procedure, prepare the washing buffers and the antigen unmasking solution (see separate material details). Prepare the ABC complex solution at least 30 min before use.
This study presents a method that shows how to produce a biomaterial for transplantation using plastic compression of collagen and minced tissue.
Bladder mucosa and skin can be harvested and then mechanically minced into small particles (Figure 3). By plastic compression, the minced particles are incorporated within the composite scaffold composed of a centrally placed biodegradable polymer that is mechanically strong within outer layers of a collagen gel (Figure 4
This study presents an easy-to-use approach to produce bladder wall patches with autologous tissue for transplantation at the surgical table. The patches are formed by the combination of a biodegradable polymer knitting in the middle and collagen with and without minced tissue in the outer surfaces in combination with plastic compression. Plastic compression is a method previously described by other authors and can be defined as a rapid expulsion of fluid from collagen gels12,13. Minced tissue of bladder mucos...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors thank the Swedish Society for Medical Research, the Promobilia Foundation, the Crown Princess Lovisa Foundation, the Freemason Foundation for Children’s Welfare, the Swedish Society of Medicine, the Solstickan Foundation, Karolinska Institutet, and the Stockholm City Council for financial support.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Silicone catheter 10-French | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | ||
DMEM 10x | Gibco | 31885-023 | Plastic compression section 4 |
24 well plates | Falcon | 08-772-1 | Plastic compression section 4 |
3',3',5-Triiodothyronine | Sigma-Aldrich | IRMM469 | In vitro culture; Section 5 |
4% PFA | Labmed Solutions | 200-001-8 | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 |
70% ethanol | Histolab | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 | |
ABC Elite kit: Biotin-Streptavidin detection kit | Vector | PK6102 | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 |
Absolute ethanol | Histolab | 1399.01 | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 |
Adenine | Sigma-Aldrich | A8626 | In vitro culture; Section 5 |
Atropine 25 μg/kg | Temgesic, RB Pharmaceuticals, Great Britain | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Azaperone 2 mg/kg | Stresnil, Janssen-Cilag, Pharma, Austria | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Biosafety Level 2 hood | Plastic compression; Section 4 | ||
Blocking solution: Normal serum from the same species as the secondary secondary antibody was generated in. | Vector | The blocking solution depends of the origin of first antibody | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 |
Buprenorphine 45 μg/kg | Atropin, Mylan Inc, Canonsburg, PA | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Carprofen 3 mg/kg | Rimadyl, Orion Pharma, Sweden | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Chlorhexidine gluconate | Hibiscrub 40 mg/mL, Regent Medical, England | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Cholera toxin | Sigma-Aldrich | C8052 | In vitro culture; Section 5 |
Coplin jar: staining jar for boiling | Histolab | 6150 | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 |
Stainless mold (33 mm x 22 mm x 10 mm) custom made | Plastic compression; Section 4 | ||
DMEM | Gibco | 3188-5023 | Plastic compression section 4. Keep on ice when using it in plastic compression |
Epidermal growth factor | Sigma-Aldrich | E9644 | In vitro culture; Section 5 |
Ethilon (non-absorbable monofilament for skin sutures) | Ethicon | Surgery, Section 1 | |
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) | Gibco | 10437-036 | Plastic compression section 4 |
Forceps (Adison with tooth) | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | ||
Gauze (Gazin Mullkompresse) | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | ||
Ham's F12 | Gibco | 31765-027 | Plastic compression section 4 |
Hematoxylin | Histolab | 1820 | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 |
Humidity chamber | DALAB | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 | |
Hydrocortisone | Sigma-Aldrich | H0888 | In vitro culture; Section 5 |
Hydrogen peroxide Solution 30% | Sigma-Aldrich | H1009 | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 |
Insulin | Sigma-Aldrich | I3536 | In vitro culture; Section 5 |
Isoflurane | Isoflurane, Baxter, Deerfield, IL | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Lidocaine 5 mg/ml | Xylocaine, AstraZeneca, Sweden | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Lucose 25 mg/ml | Baxter, Deerfield, IL | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Marker pen pap pen | Sigma-Aldrich | Z377821-1EA | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 |
Medetomidine 25 μg/kg | Domitor, Orion Pharma, Sweden | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Mincing device | Applied Tissue Technologies LLC | Minced tissue preparation, section 2 | |
Monocryl (absorbable monofilament) | Ethicon | Surgery, Section 1 | |
NaCl | Sigma-Aldrich | S7653 | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 |
NaOH 1 N | Merck Millipore | 106462 | Plastic compression section 4 and cell culture |
Nylon mesh, 110 μM thick pore size 0.04 sqmm | Plastic compression; Section 4 | ||
Oculentum simplex APL: ointment for eye protection | APL | Vnr 336164 | Surgery, Section 1 |
PBS | Gibco | 14190-094 | Plastic compression section 4 |
Penicillin-Streptomycin | Gibco | 15140-122 | Plastic compression section 4 |
Phenobarbiturate 15 mg/kg | Pentobarbital, APL, Sweden | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
PCL Knitted fabric | Plastic compression; Section 4 | ||
Rat-tail collagen | First LINK, Ltd, UK | 60-30-810 | Plastic compression section 4, keep on ice |
Scalpel blade - 15 | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | ||
Shaving shears | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | ||
Stainless stell mesh, 400 μM thick pore size | Plastic compression; Section 4 | ||
Steril gloves | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | ||
Sterile gowns | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | ||
Sterile drapes | |||
Sterilium | Bode Chemie HAMBURG | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Suture Thread Ethilon | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | ||
TE-solution (antigen unmasking solution) consist of 10 mM Tris and 1 mM EDTA, pH 9.0 | 10 mM Tris/1 mM EDTA, adjust pH to 9.0 | ||
Tiletamine hypochloride 2.5 mg/kg | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | ||
Transferrin | Sigma-Aldrich | T8158 | In vitro culture; Section 5 |
Trizma Base, H2NC | Sigma-Aldrich | T6066 | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 |
Vector VIP kit: Enzyme peroxidase substrate kit | Vector | SK4600 | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6 |
Vicryl (absorbable braded) | Ethicon | Surgery, Section 1 | |
Tris buffer pH 7.6 (washing buffer) | TE solution: Make 10x (0.5 M Tris, 1.5 M NaCl) by mixing: 60.6 g Tris (Trizma Base, H2NC(CH2OH)3, M=121.14 g/mol), add 800 ml distilled water adjust the pH till 7.6, add 87.7 g NaCl and fill to 1,000 ml with distilled water. Dilute to 1x with distilled water. | ||
X-tra solv (solvent) | DALAB | 41-5213-810 | Immunocytochemistry; Section 6. Use under fume hood |
Zolazepam hypochloride | Zoletil, Virbac, France | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Depilatory wax strips | Veet | Preparing the animal for surgery, Section 1 | |
Pentobarbital sodium | Lundbeck | Termination, Section 3 |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone