Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

A step-by-step procedure is described for label-free immobilization of exosomes and extracellular vesicles from liquid samples and their imaging by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The AFM images are used to estimate the size of the vesicles in the solution and characterize other biophysical properties. 

Abstract

Exosomes and other extracellular vesicles (EVs) are molecular complexes consisting of a lipid membrane vesicle, its surface decoration by membrane proteins and other molecules, and diverse luminal content inherited from a parent cell, which includes RNAs, proteins, and DNAs. The characterization of the hydrodynamic sizes of EVs, which depends on the size of the vesicle and its coronal layer formed by surface decorations, has become routine. For exosomes, the smallest of EVs, the relative difference between the hydrodynamic and vesicles sizes is significant. The characterization of vesicles sizes by the cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) imaging, a gold standard technique, remains a challenge due to the cost of the instrument, the expertise required to perform the sample preparation, imaging and data analysis, and a small number of particles often observed in images. A widely available and accessible alternative is the atomic force microscopy (AFM), which can produce versatile data on three-dimensional geometry, size, and other biophysical properties of extracellular vesicles. The developed protocol guides the users in utilizing this analytical tool and outlines the workflow for the analysis of EVs by the AFM, which includes the sample preparation for imaging EVs in hydrated or desiccated form, the electrostatic immobilization of vesicles on a substrate, data acquisition, its analysis, and interpretation. The representative results demonstrate that the fixation of EVs on the modified mica surface is predictable, customizable, and allows the user to obtain sizing results for a large number of vesicles. The vesicle sizing based on the AFM data was found to be consistent with the cryo-TEM imaging. 

Introduction

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are present in all body fluids, including blood, urine, saliva, milk, and the amniotic fluid. Exosomes form a district class of EVs differentiated from other EVs by endosomal biogenesis, the markers of the endosomal pathway, and the smallest size among all EVs. The size of exosomes is often reported with substantial variability between studies. The sizing results were found to be method dependent, reflecting the difference in physical principles employed by different analytical techniques to estimate EV sizes1,2. For example, the nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) ― the most widely used size characterization technique ― estimates the size of EVs as their hydrodynamic diameters, which characterize the resistance to the Brownian mobility of EVs in the solution. A larger hydrodynamic diameter of a vesicle implies its lower mobility in liquid. The coronal layer around vesicles, consisting of surface proteins and other molecules anchored or adsorbed to the membrane surface, substantially impedes the mobility and increases the hydrodynamic size of EVs. In relative terms, this increase is particularly large for the exosomes3, as illustrated in Figure 1

The cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) imaging is a definitive technique in characterizing vesicle sizes and morphology in their hydrated states. However, the high cost of the instrumentation and the specialized expertise needed to use it correctly motivate the exploration of alternative techniques that can image hydrated EVs. A relatively small number of EVs observed or characterized in the acquired cryo-TEM images is another notable disadvantage of this technique.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) visualizes the three-dimensional topography of hydrated or desiccated EVs4,5,6 by scanning a probe across the substrate to raster the image of the particles on the surface. The essential steps of the protocol to characterize EVs by AFM are outlined in this study. Before imaging the vesicles in liquid, they must be immobilized on a substrate by either tethering to a functionalized surface, trapping in a filter, or by electrostatic attraction7. The electrostatic fixation on a positively charged substrate is a particularly convenient option for immobilization of exosomes known to have a negative zeta potential. However, the same electrostatic forces that immobilize the extracellular vesicles on the surface also distort their shape, which makes post-imaging data analysis essential. We elaborate this point by describing the algorithm that estimates the size of the globular vesicles in the solution based on the AFM data on the distorted shape of the exosomes immobilized on the surface.

In the developed protocol, the procedure for the robust electrostatic immobilization of vesicles is presented and followed by the steps needed to perform atomic force imaging in the hydrated or desiccated states. The factors that influence the surface concentration of the immobilized vesicles are identified. The guidance is given on how to perform the electrostatic immobilization for samples with different concentrations of EVs in the solution. The selection of experimental conditions permitting the estimation of empirical probability distributions of different biophysical properties based on a sufficiently large number of immobilized vesicles is discussed. Examples of post-imaging analysis of the AFM data are given. Specifically, an algorithm is described for determining the size of vesicles in the solution based on the AFM characterization of immobilized EVs. The representative results show the consistency of the vesicle sizing by AFM with the results of cryo-TEM imaging. 

Protocol

1. Isolation of EVs from a biofluid

  1. Isolate EVs by one of the established methods, such as the differential ultracentrifugation8, precipitation, or size-exclusion chromatography9.
  2. Confirm the presence of expected surface and luminal biomarkers and the absence of biomarkers indicating cross-contamination of the preparation. Confirm the lipid bilayer morphology of the isolated particles by electron microscopy.
    NOTE: When isolating the exosomes, the hydrodynamic size distribution measured by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) or dynamic light scattering should be in the expected range. The details of EV and exosome isolation are beyond the scope of this protocol. The selected method will depend on experimental questions and the goal of the study10. The following steps provide a concrete illustration of the procedure to enrich the exosomes by precipitation from the growth medium of MCF-7 breast cancer cells using a commercially available precipitation kit (Table of Materials).
  3. Before cell culture expansion, store MCF-7 breast cancer cells in liquid nitrogen. Thaw cells to subculture.
  4. Following aseptic practices, perform cell plating on 150 mm plates. Use the growth medium composed of the Eagles minimum essential medium, 0.01 mg/mL human recombinant insulin, and 10% exosome-free fetal bovine serum.
  5. Aerate the culture by 95% air and 5% CO2 and incubate at 37 °C.
  6. After the cells are settled (approximately 24 h after plating), change the media. Split the plate at 1:10 ratio and culture ten plates, each containing 20 mL of media.
  7. Harvest and pool media from 9 of these plates (180 mL) at ~7080% confluence when cells are still in the growth phase.
  8. Divide the media into 60 mL and 120 mL, further split into 30 mL/tube, and centrifuge at 3,000 x g for 15 min.
  9. Transfer the supernatant from each tube to a new sterile 50 mL tube and perform the exosome isolation.
  10. Isolate exosomes by precipitation according to published protocols (see, for example, reference11) or follow the manufacturers instructions if a commercial isolation kit (Table of Materials) is used. As a first step in the latter case, centrifuge cell medium at 3,000 x g for 15 min. Withdraw supernatant and discard cells and cell debris.
  11. Add the precipitation solution (1:5 volume ratio) to the supernatant, mix, and refrigerate overnight.
  12. Centrifuge at 1,500 x g for 30 min at room temperature. Discard the supernatant after centrifugation.
  13. Spin the remaining exosome pellet for another 5 min at 1,500 x g. Without disturbing the pellet, remove the remaining precipitation solution by aspiration.
  14. Resuspend the pellet in 100500 µL of 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer and divide into multiple aliquots as needed for the downstream analysis.
  15. Immediately proceed to the surface immobilization of the isolated exosomes for AFM imaging. If necessary, freeze the aliquots at -80 °C for later use while taking precautions to avoid damage to the sample during the freeze-thaw cycle.

2. Surface fixation of extracellular vesicles

  1. Use strong double-sided tape, epoxy, or an alternative adhesive to firmly attach a mica disk to an AFM/scanning tunneling microscope (STM) magnetic stainless-steel specimen disk.
  2. Cleave mica disc by using a sharp razor or utility knife, or by attaching an adhesive tape to the top surface and then pealing it off to remove a layer of material.
    NOTE: Either method should reveal a virgin surface by removing a thin layer of mica previously exposed to the environment. After the procedure, the attachment of mica to the AFM/STM metal specimen disk must remain firm.
  3. At room temperature, treat the top surface of mica for 10 s with 100 µL of 10 mM NiCl2 solution, which modifies the surface charge from negative to positive.
  4. Blot NiCl2 solution with a lint-free wipe or blotting paper. Wash the mica surface 3x with deionized (DI) water and dry it with a stream of dry nitrogen.
    NOTE: It is a good practice to scan the modified surface with AFM to confirm it is free from contaminants.
  5. Place the AFM specimen disk with the attached surface-modified mica in a petri dish.
  6. Dilute the exosome sample from step 1.14 with 1x PBS to obtain a concentration between 4.0 x 109 and 4.0 x 1010 particles per mL of solution. Validate the diluted particle concentration using NTA.
  7. Form a sessile drop on the surface of mica by emptying 100 μL of the diluted exosome solution from a pipette.
  8. Place lid on the petri dish and seal it with a paraffin film to reduce sample evaporation. Incubate the sample for 1218 h at 4 °C.
    NOTE: The surface density of the immobilized exosomes will increase with the incubation time and the concentration of EVs in the liquid. Longer incubation time may be necessary if exosomes are present in the sample at lower concentrations.
  9. After incubation, aspirate 8090% of the sample without disturbing the surface. At this point, the exosomes will be electrostatically immobilized on the mica substrate.
  10. Before imaging hydrated EVs, rinse the surface with 1x PBS. Repeat 3x. Take care to keep the sample hydrated throughout the rinsing process.
  11. After washing the mica surface with 1x PBS, remove 80%90% of liquid, and pipette ~40 μL of fresh 1x PBS to cover the sample.
  12. When imaging the desiccated EVs, rinse the substrate with DI water. Repeat 3x.
    NOTE: Rinsing with DI water will prevent the formation of salt crystals and the deposition of solutes on the surface as the substrate dries.
  13. Before imaging desiccated EVs, aspirate as much liquid as possible without touching the surface and dry the rest with a stream of dry nitrogen.

3. AFM imaging

  1. To image the desiccated EVs, select a cantilever designed for scanning in the air in tapping and non-contact imaging modes and mount it onto the probe holder.
    NOTE: The characteristics of an example cantilever listed in Table of Materials (123 μm length, 40 μm width, 7 nm tip radius, and 37 N/m spring constant) may be used as a guide when selecting a probe compatible with the available AFM instrumentation.
    1. Place the preparation from step 2.13 on the AFM stage. The magnetic stainless-steel specimen disk will immobilize the sample on the stage. Allow time for the preparation and the stage to equilibrate thermally.
    2. Use the tapping mode to scan a sufficiently large area of the micas surface. For example, choose an area of 5 x 5 µm, rastered in 512 lines at a scan rate of ~1 Hz. Acquire both the height and phase images as they provide complementary information on the topography and the surface properties of the sample.
      NOTE: The scan time will increase with the imaged area and the number of lines selected to form the image but decrease with the scan rate defined as the number of lines scanned per second. Fast scan rates may impact the image quality. Therefore, the speed of rastering should judicially balance the tradeoff between the acquisition time and the image quality.
  2. To image hydrated vesicles, select a cantilever appropriate for scanning soft, hydrated samples and mount the cantilever onto a probe holder designed for scanning in liquids.
    NOTE: When selecting a probe compatible with the available AFM instrumentation, the specifications of the probe listed in Table of Materials (triangular cantilever with 175 µm nominal length, 22 µm width, 20 nm tip radius, 0.07 N/m spring constant, and optimized for imaging with the drive frequency in the range between 4 to 8 kHz) may be used as a guide.
    1. Wet the tip of the cantilever with 1x PBS to reduce the likelihood of introducing air bubbles into the liquid during scanning.
    2. Place the preparation from step 2.11 on the AFM stage. The magnetic stainless-steel specimen disk will immobilize the attached mica containing immobilized EVs on its surface.
    3. Allow time for the preparation and the AFM stage to equilibrate thermally.
    4. Image the hydrated mica surface in the tapping mode. Acquire both the height and phase images.
      NOTE: The imaging quality is influenced by the instrumentation, selected probe, and scan parameters. When optimizing the scanning conditions, the following choices may be used as a starting point: 5 x 5 µm area scanned in 512 lines with ~0.8-1.0 Hz scan rate and drive frequency between 4 to 8 kHz.

4. Image analysis

NOTE: The following data processing and analysis steps are applied to the acquired height images. A similar procedure may be adapted to analyze the phase data. The description below is specific to Gwyddion12, a free and open source software available under GNU General Public License. Similar capabilities are available in alternative software tools.

  1. Go to Data Process, SPM modes, Tip and choose Model Tip (Figure 2). Select the geometry and the dimensions of the tip used to scan the sample and click OK.
  2. Correct the tip erosion artifacts by performing the surface reconstruction. Open the image. From the menu, select Data Process, SPM modes, Tip, then choose Surface Reconstruction and click OK (Figure 3).
  3. Align the imaging plane to match the laboratory XY plane by removing the tilt in the substrate from the scan data. To accomplish this task, select Data Process, Level and choose Plane Level (Figure 4).
  4. Align rows of the image by selecting Data Process, Correct Data and then choose Align Rows. Several alignment options are available (Figure 5). For example, Median is an algorithm that finds an average height of each scan line and subtracts it from the data.
  5. Go to Data Process, Correct Data and choose Remove Scars (Figure 6), which removes common scanning errors known as scars.
  6. Align the mica surface at the zero height, Z = 0, by selecting Flatten Base in Level drop-down menu accessible from Data Process (Figure 7).
  7. Identify EVs on the scanned surface by using Mark by Threshold in Grains drop-down menu (Figure 8A). This algorithm identifies surface-immobilized exosomes as particles protruding from the zero-surface substrate by the height above the user-selected threshold. Select a threshold in the range between 1 and 3 nm, which will eliminate most of the background interference. Smaller thresholds are used with cleaner background.
    NOTE: The threshold in Figure 8A is 1.767 nm. The outcome of the MCF-7 exosome identification with this thresholding is shown in Figure 8B. Gwyddion offers several alternatives to thresholding as the algorithm to automatically identify vesicles in the image, including automated thresholding (Otsu's method), edge detection, and the watershed algorithm.
    NOTE: Particle agglomerates, if present in the AFM image, may be masked and excluded from the analysis.
  8. Perform geometric and dimensional characterization of the identified EVs using the available Distributions algorithms accessible from Grains menu.
    NOTE: Gwyddion provides tools to assess the distribution of scalar-valued, areal, volumetric, and other properties of immobilized EVs in a hydrated or dessicated state. An example of a scalar-values property is shown in Figure 9, which gives the distribution of maximum heights within the footprint of each identified exosome.
  9. Export the AFM data from Gwyddion for specialized analysis by other computational tools and custom computer programs.

Results

Surface fixation of EVs is a critical step in the imaging sequence. Electrostatic surface immobilization of exosomes, known to have a negative zeta potential, will robustly occur after the mica’s substrate is modified to have a positive surface charge. Without the treatment with NiCl2 to impart positive surface changes, the immobilization of EVs on the substrate was found to be ineffective. The height image in Figure 10A, acquired in the air after the MCF-7 exosome sample co...

Discussion

The immobilization of EVs from a biological fluid, surface scanning, and image analysis are the essential steps of the developed protocol for the AFM characterization of EVs in liquid. The number of vesicles amenable to AFM imaging scales with the imaged surface area and the surface concentration of the vesicles immobilized on the substrate. Given a negative zeta potential of EVs and exosomes18, we advocate electrostatic fixation of EVs from liquid samples to the AFM substrate. The immobilization ...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose. 

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Science Foundation (award number IGERT-0903715), the University of Utah (Department of Chemical Engineering Seed Grant and the Graduate Research Fellowship Award), and Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech Fellowship). 

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
AFM/STM Controller BrukerMultimode Nanoscope VThis AFM controller supports imaging of biological samples in liquid and air. 
AFM/STM metal specimen discs (10 mm)TedPella16207Metal specimen disc on which a mica disk is attached by a double-sided tape or other means.
AFM/STM Mica discs (10 mm)TedPella50Highest quality grade V1 mica, 0.21mm (0.0085”) thick. Interleaved, in packages of 10. Can be mounted on AFM/STM discs. Available in four diameters
AFM probe for imaging in the airBrukerTESP-V2High quality etched silicon probes for tapping mode and non-contact mode for scanning in the air.
AFM probe for soft sample imaging in liquidBrukerMLCTSoft silicon nitride cantilevers with silicon nitride tips, which are well-suited for liquid operation.  The range in force constants enables users to image extremely soft samples in contact mode as well as high load vs distance spectroscopy.
Double sided tapeSpectrum360-77705Used to fix the mica disk on the metal specimen disc.
ExoQuick-TCSystem BiosciencesEXOTC50A-1ExoQuick-TC is a proprietary polymer-based kit designed for exosome isolation from tissue culture media. 
Glass probe AFM holder for imaging in liquidBruker MTFML-V2This glass probe holder is designed for scanning in fluid with the MultiMode AFM.  The holder can be used in peak force tapping mode, contact mode, tapping mode, and force modulation.  The probe is acoustically driven by a separate piezo oscillator for larger amplitude modulation.  The holder is supplied with two ports, required fittings, and accessories kit for adding and removing fluids.
GwyddionCzech Metrology Institute.Version 2.52Open Source software for visualization and analysis of data fields obtained by scanning probe microscopy techniques.
Lint-free blotting paperGE Healthcare Whatman Grade GB003 Blotting PaperUse this blotting paper to remove NiCl2 after the modification of the mica's substrate.  
Lint-free cleanroom wipesTexwipeAlphaWipe TX1004Use these polyester wipes for surface cleaning. 
Nickel(II) chloride (NiCl2)Sigma-Aldrich339350Powder used to make 10 mM NiCl2 in DI water
Phosphate Buffered Saline (1x)Gibco10010023PBS, pH 7.4

References

  1. Chernyshev, V. S., et al. Size and shape characterization of hydrated and desiccated exosomes. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 407, 3285-3301 (2015).
  2. Ramirez, M. I., et al. Technical challenges of working with extracellular vesicles. Nanoscale. 10, 881-906 (2018).
  3. Skliar, M., et al. Membrane proteins significantly restrict exosome mobility. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 501, 1055-1059 (2018).
  4. Parisse, P., et al. Atomic force microscopy analysis of extracellular vesicles. European Biophysics Journal. 46, 813-820 (2017).
  5. Ito, K., et al. Host Cell Prediction of Exosomes Using Morphological Features on Solid Surfaces Analyzed by Machine Learning. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 122, 6224-6235 (2018).
  6. Sharma, S., LeClaire, M., Gimzewski, J. K. Ascent of atomic force microscopy as a nanoanalytical tool for exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Nanotechnology. 29, 132001 (2018).
  7. Meyer, R. L. Immobilisation of living bacteria for AFM imaging under physiological conditions. Ultramicroscopy. 110, 1349-1357 (2010).
  8. Théry, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G., Clayton, A., et al. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Current protocols in cell biology. Chapter 3 (Unit 3.22), (2006).
  9. Taylor, D. D., Zacharias, W., Gercel-Taylor, C. Exosome isolation for proteomic analyses and RNA profiling. Methods in Molecular Biology. 728, 235-246 (2011).
  10. Théry, C., et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. 8, 1535750 (2019).
  11. Weng, Y., et al. Effective isolation of exosomes with polyethylene glycol from cell culture supernatant for in-depth proteome profiling. The Analyst. 141, 4640-4646 (2016).
  12. Nečas, D., Klapetek, P. Gwyddion: an open-source software for SPM data analysis. Open Physics. 10, 181-188 (2012).
  13. Hsueh, C., Chen, H., Gimzewski, J. K., Reed, J., Abdel-Fattah, T. M. Localized nanoscopic surface measurements of nickel-modified Mica for single-molecule DNA sequence sampling. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces. 2, 3249-3256 (2010).
  14. Conde-Vancells, J., et al. Characterization and comprehensive proteome profiling of exosomes secreted by hepatocytes. Journal of Proteome Research. 7, 5157-5166 (2008).
  15. Zhou, Y., et al. Exosomes released by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells protect against cisplatin-induced renal oxidative stress and apoptosis in vivo and in vitro. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 4, 34 (2013).
  16. Coleman, B. M., Hanssen, E., Lawson, V. A., Hill, A. F. Prion-infected cells regulate the release of exosomes with distinct ultrastructural features. FASEB Journal. 26, 4160-4173 (2012).
  17. Briegel, A., et al. Universal architecture of bacterial chemoreceptor arrays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106, 17181-17186 (2009).
  18. Akagi, T., et al. On-Chip Immunoelectrophoresis of Extracellular Vesicles Released from Human Breast Cancer Cells. PLOS ONE. 10, e0123603 (2015).
  19. Sharma, S., et al. Structural-mechanical characterization of nanoparticle exosomes in human saliva, using correlative AFM, FESEM, and force spectroscopy. ACS Nano. 4, 1921-1926 (2010).
  20. Radeghieri, A., et al. Cultured human amniocytes express hTERT, which is distributed between nucleus and cytoplasm and is secreted in extracellular vesicles. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 483, 706-711 (2017).
  21. Woo, J., Sharma, S., Gimzewski, J. The Role of Isolation Methods on a Nanoscale Surface Structure and Its Effect on the Size of Exosomes. Journal of Circulating Biomarkers. 5, 11 (2016).
  22. Deegan, R. D., et al. Capillary flow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops. Nature. 389, 827-829 (1997).
  23. Johnson, C. A., Lenhoff, A. M. Adsorption of Charged Latex Particles on Mica Studied by Atomic Force Microscopy. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 179, 587-599 (1996).
  24. Pastré, D., et al. Adsorption of DNA to Mica Mediated by Divalent Counterions: A Theoretical and Experimental Study. Biophysical Journal. 85, 2507-2518 (2003).
  25. van der Pol, E., Böing, A. N., Harrison, P., Sturk, A., Nieuwland, R. Classification, functions, and clinical relevance of extracellular vesicles. Pharmacological Reviews. 64, 676-705 (2012).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Extracellular VesiclesAtomic Force MicroscopyAFM ImagingElectrostatic ImmobilizationSurface ScanningVesicle IdentificationData AnalysisHydrated SamplesDesiccated SamplesMica Disc PreparationNickel II Chloride TreatmentNano Particle Tracking AnalysisExosome ConcentrationSample IncubationPBS Rinsing

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved