Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Representative Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Here, we describe, compare, and contrast two different techniques for accurate follicle counting of fixed mouse ovarian tissues.

Abstract

Sexually reproducing female mammals are born with their entire lifetime supply of oocytes. Immature, quiescent oocytes are found within primordial follicles, the storage unit of the female germline. They are non-renewable, thus their number at birth and subsequent rate of loss largely dictates the female fertile lifespan. Accurate quantification of primordial follicle numbers in women and animals is essential for determining the impact of medicines and toxicants on the ovarian reserve. It is also necessary for evaluating the need for, and success of, existing and emerging fertility preservation techniques. Currently, no methods exist to accurately measure the number of primordial follicles comprising the ovarian reserve in women. Furthermore, obtaining ovarian tissue from large animals or endangered species for experimentation is often not feasible. Thus, mice have become an essential model for such studies, and the ability to evaluate primordial follicle numbers in whole mouse ovaries is a critical tool. However, reports of absolute follicle numbers in mouse ovaries in the literature are highly variable, making it difficult to compare and/or replicate data. This is due to a number of factors including strain, age, treatment groups, as well as technical differences in the methods of counting employed. In this article, we provide a step-by-step instructional guide for preparing histological sections and counting primordial follicles in mouse ovaries using two different methods: [1] stereology, which relies on the fractionator/optical dissector technique; and [2] the direct count technique. Some of the key advantages and drawbacks of each method will be highlighted so that reproducibility can be improved in the field and to enable researchers to select the most appropriate method for their studies.

Introduction

The immature, meiotically-arrested oocytes stored within primordial follicles in the ovary are the storage unit for the female germline and comprise an individual’s lifetime ovarian reserve. Primordial follicle numbers decline naturally with age1, or alternatively, can be prematurely depleted following exposure to exogenous chemicals, including some pharmaceuticals and environmental toxicants in air, food and water2. Given that the primordial follicle number is finite, the quantity and quality of follicles present within the ovary largely determine female fertility and offspring health. Thus, accurate quantificatio....

Protocol

Ovaries were collected from female C57BL6J mice. All animal procedures and experiments were performed in accordance with the NHMRC Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals and approved by the Monash Animal Research Platform Animal Ethics Committee.

NOTE: A chemotherapy agent shown to deplete primordial follicle oocytes, as determined using stereology11 and direct counts12,13 was used in this r.......

Representative Results

A well-characterized model of follicle depletion was used, whereby young adult female mice were administered a single dose of cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, or saline vehicle control (n=5/group) and both ovaries were harvested from each animal after 48 hours. One ovary per animal was prepared as described in Step 1 for each of the two methods: stereology or direct counts. The left and right ovary from each animal was randomly assigned to each group. These data show that when using stereology, a significant depletion of m.......

Discussion

This article provides a step-by-step protocol for the gold standard technique for enumerating mouse primordial follicles, stereology, and the more commonly employed method of direct follicle counting. Chemotherapy treatment was used to compare and contrast the results obtained from these two different methods within the left and right ovary from the same animal. Both methods revealed high inter-animal variability in primordial follicle numbers. A significant depletion of the ovarian reserve was recorded using stereology,.......

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was made possible through Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support and Australian Government NHMRC IRIISS and supported by funding from National Health and Medical Research Council (ALW #1120300) and Australian Research Council (KJH #FT190100265). The authors would like to acknowledge the technical support of the Monash Animal Research Platform, Monash Histology Platform and Monash Micro Imaging facility.

....

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1-Butanol (HPLC)Fisher Chemical#A383-1
Acid alcoholAmber Scientific#ACDL
Bouin’s fixativeSigma-Aldrich#HT10132Picric acid 0.9% (w/v), formaldehyde 9% (v/v), acetic acid 5% (w/v)
CyclophosphamideSigma-Aldrich#C0768-5G
Dibutylphthalate Polystyrene Xylene (DPX)Sigma-Aldrich#06522
EthanolAmber Scientific#ETHEthanol 100%
Micro Feather opthalmic scalpel with aluminium handleDesigns for Vision#FEA-745-SRFeather blade for dissections (seen in Figure 1)
Formalin fixativeAustralian Biostain#ANBFC
Glass coverslipThermo Scientific#MENCS22501GP22 mm x 50 mm
Glycomethacrylate resin RM2165 microtomeLeica Microsystems#RM2165
Glycolmethacrylate DPX*made in house*Mix 1.5 L Xylene; 800 g polystyrene pellets; 100mL Dibutyl phthalate for 3 weeks
HistoleneTrajan#11031
Mayer’s haematoxylinAmber Scientific#MH
Olympus BX50 microscopeOlympus#BX50Brightfield microscope fitted with 10x dry & 100x oil immersion objective (numerical aperture 1.3)
Olympus immersion oil type-FOlympus#IMMOIL-F30CC
Olympus TH4-200 light sourceOlympus#TH4-200
Paraffin waxSigma-Aldrich#03987
Periodic acidTrajan#PERI1%Periodic acid 1%
Rotary Microtome CUT 4060MicroTec#4060R/FUsed to cut paraffin sections
Schiff’s reagentTrajan#SCHF
Scott's tap waterAmber Scientific#SCOTPotassium carbonate, magnesium sulphate, water
StereoInvestigator Stereological SystemMBF BioscienceIncludes StereoInvestigator software, multi-control unit, automatic stage and joystick
Superfrost microscope slidesThermo Scientific#MENSF41296SP1 mm, 72 pcs
Technovit 7100 Plastic embedding systemEmgrid Australia#64709003500 mL/5 x 1 g/40 mL
Technovit 3040 yellowEmgrid Australia#64708805100 g/80 mL

References

  1. Stringer, J. M., Winship, A., Liew, S. H., Hutt, K. The capacity of oocytes for DNA repair. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 75 (15), 2777-2792 (2018).
  2. Winship, A. L., Stringer, J. M., Liew, S. H., Hutt, K. J.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

StereologyFollicle EnumerationOvarian BiologyOvarian ReservesOptical FractionatorPrimordial FollicleHistological TechniquesMorphologyReproducibility

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved