Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

The present protocol describes how to graft human skin onto non-obese diabetic (NOD)-scid interleukin-2 gamma chain receptor (NSG) mice. A detailed description of the preparation of human skin for transplant, preparation of mice for transplant, transplantation of split-thickness human skin, and post-transplantation recovery procedure are included in the report.

Abstract

The human skin xenograft model, in which human donor skin is transplanted onto an immunodeficient mouse host, is an important option for translational research in skin immunology. Murine and human skin differ substantially in anatomy and immune cell composition. Therefore, traditional mouse models have limitations for dermatological research and drug discovery. However, successful xenotransplants are technically challenging and require optimal specimen and mouse graft site preparation for graft and host survival. The present protocol provides an optimized technique for transplanting human skin onto mice and discusses necessary considerations for downstream experimental aims. This report describes the appropriate preparation of a human donor skin sample, assembly of a surgical setup, mouse and surgical site preparation, skin transplantation, and post-surgical monitoring. Adherence to these methods allows for maintenance of xenografts for over 6 weeks post-surgery. The techniques outlined below allow maximum grafting efficiency due to the development of engineering controls, sterile technique, and pre- and post-surgical conditioning. Appropriate performance of the xenograft model results in long-lived human skin graft samples for experimental characterization of human skin and preclinical testing of compounds in vivo.

Introduction

Mouse models are frequently used to make inferences about human biology and disease, partly due to their experimental reproducibility and capacity for genetic manipulation. However, mouse physiology does not completely recapitulate human organ systems, particularly skin, and therefore has limitations for use as a preclinical model in drug development1. Anatomical differences between mouse and human skin include differences in epithelial thicknesses and architecture, lack of murine eccrine sweat glands, and variations in hair cycling2. Furthermore, both the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system are divergent between the two species3. Mouse skin contains a unique immune population of dendritic epidermal T cells (DETCs), has a higher abundance of dermal γδ T cells, and varies in immune cell subset localization in comparison to human tissue4. Therefore, experimental findings regarding human skin biology and inflammation benefit from validation with human tissue. While in vitro and organoid culture systems are widely utilized tools to study human tissue, these systems are limited by absent or incomplete immune reconstitution and a lack of connection to peripheral vasculature5. The humanized xenograft skin transplant model aims to allow for therapeutic or biological manipulation of immune and non-immune pathways in human tissues in vivo.

The human skin xenograft model has been utilized to study skin physiology and pharmacology, analyze immune rejection and responses, dissect human skin cancer mechanisms, and understand skin diseases and wound healing6. While applicable to multiple fields of skin research, the xenograft model has lower throughput than in vitro studies and lacks the ease of genetic manipulation employed in mouse models. Time points within this model may range from weeks to months, and successful grafting requires appropriate facilities and equipment to perform these surgeries. However, the xenograft model supplies biological and physiological context to experiments, while organoid culture systems, such as tissue explants, often require replicating a myriad of moving parts, such as exogenous signals, at specific time intervals7. Therefore, this model is best utilized to further validate findings observed in vitro and within mouse models, or for work that is not otherwise biologically feasible. Appropriate use of the xenograft model provides a unique opportunity to study and manipulate intact human tissue in vivo.

Optimization of the xenograft skin transplant model has relied on decades of research to preserve graft integrity over time. Critical to this process is utilizing the non-obese diabetic (NOD)-scid interleukin-2 gamma chain receptor (NSG) mouse, which lacks B and T adaptive immune cells, functional NK cells, and has deficiencies in macrophage and dendritic cells8. The immunodeficient nature of these NSG hosts allows for the transplant of human hematopoietic cells, patient-derived cancers, and skin8,9,10. Despite this immunosuppressive host environment, additional suppression of mouse neutrophilic immune responses by anti-GR1 administration is necessary for graft success10. The major roadblocks in transplanting intact tissue are infection, rejection, and difficulty in re-establishing blood flow to the graft, sometimes leading to loss of dermal and epidermal integrity11. Techniques including administration of anti-FR1 and use of appropriate graft depth improve graft survival10. Meticulous optimization makes it possible to perform human xenograft skin transplants on NSG mice with high efficiency and survival rates, ranging from 90%-100%.

Protocol

The present study was approved and performed in compliance with UCSF IACUC (AN191105-01H) and IRB (13-11307) protocols. Skin samples, discarded as part of routine elective surgical procedures, such as hernia repair, were used for the present research. The skin samples are either de-identified and certified as Not Human Subjects Research or, if clinically identifying information is required for downstream analyses, patients provided written consent under IRB protocol 13-11307. No other inclusion or exclusion criteria were utilized. NSG mice of either sex, 8-10 weeks of age, were employed in the study. The mice were obtained from commercial sources (see Table of Materials).

1. Processing of donor human skin sample

NOTE: The human skin sample used in this transplant was a large sample collected from the abdomen of a healthy patient. The sample must be at least 15 cm x 7.5 cm. Size limitations may affect the number of mice for which skin is available and the choice of graft size.

  1. Maintain the skin sample at cold temperatures (on ice; 4°C) before preparation and grafting. Keep the sample moist in a closed specimen collection cup with the gauze soaked in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
    NOTE: Storing the skin sample at 4 °C for longer than 2 days is not recommended. However, reports exist where the skin samples are stored for a longer time12.
    CAUTION: Treat all human tissue with standard biohazard precautions.
  2. Prepare to dermatome the human skin sample in a sterilized negative pressure tissue culture hood on a sterilized dissection board.
  3. Place the skin sample, epidermis side up, on the dissection board. Wipe the epidermis with a sterile alcohol prep pad and then with PBS.
  4. Pin the closer edge of the skin in place with a 1.5 in dissecting T-pin (see Table of Materials).
  5. Dermatome the skin specimen at a 400 µm thickness, applying steady pressure while cutting forward at a 30°-45° angle. Follow all instrument-specific instructions and safety measures (see Table of Materials).
    NOTE: For details on the dermatome technique, please see a previously published report13.
  6. Prepare a 100 mm x 20 mm Petri dish by placing a sterile gauze soaked in sterile PBS at the bottom of the dish. Place the skin, epidermis side up, onto the wet gauze.
  7. Seal and cover the plate edges with a semitransparent sealing film (see Table of Materials) to ensure the sample is not contaminated. Store the sample at 4° C prior to grafting.

2. Pre-surgery conditioning and preparation

  1. Prepare the sterile instruments and a sterile surgical station for grafting. Use autoclaved paper towels as sterile surfaces for instrument and mouse placement.
    NOTE: Mice may be grafted after weaning but are preferably grafted between 8-10 weeks of age. Mice of either sex may be grafted.
  2. Perform the surgical preparation, such as hair removal, in an area physically separated from the surgical station.
  3. Prepare the anti-GR1 (see Table of Materials) by diluting it to 1 mg/mL in sterile saline. Dose each mouse with 100 µg/100 µL of the anti-GR1 solution intraperitoneally following anesthesia induction.
  4. Anesthetize the mice, one at a time, with isoflurane or other institutionally approved anesthetics.
    NOTE: Isoflurane needs to be given at a 3%-5% concentration during induction. Once the mouse is immobile, lower the isoflurane concentration to 1%-3% to effect for the duration of the surgery.
    1. Monitor the mouse for appropriate depth of anesthesia by observing respiratory rate, absence of toe-pinch response, and appropriate pink coloration of ears and mouth.
      CAUTION: Use appropriate anesthetic machinery and scavenging methods, and avoid exposure to isoflurane vapors.
  5. Transfer the mouse to a heating pad or another heat source (see Table of Materials).
  6. Administer the ophthalmic ointment by dabbing a small drop of ointment on the eye with a gloved finger.
  7. Administer analgesics Buprenorphine (0.08 mg/kg) and Carprofen (5 mg/kg) (see Table of Materials) subcutaneously by pinching the skin and injecting at an angle parallel to the body.
    NOTE: Prepare the pre-treatment analgesia following institutional protocols. Follow institutional guidelines for the selection and administration of analgesics. The method of analgesia used in this study is outlined in step 2.7 and Supplementary Figure 1.
  8. Administer the anti-GR1 (prepared in step 2.4) intraperitoneally by slightly lifting the mouse by the tail, exposing the abdomen, and injecting at a 30° angle using an insulin 1 mL (12.7 mm) syringe.
  9. Use animal-safe electric clippers (see Table of Materials) to shave the middle and upper portions of the dorsal side of the mouse.
  10. Clear all the hair and apply a generous amount of hair removal ointment onto the shaved skin for 30 s to 1 min.
  11. Completely wipe away hair removal ointment with a paper towel and PBS.

3. Transplantation procedure

  1. Transfer the mouse to a secondary surgical location, away from the hair removal station.
  2. Sterilize the surgical site with the iodine swab stick in a circular motion, starting in the middle and working out toward the edge of the depilated area.
  3. Place a piece of sterile plastic wrap over the mouse and cut a window in the plastic slightly larger than the size of the area to be grafted.
  4. Cut a rectangle-shaped 10 mm x 10 mm portion of donor skin to be grafted with a scalpel. Do this by firmly holding the donor skin in place with the backside of the forceps and cutting alongside the forceps with the scalpel.
  5. Using the surgical scissors, snip a rectangular area of mouse skin matching the size of the donor skin piece, creating a graft bed. Use forceps to pull the skin away from the body, and cut the skin with the scissors angled away from the body to avoid cutting deeply into the facia.
  6. Place the donor skin piece, epidermis side up, onto the prepared graft bed.
  7. Using the back of the forceps, manipulate the skin, sliding back and forth until the donor skin lies completely flat against the graft bed.
  8. Add drops of surgical glue tissue adhesive (see Table of Materials) where the donor skin meets the mouse skin and hold the mouse and donor skin together with forceps for 1-2 s so that the glue adheres to the tissues. Completely seal the edge of the graft and allow for the glue to dry fully.
  9. Bandage the mice (Figure 1) following the steps below.
    1. Cut a piece of petrolatum gauze (see Table of Materials) large enough to cover the graft area completely.
    2. Cover the graft with the petrolatum gauze, and lightly press the gauze against the skin using forceps.
    3. Cut a strip of a transparent film dressing lengthwise so that the width is large enough to cover the mouse's wound.
    4. Firmly press the transparent film dressing, adhesive side down, over the gauze. Quickly roll the mouse to wrap the dressing completely around the torso, ensuring it fits tightly without impeding respiration and all limbs are free for movement.
    5. Place the mouse in a recovery cage and monitor it until it is alert and moving around. Provide a heat source on part of the cage for at least 15 min following recovery.
      NOTE: The animals are expected to recover within 1-5 min after placing them in the recovery cage.
  10. Singly house the mice following grafting.
  11. Administer post-surgical analgesia as required by institutional protocols.
    ​NOTE: Buprenorphine (0.08 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously 4-6 h later during the present study.

4. Post-surgical procedures

  1. Inject 100 µL (100 µg) of anti-GR1 intra-peritoneally at 4 days, 7 days, and 11 days post-grafting to prevent graft rejection (Supplementary Figure 1).
  2. Replace bandages as necessary and if removed by mice.
  3. Rebandage all the mice on day 7.
  4. Remove the bandages on day 14.
  5. Monitor the mice for signs of graft rejection and systemic inflammation (weight loss, hair loss, extreme lethargy).
  6. Harvest the mice between 3 and 6 weeks post-graft.
    1. Euthanize the mice via regulator-controlled carbon dioxide (CO2) administration followed by cervical dislocation.
      ​NOTE: Follow institutional guidelines for euthanasia.
    2. Dissect the skin grafts from the mice14. Place a portion of the graft in 10% formalin for 24 h before paraffin embedding and sectioning for histology staining9.
    3. Mince the skin grafts with scissors and digest enzymatically with 250 IU/mL of Collagenase IV and 0.02 mg/mL of DNase in cell culture media overnight. Stain the cells for surface and intracellular markers following the previously described procedure14.

Results

Human skin xenografts were performed on NSG mice inside a super-barrier animal facility. Success was defined by the prolonged graft and mouse survival and behavioral health of mice post-transplant. Poor survival during the week following surgery was initially observed as the biggest barrier to experimental success, with up to 50% of mice requiring euthanasia. Improving sterile technique and better support of mouse body temperatures during and immediately after surgery increased surgical survival consistently to over 80% ...

Discussion

The mouse xenograft skin transplant model is a key technique to mechanistically dissect human skin immune responses in an in vivo setting14. Successful skin xenograft transplants rely upon appropriate preparation of mice and skin specimens and mice and adherence to aseptic rodent surgery methods15. Rapid cooling and proper storage of skin samples at cold temperatures in media (such as sterile saline) are important to ensure continued tissue health prior to tra...

Disclosures

MDR is a founder of TRex Bio and Sitryx. MDR and MML receive research funding from Sitryx, Q32, and TRex Bio.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded in part by sponsored research agreements from TRex Bio and grants from the NIH (1R01AR075864-01A1). JMM is supported by the Cancer Research Society (grant 26005). We acknowledge the Parnassus Flow Cytometry Core supported in part by grants NIH P30 DK063720, S10 1S10OD021822-01, and S10 1S10OD018040-01.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
10% Neutral Buffered FormalinFisherSF100-20Fixative for histology
3M Vetbond Tissue Adhesive3M1469SBsurgical glue
Alexa 700 CD45 monoclonal antibody (Clone 30F11)Thermo Fischer56-0451-82Flow cytometry analysis: Surface protein staining
Anti-GR1 clone RB6-8C5BioXcellBE0075Anti-rejection
APC mouse anti-human CD25  (Clone 2A3)BD Biosciences340939Flow cytometry analysis: Surface protein staining
APC-eFluor 780 anti-human HLA-DR (Clone LN3)eBioscience47-9956-42Flow cytometry analysis: Surface protein staining
Autoclave pouchesVWR 89140-800For autoclaving tools and paper towels
Brilliant Violet 60 anti-human CD4 antibody (Clone OKT4Biolegend317438Flow cytometry analysis: Surface protein staining
Brilliant Violet 65 anti-human CD8a antibody (Clone RPA-T8)Biolegend301042Flow cytometry analysis: Surface protein staining
Brilliant Violet 711 anti-human CD3 antibody (Clone OKT3)Biolegend317328Flow cytometry analysis: Surface protein staining
Buprenex 0.3 mg/mLCovetrus059122Analgesia
Carprofen 50 mg/mLZoetisNADA # 141-199Analgesia
Collagenase Type IVWorthington4188Skin digestion
D42 Dermatome bladeHumeca5.D42BL10dermatome (1 blade per sample)
Dermatome D42Humeca4.D42dermatome
Disposable ScalpelBard-Parker371610skin preparation
Dissecting T-Pins; 1-1/2 inch, 1000/CS 1.5Cole-ParmerUX-10915-03To pin skin specimen for dermatome
Dissection scissorsmedicon02.04.10sample preparation and mouse dissection
DNAseSigma-AldrichDN25-1GSkin digestion
eBioscience Foxp3 / Transcription Factor Fixation/Permeabilization Concentrate and DiluenteBioscience00-5521-00Flow cytometry analysis: Cell Fixation and Permeabilization
eFluor-450 FOXP3 monoclonal antibody (Clone PCH101)eBioscience48-4776-42Flow cytometry analysis: Intracellular protein staining
Electric clippersKentCL8787-KIThair removal
Epredia Shandon Instant EosinFisher Scientific6765040H&E
Epredia Shandon Instant HematoxylinFisher Scientific6765015H&E
FITC anti-human CD45 (Clone HI30)Tonbo Biosciences35-0459-T100Flow cytometry analysis: Surface protein staining
Forceps medicon07.60.07sample preparation and mouse dissection
GauzeFisherbrand22-362-178Sample preparation
Heating lampMorganville ScientificHL0100Post-surgical care
Heating pads 4" x 10"Pristech20415Surgical heat supply
Insulin 1cc 12.7 mm syringesBD329410drug administration
IsofluraneUnited States Pharmacopeia (USP) NDC 66794-013-25Anesthesia 
Isoflurane machineVetEquip911103Anesthesia
Nair for MenNair‎ 10022600588556hair removal
Neomycin and Polymyxin Bisulfates and Bacitracin Zinc Ophthalmic ointmentDechra NDC 17478-235-35eye ointment to prevent drying
NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) miceThe Jackson Laboratory005557Mice
Paper towelsKleenex100848May be autoclaved for sterile surfaces
ParafilmFisher Scientific13-374-12Semitransparent sealing film
PE mouse anti-human CD127 (Clone HIL-7R-M21)BD Biosciences557938Flow cytometry analysis: Surface protein staining
PE-Cy-7 mouse anti-Ki-67 (Clone B56)BD Biosciences561283Flow cytometry analysis: Intracellular protein staining
PerCP-eFluor-710 CD152 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody (Clone 14D3)eBioscience46-1529-42Flow cytometry analysis: Intracellular protein staining
Permeabilization Buffer 10xeBioscience00-8333-56Flow cytometry analysis: Intracellular protein staining buffer
Petri Dish 150 mmCorning430597Sample storage
Plastic WrapFisherbrand22-305-654Site preparation
Providone-Iodine Swab stickPDIS41350Site sterilization
Soft-Feed and Oral Hydration (Napa Nectar)Se Lab Group IncNC9066511 For supplementing poorly recovering mice post-surgery
Specimen Collection CupsFisher Scientific22-150-266sample storage
Sterile alcohol prep padFisherbrand22-363-750skin preparation
Sterile PBSGibco14190-144Media for sample storage
Sterile salineHospiraNDC 0409-4888-02For drug dilution
Tegaderm Film 4” x 43/4” 3M1626transparent film wound dressing
Vaseline Petrolatum Gauze 3” x 8” Kendall414600wound dressing
Violet 510 Ghost Dye Tonbo Biosciences13-0870-T100Flow cytometry analysis: Viability dye

References

  1. Zomer, H. D., Trentin, A. G. Skin wound healing in humans and mice: Challenges in translational research. Journal of Dermatological Science. 90 (1), 3-12 (2018).
  2. Wong, V. W., Sorkin, M., Glotzbach, J. P., Longaker, M. T., Gurtner, G. C. Surgical approaches to create murine models of human wound healing. Journal of Biomedicine & Biotechnology. 2011, 969618 (2011).
  3. Mestas, J., Hughes, C. C. W. Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology. The Journal of Immunology. 172 (5), 2731-2738 (2004).
  4. Pasparakis, M., Haase, I., Nestle, F. O. Mechanisms regulating skin immunity and inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology. 14 (5), 289-301 (2014).
  5. Sun, H., Zhang, Y. -. X., Li, Y. -. M. Generation of skin organoids: potential opportunities and challenges. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 9, 3176 (2021).
  6. Cristóbal, L., et al. Mouse models for human skin transplantation: a systematic review. Cells Tissues Organs. 210 (4), 250-259 (2021).
  7. Rossi, G., Manfrin, A., Lutolf, M. P. Progress and potential in organoid research. Nature Reviews Genetics. 19 (11), 671-687 (2018).
  8. Ito, M., et al. NOD/SCID/γcnull mouse: an excellent recipient mouse model for engraftment of human cells. Blood. 100 (9), 3175-3182 (2002).
  9. Meraz, I. M., et al. An improved patient-derived xenograft humanized mouse model for evaluation of lung cancer immune responses. Cancer Immunology Research. 7 (8), 1267-1279 (2019).
  10. Racki, W. J., et al. NOD-scid IL2rgamma(null) mouse model of human skin transplantation and allograft rejection. Transplantation. 89 (5), 527-536 (2010).
  11. Meehan, G. R., et al. Developing a xenograft model of human vasculature in the mouse ear pinna. Scientific Reports. 10 (1), 2058 (2020).
  12. Gokkaya, A., et al. Skin graft storage in platelet rich plasma (PRP). Dermatologic Therapy. 33 (1), 13178 (2020).
  13. . The Humeca D42 and D80 battery operated cordless dermatomes Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCRowX-TdA (2021)
  14. Rodriguez, R. S., et al. Memory regulatory T cells reside in human skin. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 124 (3), 1027-1036 (2014).
  15. Hoogstraten-Miller, S. L., Brown, P. A. Techniques in rodent aseptic surgery. Current Protocols in Immunology. 82 (1), 12-14 (2008).
  16. Karim, A. S., et al. Evolution of ischemia and neovascularization in a murine model of full thickness human wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration: Official Publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. 28 (6), 812-822 (2020).
  17. Ali, N., et al. Xenogeneic graft-versus-host-disease in NOD-scid IL-2Rγnull mice display a T-effector memory phenotype. PloS One. 7 (8), 44219 (2012).
  18. Souci, L., Denesvre, C. 3D skin models in domestic animals. Veterinary Research. 52 (1), 21 (2021).
  19. Holtkamp, S. J., et al. Circadian clocks guide dendritic cells into skin lymphatics. Nature Immunology. 22 (11), 1375-1381 (2021).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Xenograft Skin ModelImmune ResponsesHuman TissuesIn VivoPreclinical TestingSkin InflammationDermatomeSurgical TechniquesAnesthesia InductionAnalgesics InjectionIntraperitoneal InjectionAntiseptic PreparationHair Removal ProcessAnimal Surgery

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved