Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

In this study, a method was developed to facilitate the transfer of experimental settings and analysis templates between two flow cytometers in two laboratories for the detection of lymphocytes in Japanese encephalitis-vaccinated children. The standardization method for the flow cytometer experiments will allow research projects to be effectively conducted in multiple centers.

Abstract

An increasing number of laboratories need to collect data from multiple flow cytometers, especially for research projects performed across multiple centers. The challenges of using two flow cytometers in different labs include the lack of standardized materials, software compatibility issues, inconsistencies in instrument setup, and the use of different configurations for different flow cytometers. To establish a standardized flow cytometry experiment to achieve the consistency and comparability of experimental results across multiple centers, a rapid and feasible standardization method was established to transfer parameters across different flow cytometers.

The methods developed in this study allowed the transfer of experimental settings and analysis templates between two flow cytometers in different laboratories for the detection of lymphocytes in Japanese encephalitis (JE)-vaccinated children. A consistent fluorescence intensity was obtained between the two cytometers using fluorescence standard beads to establish the cytometer settings. Comparable results were obtained in two laboratories with different types of instruments. Using this method, we can standardize analysis for evaluating the immune function of JE-vaccinated children in different laboratories with different instruments, diminish the differences in data and results among flow cytometers in multiple centers, and provide a feasible approach for the mutual accreditation of laboratory results. The standardization method of flow cytometer experiments will ensure the effective performance of research projects across multiple centers.

Introduction

The standardization of flow cytometry is useful for the comparability of results obtained from different cytometers across different laboratories and study centers, and conducive to the mutual recognition of results to improve work efficiency. An increasing number of scenarios require standardization. During the drug development process, flow cytometry standardization is important, as a developed and validated assay will support the whole drug development process from preclinical to clinical analysis. Flow cytometric methods are frequently transferred between the pharmaceutical industry and collaborating laboratories1. Moreover, it is essential to obtain comparable data from multicentric clinical studies. For example, a standardization workflow was developed in the Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Multicenter Clinical Research Project to obtain comparable data from multicentric flow cytometry2.

The standardization of flow cytometry methods is challenging. The challenges experienced across labs are attributed to the lack of standardized materials, software compatibility issues, inconsistencies in instrument setup, and the use of different configurations among different flow cytometers and divergent gating strategies between the centers3,4. Therefore, it is important to conduct a gap analysis between laboratories. Sample access, quality systems, personnel qualifications, and instrument configuration must be reviewed to ensure that the requirements are met.

At present, children vaccinated with the Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccine have a significantly reduced incidence of JE5. Monitoring peripheral blood immune cells can help understand the changes in cell-mediated adaptive immunity after vaccination, and the correlation between the changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and the effects of vaccination. Due to the limited stability of whole blood samples, evaluations of vaccine efficacy are often performed in multiple centers. For this analysis, we defined naïve CD8+ or CD4+ T cells as CD27+ CD45RA+, central memory T cells (TCM) as CD27+ CD45RA-, effector memory T cells (TEM) as CD27- CD45RA-, and terminally differentiated effector memory T cells (TEMRA) as CD27- CD45RA+. CD19+ B cells can be separated into populations that express CD27 versus IgD6,7, naïve B cells express CD27n memory B cells (mBCs) can be identified based on the expression of IgD6, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) can be identified as CD4+CD25++CD127low 8. To establish a standardized flow cytometry experiment to achieve the consistency and comparability of experimental results in multiple centers, a rapid and feasible standardization method was established to facilitate the transfer of protocols across different flow cytometers for the detection of lymphocytes in the whole blood of JE-vaccinated children. Six healthy children (2 years old) were recruited from Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University. After receiving a prime and boost vaccination with a live-attenuated JE SA14-14-2 vaccine less than 6 months prior, peripheral blood samples were collected from the volunteers. Highly comparable data were obtained from different instruments following standardized procedures, which is helpful for multicenter assessments.

Protocol

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University (Approval Number: 2020-k-85). Informed consent of human subjects was waived as only residual samples after clinical testing were used in this study. Two labs are involved in this study. The transferring lab is where the standardized method was developed using one flow cytometer. The cytometer in this lab is hereinafter referred to as cytometer A. The test method lab is the laboratory that receives methods using another flow cytometer, and the cytometer in this lab is hereinafter referred to as cytometer B.

1. Peripheral blood sample collection and cell preparation

  1. Collect peripheral blood samples (2 mL) from JE-vaccinated children and unvaccinated children in EDTA-K2-anticoagulated tubes by standard venipuncture.
  2. Mix the whole blood sample by turning the tubes upside down 10x. Add 100 µL of whole blood to a 12 mm x 75 mm tube. Make each sample in duplicate.
  3. Add 10 µL of brilliant stain buffer (BV buffer) to a 12 mm x 75 mm tube. Add 5 µL of each antibody (CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD127, CD27, CD19, IgD; dilution factor: 1:20) and 20 µL of antibody (CD25, CD45RA; dilution factor: 1:5) to the BV buffer. Vortex gently.
    NOTE: The volumes and information of the antibody reagents are shown in Table 1.
  4. Add the antibody cocktail into the tube with the whole blood sample. Vortex gently and incubate at room temperature for 15 min in the dark.
  5. Dilute the 10x lysing solution 1:10 with distilled water to prepare 1x lysing solution. Lyse the blood samples by adding 2 mL of 1x lysing solution. Vortex gently and incubate for 10 min in the dark at room temperature.
  6. Centrifuge at 300 × g for 5 min and decant the supernatant.
  7. Resuspend the pellet in 2 mL of 1x PBS, centrifuge at 300 × g for 5 min, and decant the supernatant.
  8. Resuspend the pellet in 0.5 mL of 1x PBS and mix thoroughly. Store at 2 °C to 8 °C. Send the samples to the two labs for flow cytometric analysis.
    ​NOTE: The negative control sample and cell single-stained control must be processed simultaneously.

2. Preparing compensation beads and single-stained control

  1. Label V500-anti-CD45 single-stained, APC-H7-anti-CD3 single-stained, FITC-anti-CD4 single-stained, R718-anti-CD8 single-stained, BV605-anti-CD27 single-stained, APC-anti-CD45RA single-stained, PE-anti-CD25 single-stained, BV421-anti-CD127 single-stained, BB700-anti-CD19 single-stained, and PE-CY7-anti-IgD single-stained tubes.
  2. Add 100 µL of 1x Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) buffer containing 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS) to a 5 mL round-bottom polystyrene test tube.
  3. Add 50 µL of the negative beads and 50 µL of the anti-mouse Ig, κ beads to each tube and vortex.
  4. Add 2 µL of each labeled antibody (CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, CD127, CD45RA, CD27, CD19, IgD) to a single-stained tube. Vortex the mixture gently and incubate for 15 min in the dark at room temperature (20 °C to 25 °C).
  5. Resuspend the beads in 2 mL of 1x PBS, centrifuge at 300 × g for 5 min, and decant the supernatant.
  6. Resuspend the beads in 0.5 mL of 1x PBS and mix thoroughly. Store at 2 °C to 8 °C.

3. Using identical configuration names on the different cytometers in two labs

  1. Create a new configuration in the software of cytometer A. Click the Cytometer button and choose view Configurations to display the configuration window.
  2. In the configuration list, right-click the base configurations folder, choose New Folder, and rename it.
  3. Right-click the base configuration and choose copy.
  4. Right-click the new folder and paste the base configuration to create a new configuration. Rename the new configuration "Standardized Method Transfer".
  5. Drag the parameter name, such as FITC, from the Parameters list onto the appropriate detector (530/30).
  6. Edit additional parameters (PE, BB700, PE-CY7, APC, R718, APC-H7, BV421, V500, and BV605) to the new configuration.
  7. Follow this method to create a new configuration on a different flow cytometer model using the same name "Standardized Method Transfer". Ensure that the configuration includes the same parameters for each detector.
    NOTE: To successfully identify the experiment template on the two different flow cytometer models, make sure that the name is consistent.
  8. Under the cytometer configurations, use cytometer setup and tracking (CST) beads to define the cytometer baseline and track cytometer performance. Click on the Cytometer button and choose CST to display the cytometer setup and tracking workspace.
  9. Add three drops (150 µL) of setup beads to 0.5 mL of 1x PBS in a 5 mL round-bottom polystyrene test tube. Place the beads tube on the cytometer.
  10. In the Setup Control window, choose Define Baseline, and click Run.

4. Standardizing experiment using cytometer A in the transferring lab

  1. Run a performance check using the cytometer setup and tracking beads to verify that the cytometer is performing well.
  2. In the software browser window, right-click the cytometer settings and choose Application Settings to create a worksheet.
  3. Using an unstained sample, adjust the photomultiplier tube (PMT) voltages of FSC, SSC, and all fluorescence parameters. FSC: 260; SSC: 460; FITC: 490; PE: 575; BB700: 620; PE-CY7: 640; APC: 600; R718: 620; APC-H7: 620; BV421: 466; V500: 420; and BV605: 505.
  4. Right-click the experiment cytometer settings and choose application settings to save it.
  5. Click on the experiment button and choose compensation setup menu. Then, choose Create compensation controls to automatically add compensation controls.
  6. Record data for all compensation control beads.
  7. Click on the experiment and choose compensation setup. Then, calculate the compensation automatically.
  8. Record data for cell single-stained controls.
  9. Use CD45RA APC to modify the compensation value of R718 to 15% APC. Use CD19 BB700 to modify the compensation value of APC-H7 to 14% BB700. Use CD8 R718 to modify the compensation value of APC-H7 to 60% R718.
  10. Record data for the CST beads.
  11. Create a global worksheet of the target value template for the CST bright beads.
  12. Using an FSC/SSC plot, draw the polygon gate for the CST bright beads. Obtain histogram plots of 10 fluorescence channels for the CST bright beads: FITC, PE, BB700, PE-Cy7, APC, R718, APC-H7, BV421, V500, and BV605. Create interval gates in the histogram plots. Create the statistics view by showing the median of the interval gates.
  13. Run the samples on the flow cytometer; collect a total of 25,000 lymphocytes.
  14. Create a global worksheet of the analysis template for the samples.
  15. Use the following sample gating strategy:
    1. Using a CD45/side scatter-area (SSC-A) dot plot, draw the polygon gate to identify the intact lymphocyte population while excluding debris.
    2. Using a CD3/CD19 dot plot, draw a rectangular gate to select CD3+ T cells and CD19+ B cells.
    3. Using a CD4/CD8 dot plot, draw a quad gate to select CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (cells with a high fluorescence for these markers, respectively).
    4. Using a CD45RA/CD27 dot plot, draw a quad gate to subdivide CD8+ or CD4+ T cells into naïve (CD27+CD45RA+), TCM (CD27+ CD45RA-), TEM (CD27-CD45RA-), and TEMRA (CD27-CD45RA+) cells.
    5. Using a CD25/CD127 dot plot, draw a quad gate to subdivide CD4+ T cells into Treg cells (CD4+CD25++CD127low).
    6. Using a CD27/IgD dot plot, draw a quad gate to subdivide CD19+ B cells into naïve B cells (CD27-IgD+) and memory B cells (CD27+IgD-).
  16. Save the experimental template on cytometer A.
  17. Use the CD-ROM to export the experimental template.

5. Transferring the experimental template to cytometer B in the test method lab

NOTE: The experimental template includes instrument settings, the analysis template, and the target value template of median fluorescence intensity (MFI).

  1. Conduct a performance check using CST beads to verify that the cytometer is performing well.
  2. Import the experimental template and create an experiment for cytometer B using the template.
  3. Use the same lot of CST beads to adjust the fluorescent parameter voltages for each fluorescence channel to match the previous MFI instrument.
    NOTE: The MFI values vary within ±5% (the MFI of bright beads before and after transfer are shown in Table 2).
  4. Adjust the voltage for FSC using the unstained sample, if needed.
  5. Right-click on the experimental cytometer settings and choose application settings to save the application settings.
  6. Use CD45RA APC to modify the compensation value of R718 to 15% APC. Use CD19 BB700 to modify the compensation value of APC-H7 to 24% BB700. Use CD8 R718 to modify the compensation value of APC-H7 to 60% R718.
  7. Run the samples on the flow cytometer; collect a total of 25,000 lymphocytes.

6. Consistency between the experimental results obtained on the two cytometers

  1. Assess the differences in lymphocyte subsets between instruments using one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05).

Results

Figure 1 shows a global worksheet of the target value template for the CST bright beads. Using an FSC/SSC plot, a polygon gate is drawn to select the CST bright beads. Histogram plots of 10 fluorescence channels were obtained for the CST bright beads: FITC, PE, BB700, PE-Cy7, APC, R718, APC-H7, BV421, V500, and BV605. The target value for each parameter is displayed by showing the median within the histogram gates in Table 2. The screenshots of templates and parameter s...

Discussion

Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets can help understand the changes in cell-mediated adaptive immunity after vaccination in children. In clinical applications, unexpected situations occur, such as a failure to detect samples in a timely manner or the replacement of a flow cytometer; therefore, rapid standardized methods that facilitate transfers between flow cytometers in different labs are needed9,10,11. He...

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

RW was supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation, China (No. 7222059), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82002130), XZ was supported by the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (No. 2019-I2M-5-026).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
BD CompBeads Anti-Mouse Ig, κ/Negative Control Compensation Particles SetBD552843compensation
BD FACSCantoBDFACSCantoflow Cytometry A in the transferring lab
BD FACSDiva CS&T Research BeadsBD655051define flow cytometer baseline and track cytometer performance
BD Horizon BV421 Mouse Anti-Human CD127BD562436Fluorescent antibody 
BD Horizon BV605 Mouse Anti-Human CD27BD562656Fluorescent antibody 
BD Horizon V500 Mouse Anti-Human CD45BD560777Fluorescent antibody 
BD LSRFortessaBDLSRFortessaflow Cytometry B in the test method lab
BD OptiBuild BB700 Mouse Anti-Human CD19BD745907Fluorescent antibody 
BD OptiBuild R718 Mouse Anti-Human CD8BD751953Fluorescent antibody 
BD Pharmingen APC Mouse Anti-Human CD45RABD550855Fluorescent antibody 
BD Pharmingen APC-H7 Mouse Anti-Human CD3BD560176Fluorescent antibody 
BD Pharmingen FITC Mouse Anti-Human CD4BD566320Fluorescent antibody 
BD Pharmingen PE Mouse Anti-Human CD25BD555432Fluorescent antibody 
BD Pharmingen PE-Cy7 Mouse Anti-Human IgDBD561314Fluorescent antibody 
Brilliant Staining Buffer PlusBD566385Staining Buffer
CentrifugeEppendorf5810Cell centrifugation
Centrifuge TubeBD FalconBD-3520971515 mL centrifuge tube
CS&T IVD BeadsBD662414standard beads to setup cytometer settings in different flow cytometer
Lysing Solution 10x ConcentrateBD349202lysing red blood cells
Phosphate-buffered Saline (PBS)Gibco10010-023PBS
Round-bottom test tubeBD Falcon3522355 mL test tube

References

  1. Cabanski, M., et al. Flow cytometric method transfer: Recommendations for best practice. Cytometry Part B. Clinical Cytometry. 100 (1), 52-62 (2021).
  2. Le Lann, L., et al. Standardization procedure for flow cytometry data harmonization in prospective multicenter studies. Scientific Reports. 10 (1), 11567 (2020).
  3. Linskens, E., et al. Improved standardization of flow cytometry diagnostic screening of primary immunodeficiency by software-based automated gating. Frontiers in Immunology. 11, 584646 (2020).
  4. Glier, H., et al. Standardization of 8-color flow cytometry across different flow cytometer instruments: A feasibility study in clinical laboratories in Switzerland. Journal of Immunological Methods. 475, 112348 (2019).
  5. Wang, R., et al. The epidemiology and disease burden of children hospitalized for viral infections within the family Flaviviridae in China: A national cross-sectional study. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 16 (7), e0010562 (2022).
  6. Ding, Y., et al. Reference values for peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets of healthy children in China. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 142 (3), 970-973 (2018).
  7. Zhang, L., et al. Detection of polyfunctional T cells in children vaccinated with Japanese encephalitis vaccine via the flow cytometry technique. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (187), e64671 (2022).
  8. Yu, N., et al. CD4(+) CD25 (+) CD127 (low/-) T cells: a more specific Treg population in human peripheral blood. Inflammation. 35 (6), 1773-1180 (2012).
  9. Kalina, T. Reproducibility of flow cytometry through standardization: opportunities and challenges. Cytometry Part A. 97 (2), 137-147 (2020).
  10. Sommer, U., et al. Implementation of highly sophisticated flow cytometry assays in multicenter clinical studies: considerations and guidance. Bioanalysis. 7 (10), 1299-1311 (2015).
  11. Glier, H., et al. Comments on EuroFlow standard operating procedures for instrument setup and compensation for BD FACS Canto II, Navios and BD FACS Lyric instruments. Journal of Immunological Methods. 475, 112680 (2019).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

StandardizationFlow CytometryLymphocytes DetectionJapanese EncephalitisLaboratory AccreditationData AnalysisPerformance CheckPMT VoltagesCompensation ControlsCytometer ConfigurationFluorescence ParametersExperimental SettingsCST Beads

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved