A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Antimicrobial lab coats prevent the cross-contamination of pathogen accumulation and accidental bio-spills. Here, we describe the protocol for developing a skin-friendly antimicrobial fabric using nano-herbal encapsulation and modified standard tests to precisely evaluate the efficacy and suitability for typical usage of the lab coat.
Lab coats are widely used in biohazard laboratories and healthcare facilities as protective garments to prevent direct exposure to pathogens, spills, and burns. These cotton-based protective coats provide ideal conditions for microbial growth and attachment sites due to their porous nature, moisture-holding capacity, and retention of warmth from the user's body. Several studies have demonstrated the survival of pathogenic bacteria on hospital garments and lab coats, acting as vectors of microbial transmission.
A common approach to fix these problems is the application of antimicrobial agents in textile finishing, but concerns have been raised due to the toxicity and environmental effects of many synthetic chemicals. The ongoing pandemic has also opened a window for the investigation of effective antimicrobials and eco-friendly and toxic-free formulations. This study uses two natural bioactive compounds, carvacrol and thymol, encapsulated in chitosan nanoparticles, which guarantee effective protection against four human pathogens with up to a 4-log reduction (99.99%). These pathogens are frequently detected in lab coats used in biohazard laboratories.
The treated fabrics also resisted up to 10 wash cycles with 90% microbial reduction, which is sufficient for the intended use. We made modifications to the existing standard fabric tests to better represent the typical scenarios of lab coat usage. These refinements allow for a more accurate evaluation of the effectiveness of antimicrobial lab coats and for the simulation of the fate of any accidental microbial spills that must be neutralized within a short time. Further studies are recommended to investigate the accumulation of pathogens over time on antimicrobial lab coats compared to regular protective coats.
The protective white coat is a mandatory personal protective equipment (PPE) item in microbiology laboratories and healthcare facilities, and it protects from direct exposure to pathogens, spills, and burns. These cotton coats promote microbial growth due to many factors-the woven fabric provides attachment sites and aeration, cotton and starch used in the manufacturing process along with exfoliated epithelial cells from the user supply nutrients, and the proximity to the user gives warmth and moisture. The accumulation of microbes on textiles can also cause health problems such as allergies and nosocomial infection, unpleasant odors, and fabric deterioration
1. Preparation of nanoparticles
Initial screening of the synthesized NPs
Following the two-step oil-in-water emulsion technique16, the bioactive compounds (carvacrol and thymol) were successfully encapsulated in chitosan. This was confirmed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry for the peak absorption of the respective bioactive compounds compared to controls, which were the chitosan NPs without any bioactive compounds. The constituted NPs were homogeneous and stable over 12 months at 4 °C. The initial screenin.......
The antimicrobial efficacy of biocides is conventionally tested by quantitative assays, such as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), in which the bacteria are immersed in an antimicrobial liquid for 24 h. However, these assays are not suitable for coated fabrics, where the liquid interface is lacking and the biocides are diffused slowly along the fabric fibers. Therefore, many standard fabric tests have been established, such as AATCC 147, ISO 20645, AATCC 100, and JIS L 19.......
This study was funded by "Applied Research, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Services" (ARIES), Centennial College, Canada.
....Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Acetic acid | Millipore Sigma | 64-19-7 | |
Antibiotic base agar | BD Difco | DF0270-17-4 | Also known as Antibiotic Medium 2 |
Antibiotic seed agar | BD Difco | DF0263-17-3 | Also known as Antibiotic Medium 1 |
Blood Agar (Nutrient Agar with 5% Sheep Blood) | Donated by CFIA | ||
Bromcresol Purple Lactose Agar | Donated by CFIA | ||
Candida albicans | ATCC The Global Bioresource Center | ATTC 10231 | |
Carvacrol | Millipore Sigma | 282197 (CAS# 499-75-2) | |
Centrifuge Allergra X-22R Centrifuge | Beckman Coulter | Model # X-22R | Refrigerated. Wait at least 20 min or until the temperature reach the set low value (e.g., 4 °C) as the refrigeration takes time. |
Chitosan Medium Molecular Weight (CS) | Millipore Sigma | 448877 (CAS # 9012-76-4) | |
Clamshell Heat Press | Intiva | IM1200 | |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) | ATCC The Global Bioresource Center | ATTC 23725 | |
Incubator | Thermo Scientific | 1205M34 | |
Letheen Broth | BD Difco | DF0681-17-7 | Used to neutralize antimicrobial effects. Product from different manufacturers may require to add Polysorbate 80, which is already added in Difco product. |
Milli Q water | Millipore Sigma | ZR0Q16WW | Deionized water |
Mueller-Hinton Agar | BD Difco | DF0252-17-6 | |
Pentasodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) | Millipore Sigma | 238503 (CAS# 7758-29-4) | |
Phospahte Buffered Saline (PBS) | Thermo Scientific | AM9624 | |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | ATCC The Global Bioresource Center | ATTC 9027 | |
Sabouraud Dextrose Agar | BD Difco | DF0109-17-1 | |
Shaking incubator/ Thermo shaker | VWR | Model# SHKA2000 | |
Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC The Global Bioresource Center | ATTC 6538 | |
Thymol | Millipore Sigma | T0501 (CAS# 89-83-8) | |
Trypticase Soy Agar | BD Difco | 236950 | |
Trypticase Soy Broth | BD Difco | 215235 | |
Tween 80 | Millipore Sigma | STS0204 (CAS # 9005-65-6) | |
UV-Vis Spectrophometer | Thermo Scientific | GENESYS 30 (840-277000) |
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved