A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
* These authors contributed equally
This research outlines two techniques for isolating abundant neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) from rat bone marrow. One method combines a commercial neutrophil isolation kit with density gradient centrifugation, while the other employs only density gradient centrifugation. Both approaches yield functional NETs surpassing those from peripheral blood neutrophils.
The primary aim of this research was to develop a reliable and efficient approach for isolating neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) from rat bone marrow. This effort arose due to limitations associated with the traditional method of extracting NETs from peripheral blood, mainly due to the scarcity of available neutrophils for isolation. The study revealed two distinct methodologies for obtaining rat neutrophils from bone marrow: a streamlined one-step procedure that yielded satisfactory purification levels, and a more time-intensive two-step process that exhibited enhanced purification efficiency. Importantly, both techniques yielded a substantial quantity of viable neutrophils, ranging between 50 to 100 million per rat. This efficiency mirrored the results obtained from isolating neutrophils from both human and murine sources. Significantly, neutrophils derived from rat bone marrow exhibited comparable abilities to secrete NETs when compared with neutrophils obtained from peripheral blood. However, the bone marrow-based method consistently produced notably larger quantities of both neutrophils and NETs. This approach demonstrated the potential to obtain significantly greater amounts of these cellular components for further downstream applications. Notably, these isolated NETs and neutrophils hold promise for a range of applications, spanning the realms of inflammation, infection, and autoimmune diseases.
Neutrophils constitute a critical subset of leukocytes that play a pivotal role in the innate immune response. They are characterized by multilobed nuclei and granules containing various proteases and antimicrobial peptides1. Neutrophils primarily function through degranulation, phagocytosis, and the formation of NETs. The observation of NETs was first made by Takei et al. in 1996 during an experiment where neutrophils were stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)2. Subsequently, the process of NET formation was coined "NETosis" by Brinkmann et al.3 in 2004. Their research further illuminated the crucial role of NETs in neutrophil-mediated antimicrobial responses. NETs are web-like structures composed of chromatin, histones, and antimicrobial proteins that are released from activated neutrophils in response to infectious and inflammatory stimuli. NETs can immobilize and kill invading pathogens by trapping them and exposing them to a high concentration of antimicrobial peptides and proteases1,3. Additionally, NETs contribute to the clearance of apoptotic cells and participate in inflammation resolution. Recent studies also indicate that an excessive formation of NETs or impaired NET degradation can lead to tissue damage, autoimmune disorders, thrombogenesis, and impaired revascularization4,5,6,7,8,9,10.
The pathogenic role of NETs in uncontrolled fibrosis following myocardial infarction and the formation of ventricular aneurysms has been demonstrated through the expansion of perivascular fibrosis4,11. The myocardial infarction model and the isolation of neutrophils from bone marrow in mice are both well-established. Polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes, a type of white blood cell abundant in human blood, serve as an excellent source for isolating human neutrophils. This method eliminates the need to harvest bone marrow, thus enhancing safety and efficiency.
NETs also play a role in atrial fibrillation associated with cardiac remodeling. However, large animals such as dogs and pigs were utilized to model atrial fibrillation, as mice lack an atrium sizable enough to establish a re-entrant cycle or the AF model, unless specific ion channels or signaling pathways are knocked down or knocked out12. While it's possible to induce atrial fibrillation in rats and isolate neutrophils from rat peripheral blood as previously described, researchers encountered a limitation whereby only 2 x 105-5 x 105 neutrophils could be isolated from peripheral blood (10 mL per rat). Extracting sufficient NETs at each time point required approximately 10-25 rats (5 x 106 neutrophils in total), resulting in a time-consuming, expensive, and often low-yield process13. In this regard, Li He and colleagues present a bone marrow-oriented strategy to obtain adequate NETs from rats14. In their article, they provide a comprehensive description of isolating neutrophils from rat bone marrow and compare the NET secretion capabilities of rat peripheral and bone marrow neutrophils. The two methods outlined cater to distinct experimental goals, both resulting in sufficient quantities of rat bone marrow neutrophils while reducing the number of required rats. The two-step isolation method demonstrated superior neutrophil purification, while the one-step method proved time-efficient with acceptable purification levels. Furthermore, the researchers compared NETosis and NET formation between rat bone marrow neutrophils and their peripheral counterparts, finding equal potency with PMN. These findings significantly contribute to neutrophil-related studies of atrial fibrillation and underscore the importance of flexibly selecting different sources for neutrophil isolation in various experimental animals with differing neutrophil distributions.
The study was performed under a project license (No. 20211404A) granted by the Animal Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, in compliance with the guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University for the care and use of animals. In accordance with ethical guidelines, the rats used in this study were maintained in a controlled environment with a 12 h light/dark cycle, temperature at 22-24 °C and humidity of 50%-60%. The rats were given access to food and water ad libitum. The animals used in this study were 6-8 weeks old Sprague Dawley (SD) male rats, weighing about 250 g and specific pathogen-free. The animals were obtained from a commercial source (see Table of Materials).
1. Isolation of rat neutrophils
2. Acquisition of rat NETs
3. Verification of the presence of NETs
4. Quantification of NETs
5. Analysis of NETs secretion by cell cytometry
The protocol outlined herein delineates two distinct methods, each characterized by improved purification or streamlined steps. Both methods yielded approximately 0.5 x 108-1 x 108 neutrophils per rat. Flow cytometry analysis, employing the annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit, exhibited cell viability above 90%, comparable to mouse and human counterparts (Figure 1). While lymphocyte contamination seemed inevitable during neutrophil isolation from bone marrow, the ...
The isolation of neutrophils constitutes a pivotal step in studying NETosis, where the selection of an appropriate isolation method is paramount for obtaining dependable results. An important factor to weigh is the occurrence of lymphocyte contamination during isolation. Addressing this challenge is particularly significant when isolating rat neutrophils from bone marrow. Despite the distinct density range of neutrophils (1.0814-1.0919, with a peak at 1.0919) compared to lymphocytes (1.0337-1.0765, with a peak at 1.0526)...
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82004154, 81900311, 82100336 and 81970345).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
A488-conjugated donkey antirabbit IgG(H + L) | Invitrogen, USA | A32790 | |
A594-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG(H + L) | Invitrogen, USA | A32744 | |
A594-conjugated goat anti-Mouse IgG1 | Invitrogen, USA | A21125 | |
Anti-rat myeloperoxidase | Abcam, England | ab134132 | |
Anti-rat neutrophil elastase | Abcam, England | ab21595 | |
Celigo Image Cytometer | Nexelom, USA | 200-BFFL-5C | |
DNase I | Sigma, USA | 10104159001 | |
fetal bovine serum (FBS) | Gibco, USA | 10099141C | |
Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) | Gibco, USA | C14175500BT | |
Hoechst | Thermofisher, USA | 33342 | |
Isoflurane | RWD, China | R510-22-10 | |
Mowiol | Sigma, USA | 81381 | |
Normal Donkey Serum | Solarbio, China | SL050 | |
Paraformaldehyde | biosharp, China | BL539A | |
Penicillin-streptomycin | Hyclone, USA | SV30010 | |
Percoll | GE, USA | P8370-1L | |
Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) | Sigma, USA | P1585 | |
Picogreen dsDNA Assay Kit | Invitrogen, USA | P11496 | |
Rat neutrophil isolation kit | Solarbio, China | P9200 | |
Red blood cell lysis buffer | Solarbio, China | R1010 | |
Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) media | Hyclone, USA | SH30809.01B | |
RWD Universal Animal Anesthesia Machine | RWD, China | R500 | |
Sprague Dawley (SD) rats | Dashuo, China | ||
SytoxGreen | Thermofisher, USA | S7020 | |
Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer | Solarbio, China | T1120 | |
Triton-X-100 | Biofroxx, German | 1139ML100 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved