A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
The application of support layers to cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM) grids can increase particle density, limit interactions with the air-water interface, reduce beam-induced motion, and improve the distribution of particle orientations. This paper describes a robust protocol for coating cryoEM grids with a monolayer of graphene for improved cryo-sample preparation.
In cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM), purified macromolecules are applied to a grid bearing a holey carbon foil; the molecules are then blotted to remove excess liquid and rapidly frozen in a roughly 20-100 nm thick layer of vitreous ice, suspended across roughly 1 µm wide foil holes. The resulting sample is imaged using cryogenic transmission electron microscopy, and after image processing using suitable software, near-atomic resolution structures can be determined. Despite cryoEM's widespread adoption, sample preparation remains a severe bottleneck in cryoEM workflows, with users often encountering challenges related to samples behaving poorly in the suspended vitreous ice. Recently, methods have been developed to modify cryoEM grids with a single continuous layer of graphene, which acts as a support surface that often increases particle density in the imaged area and can reduce interactions between particles and the air-water interface. Here, we provide detailed protocols for the application of graphene to cryoEM grids and for rapidly assessing the relative hydrophilicity of the resulting grids. Additionally, we describe an EM-based method to confirm the presence of graphene by visualizing its characteristic diffraction pattern. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of these graphene supports by rapidly reconstructing a 2.7 Å resolution density map of a Cas9 complex using a pure sample at a relatively low concentration.
Single particle cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM) has evolved into a widely used method for visualizing biological macromolecules1. Fueled by advances in direct electron detection2,3,4, data acquisition5, and image processing algorithms6,7,8,9,10, cryoEM is now capable of producing near-atomic resolution 3D structures of a fast-growing number of macromolecules11. Moreover, by leveraging the single-molecule nature of the approach, users can determine multiple structures from a single sample12,13,14,15, highlighting the promise of using the data generated to understand heterogeneous structural ensembles16,17. Despite this progress, bottlenecks in cryo-specimen grid preparation persist.
For structural characterization by cryoEM, biological samples should be well-dispersed in aqueous solution and then must be flash-frozen through a process called vitrification18,19. The goal is to capture particles in a uniformly thin layer of vitrified ice suspended across regularly spaced holes that are typically cut into a layer of amorphous carbon. This patterned amorphous carbon foil is supported by a TEM grid bearing a mesh of copper or gold support bars. In standard workflows, grids are rendered hydrophilic using a glow-discharge plasma treatment prior to the application of sample. Excess liquid is blotted with filter paper, allowing the protein solution to form a thin liquid film across the holes that can be readily vitrified during plunge-freezing. Common challenges include particle localization to the air-water interface (AWI) and subsequent denaturation20,21,22 or adoption of preferred orientations23,24,25, particle adherence to the carbon foil rather than migrating into the holes, and clustering and aggregation of the particles within the holes26. Nonuniform ice thickness is another concern; thick ice can result in higher levels of background noise in the micrographs due to increased electron scattering, whereas extremely thin ice can exclude larger particles27.
To address these challenges, a variety of thin support films have been used to coat grid surfaces, allowing particles to rest on these supports and, ideally, avoid interactions with the air-water interface. Graphene supports have shown great promise, in part due to their high mechanical strength coupled with their minimal scattering cross-section, which reduces the background signal added by the support layer28. In addition to its minimal contribution to background noise, graphene also exhibits remarkable electrical and thermal conductivity29. Graphene and graphene oxide coated grids have been shown to yield higher particle density, more uniform particle distribution30, and reduced localization to the AWI22. In addition, graphene provides a support surface that can be further modified to: 1) tune the physiochemical properties of the grid surface through functionalization31,32,33; or 2) couple linking agents that facilitate affinity purification of proteins of interest34,35,36.
In this article, we have modified an existing procedure for coating cryoEM grids with a single uniform layer of graphene30. The modifications aim to minimize grid handling throughout the protocol, with the goal of increasing yield and reproducibility. Additionally, we discuss our approach to evaluate the efficacy of various UV/ozone treatments in rendering grids hydrophilic prior to plunging. This step in cryoEM sample preparation using graphene-coated grids is critical, and we have found our straightforward method to quantify the relative hydrophilicity of the resulting grids to be useful. Using this protocol, we demonstrate the utility of employing graphene-coated grids for structure determination by generating a high-resolution 3D reconstruction of catalytically inactive S. pyogenes Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA.
1. Preparation of CVD graphene
2. Coating CVD graphene with MMA
3. Plasma etching of the graphene back-side
4. Cutting grid-sized MMA coated CVD graphene squares
5. Dissolving copper substrate from MMA coated CVD graphene
6. Removing MMA/graphene films from APS
7. Adhering graphene to grids
8. Dissolving MMA with acetone
9. Removing residual acetone with isopropanol
10. UV/ozone treatment of graphene-coated grids
11. Capturing a diffraction image
12. Assessing grid hydrophilicity
13. Single particle analysis of the dCas9 complex dataset
NOTE: All image processing described in this protocol was performed using cryoSPARC version 4.2.1.
Successful fabrication of graphene-coated cryoEM grids using the equipment (Figure 1) and protocol (Figure 2) outlined here will result in a monolayer of graphene covering the foil holes that can be confirmed by its characteristic diffraction pattern. To promote protein adsorption to the graphene surface, UV/ozone treatment can be used to render the surface hydrophilic by installing oxygen-containing functional groups. However, hydrocarbon contaminants in the ai...
CryoEM sample preparation involves a host of technical challenges, with most workflows requiring researchers to manually manipulate fragile grids with extreme care to avoid damaging them. Additionally, the amenability of any sample to vitrification is unpredictable; particles often interact with the air-water-interface or with the solid support foil overlaying the grids, which can lead to particles adopting preferred orientations or failing to enter the imaging holes unless very high protein concentrations are applied
The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
Specimens were prepared and imaged at the CryoEM Facility in MIT.nano on microscopes acquired thanks to the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation. Contact angle imaging devices were printed at the MIT Metropolis Maker Space. We thank the laboratories of Nieng Yan and Yimo Han, and staff at MIT.nano for their support throughout the adoption of this method. In particular, we extend our thanks to Drs. Guanhui Gao and Sarah Sterling for their insightful discussions and feedback. This work was supported by NIH grants R01-GM144542, 5T32-GM007287, and NSF-CAREER grant 2046778. Research in the Davis lab is supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the James H. Ferry Fund, the MIT J-Clinic, and the Whitehead Family.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
250 mL beaker (3x) | Fisher | 02-555-25B | |
50 mL beaker (2x) | Corning | 1000-50 | |
Acetone | Fisher | A949-4 | |
Aluminum foil | Fisher | 15-078-292 | |
Ammonium persulfate | Fisher | (I17874 | |
Coverslips 50 mm x 24 mm | Mattek | PCS-1.5-5024 | |
CVD graphene | Graphene Supermarket | CVD-Cu-2x2 | |
easiGlow discharger | Ted-Pella | 91000S | |
Ethanol | Millipore-Sigma | 1.11727 | |
Flat-tip tweezers | Fisher | 50-239-60 | |
Glass cutter | Grainger | 21UE26 | |
Glass petri plate and cover | VWR | 75845-544 | |
Glass serological pipette | Fisher | 13-676-34D | |
Grid Storage Case | EMS | 71146-02 | |
Hot plate | Fisher | 07-770-108 | |
Isopropanol | Sigma | W292907 | |
Kimwipe | Fisher | 06-666 | |
Lab scissors | Fisher | 13-806-2 | |
Methyl-Methacrylate EL-6 | Kayaku | MMA M310006 0500L1GL | |
Molecular grade water | Corning | 46-000-CM | |
Negative action tweezers (2x) | Fisher | 50-242-78 | |
P20 pipette | Rainin | 17014392 | |
P200 pipette | Rainin | 17008652 | |
Parafilm | Fisher | 13-374-12 | |
Pipette tips | Rainin | 30389291 | |
Quantifoil grids with holey carbon | EMS | Q2100CR1 | |
Spin coater | SetCas | KW-4A | with chuck SCA-19-23 |
Straightedge | ULINE | H-6560 | |
Thermometer | Grainger | 3LRD1 | |
UV/Ozone cleaner | BioForce | SKU: PC440 | |
Vacuum desiccator | Thomas Scientific | 1159X11 | |
Whatman paper | VWR | 28297-216 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionExplore More Articles
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ISSN 2578-2037
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved
We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website.
By continuing to use our website or clicking “Continue”, you are agreeing to accept our cookies.