A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
This article describes a tissue transplantation technique that was designed to test the signaling and patterning properties of surface cephalic ectoderm during craniofacial development.
The accessibility of avian embryos has helped experimental embryologists understand the fates of cells during development and the role of tissue interactions that regulate patterning and morphogenesis of vertebrates (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4). Here, we illustrate a method that exploits this accessibility to test the signaling and patterning properties of ectodermal tissues during facial development. In these experiments, we create quail-chick 5 or mouse-chick 6 chimeras by transplanting the surface cephalic ectoderm that covers the upper jaw from quail or mouse onto either the same region or an ectopic region of chick embryos. The use of quail as donor tissue for transplantation into chicks was developed to take advantage of a nucleolar marker present in quail but not chick cells, thus allowing investigators to distinguish host and donor tissues 7. Similarly, a repetitive element is present in the mouse genome and is expressed ubiquitously, which allows us to distinguish host and donor tissues in mouse-chick chimeras 8. The use of mouse ectoderm as donor tissue will greatly extend our understanding of these tissue interactions, because this will allow us to test the signaling properties of ectoderm derived from various mutant embryos.
1. Preparing the Donor Tissue
2. Preparing the Host
3. Representative Results:
To assess chimeras, embryos should be collected and processed for analysis of the distribution of host and donor tissues. For detection of quail cells, immunohistochemistry using the QcPN antibody (described in: 3) is employed, and for detection of mouse cells, in situ hybridization on paraffin sections is used 6. Donor cells should be restricted to the epithelium, and there should be no evidence of donor mesenchymal tissues (Figure 1). The presence of isolated donor cells in the mesenchyme indicates the presence of contamination neural crest cells which will confound any morphological interpretation due to the influence of these cells on many aspects of facial development (e.g., 10). Once convinced that the graft technique is free of contaminating mesenchyme, further morphological or molecular outcome measures can be used to assess the chimeras. For our purposes, we detected the presence of ectopic cartilages and bones that corresponded to duplications of the upper jaw that were induced by the transplanted tissues (Figure 2), and molecular changes in the mesenchymal tissues in response to the grafted ectoderm (Figure 3)5,6.
Figure 1. Assessment of chimerism (A) Anti-QcPN staining is used to detect quail cells in quail-chick chimeras. There is no evidence of staining in the mesenchyme. (B) In situ hybridization is used to detect the expression of SINE B2 transcripts in mouse-chick chimeras. Expression is restricted to the ectoderm comprising the graft.
Figure 2. Trichrome staining shows duplication of the upper jaw skeleton in (A) quail-chick chimera, and (B) mouse-chick chimeras.
Figure 3. The ectoderm regultes gene expression in the mesenchyme. (A) Normal Bmp7 expression in the mesenchyme of a chick embryo (radioactive in situ hybridization with positive signal pseudo-colored red in Adobe Photoshop). (B) Bmp7 expression is induced in the mesenchyme adjacent to the graft (Arrow) in chimeric embryos.
Using this transplantation method has allowed us to determine that the ectoderm contains signaling information that regulates dorsoventral polarity and proximodistal extension of the upper jaw. The similarity of outcomes when using quail or mouse ectoderm, and the conservation of molecular signals in this tissue among many species 6,11 indicates that this is a highly conserved signaling center among vertebrates. Furthermore, other investigators have used similar techniques to test the signaling properties of d...
No conflicts of interest declared.
This work was funded by R01-DE018234 and R01-DE019638.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
1x PBS | Tektronix, Inc. | TEKZR114 | |
DMEM | University of California - San Francisco | CCFDA003 | |
BSA | Sigma-Aldrich | A7906 | |
Dispase | GIBCO, by Life Technologies | 17105-041 | |
35x10 mm Petri dish | Falcon BD | 1008 | |
No. 5 Dumont forceps | Fine Science Tools | 11252-20 | |
Scissors | Fine Science Tools | 14058-11 | |
Spring Scissors | Fine Science Tools | 15010-11 | |
Needle holder | Fine Science Tools | 26016-12 | |
Tungsten Needle | Fine Science Tools | 26000 | |
Microcapillary tube | Drummond Scientific | 3-000-225-G | |
Pasteur Pipets | Fisher Scientific | 13-678-6B | |
Spring scissors | Fine Science Tools | 15010-11 | |
Blade holder | Fine Science Tools | 10052-11 | |
Razor blade | Fine Science Tools | 10050-00 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved