A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
The microinjection of mouse oocytes is commonly used for both classic transgenesis (i.e., the random integration of transgenes) and CRISPR-mediated gene targeting. This protocol reviews the latest developments in microinjection, with a particular emphasis on quality control and genotyping strategies.
The use of genetically modified mice has significantly contributed to studies on both physiological and pathological in vivo processes. The pronuclear injection of DNA expression constructs into fertilized oocytes remains the most commonly used technique to generate transgenic mice for overexpression. With the introduction of CRISPR technology for gene targeting, pronuclear injection into fertilized oocytes has been extended to the generation of both knockout and knockin mice. This work describes the preparation of DNA for injection and the generation of CRISPR guides for gene targeting, with a particular emphasis on quality control. The genotyping procedures required for the identification of potential founders are critical. Innovative genotyping strategies that take advantage of the "multiplexing" capabilities of CRISPR are presented herein. Surgical procedures are also outlined. Together, the steps of the protocol will allow for the generation of genetically modified mice and for the subsequent establishment of mouse colonies for a plethora of research fields, including immunology, neuroscience, cancer, physiology, development, and others.
Animal models, both in vertebrates and invertebrates, have been instrumental to examining the pathophysiology of human conditions such as Alzheimer's disease1,2. They are also invaluable tools to search for disease modifiers and to ultimately develop novel treatment strategies in the hope of a cure. Although each model has intrinsic limitations, the use of animals as entire systemic models is vital to biomedical research. This is because the metabolic and complex physiological environment cannot be entirely simulated in tissue culture.
To date, the mouse remains the most common mammalian species used for genetic manipulation because it features several advantages. The physiological processes and genes associated with diseases are highly conserved between mice and humans. The mouse was the first mammal to have its full genome sequenced (2002), one year before the human genome (2003). Aside from this wealth of genetic information, the mouse has good breeding capacities, a fast development cycle (6 weeks from fertilization to weaning), and a reasonable size. All these advantages, coupled with physiological indicators, such as distinct coat colors (required for crossing strategies), made the mouse an attractive model for genetic manipulation. Notably, in the very early age of modern genetics, Gregor Mendel started working on mice before moving to plants3.
Gene transfer techniques resulted in the generation of the first transgenic mouse over three decades ago4, initially created using viral delivery. However, researchers soon realized that one of the main challenges of mouse transgenesis was the inability to control the fate of the exogenous DNA. Because the viral delivery of transgenes into mouse oocytes resulted in multiple copies integrated randomly into the genome, the possibility of establishing subsequent transgenic lines was limited.
One such limitation was overcome when Gordon et al. generated the first transgenic mouse line by microinjection5,6. This began the era of recombinant DNA technology, and the parameters influencing the outcome of a microinjection session have been widely studied7. Although microinjection does not allow for control over the integration site of the transgene (which eventually results in specific expression levels for each founder mouse), the main advantage of pronuclear microinjection remains the formation of concatemers (i.e., arrays of multiple copies of the transgene, linked in series) before genomic integration5. This characteristic has been used over the years to establish thousands of transgenic mouse lines that overexpress a gene of interest. Since then, transgenesis, the artificial modification of an organism's genome, has been extensively used to identify the role of single genes in the occurrence of diseases.
A further key achievement in manipulating the mouse genome was reached when Mario Capecchi successfully disrupted a single gene in the mouse, opening the era of gene targeting8. However, major drawbacks quickly emerged from ES cell-based gene targeting, including the challenges of culturing ES cells, the somewhat variable degree of chimerism, and the length of the process (i.e., 12-18 months, minimum, to obtain the mouse).
Recently, advances in new technologies, such as engineered endonucleases (e.g., zinc finger nucleases (ZFN), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR/Cas9)) have emerged as alternative methods to accelerate the process of gene targeting in mice9,10. These endonucleases can readily be injected into mouse oocytes by microinjection, allowing for the generation of gene-targeted mice in as little as 6 weeks.
Since the first report on the use of CRISPR for genome editing11, this bacterial adaptive immune system has superseded ZFN and TALEN because of its many advantages, including the ease of synthesis and the ability to target multiple loci at once (referred to as "multiplexing"). CRISPR was first used for gene targeting in mice12 and has since been applied to countless species, from plants to humans13,14. To date, there is no report of a single species resistant to CRISPR genome editing.
The two main limiting steps of the generation of transgenic mice are the injection of oocytes and the reimplantation of these oocytes into pseudo-pregnant females. Although this technique has been described by us15 and others16, recent technical improvements in mouse embryology and gene transfer techniques have revolutionized the process of generating genetically modified mice. These improvements will be described herein.
All procedures have been approved by the University of New South Wales Animals Care and Ethics Committee.
1. Preparation of the Transgene (Random Integration)
2. Synthesis of CRISPR Components (Gene Targeting)
3. Donor Template
4. Injection Mix
5. Scrotal Vasectomy
NOTE: Two types of vasectomy are commonly performed in mice: abdominal and scrotal. The latter is less invasive and has been previously described15.
6. Superovulation (Oocytes Donors) and Time-mating (Pseudo-pregnant Females)
NOTE: The technique to generate a suitable number of fertilized oocytes and plugged foster females for reimplantation has been described elsewhere15.
7. Pronuclear (random-integration) and Cytoplasmic (Gene-targeting) Injections
8. Reimplantation
9. Genotyping Strategies/Sequencing
NOTE: Isolate the genomic DNA from 2-mm tail or ear biopsies, following relevant animal ethics regulations.
Below, the workflows for microinjection in the case of random integration and CRISPR-mediated gene targeting are described (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Typical Workflow for the Generation of Genetically Modified Mice. For random integration, the purified transgene is injected into the pronucleus of f...
Critical steps within the protocol
The generation of genetically modified mice is known to be technically challenging. However, the protocol presented here is an optimized and simplified method that allows one to master and troubleshoot the technique in record time. There are two steps necessary for the successful completion of the technique. First, the synthesis of linear DNA templates (for the synthesis of sgRNAs) can be achieved without magnesium chloride (MgCl2). However, it is hig...
The authors provide academic transgenesis services in mice via the University of New South Wales Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre.
The authors thank the staff of the animal facility (BRC) for their ongoing support. This work was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and the Australian Research Council.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Micropipette 0.1-2.5 ul | Eppendorf | 4920000016 | |
Micropipette 2-20 ul | Eppendorf | 4920000040 | |
Micropipette 20-200 ul | Eppendorf | 4920000067 | |
Micropipette 100-1000 ul | Eppendorf | 4920000083 | |
Molecular weight marker | Bioline | BIO-33025 | HyperLadder 1kb |
Molecular weight marker | Bioline | BIO-33056 | HyperLadder 100 bp |
Agarose | Bioline | BIO-41025 | |
EDTA buffer | Sigma-Aldrich | 93296 | 10x - Dilute to 1x |
Ethidium bromide | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 15585011 | |
SYBR Safe gel stain | Invitrogen | S33102 | |
Gel extraction kit | Qiagen | 28706 | |
PCR purification kit (Qiaquick) | Qiagen | 28106 | |
Vacuum system (Manifold) | Promega | A7231 | |
Nuclease-free microinjection buffer | Millipore | MR-095-10F | |
Ultrafree-MC microcentrifuge filter | Millipore | UFC30GV00 | |
Cas9 mRNA | Sigma-Aldrich | CAS9MRNA | |
CRISPR expressing plasmid (px330) | Addgene | 42230 | |
Nuclease free water | Sigma-Aldrich | W4502 | |
Phusion polymerase | New England Biolabs | M0530L | |
T7 Quick High Yield RNA kit | New England Biolabs | E2050S | |
RNA purification spin columns (NucAway) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | AM10070 | |
ssOligos | Sigma-Aldrich | OLIGO STANDARD | |
Donor plasmid | Thermo Fisher Scientific | GeneArt | |
Hyaluronidase | Sigma-Aldrich | H3884 | |
KSOMaa embryo culture medium | Zenith Biotech | ZEKS-100 | |
Mineral oil | Zenith Biotech | ZSCO-100 | |
M2 Medium | Sigma-Aldrich | M7167 | |
Cytochalasin B | Sigma-Aldrich | C6762 | |
Mouthpiece | Sigma-Aldrich | A5177 | |
Glass microcapillaries | Sutter Instrument | BF100-78-10 | |
Proteinase K | Applichem | A3830.0100 | |
Dumont #5 forceps | Fine Science Tools | 91150-20 | |
Iris scissors | Fine Science Tools | 91460-11 | |
Vessel clamp | Fine Science Tools | 18374-43 | |
Wound clips | Fine Science Tools | 12040-01 | |
Clips applier | Fine Science Tools | 12018-12 | |
Micro-scissors | Fine Science Tools | 15000-03 | |
Cauterizer | Fine Science Tools | 18000-00 | |
Non-absorbable surgical sutures (Ethilon 3-0) | Ethicon | 1691H | |
5% CO2 incubator | MG Scientific | Galaxy 14S | |
Spectrophotometer | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Nanodrop 2000c | |
Thermocycler | Eppendorf | 6321 000.515 | |
Electrophoresis set up | BioRad | 1640300 | |
UV Transilluminator | BioRad | 1708110EDU | |
Thermocycler | Eppendorf | 6334000069 | |
Stereoscopic microscope | Olympus | SZX7 | |
Inverted microscope | Olympus | IX71 | |
2x Micromanipulators | Eppendorf | 5188000.012 | |
Oocytes manipulator | Eppendorf | 5176000.025 | |
Microinjector (Femtojet) | Eppendorf | 5247000.013 | |
Mice C57BL/6J strain | Australian BioResources | C57BL/6JAusb |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved