A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

The method presented here can evaluate the effect of reagents on angiogenesis or vascular permeability in vivo without staining. The method uses dextran-FITC injection via the tail vein to visualize neo-vessels or vascular leakage.

Abstract

Several models have been developed to investigate angiogenesis in vivo. However, most of these models are complex and expensive, require specialized equipment, or are hard to perform for subsequent quantitative analysis. Here we present a modified matrix gel plug assay to evaluate angiogenesis in vivo. In this protocol, vascular cells were mixed with matrix gel in the presence or absence of pro-angiogenic or anti-angiogenic reagents, and then subcutaneously injected into the back of recipient mice. After 7 days, phosphate buffer saline containing dextran-FITC is injected via the tail vein and circulated in vessels for 30 min. Matrix gel plugs are collected and embedded with tissue embedding gel, then 12 µm sections are cut for fluorescence detection without staining. In this assay, dextran-FITC with high molecular weight (~150,000 Da) can be used to indicate functional vessels for detecting their length, while dextran-FITC with low molecular weight (~4,400 Da) can be used to indicate the permeability of neo-vessels. In conclusion, this protocol can provide a reliable and convenient method for the quantitative study of angiogenesis in vivo.

Introduction

Angiogenesis, the process of formation of neo-vessels from pre-existing vessels, plays a critical role in many physiological and pathological processes, such as embryonic development, wound healing, atherosclerosis, tumor development, etc.1,2,3,4,5. This dynamic process involves several steps, including the degradation of the matrix, vascular cell proliferation, migration and self-organization to form tubular structures and the stabilization of the neo-vessels6. Promoting angiogenesis has been demonstrated to be critical in the treatment of myocardial infarction, stroke and other kinds of ischemic diseases7 while inhibiting angiogenesis has been considered a promising strategy in the treatment of cancers8 and rheumatoid diseases9. Angiogenesis has been considered an organizing principle for drug discovery10. Thus, the construction of a reliable and convenient method to assess the extent of angiogenesis is critical for mechanical research or drug discovery in angiogenesis-dependent diseases.

Several in vitro and in vivo models have been developed to evaluate angiogenesis11. Among these, two-dimensional (2-D) models, like matrix gel tube formation assay12, cannot form functional tubular structures. The animal models, such as the hind limb ischemia model13,14, can reproduce the angiogenesis process but are complex and require a laser speckle blood flow imaging system. 3D models of vascular morphogenesis, like matrix gel plug assay, provide a simple platform that can mimic the process of angiogenesis in vivo15, but the detection of angiogenesis requires immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence staining16,17,18, which are variable and poorly visualized.

Here, we describe a protocol for a modified matrix gel plug assay where vascular cells were mixed with matrix gel and subcutaneously injected into the back of mice to form a plug. In the plug, vascular cells need to degrade the matrix, proliferate, migrate, and self-organize to finally form functional vessels with blood flow in the internal environment. Thereafter, fluorescent-labeled dextran is injected via the tail vein, to flow through the plug, and the label is visualized to indicate neo-vessels. The content of angiogenesis can be quantitatively evaluated by the length of the vessels. This method can form functional vessels that cannot be produced in 2-D angiogenesis models12, and does not need complex stain process as in ordinary matrix gel plug assay11. It also does not require expensive specific instruments like laser speckle blood flow imaging system in hind limb ischemia model13,14,19. This method is versatile, low-cost, quantifiable, and easy to perform, and can be used to determine the pro- or anti-angiogenic capability of drugs or be used in mechanical research involved in angiogenesis.

Protocol

All procedures involving animal subjects were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Wenzhou Medical University (XMSQ2021-0057, July 19th, 2021). All reagents and consumables are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Culture medium preparation

  1. 10x M199 culture medium: Dissolve M199 powder to 10x concentration with 90 mL of deionized water and add 10 mL of fetal bovine serum (FBS), then pass through a 0.22 µm filter. Store the medium at 4 °C for up to 2 months.
  2. Complete endothelial culture medium: Add 50 mL of FBS, 5 mL of penicillin/streptomycin, and 5 mL of endothelial cell growth supplement to 460 mL of endothelial cell medium (ECM). Store the medium at 4 °C for up to 1 month.

2. Vascular cell preparation

  1. Culture 1 x 105 vascular cells (primary cultured endothelial progenitor cells14, endothelial cells, or endothelial cell lines) with 8 mL of complete endothelial culture medium in 100 mm tissue culture dish at 37 °C and 5% CO2 to 70% confluency.
  2. Remove the culture medium and rinse the dish 2x with 1x phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to remove unattached cells and debris. Remove PBS and add 3 mL of 0.25% trypsin containing 2.21 mM EDTA, and incubate at 37 °C for 1 min.
  3. Neutralize the trypsin with 7 mL of complete endothelial culture medium, and gently rinse cells off the culture dish. Confirm cell detachment under a light microscope (40x magnification).
  4. Collect cell suspension in a 15 mL tube and centrifuge at 400 x g for 10 min. Remove supernatant and resuspend cells with 5 mL of complete endothelial culture medium.
  5. Count cells using a hemocytometer and move suspension containing 2 x 106 cells to a sterile 1.5 mL tube. Each plug contains 1.5 x 106 cells, additional 25% cells are used in case of waste. Each group includes at least 3 plugs.
    NOTE: After trials it was found that 1.5 x 106 cells in 300 µL of matrix gel led to the proper development of angiogenesis and was therefore chosen for experimentation.
  6. Centrifuge cell suspension at 400 x g for 5 min to pellet cells, and then remove supernatant.

3. Matrix gel preparation

  1. Pre-cool sterile 1.5 mL tubes containing cell pellet in a 4 °C water bath. Pre-cool 30G 1 mL insulin syringes in a 4 °C refrigerator.
  2. Completely thaw matrix gel in a 4 °C water bath . Do not mix or vortex. Pre-cool 10x M199 and test reagent/drug-of-interest in a 4 °C water bath.
  3. Mix pre-cooled matrix gel with 10x M199 containing 10% FBS and the reagent to be tested at a volume ratio of 8.8:1:0.2 to get a matrix gel and M199 mixture containing 1% FBS and the reagent.
  4. Resuspend cells with 400 µL of the matrix gel mixture, mix gently to avoid forming bubbles. Keep the tube on ice until mice are prepared for injection. Keep the matrix gel mixture on ice all the time to avoid coagulation.
    ​NOTE: Here, 300 µL of matrix gel mixture containing 1.5 x 106 cells was used to form gel plug. Prepare 25% extra gel according to 25% additional cells in step 2.

4. Mouse preparation

  1. Anesthetize 6-8 week old male Nu/Nu mouse (18-25 g) in the chamber of the animal anesthesia device with isoflurane (3% isoflurane in 100% oxygen at a flowrate of 1 L/min). After successful anaesthetization, confirmed by the absence of righting reflex and toe pinch reflex, move the mouse out of the chamber, move the mouse out of the chamber and put an anesthesia mask on the mouse and change the concentration of isoflurane to 1.5% in 100% oxygen at a flowrate of 1 L/min.
    NOTE: Provide thermal support to the animal using a heating pad throughout the procedure.
  2. Use vet ointment on eyes to prevent dryness. Tape the limbs of the mice on the operation board in the prone position.

5. Matrix gel mixture injection

  1. Load 300 µL of the matrix gel mixture into a 1 mL insulin syringe with a 30G needle. Avoid bubble formation. Quickly load the matrix gel (within 2 min) to avoid solidification during this time. Place the insulin syringe loaded with matrix gel on ice immediately.
  2. Clean the skin on the back of mice using 75% alcohol pads. Subcutaneously inject 300 µL of matrix gel mixture into one side of the back of mice.
  3. Gently remove the needle from the injection site to prevent leakage of the matrix gel mixture. Check for a small hump at the injection site (Figure 1).
  4. Place the mouse on the heating pad for 2 min to let the matrix gel mixture coagulate and form plug.
  5. Repeat steps 5.2. to 5.4. to create plug on the other side of the back of the mouse. Mark the edges of the humps using a marker pen.
  6. Observe the mouse until it has regained sufficient consciousness to maintain sternal recumbency. Put the mouse in a separate cage until it is fully recovered. House the mice in SPF-class experimental animal laboratory at 22 ± 2 °C with a 12 h light/dark cycle for 7 days.

6. Dextran-FITC injection through the tail vein

  1. After 7 days of matrix gel injection, resuspend 0.5 mg of dextran-FITC with 500 µL of double distilled water (ddH2O) and then violently vortex to obtain the dextran-FITC solution at the final concentration of 1 µg/µL.
    NOTE: Use dextran-FITC with molecular weight of ~150 kDa for angiogenesis assay, and use dextran-FITC with molecular weight of ~4 kDa for vascular permeability assay.
  2. Load 50 µL of dextran-FITC solution into the 29G syringes.
  3. Fix the mouse on the tail vein injection instrument. Clean the tail with 75% alcohol cotton ball and gently inject 50 µL of dextran-FITC through tail vein.
  4. Compress the injection site with cotton swab for 1 min to stanch bleeding, and then put the mice back in the cage for 30 min.
  5. Repeat steps 6.3. and 6.4. until all mice have received dextran-FITC injection.

7. Matrix gel plug collection

  1. Intraperitoneally inject 1% pentobarbital sodium in PBS (200 mg/kg body weight) and euthanize the mice with an IACUC approved procedure.
  2. Cut the skin along the marked border of the plug using surgical scissors and remove the skin above the matrix gel plug.
  3. Collect the plug and rinse in a small beaker with 1x PBS to wash away excess blood (Figure 2A). The color of plug can roughly delineate the degree of blood abundance and the content of neo-vessels (Figure 3A).

8. Embedding matrix gel plug and section preparation

  1. Cover the button of tissue embedding cassette with about 0.5 mL of tissue embedding gel, then immediately place matrix gel plug on the tissue embedding gel in the desired orientation as shown in Figure 2B. Then, embed the plug with additional tissue embedding gel.
  2. Put the cassettes into a -80 °C freezer for 12 h to solidify.
  3. For thick section preparation, take out the solidified plug block and cut 12 µm thick sections using the freezing microtome according to the instruction, and mount onto microscope slides.
  4. Slice 5-10 sections from each plug block.

9. Quantification of angiogenesis (Figure 3)

  1. Acquire fluorescence images from 5 independent fields of the section with an inverted fluorescence microscope at 488 nm wavelength under 10x magnification.
  2. Open the image file with Image J software (https://imagej.en.softonic.com/) and click the Angiogenesis Analyze button. Then, click Analyze HUVEC Phase Contrast button, and switch to Stat Results Table to gather information. Measure all 5 acquired fluorescence images for each section.
  3. Analyze the total length of neo-vessels from different groups to statistically evaluate the difference in angiogenesis between these groups.
    ​NOTE: Total master segments length indicates the total length of neo-vessels. The reagent that increases the length of neo-vessels is termed pro-angiogenic, while the reagent that decreases the length of neo-vessels is anti-angiogenic.

10. Quantification of vascular permeability (Figure 4)

  1. Acquire fluorescence images from 5 independent fields of the section with an inverted fluorescence microscope at 488 nm wavelength under 20x magnification.
  2. Open the image file with Image J software. Click the Freehand Selection button and circle the leakage area, then click on the Analyze menu and select the Measure option to get the area information of the leakage area. Use the ratio of leakage area and the area of image to indicate vascular permeability.
  3. Analyze the ratio of leakage area and area of the image from different groups to statistically evaluate the difference in vascular permeability between these groups.

Results

Figure 1 is the flowchart depicting how to prepare the mixture of matrix gel, vascular cells, culture medium and reagent. The mixture was then subcutaneously injected into the back of Nu/Nu mice and heated using a heating pad to accelerate its coagulation to finally form gel plug.

Figure 2A is the flowchart to indicate vessels with fluorescent labeled dextran. Fluorescent labeled dextran was injected via the tail vein and circle for 3...

Discussion

We present a reliable and convenient method for the quantitative evaluation of angiogenesis in vivo without staining. In this protocol, vascular cells were mixed with matrix gel in the presence of pro-angiogenic or anti-angiogenic reagents, and then subcutaneously injected into the back of Nu/Nu mice to form gel plug (Figure 1). After 7 days of gel plug formation, dextran-FITC was intravenously injected and circulated for 30 min. The gel plug was collected and embedded with tissue e...

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY22H020005), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873466).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Adhesion Microscope SlidesCITOTEST188105
Anesthesia SystemRWDR640-S1
Cell CounterInvitrogenAMQAX1000
Cell Culture DishCorning430167
CryoslicerThermo FisherCryoStar NX50
Dextrans-FITC-150kDaWEIHUA BIOWH007N07
Dextrans-FITC-4kDaWEIHUA BIOWH007N0705
Embedding CassettesCITOTEST80203-0007
Endothelial Cell MediumScienCell35809
Endothelial Growth SupplementsScienCell1025
Fetal Bovine SerumGibco10100147C
Fibroblast Growth Factor 1AtaGenix9043p-082318-A01FGF1
Fluorescence MicroscopeNikonECLIPSE Ni
Heating PadBoruida30-50-30
Insulin SyringeBD300841
IsofluraneRWDR510-22-10
Laboratory BalanceSartoriusBSA124S-CW
MatrigelCorning356234Matrix gel
Medium 199 powderGibco31100-035
MicrotubesAxygenMCT-150-C
Optimal Cutting Temperature (OCT) CompoundSUKURA4583Tissue embedding gel
Palmitate AcidKunChuangKC001
Penicillin-Streptomycin LiquidSolarbioP1400
Phosphate Buffer SalineSolarbioP1022
Surgical InstrumentsRWDRWD
Tail Vein Injection InstrumentKEW BASISKW-XXY
Trypsin-EDTA SolutionSolarbioT1320
Ultra-Low Temperature FreezereppendorfU410
Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorCHAMOTCM058-5HPVEGF

References

  1. Bikfalvi, A. History and conceptual developments in vascular biology and angiogenesis research: a personal view. Angiogenesis. 20 (4), 463-478 (2017).
  2. Carmeliet, P., Jain, R. Principles and mechanisms of vessel normalization for cancer and other angiogenic diseases. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 10 (6), 417-427 (2011).
  3. De Palma, M., Biziato, D., Petrova, T. Microenvironmental regulation of tumour angiogenesis. Nature reviews Cancer. 17 (8), 457-474 (2017).
  4. Griffioen, A., Molema, G. Angiogenesis: potentials for pharmacologic intervention in the treatment of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic inflammation. Pharmacological reviews. 52 (2), 237-268 (2000).
  5. Viallard, C., Larrivée, B. Tumor angiogenesis and vascular normalization: alternative therapeutic targets. Angiogenesis. 20 (4), 409-426 (2017).
  6. Craig, M., Sumanas, S. ETS transcription factors in embryonic vascular development. Angiogenesis. 19 (3), 275-285 (2016).
  7. Losordo, D., Dimmeler, S. Therapeutic angiogenesis and vasculogenesis for ischemic disease. Part I: angiogenic cytokines. Circulation. 109 (21), 2487-2491 (2004).
  8. Folkman, J. Anti-angiogenesis-new concept for therapy of solid tumors. Annals of Surgery. 175 (3), 409-416 (1972).
  9. Folkman, J. Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nature Medicine. 1 (1), 27-31 (1995).
  10. Folkman, J. Opinion - Angiogenesis: an organizing principle for drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 6 (4), 273-286 (2007).
  11. Nowak-Sliwinska, P., et al. Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays. Angiogenesis. 21 (3), 425-532 (2018).
  12. Fan, X., et al. Interleukin-1β augments the angiogenesis of endothelial progenitor cells in an NF-κB/CXCR7-dependent manner. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 24 (10), 5605-5614 (2020).
  13. Dai, X., et al. Nrf2 transcriptional upregulation of IDH2 to tune mitochondrial dynamics and rescue angiogenic function of diabetic EPCs. Redox Biology. 56, 102449 (2022).
  14. Yan, X., et al. Liraglutide Improves the Angiogenic Capability of EPC and Promotes Ischemic Angiogenesis in Mice under Diabetic Conditions through an Nrf2-Dependent Mechanism. Cells. 11 (23), 3821 (2022).
  15. Koh, W., Stratman, A., Sacharidou, A., Davis, G. In vitro three dimensional collagen matrix models of endothelial lumen formation during vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Methods in enzymology. 443, 83-101 (2008).
  16. Nowak-Sliwinska, P., et al. Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays. Angiogenesis. 21 (3), 425-532 (2018).
  17. Malinda, K. In vivo matrigel migration and angiogenesis assay. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, NJ). , 287-294 (2009).
  18. Rezzola, S., et al. In vitro and ex vivo retina angiogenesis assays. Angiogenesis. 17 (3), 429-442 (2014).
  19. Dai, Q., et al. FGF21 promotes ischaemic angiogenesis and endothelial progenitor cells function under diabetic conditions in an AMPK/NAD+-dependent manner. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 25 (6), 3091-3102 (2021).
  20. Gavard, J., Gutkind, J. S. VEGF controls endothelial-cell permeability by promoting the beta-arrestin-dependent endocytosis of VE-cadherin. Nature cell biology. 8 (11), 1223-1234 (2006).
  21. Birdsey, G. M., et al. The endothelial transcription factor ERG promotes vascular stability and growth through Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Developmental Cell. 32 (1), 82-96 (2015).
  22. Yan, X., et al. A Novel CXCR4 antagonist enhances angiogenesis via modifying the ischaemic tissue environment. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 21 (10), 2298-2307 (2017).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

AngiogenesisMatrix Gel Plug AssayVessel PermeabilityIn Vivo ModelMyocardial ResearchPro angiogenic ReagentsAnti angiogenic ReagentsDextran FITCQuantitative AnalysisFluorescence DetectionNeo vesselsFunctional Vessels

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved