We would like to thank Dr. Sam Hanlon, Evelyn Brown, and Margaret Gondo for their excellent technical assistance. This research was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 EY-018239 and P30 EY007551 (National Eye Institute), in part by the Lion&#39;s Foundation for Sight, and in part by NIH 1R15 HD084262-01 (National Institute of Child Health &#38; Human Development).

The authors have nothing to disclose.

The purpose of this methods paper is to highlight the tissue preparation and imaging methodology that has allowed our lab to reliably capture high-resolution serial electron microscopy images, and to point out critical steps that lead to this outcome as well as potential pitfalls that can occur when conducting SBF-SEM imaging. Success using this protocol requires proper fixation of tissue, impregnation of heavy metals into the sample, modifications of the embedding resin to reduce charging, as well as an understanding of...

Serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) was first described by Leighton in 1981 where he fashioned a scanning electron microscope augmented with an in-built microtome which could cut and image thin sections of tissue embedded in resin. Unfortunately, technical limitations restricted its use to conductive samples, as non-conductive samples such as biological tissue accumulated unacceptable levels of charging (electron buildup within the tissue sample)1. While coating the block-face between cuts with evaporated carbon reduced tissue charging, this greatly increased imaging acquisition time and image storage remained a problem as computer technology at the time was insufficient to manage the large file sizes created by the device. This methodology was revisited by Denk and Horstmann in 2004 using a SBF-SEM equipped with a variable pressure chamber2. This allowed for the introduction of water vapor to the imaging chamber which reduces charging within the sample, making imaging of non-conductive samples viable albeit with a loss of image resolution. Further improvements in tissue preparation and imaging methods now allow for imaging using high vacuum, and SBF-SEM imaging no longer relies on water vapor to dissipate charging3,4,5,6,7,8,9. While SBF-SEM has seen an exponential increase in use in recent years, technical aspects such as proper tissue preparation and imaging parameters are paramount for the success of this imaging modality.
SBF-SEM allows for the automated collection of thousands of serially-registered electron microscopy images, with planar resolution as small as 3-5 nm10,11. Tissue, impregnated with heavy metals and embedded in resin, is placed within a scanning electron microscope (SEM) containing an ultramicrotome fitted with a diamond knife. A flat surface is cut with the diamond knife, the knife is retracted, and the surface of the block is scanned in a raster pattern with an electron beam to create an image of tissue ultrastructure. The block is then raised a specified amount (e.g., 100 nm) in the z-axis, known as a &#34;z-step,&#34; and a new surface is cut before the process is repeated. In this way a 3-dimensional (3D) block of images is produced as the tissue is cut away. This imaging system further benefits from the automated nature of the device, allowing one to leave the microscope unattended during the imaging process, with the automated collection of hundreds of images possible in a single day.
While SBF-SEM imaging primarily uses backscattered electrons to form an image of the block-face, secondary electrons are generated during the imaging process12. Secondary electrons can accumulate, alongside backscattered and primary-beam electrons that do not escape the block, and produce &#34;tissue charging,&#34; which can lead to a localized electrostatic field at the block-face. This electron accumulation can distort the image or cause electrons to be ejected from the block and contribute to the signal collected by the backscatter detector, decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio13. While the level of tissue charging can be decreased by reducing the electron beam voltage or intensity, or reducing beam dwell time, this results in a diminished signal-to-noise ratio14. When an electron beam of lower voltage or intensity is used, or the beam is only allowed to dwell within each pixel space for a shorter period of time, less backscattered electrons are ejected from the tissue and captured by the electron detector resulting in a weaker signal. Denk and Horstmann dealt with this problem by introducing water vapor into the chamber, thereby reducing charge in the chamber and on the block face at the cost of image resolution. With a chamber pressure of 10-100 Pa, a portion of the electron beam is scattered contributing to image noise and a loss of resolution, however this also produces ions in the specimen chamber which neutralizes charge within the sample block2. More recent methods for neutralizing charge within the sample block use focal gas injection of nitrogen over the block-face during imaging, or introducing negative voltage to the SBF-SEM stage to decrease probe-beam-lading energy and increase signal collected6,7,15. Rather than introducing stage bias, chamber pressure or localized nitrogen injection to decrease charge buildup on the block surface, it is also possible to increase the conductivity of the resin by introducing carbon to the resin mix allowing for more aggressive imaging settings16. The following general protocol is an adaptation of the Deerinck et al. protocol published in 2010 and covers modifications to tissue preparation and imaging methodologies we found useful for minimizing tissue charging while maintaining high resolution image acquisition3,17,18,19. While the previously mentioned protocol focused on tissue processing and heavy metal impregnation, this protocol provides insight into the imaging, data analysis, and reconstruction workflow inherent to SBF-SEM studies. In our laboratory, this protocol has been successfully and reproducibly applied to a wide variety of tissues including cornea and anterior segment structures, eyelid, lacrimal and harderian gland, retina and optic nerve, heart, lung and airway, kidney, liver, cremaster muscle, and cerebral cortex/medulla, and in a variety of species including mouse, rat, rabbit, guinea pig, fish, monolayer and stratified cell cultures, pig, non-human primate, as well as human20,21,22,23. While small changes may be worthwhile for specific tissues and applications, this general protocol has proven highly reproducible and useful in the context of our core imaging facility.

<table><tbody><tr><td>1/16 x 3/8 Aluminum Rivets</td><td>Industrial Rivet &amp;amp; Fastener Co.</td><td>6N37RFLAP/1100</td><td>Used as specimen pins.</td></tr><tr><td>2.5mm Flathead Screwdriver</td><td>Wiha Quality Tools</td><td>27225</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Acetone</td><td>Electron Microscopy Sciences</td><td>RT 10000</td><td>Used to dilute silver paint.</td></tr><tr><td>Aspartic Acid</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>A8949</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Calcium Chloride</td><td>FisherScientific</td><td>C79-500</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Conductive Silver Paint</td><td>Ted Pella</td><td>16062</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Denton Desk-II Vacuum Sputtering Device equipped with standard gold foil target</td><td>Denton Vacuum</td><td>N/A</td><td>This is the gold-sputtering device used by the authors, alternates are acceptable.</td></tr><tr><td>Double-edged Razors</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>50-949-411</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Embed 812</td><td>Electron Microscopy Sciences</td><td>14120</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gatan 3View2 mounted in a Tescan Mira3 Field emission SEM</td><td>Gatan &amp;amp; Tescan</td><td>N/A</td><td>This is the SBF-SEM device used by the authors, alternates are acceptable.</td></tr><tr><td>Glass Shell Vials, 0.5 DRAM (1.8 ml)</td><td>Electron Microscopy Sciences</td><td>72630-05</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gluteraldehyde</td><td>Electron Microscopy Sciences</td><td>16320</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gorilla Super Glue - Impact Tough</td><td>NA</td><td>NA</td><td>Refered to as cyanoacrylate glue in text.</td></tr><tr><td>Ketjen Black</td><td>HM Royal</td><td>EC-600JD</td><td>Refered to as carbon black in text.</td></tr><tr><td>KOH</td><td>FisherScientific</td><td>18-605-593</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Lead Nitrate</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>L62-100</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Microwave</td><td>Pelco</td><td>BioWave Pro</td><td>This is the microwave used by the authors, alternates are acceptable.</td></tr><tr><td>Osmium Tetroxide</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>201030</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Potassium Ferrocyanide</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>P9387</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Silicone Embedding Mold</td><td>Ted Pella</td><td>10504</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Sodium Cacodylate Trihydrate</td><td>Electron Microscopy Sciences</td><td>12300</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Samco Transfer Pipette</td><td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td><td>202</td><td>Used to make specimen pin storage tubes.</td></tr><tr><td>Swiss Pattern Needle Files</td><td>Electron Microscopy Sciences</td><td>62115</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Thiocarbohydrazide</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>223220</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Uranyl Acetate</td><td>Polysciences, Inc.</td><td>21447-25</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>&lt;strong&gt;Reconstruction Software&lt;/strong&gt;</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Amira Software</td><td>Thermo Scientific</td><td>N/A</td><td>Used to create the reconstructions found in figures 5-7 and 9.</td></tr><tr><td>Fiji (Fiji is Just ImageJ)</td><td>ImageJ.net</td><td>N/A</td><td>TrakEM2 can be added to Fiji to asist in manual segmentation.</td></tr><tr><td>Microscopy Image Browser (MIB)</td><td>University of Helsinki, Institute of Biotechnology</td><td>N/A</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Reconstuct Software</td><td>Neural Systems Lab</td><td>N/A</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>SuRVoS Workbench</td><td>Diamond Light Source &amp;amp; The University of Nottingham</td><td>N/A</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>SyGlass</td><td>IstoVisio, Inc.</td><td>N/A</td><td>Allows for reconstruction in virtual reality and histogram-based reconstruction methods.</td></tr></tbody></table>

serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (sbf-sem) of biological tissue samples

Serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) allows for the collection of hundreds to thousands of serially-registered ultrastructural images, offering an unprecedented three-dimensional view of tissue microanatomy. While SBF-SEM has seen an exponential increase in use in recent years, technical aspects such as proper tissue preparation and imaging parameters are paramount for the success of this imaging modality. This imaging system benefits from the automated nature of the device, allowing one to leave the microscope unattended during the imaging process, with the automated collection of hundreds of images possible in a single day. However, without appropriate tissue preparation cellular ultrastructure can be altered in such a way that incorrect or misleading conclusions might be drawn. Additionally, images are generated by scanning the block-face of a resin-embedded biological sample and this often presents challenges and considerations that must be addressed. The accumulation of electrons within the block during imaging, known as "tissue charging," can lead to a loss of contrast and an inability to appreciate cellular structure. Moreover, while increasing electron beam intensity/voltage or decreasing beam-scanning speed can increase image resolution, this can also have the unfortunate side effect of damaging the resin block and distorting subsequent images in the imaging series. Here we present a routine protocol for the preparation of biological tissue samples that preserves cellular ultrastructure and diminishes tissue charging. We also provide imaging considerations for the rapid acquisition of high-quality serial-images with minimal damage to the tissue block.

Mouse Cornea 
This protocol has been applied extensively to the mouse cornea. Using SBF-SEM imaging a network of elastin-free microfibril bundles (EFMBs) were shown to be present within the adult mouse cornea. It was previously believed that this network was only present during embryonic and early postnatal development. SBF-SEM revealed an extensive EFMB network throughout the cornea, with individual fibers found to be 100-200 nm in diameter when measured in cross-section. It was also found that thi...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy SBF-SEM of Biological Tissue Samples at JoVE.com

Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy SBF-SEM of Biological Tissue Samples

This protocol outlines a routine method for using serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM), a powerful 3D imaging technique. Successful application of SBF-SEM hinges on proper fixation and tissue staining techniques, as well as careful consideration of imaging settings. This protocol contains practical considerations for the entirety of this process.

Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy (SBF-SEM) of Biological Tissue Samples

Serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) allows for the collection of hundreds to thousands of serially-registered ultrastructural images, ...

serial-block-face-scanning-electron-microscopy-sbf-sem-biological

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

7.4K Views.  University of Houston. This protocol outlines a routine method for using serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM), a powerful 3D imaging technique. Successful application of SBF-SEM hinges on proper fixation and tissue staining techniques, as well as careful consideration of imaging settings. This protocol contains practical considerations for the entirety of this process.

Video: Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy SBF-SEM of Biological Tissue Samples

Focussed Ion Beam Milling and Scanning Electron Microscopy of Brain Tissue

This protocol describes how biological samples, like brain tissue, can be imaged in three dimensions using the focussed ion beam/scanning electron microscope (FIB/SEM). The samples are fixed with aldehydes, heavy metal stained using osmium tetroxide and uranyl acetate. They are then dehydrated with alcohol and infiltrated with resin, which is then hardened. Using a light microscope and ultramicrotome with glass knives, a small block containing the region interest close to the surface is made. The block is then placed inside the FIB/SEM, and the ion beam used to roughly mill a vertical face along one side of the block, close to this region. Using backscattered electrons to image the underlying structures, a smaller face is then milled with a finer ion beam and the surface scrutinised more closely to determine the exact area of the face to be imaged and milled. The parameters of the microscope are then set so that the face is repeatedly milled and imaged so that serial images are collected through a volume of the block. The image stack will typically contain isotropic voxels with dimenions as small a 4 nm in each direction. This image quality in any imaging plane enables the user to analyse cell ultrastructure at any viewing angle within the image stack.

This protocol describes how resin embedded brain tissue can be prepared and imaged in the three dimensions in the focussed ion beam, scanning electron microscope.

This protocol describes how biological samples, like brain tissue, can be imaged in three dimensions using the focussed ion beam/scanning electron ...

Neuroscience

Processing Embryo, Eggshell, and Fungal Culture for Scanning Electron Microscopy

Although scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is being widely used for the ultra-structural analysis of various biological and non-biological samples, methods involved in processing different biological samples involve unique practices. All conventional practices described in the literature for processing samples still find useful applications, but subtle changes in the sample preparation can alter image quality, as well as, introduce artifacts. Hence, using a unique sample preparation technique specific to the type of tissue analyzed is required to obtain a good quality image with ultrastructural resolution. The focus of this study is to provide the optimal sample preparation protocols for imaging embryos, rigid eggshells, and fungal cultures using SEM. The following optimizations were recommended to yield good results for the three different delicate biological samples studied. Use of milder fixatives like 4% paraformaldehyde or 3% glutaraldehyde followed by dehydration with ethanol series is mandatory. Fungal mycelium on agar blocks obtained by slide cultures yields a better ultrastructural integrity compared to cultures taken directly from agar plates. Chemical drying of embryos with HMDS provides drying without introducing surface tension artifacts compared to critical point drying. HMDS prevents cracking caused by shrinkage as samples are less brittle during drying. However, for fungal culture, critical point drying provides acceptable image quality compared to chemical drying. Eggshells can be imaged with no special preparation steps except for thorough washing and air drying prior to mounting. Preparation methodologies were standardized based on acceptable image quality obtained with each trial.&#160;

Here, we present detailed processing protocols for imaging delicate tissue samples using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Three different processing methods, namely, hexamethyl disilazana (HMDS) chemical drying, simple air drying, and critical point drying are described for preparing rigid eggshells, embryos at early developmental stages, and fungal cultures respectively.

Although scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is being widely used for the ultra-structural analysis of various biological and non-biological samples, ...

Environment

Multimodal Hierarchical Imaging of Serial Sections for Finding Specific Cellular Targets within Large Volumes

Targeting specific cells at ultrastructural resolution within a mixed cell population or a tissue can be achieved by hierarchical imaging using a combination of light and electron microscopy. Samples embedded in resin are sectioned into arrays consisting of ribbons of hundreds of ultrathin sections and deposited on pieces of silicon wafer or conductively coated coverslips. Arrays are imaged at low resolution using a digital consumer like smartphone camera or light microscope (LM) for a rapid large area overview, or a wide field fluorescence microscope (fluorescence light microscopy (FLM)) after labeling with fluorophores. After post-staining with heavy metals, arrays are imaged in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Selection of targets is possible from 3D reconstructions generated by FLM or from 3D reconstructions made from the SEM image stacks at intermediate resolution if no fluorescent markers are available. For ultrastructural analysis, selected targets are finally recorded in the SEM at high-resolution (a few nanometer image pixels). A ribbon-handling tool that can be retrofitted to any ultramicrotome is demonstrated. It helps with array production and substrate removal from the sectioning knife boat. A software platform that allows automated imaging of arrays in the SEM is discussed. Compared to other methods generating large volume EM data, such as serial block-face SEM (SBF-SEM) or focused ion beam SEM (FIB-SEM), this approach has two major advantages: (1) The resin-embedded sample is conserved, albeit in a sliced-up version. It can be stained in different ways and imaged with different resolutions. (2) As the sections can be post-stained, it is not necessary to use samples strongly block-stained with heavy metals to introduce contrast for SEM imaging or render the tissue blocks conductive. This makes the method applicable to a wide variety of materials and biological questions. Particularly prefixed materials e.g., from biopsy banks and pathology labs, can directly be embedded and reconstructed in 3D.

This protocol targets specific cells in tissue for imaging at nanoscale resolution using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Large numbers of serial sections from resin-embedded biological material are first imaged in a light microscope to identify the target and then in a hierarchical manner in the SEM.

Targeting specific cells at ultrastructural resolution within a mixed cell population or a tissue can be achieved by hierarchical imaging using a ...

Developmental Biology

Surgery and Sample Processing for Correlative Imaging of the Murine Pulmonary Valve

The underlying causes of heart valve related-disease (HVD) are elusive. Murine animal models provide an excellent tool for studying HVD, however, the surgical and instrumental expertise required to accurately quantify the structure and organization across multiple length scales have stunted its advancement. This work provides a detailed description of the murine dissection, en bloc staining, sample processing, and correlative imaging procedures for depicting the heart valve at different length scales. Hydrostatic transvalvular pressure was used to control the temporal heterogeneity by chemically fixing the heart valve conformation. Micro-computed tomography (&#181;CT) was used to confirm the geometry of the heart valve and provide a reference for the downstream sample processing needed for the serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM). High-resolution serial SEM images of the extracellular matrix (ECM) were taken and reconstructed to provide a local 3D representation of its organization. &#181;CT and SBF-SEM imaging methods were then correlated to overcome the spatial variation across the pulmonary valve. Though the work presented is exclusively on the pulmonary valve, this methodology could be adopted for describing the hierarchical organization in biological systems and is pivotal for the structural characterization across multiple length scales.

Here, we describe a correlative workflow for the excision, pressurization, fixation, and imaging of the murine pulmonary valve to determine the gross conformation and local extracellular matrix structures.

The underlying causes of heart valve related-disease (HVD) are elusive. Murine animal models provide an excellent tool for studying HVD, however, the ...

Engineering

Analysis of Brain Mitochondria Using Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy

Human brain is a high energy consuming organ that mainly relies on glucose as a fuel source. Glucose is catabolized by brain mitochondria via glycolysis, tri-carboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) pathways to produce cellular energy in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Impairment of mitochondrial ATP production causes mitochondrial disorders, which present clinically with prominent neurological and myopathic symptoms. Mitochondrial defects are also present in neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g. autism spectrum disorder) and neurodegenerative disorders (e.g. amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer&#39;s and Parkinson&#39;s diseases). Thus, there is an increased interest in the field for performing 3D analysis of mitochondrial morphology, structure and distribution under both healthy and disease states. The brain mitochondrial morphology is extremely diverse, with some mitochondria especially those in the synaptic region being in the range of &#60;200 nm diameter, which is below the resolution limit of traditional light microscopy. Expressing a mitochondrially-targeted green fluorescent protein (GFP) in the brain significantly enhances the organellar detection by confocal microscopy. However, it does not overcome the constraints on the sensitivity of detection of relatively small sized mitochondria without oversaturating the images of large sized mitochondria. While serial transmission electron microscopy has been successfully used to characterize mitochondria at the neuronal synapse, this technique is extremely time-consuming especially when comparing multiple samples. The serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBFSEM) technique involves an automated process of sectioning, imaging blocks of tissue and data acquisition. Here, we provide a protocol to perform SBFSEM of a defined region from rodent brain to rapidly reconstruct and visualize mitochondrial morphology. This technique could also be used to provide accurate information on mitochondrial number, volume, size and distribution in a defined brain region. Since the obtained image resolution is high (typically under 10 nm) any gross mitochondrial morphological defects may also be detected.

Mitochondrial visualization and analysis from mammalian brain tissue is a challenging task. Here, we describe how three dimensional (3D) reconstruction analysis from the serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBFSEM) can be used to gain insights on the morphological and volumetric analysis of this critical energy generating organelle.

Human brain is a high energy consuming organ that mainly relies on glucose as a fuel source. Glucose is catabolized by brain mitochondria via glycolysis, ...

Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy (SBEM) for the Study of Dendritic Spines

Three-dimensional electron microscopy (3D EM) gives a possibility to analyze morphological parameters of dendritic spines with nanoscale resolution. In addition, some features of dendritic spines, such as volume of the spine and post-synaptic density (PSD) (representing post-synaptic part of the synapse), presence of presynaptic terminal, and smooth endoplasmic reticulum or atypical form of PSD (e.g., multi-innervated spines), can be observed only with 3D EM. By employing serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBEM) it is possible to obtain 3D EM data easier and in a more reproducible manner than when performing traditional serial sectioning. Here we show how to prepare mouse hippocampal samples for SBEM analysis and how this protocol can be combined with immunofluorescence study of dendritic spines. Mild fixation perfusion allows us to perform immunofluorescence studies with light microscopy on one half of the brain, while the other half was prepared for SBEM. This approach reduces the number of animals to be used for the study.

Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy SBEM for the Study of Dendritic Spines

Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy (SBEM) is applied to image and analyze dendritic spines in the murine hippocampus.

Three-dimensional electron microscopy (3D EM) gives a possibility to analyze morphological parameters of dendritic spines with nanoscale resolution. In ...

Biological Sample Preparation by High-pressure Freezing, Microwave-assisted Contrast Enhancement, and Minimal Resin Embedding for Volume Imaging

The described sample preparation technique is designed to combine the best quality of ultrastructural preservation with the most suitable contrast for the imaging modality in a focused ion beam scanning electron microscope (FIB-SEM), which is used to obtain stacks of sequential images for 3D reconstruction and modelling. High-pressure freezing (HPF) allows close to native structural preservation, but the subsequent freeze substitution often does not provide sufficient contrast, especially for a bigger specimen, which is needed for high-quality imaging in the SEM required for 3D reconstruction. Therefore, in this protocol, after the freeze substitution, additional contrasting steps are carried out at room temperature. Although these steps are performed in a microwave, it is also possible to follow traditional bench processing, which requires longer incubation times.The subsequent embedding in minimal amounts of resin allows for faster and more precise targeting and preparation inside the FIB-SEM. This protocol is especially useful for samples that require preparation by high-pressure freezing for a reliable ultrastructural preservation but do not gain enough contrast during the freeze substitution for volume imaging using FIB-SEM. In combination with the minimal resin embedding, this protocol provides an efficient workflow for the acquisition of high-quality volume data.

Here we present a protocol for combining two sample processing techniques, high-pressure freezing and microwave-assisted sample processing, followed by minimal resin embedding for acquiring data with a focused ion beam scanning electron microscope (FIB-SEM). This is demonstrated using a mouse tibial nerve sample and Caenorhabditis elegans.

The described sample preparation technique is designed to combine the best quality of ultrastructural preservation with the most suitable contrast for the ...

Targeted Studies Using Serial Block Face and Focused Ion Beam Scan Electron Microscopy

This protocol allows for the efficient and effective imaging of cell or tissue samples in three dimensions at the resolution level of electron microscopy. For many years electron microscopy (EM) has remained an inherently two-dimensional technique. With the advent of serial scanning electron microscope imaging techniques (volume EM), using either an integrated microtome or focused ion beam to slice then view embedded tissues, the third dimension becomes easily accessible. Serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) uses an ultramicrotome enclosed in the SEM chamber. It has the capability to handle large specimens (1,000 &#181;m x 1,000 &#181;m) and image large fields of view at small X,Y pixel size, but is limited in the Z dimension by the diamond knife. Focused ion beam SEM (FIB-SEM) is not limited in 3D resolution, (isotropic voxels of &#8804;5 nm are achievable), but the field of view is much more limited. This protocol demonstrates a workflow for combining the two techniques to allow for finding individual regions of interest (ROIs) in a large field and then imaging the subsequent targeted volume at high isotropic voxel resolution. Preparing fixed cells or tissues is more demanding for volume EM techniques due to the extra contrasting needed for efficient signal generation in SEM imaging. Such protocols are time consuming and labor intensive. This protocol also incorporates microwave assisted tissue processing facilitating the penetration of reagents, which reduces the time needed for the processing protocol from days to hours.

Here, we present a protocol for efficiently combining serial block face and focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy to target an area of interest. This allows for efficient searching, in three dimensions, and locating rare events in a large field of view.

This protocol allows for the efficient and effective imaging of cell or tissue samples in three dimensions at the resolution level of electron microscopy. ...

Array Tomography Workflow for the Targeted Acquisition of Volume Information using Scanning Electron Microscopy

Electron microscopy is applied in biology and medicine for imaging of cellular and structural details at nanometer resolution. Historically, Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) provided insight into cell ultrastructure, but in the recent decade, the development of modern Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM) has changed the way of looking inside the cells. Even though the resolution of TEM is superior when protein-level structural details are needed, SEM-resolution is sufficient for the majority of the organelle-level cell biology-related questions. The advancement in technology enabled automatic volume acquisition solutions such as Serial block-face imaging (SBF-SEM) and Focused ion beam SEM (FIB-SEM). Nevertheless, to this day, these methods remain inefficient when the identification and navigation to areas of interest are crucial. Without the means for precise localization of target areas before imaging, operators need to acquire much more data than they need (in SBF-SEM), or, even worse, prepare many grids and image them all (in TEM). We propose the strategy of "lateral screening" using Array Tomography in SEM, which facilitates the localization of areas of interest, followed by automated imaging of the relevant fraction of the total sample volume. Array tomography samples are conserved during imaging, and they can be arranged into section libraries ready for repeated imaging. Several examples are shown in which lateral screening enables us to analyze structural details that are incredibly challenging to access with any other method.

We describe the preparation of ribbons of serial sections and their collection on large transfer support for use as Array Tomography samples, along with automated imaging procedures in a scanning electron microscope. The protocol allows screening, retrieval, and targeted imaging of local, rare events, and the acquisition of large data volumes.

Electron microscopy is applied in biology and medicine for imaging of cellular and structural details at nanometer resolution. Historically, Transmission ...

SEM Imaging of Biological Samples

Source: <a href="https://www.jove.com/author/Peiman_Shahbeigi-Roodposhti">Peiman Shahbeigi-Roodposhti</a> and Sina Shahbazmohamadi, Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is an instrument that uses an electron beam to nondestructively image and characterize conductive materials in a vacuum. As an analogy, an electron beam is to the SEM as light is to the optical microscope. The difference is that the electron microscope yields images of much higher resolution and magnification. The best optical microscopes typically have a resolution down to 200 nm, whereas SEMs usually claim a resolution of 0.5 nm. This is due to the fact that optical microscopes are limited by the diffraction of waves, a function of the wavelength, which is around 500 nm for visible light. Conversely, the SEM uses an energized electron beam, which as a wavelength of 1 nm. This characteristic makes them very dependable tools for the study of nano and microstructures. Electron microscopes also enable the study of biological samples with feature sizes too small for optical microscopy.
This demonstration provides an introduction to sample preparation and initial image acquisition of biological samples using a scanning electron microscope. In this case, a collagen-hydroxyapatite (HA) cellular scaffold will be studied. The vacuum environment of the SEM and the induced charging by the electron beam on non-conductive samples (such as organic matter) creates challenges that will be addressed in the preparation. The advantages and disadvantages of different imaging methods as they relate to resolution, depth of focus and sample type will also be discussed. The purpose of this demonstration is to give the participant more information on SEM to determine if this microscopy module is the best fit for a type of biological sample.

Scanning Electron Microscopy: Operations and Sample Preparation

Source: Peiman Shahbeigi-Roodposhti and Sina Shahbazmohamadi, Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
A scanning ...